Hampstead, June 23, 1824
Sir,
It was out of my power to answer your letter of yesterday, so
promptly as you desired, in consequence of being away from home. At the distance
of twenty-four years, I should hesitate to speak very positively as to matters
of conversation: but I am relieved from this difficulty by a memorandum made at
the time, in my own copy of the second edition of the Farmer's Boy, in 1800,
which I will here transcribe.
'This poem was first offered to Bent, in Paternoster-row, with a
request to know his opinion of its deserts: but this he declined, in a short
note, which was returned to Mr. B. in the course of a week, along with his MS.
Dilly was next applied to, who
refused to have any concern in publishing it, but recommended the slighted
author to take his production to Phillips, who probably might print it in the
Monthly Magazine. But as the poet foresaw that in case it was accepted for
insertion he should have to pay five or six shillings for obtaining a copy to
send to his mother, which was
his prime object, he preferred sending the MS for her inspection to his brother at Bury, who fortunately got it
conveyed to the eye of Mr. Lofft. Mr.
L. was delighted with its merits, communicated it to Mr. Hill, and it was immediately
recommended to Hood for
publication.'
With the above memorandum I will extract the following note:
'To Mr. Lofft's
protection and encouragement it was primarily owing that a production so morally
and poetically estimable as the Farmer's Boy has struggled into day; but to the
modest author's faithfulness of delineation, felicity of diction, purity of
sentiment, and refined simplicity of taste, it will stand indebted for
'aye-enduring fame.''
I had not heard of Mr.
Lofft's decease [1] till your announcement of it, and I grieve to hear of it
from a variety of considerations. Eight of his letters to me, which chiefly have
relation to his poetical protégé, I have looked out, and when occasion serves
they shall be placed in your hands. I do not remember to have seen the verses
entitled PERPLEXITY, or the essay occasioned by some insurrection in
America [2]
The subscription papers shall be circulated where I can
anticipate any success.
I cannot decidedly say whether the MS. of the Farmer's Boy was
ever taken to the editor of the Monthly Magazine; but I should think that some
of the letters which passed between his brothers and himself (a transcript of
which I transmitted, with his letters to me) would be likely to settle the
question. This I can decidedly say, that I never heard him
repeat the sarcasm ascribed to that editor, nor did I ever know him give vent to
any resentful feeling against him or any other person. Indeed I verily believe
that he had too catholic a benevolence for human kind to allow himself to foster
an emotion of resentment towards any human being; and when he did speak of his
early struggles, he spoke of them with much complacency. Perhaps the rustic
anathema, in his 'Neighbourly Resolution', may comprise the amount of his
indignant feelings, while in his 'First View of the Sea' he breathes a christian
supplication for that wisdom which would 'teach him to forgive'. [3] That we may all be taught to do so, is the hearty prayer of
yours,
With much sincerity,
Thomas Park
Notes
* Remains, II, pp. 206–9 BACK
[1] Lofft died on
26 May 1824. BACK
[2] Perhaps Lofft's An
Argument on the Nature of Party and Faction. In which is Considered, the
Duty of a Good and Peaceable Citizen at the Present Crisis
(London, 1780). BACK
[3] The 'rustic anathema' that appears in 'A
Neighbourly Resolution', lines 28–30 (edited by Weston in
Remains) reads:
May shadeless labour and sour ale,
Far from this stream, and this sweet vale,
Plague him that robb'd John Brown (I, p. 80).
'Teach wisdom —teach me to forgive': line 48 of 'A First View of the
Sea', also printed in the first volume of
Remains (p.
83).
BACK