DEDICATION.
TO
THE
REV.
H. CARD, M.A. F.R.S. F.A.S.
&c. &c. &c.
MY
DEAR SIR,
As
you have, in a late publication,
which displays your usual
learning and judgment,
mentioned this performance
in terms, perhaps dictated
by friendship rather than
critical impartiality, I
must beg to inscribe it
to your name.
There
are many prejudices with
which a playwright has to
contend, on his first appearance,
more especially if he court
the reader in lieu of the
spectator; and it is so
great an effort to give
up any established topic
of condolement, that we
can hardly yet expect those,
who call themselves "the
critics",
to abandon their favourite
complaint of the degeneracy
which characterizes the
efforts of contemporary
tragic writers. But let
any unprejudiced person
turn to the productions
even of the present year;
let him candidly examine
the anonymous Play, "The
Court of Tuscany," and
compare its best scenes
with the master-pieces of
Rowe or Otway; let him peruse
Allan Cunningham's poetical
drama, which has won the
applause of the highest
literary authority of the
day; let him dwell upon
the energetic grandeur and
warlike animation which
Croly has so successfully
displayed in pourtraying
the restless spirit of Catiline;
and I think his verdict
will place this age not
the last among those which
have done honour to the
British stage.
These
instances are sufficient
to attest the flourishing
condition of dramatic literature,
but, alas! we must seek
them in the closet, not
in their proper home, the
populous theatre, for there
we shall meet with a sight,
sufficient to deter the
boldest adventurer from
hazarding the representation
of his best and most vaunted
piece, our countrymen barely
enduring the poetry of Shakspeare
as the vehicle of a fashionable
song or a gaudy pageant.
Even the theatre itself
however may appear "not
yet enslaved, not wholly
vile," as
long as the classic taste
of Milman, the plaintive
sweetness of Barry Cornwall,
and the frank nature of
Knowles, linger, like flowers
upon the Muse's grave. But
they have almost deserted
the public haunt, and England
can hardly boast anything
that deserves to be called
a national stage.
The
following scenes were written,
as you well know, exclusively
for the closet, founded
upon facts, which occurred
at Oxford, and are well
detailed and illustrated
by an interesting ballad
in a little volume of Poems,
lately published at Oxford,
entitled the Midland Minstrel,
by Mr. Gillet: and may thus
be succinctly narrated.
The
Manciple of one of the Colleges
early in the last century
had a very beautiful daughter,
who was privately married
to a student without the
knowledge of the parents
on either side.
During
the long vacation subsequent
to this union the husband
was introduced to a young
lady, who was at the same
time proposed as his bride:
absence, the fear of his
father's displeasure, the
presence of a lovely object,
and, most likely, a natural
fickleness of disposition
overcame any regard he might
have cherished for his ill-fated
wife, and finally he became
deeply enamoured of her
unconscious rival. In the
contest of duties and desires,
which was the consequence
of this passion, the worse
part of man prevailed, and
he formed and executed a
design almost unparalleled
in the annals of crime.
His
second nuptials were at
hand when he returned to
Oxford, and to her who was
now an obstacle to his happiness.
Late at night he prevailed
upon his victim to accompany
him to a lone spot in the
Divinity Walk, and there
murdered and buried her.
The wretch escaped detection,
and the horrid deed remained
unknown till he confessed
it on his deathbed. The
remains of the unfortunate
girl were dug up in the
place described, and the
Divinity Walk was deserted
and demolished, as haunted
ground. Such are the outlines
of a Minor's Tragedy.
My
age, it will be said, is
a bad excuse for the publication
of a faulty poem; be it
so: secure of your approbation,
I can meet with a careless
smile the frown of him
who reads only to condemn.
I
am, my dear Sir,
Your's
most sincerely,
THOMAS
LOVELL BEDDOES.
|