ADDITIONAL
NOTES. XIV.
THE
THEORY AND STRUCTURE OF
LANGUAGE.
Next
to each thought
associate sound
accords,
And
forms the dulcet
symphony of words. CANTO
III.
1.
366. |
IDEAS consist
of
synchronous
motions
or
configurations
of
the
extremities
of
the
organs
of
sense;
these
when
repeated
by
sensation,
volition,
or
association,
are
either
simple
or
complex,
as
they
were
first
excited
by
irritation;
or
have
afterwards
some
parts
abstracted
from
them,
or
some
parts
added
to
them.
Language
consists
of
words,
which
are
the
names
or
symbols
of
ideas.
Words
are
therefore
properly
all
of
them
nouns
or
names
of
things.
Little
had
been
done
in
the
investigation
of
the
theory
of
language
from
the
time
of
Aristotle
to
the
present
era,
till
Mr.
Horne
Tooke,
the
ingenious
and
learned
author
of
the
Diversions
of
Purley,
explained
those
undeclined
words
of
all
languages,
which
had
puzzled
the
grammarians,
and
evinced
from
their
etymology,
that
they
were
abbreviations
of
other
modes
of
expression.
Mr.
Tooke
observes,
that
the
first
aim
of
language
was
to
communicate
our
thoughts,
and
the
second
to
do
it
with
dispatch;
and
hence
he
divides
words
into
those,
which
were
necessary
to
express
our
thoughts,
and
those
which
are
abbreviations
of
the
former;
which
he
ingeniously
styles
the
wings
of
Hermes.
For
the
greater
dispatch
of
conversation
many
words
suggest
more
than
one
idea;
I
shall
therefore
arrange
them
according
to
the
number
and
kinds
of
ideas,
which
they
suggest;
and
am
induced
to
do
this,
as
a
new
distribution
of
the
objects
of
any
science
may
advance
the
knowledge
of
it
by
developing
another
analogy
of
its
constituent
parts.
And
in
thus
endeavouring
to
analyze
the
theory
of
language
I
mean
to
speak
primarily
of
the
English,
and
occasionally
to
add
what
may
occur
concerning
the
structure
of
the
Greek
and
Latin.
I.
Conjunctions and Prepositions.
The
first class of words consists
of those, which suggest but
one idea, and suffer no change
of termination; which have
been termed by grammarians
CONJUNCTIONS and PREPOSITIONS;
the former of which connect
sentences, and the latter
words. Both which have been
ingeniously explained by Mr.
Horne Tooke from their etymology
to be abbreviations of other
modes of expression.
1.
Thus the conjunctions if and
an are shown by Mr. Tooke
to be derived from the imperative
mood of the verbs to give
and to grant; but both of
these conjunctions by long
use appear to have become
the name of a more abstracted
idea, than the words give
or grant suggest, as they
do not now express any ideas
of person, or of number, or
of time; all which are generally
attendant upon the meaning
of a verb; and perhaps all
the words of this class are
the names of ideas much abstracted,
which has caused the difficulty
of explaining them.
2.
The number of Prepositions is
very great in the English language,
as they are used before the cases
of nouns, and the infinitive mood
of verbs, instead of the numerous
changes of termination of the
nouns and verbs of the Greek and
Latin; which gives greater simplicity
to our language, and greater facility
of acquiring it.
The
prepositions, as well as the preceding
conjunctions, have been well explained
by Mr. Horne Tooke; who has developed
the etymology of many of them.
As the greatest number of the
ideas, we receive from external
objects, are complex ones, the
names of these constitute a great
part of language, as the proper
names of persons and places; which
are complex terms. Now as these
complex terms do not always exactly
suggest the quantity of combined
ideas we mean to express, some
of the prepositions are prefixed
to them to add or to deduct something,
or to limit their general meaning;
as a house with a party wall,
or a house without a roof. These
words are also derived by Mr.
Tooke, as abbreviations of the
imperative moods of verbs; but
which appear now to suggest ideas
further abstracted than those
generally suggested by verbs,
and are all of them properly nouns,
or names of ideas.
II. Nouns Substantive.
The
second class of words consists
of those, which in their simplest
state suggest but one idea,
as the word man; but which
by two changes of termination
in our language suggest one
secondary idea of number,
as the word men; or another
secondary idea of the genitive
case, as man's mind, or the
mind of man. These words by
other changes of termination
in the Greek and Latin languages
suggest many other secondary
ideas, as of gender, as well
as of number, and of all the
other cases described in their
grammars; which in English
are expressed by prepositions.
This
class of words includes the
NOUNS SUBSTANTIVE, or names
of things, of common grammars,
and may be conveniently divided
into three kinds. 1. Those
which suggest the ideas of
things believed to possess
hardness and figure, as a
house or a horse. 2. Those
which suggest the ideas of
things, which are not supposed
to possess hardness and figure,
except metaphorically, as
virtue, wisdom; which have
therefore been termed abstracted
ideas. 3. Those which have
been called by metaphysical
writers reflex ideas, and
mean those of the operations
of the mind, as sensation,
volition, association.
Another
convenient division of these
nouns substantive or names
of things may be first into
general terms, or the names
of classes of ideas, as, man,
quadruped, bird, fish, animal.
2. Into the names of complex
ideas, as this house, that
dog. 3. Into the names of
simple ideas, as whiteness,
sweetness.
A
third convenient division
of the names of things may
be into the names of intire
things, whether of real or
imaginary being; these are
the nouns substantive of grammars.
2. Into the names of the qualities
or properties, of the former;
these are the nouns adjective
of grammars. 3. The names
of more abstracted ideas as
the conjunctions and prepositions
of grammarians.
These
nouns substantive, or names
of intire things, suggest
but one idea in their simplest
form, as in the nominative
case singular of grammars.
As the word a stag is the
name of a single complex idea;
but the word stags by a change
of termination adds to this
a secondary idea of number;
and the word stag's, with
a comma before the final s,
suggests, in English, another
secondary idea of something
appertaining to the stag,
as a stag's horn; which is,
however, in our language,
as frequently expressed by
the preposition of, as the
horn of a stag.
In
the Greek and Latin languages
an idea of gender is joined
with the names of intire things,
as well as of number; but
in the English language the
nouns, which express inanimate
objects, have no genders except
metaphorically; and even the
sexes of many animals have
names so totally different
from each other, that they
rather give an idea of the
individual creature than of
the sex, as bull and cow,
horse and mare, boar and sow,
dog and bitch. This constitutes
another circumstance, which
renders our language more
simple, and more easy to acquire;
and at the same time contributes
to the poetic excellence of
it; as by adding a masculine
or feminine pronoun, as he,
or she, other nouns substantive
are so readily personified.
In
the Latin language there are
five cases besides the nominative,
or original word, and in the
Greek four. Whence the original
noun substantive by change
of its termination suggests
a secondary idea either corresponding
with the genitive, dative,
accusative, vocative, or ablative
cases, besides the secondary
ideas of number and gender
above mentioned. The ideas
suggested by these changes
of termination, which are
termed cases, are explained
in the grammars of these languages,
and are expressed in ours
by prepositions, which are
called the signs of those
cases.
Thus
the word Domini, of the Lord,
suggests beside the primary
idea a secondary one of something
appertaining to it, as templum
domini, the temple of the
Lord, or the Lord's temple;
which in English is either
effected by an addition of
the letter s, with a comma
before it, or by the preposition
of. This genitive case is
said to be expressed in the
Hebrew language simply by
the locality of the words
in succession to each other;
which must so far add to the
conciseness of that language.
Thus
the word Domino, in the dative
case, to the Lord, suggests
besides the primary idea a
secondary one of something
being added to the primary
one; which is effected in
English by the preposition
to.
The
accusative case, or Dominum,
besides the primary idea implies
something having acted upon
the object of that primary
idea; as felis edit murem,
the cat eats the mouse. This
is thus effected in the Greek
and Latin by a change of termination
of the noun acted upon, but
is managed in a more concise
way in our language by its
situation in the sentence,
as it follows the verb. Thus
if the mouse in the above
sentence was placed before
the verb, and the cat after
it, in English the sense would
be inverted, but not so in
Latin; this necessity of generally
placing the accusative case
after the verb is inconvenient
in poetry; though it adds
to the conciseness and simplicity
of our language, as it saves
the intervention of a preposition,
or of a change of termination.
The
vocative case of the Latin
language, or Domine, besides
the primary idea suggests
a secondary one of appeal,
or address; which in our language
is either marked by its situation
in the sentence, or by the
preposition O preceding it.
Whence this interjection O
conveys the idea of appeal
joined to the subsequent noun,
and is therefore properly
another noun, or name of an
idea, preceding the principal
one like other prepositions.
The
ablative case in the Latin
language, as Domino, suggests
a secondary idea of something
being deducted from or by
the primary one. Which is
perhaps more distinctly expressed
by one of those prepositions
in our language; which, as
it suggests somewhat concerning
the adjoined noun, is properly
another noun, or name of an
idea, preceding the principal
one.
When
to these variations of the
termination of nouns in the
singular number are added
those equally numerous of
the plural, and the great
variety of these terminations
correspondent to the three
genders, it is evident that
the prepositions of our own
and other modern languages
instead of the changes of
termination add to the simplicity
of these languages, and to
the facility of acquiring
them.
Hence
in the Latin language, besides
the original or primary idea
suggested by each noun substantive,
or name of an entire thing,
there attends an additional
idea of number, another of
gender, and another suggested
by each change of termination,
which constitutes the cases;
so that in this language four
ideas are suggested at the
same time by one word; as
the primary idea, its gender,
number, and case; the latter
of which has also four or
five varieties. These nouns
therefore may properly be
termed the abbreviation of
sentences; as the conjunctions
and prepositions are termed
by Mr. Tooke the abbreviation
of words; and if the latter
are called the wings affixed
to the feet of Hermes, the
former may be called the wings
affixed to his cap.
III. Adjectives, Articles, Participles,
Adverbs.
1.
The third class of words consists
of those, which in their simplest
form suggest two ideas; one
of them is an abstracted idea
of the quality of an object,
but not of the object itself;
and the other is an abstracted
idea of its appertaining to
some other noun called a substantive,
or a name of an entire thing.
These
words are termed ADJECTIVES,
are undeclined in our language
in respect to cases, number,
or gender; but by three changes
of termination they suggest
the secondary ideas of greater,
greatest, and of less; as
the word sweet changes into
sweeter, sweetest, and sweetish;
which may be termed three
degrees of comparison besides
the positive meaning of the
word; which terminations of
er and est are seldom added
to words of more than two
syllables; as those degrees
are then most frequently denoted
by the prepositions more and
most.
Adjectives
seem originally to have been
derived from nouns substantive,
of which they express a quality,
as a musky rose, a beautiful
lady, a stormy day. Some of
them are formed from the correspondent
substantive by adding the
syllable ly, or like, as a
lovely child, a warlike countenance;
and in our language it is
frequently only necessary
to put a hyphen between two
nouns substantive for the
purpose of converting the
former one into an adjective,
as an eagle-eye, a May-day.
And many of our adjectives
are substantives unchanged,
and only known by their situation
in a sentence, as a German,
or a German gentleman. Adjectives
therefore are names of qualities,
or parts of things; as substantives
are the names of entire things.
In
the Latin and Greek languages
these adjectives possess
a great variety of terminations;
which suggest occasionally
the ideas of number, gender,
and the various cases, agreeing
in all these with the substantive,
to which they belong; besides
the two original or primary
ideas of quality, and of
their appertaining to some
other word, which must be
adjoined to make them sense.
Insomuch that some of these
adjectives, when declined
through all their cases, and
genders, and numbers, in their
positive, comparative, and
superlative degrees, enumerate
fifty or sixty terminations.
All which to one, who wishes
to learn these languages,
are so many new words, and
add much to the difficulty
of acquiring them.
Though
the English adjectives are
undeclined, having neither
case, gender, nor number;
and with this simplicity of
form possess a degree of comparison
by the additional termination
of ish, more than the generality
of Latin or Greek adjectives,
yet are they less adapted
to poetic measure, as they
must accompany their corresponding
substantives; from which they
are perpetually separated
in Greek and Latin poetry.
2.
There is a second kind of
adjectives, which abound in
our language, and in the Greek,
but not in the Latin, which
are called ARTICLES by the
writers of grammar, as the
letter a, and the word the.
These, like the adjectives
above described, suggest two
primary ideas; and suffer
no change of termination in
our language, and therefore
suggest no secondary ideas.
Mr.
Locke observes, that languages
consist principally of general
terms; as it would have been impossible
to give a name to every individual
object, so as to communicate an
idea of it to others; it would
be like reciting the name of every
individual soldier of an army,
instead of using the general term,
army. Now the use of the article
a, and the in English, and o in
Greek, converts general terms
into particular ones; this idea
of particularity as a quality,
or property of a noun, is one
of the primary ideas suggested
by these articles; and the other
is, that of its appertaining to
some particular noun substantive,
without which it is not intelligible.
In both these respects these articles
correspond with adjectives; to
which may be added, that our article
a may be expressed by the adjective
one or any; and that the Greek
article o is declined like other
adjectives.
The
perpetual use of the article,
besides its converting general
terms into particular ones, contributes
much to the force and beauty of
our language from another circumstance,
that abstracted ideas become so
readily personified simply by
the omission of it; which perhaps
renders the English language better
adapted to poetry than any other
ancient or modern: the following
prosopopœia from Shakspeare is
thus beautiful.
She
let Concealment like a worm
i' th' bud
Feed on her damask
cheek.
And
the following line, translated
from Juvenal by Dr. Johnson,
is much superior to the original,
owing to the easy personification
of Worth and Poverty, and
to the consequent conciseness
of it.
Difficile
emergunt, quorum virtutibus
obstat
Res
angusta domi.
Slow
rises Worth by Poverty depress'd.
3.
A third class of adjectives
includes what are termed
PARTICIPLES, which are allied
to the infinitive moods of
verbs, and are formed in
our language by the addition
only of the syllable ing or ed; and are of two kinds,
active and passive, as loving,
loved, from the verb to love.
The verbs suggest an idea
of the noun, or thing spoken
of; and also of its manner
of existence, whether at
rest,
in action, or in being acted
upon; as I lie still, or
I
whip, or I am whipped; and,
lastly, another idea, of
the time of resting, acting,
or suffering; but these adjectives
called participles, suggest
only two primary ideas, one
of the noun, or thing spoken
of, and another of the mode
of existence, but not a third
idea of time; and in this
respect participles differ
from the verbs, from which
they originate, or which
originated from them, except
in their infinitive moods.
Nor
do they resemble adjectives
only in their suggesting but
two primary ideas; but in
the Latin and Greek languages
they are declined through
all the cases, genders, and
numbers, like other adjectives;
and change their terminations
in the degrees of comparison.
In
our language the participle
passive, joined to the verb
to
be, for the purpose of
adding to it the idea of time,
forms the whole of the passive
voice; and is frequently used
in a similar manner in the
Latin language, as I am loved
is expressed either by amor,
or amatus sum. The construction
of the whole passive voice
from the verb to be and the
participles passive of other
verbs, contributes much to
the simplicity of our language,
and the ease of acquiring
it; but renders it less concise
than perhaps it might have
been by some simple variations
of termination, as in the
active voice of it.
4.
A fourth kind of adjective
is called by the grammarians
an ADVERB; which has generally
been formed from the first
kind of adjectives, as these
were frequently formed from
correspondent substantives;
or it has been formed from
the third kind of adjectives,
called participles; and this
is effected in both cases
by the addition of the syllable
ly, as wisely, charmingly.
This
kind of adjective suggests
two primary ideas, like the
adjectives, and participles,
from which they are derived;
but differ from them in this
curious circumstance, that
the other adjectives relate
to substantives, and are declined
like them in the Latin and
Greek languages, as a lovely
boy, a warlike countenance;
but these relate to verbs,
and are therefore undeclined,
as to act boldly, to suffer
patiently.
IV. Verbs.
The
fourth class of words consists
of those which are termed
VERBS, and which in their
simplest state suggest three
ideas; first an idea of the
noun, or name of the thing
spoken of, as a whip. 2. An
idea of its mode of existence,
whether at rest, or in action,
or in being acted upon. 3.
An idea of the time of its
existence. Thus "the
beadle whipped the beggar," in
prolix language might be expressed,
the beadle with a whip struck
in time past the beggar. Which
three ideas are suggested
by the one word whipped.
Verbs
are therefore nouns, or names
of intire ideas, with the
additional ideas of their
mode of existence and of time;
but the participles suggest
only the noun, and the mode
of existence, without any
idea of time; as whipping,
or whipped. The infinitive
moods of verbs correspond
in their signification with
the participles; as they also
suggest only the noun, or
name of the thing spoken of,
and an idea of its mode of
existence, excluding the idea
of time; which is expressed
by all the other moods and
tenses; whence it appears,
that the infinitive mood,
as well as the participle,
is not truly a part of the
verb; but as the participle
resembles the adjective in
its construction; so the infinitive
mood may be said to resemble
the substantive, and it is
often used as a nominative
case to another verb.
Thus
in the words "a
charming lady with a smiling
countenance," the
participle acts as an adjective;
and in the words "to
talk well commands attention," the
infinitive mood acts as the
nominative case of a noun
substantive; and their respective
significations are also very
similar, as whipping, or to
whip, mean the existence of
a person acting with a whip.
In
the Latin language the verb
in its simplest form, except
the infinitive mood, and the
participle, both which we
mean to exclude from complete
verbs, suggests four primary
ideas, as amo, suggests the
pronoun I, the noun love,
its existence in its active
state, and the present time;
which verbs in the Greek and
Latin undergo an uncounted
variation of termination,
suggesting so many different
ideas in addition to the four
primary ones.
We
do not mean to assert, that
all verbs are literally derived
from nouns in any language;
because all languages have
in process of time undergone
such great variation; many
nouns having become obsolete
or have perished, and new
verbs have been imported from
foreign languages, or transplanted
from ancient ones; but that
this has originally been the
construction of all verbs,
as well as those to whip and
to love above mentioned, and
innumerable others.
Thus
there may appear some difficulty
in analyzing from what noun
substantive were formed the
verbs to stand or to lie;
because we have not properly
the name of the abstract ideas
from which these verbs arose,
except we use the same word
for the participle and the
noun substantive, as standing,
lying. But the verbs to sit,
and to walk, are less difficult
to trace to their origin;
as we have names for the nouns
substantive, a seat, and a
walk.
But
there is another verb of great
consequence in all languages,
which would appear in its
simplest form in our language
to suggest but two primary
ideas, as the verb to
be,
but that it suggests three
primary ideas like other verbs
may be understood, if we use
the synonimous term to exist
instead of to be. Thus "I
exist" suggests
first the abstract idea of
existence, not including the
mode of existence, whether
at rest, or in action, or
in suffering; secondly it
adds to that abstracted idea
of existence its real state,
or actual resting, acting,
or suffering, existence; and
thirdly the idea of the present
time: thus the infinitive
mood to
be, and the participle,
being, suggest both the abstract
idea of existence, and the
actual state of it, but not
the time.
The
verb to be is also used irregularly
to designate the parts of
time and actual existence;
and is then applied to either
the active or passive participles
of other verbs, and called
an auxiliary verb; while the
mode of existence, whether
at rest, or in action, or
being acted upon, is expressed
by the participle, as "I
am loving" is
nearly the same as "I
love," amo;
and "I
am loved," amatus
sum, is nearly the same as
amor. This mode of application
of the verb to
be is used
in French as well as in English,
and in the passive voice of
the Latin, and perhaps in
many other languages; and
is by its perpetual use in
conversation rendered irregular
in them all, as I am, thou
art, he is, would not seem
to belong to the infinitive
mood to
be, any more than sum,
fui, sunt, fuerunt, appear
to belong to esse.
The
verb to
have affords another
instance of irregular application;
the word means in its regular
sense to possess, and then
suggests three ideas like
the above verb of existence:
first the abstracted idea
of the thing spoken of, or
possession; secondly, the
actual existence of possession,
and lastly the time, as I
have or possess. This verb
to
have like the verb to
be is also used irregularly to
denote parts of past time,
and is then joined to the
passive participles alone,
as I have eaten; or it is
accompanied with the passive
participle of the verb to
be, and then with the active
participle of another verb,
as I have been eating.
There
is another word will used
in the same irregular manner
to denote the parts of future
time, which is derived from
the verb to
will; which in
its regular use signifies
to exert our volition. There
are other words used to express
other circumstances attending
upon verbs, as may, can, shall,
all which are probably the
remains of verbs otherwise
obsolete. Lastly, when we
recollect, that in the moods
and tenses of verbs one word
expresses never less than
three ideas in our language,
and many more in the Greek
and Latin; as besides those
three primary ideas the idea
of person, and of number,
are always expressed in the
indicative mood, and other
ideas suggested in the other
moods, we cannot but admire
what excellent abbreviations
of language are thus achieved;
and when we observe the wonderful
intricacy and multiplicity
of sounds in those languages,
especially in the Greek verbs,
which change both the beginning
and ending of the original
word through three voices,
and three numbers, with uncounted
variations of dialect; we
cannot but admire the simplicity
of modern languages compared
to these ancient ones; and
must finally perceive, that
all language consists simply
of nouns, or names of ideas,
disposed in succession or
in combination, all of which
are expressed by separate
words, or by various terminations
of the same word.
Conclusion.
The
theory of the progressive
production of language in
the early times of society,
and its gradual improvements
in the more civilized ones,
may be readily induced from
the preceding pages. In the
commencement of Society the
names of the ideas of entire
things, which it was necessary
most frequently to communicate,
would first be invented, as
the names of individual persons,
or places, fire, water, this
berry, that root; as it was
necessary perpetually to announce,
whether one or many of such
external things existed, it
was soon found more convenient
to add this idea of number
by a change of termination
of the word, than by the addition
of another word.
As
many of these nouns soon became
general terms, as bird, beast,
fish, animal; it was next
convenient to distinguish
them when used for an individual,
from the same word used as
a general term; whence the
two articles a and the, in
our language, derive their
origin.
Next
to these names of the ideas
of entire things, the words
most perpetually wanted in
conversation would probably
consist of the names of the
ideas of the parts or properties
of things; which might be
derived from the names of
some things, and applied to
others, which in these respects
resembled them; these are
termed adjectives, as rosy
cheek, manly voice, beastly
action; and seem at first
to have been formed simply
by a change of termination
of their correspondent substantives.
The comparative degrees of
greater and less were found
so frequently necessary to
be suggested, that a change
of termination even in our
language for this purpose
was produced; and is as frequently
used as an additional word,
as wiser or more wise.
The
expression of general similitude,
as well as partial similitude,
becomes so frequently used
in conversation, that another
kind of adjective, called
an adverb, was expressed by
a change of termination, or
addition of the syllable ly
or like; and as adjectives
of the former kind are applied
to substantives, and express
a partial similitude, these
are applied to verbs and express
a general similitude, as to
act heroically, to speak boldly,
to think freely.
The
perpetual chain of causes
and effects, which constitute
the motions, or changing configurations,
of the universe, are so conveniently
divided into active and passive,
for expressing the exertions
or purposes of common life,
that it became particularly
convenient in all languages
to substitute changes of termination,
instead of additional nouns,
to express, whether the thing
spoken of was in a state of
acting or of being acted upon.
This change of termination
betokening action or suffering
constitutes the participle,
as loving, loved; which, as
it expresses a property of
bodies, is classed amongst
adjectives in the preceding
pages.
Besides
the perpetual allusions to
the active or passive state
of things, the comparative
times of these motions, or
changes, were also perpetually
required to be expressed;
it was therefore found convenient
in all languages to suggest
them by changes of terminations
in preference to doing it
by additional nouns. At the
same time the actual or real
existence of the thing spoken
of was perpetually required,
as well as the times of their
existence, and the active
or passive state of that existence.
And as no conversation could
be carried on without unceasingly
alluding to these circumstances,
they became in all languages
suggested by changes of termination;
which are termed moods and
tenses in grammars, and convert
the participle above mentioned
into a verb; as that participle
had originally been formed
by adding a termination to
a noun, as chaining, and chained,
from chain.
The
great variety of changes of
termination in all languages
consists therefore of abbreviations
used instead of additional
words; and adds much to the
conciseness of language, and
the quickness with which we
are enabled to communicate
our ideas; and may be said
to add unnumbered Wings to
every limb of the God of Eloquence.
|