Material from the Romantic Circles Website may not be downloaded, reproduced or disseminated in any manner without authorization unless it is for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, and/or classroom use as provided by the Copyright Act of 1976, as amended.
Unless otherwise noted, all Pages and Resources mounted on Romantic Circles are copyrighted by the author/editor and may be shared only in accordance with the Fair Use provisions of U.S. copyright law. Except as expressly permitted by this statement, redistribution or republication in any medium requires express prior written consent from the author/editors and advance notification of Romantic Circles. Any requests for authorization should be forwarded to Romantic Circles:>
By their use of these texts and images, users agree to the following conditions:
Users are not permitted to download these texts and images in order to mount them on their own servers. It is not in our interest or that of our users to have uncontrolled subsets of our holdings available elsewhere on the Internet. We make corrections and additions to our edited resources on a continual basis, and we want the most current text to be the only one generally available to all Internet users. Institutions can, of course, make a link to the copies at Romantic Circles, subject to our conditions of use.
Bodleian Library, MS Eng. Lett. c. 22. Previously published: Kenneth Curry (ed.), New Letters of Robert Southey, 2 vols (London and New York, 1965), I, pp. 116–118.
These letters were edited with the assistance of Carol Bolton, Tim Fulford and Ian Packer
For permission to publish the text of MSS in their possession, the editor wishes to thank the Beinecke Rare Books and Manuscript Library, Yale University; Berg Collection of English and American Literature, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the Bodleian Library Oxford University; the British Library; Boston Public Library; the Syndics of Cambridge University Library; the Syndics of the Fitzwilliam Museum Cambridge; Haverford College, Connecticut; the Historical Society of Pennsylvania; the Hornby Library, Liverpool Libraries and Information Services; the Houghton Library, Harvard University; the John Rylands Library, Manchester; the Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas; Luton Museum (Bedfordshire County Council); Massachusetts Historical Society; McGill University Library; the National Library of Scotland; the Newberry Library, Chicago; the New York Public Library (Pforzheimer Collections); the Pierpont Morgan Library, New York; the Public Record Offices of Bedford, Suffolk (Bury St Edmunds) and Northumberland, the Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge; the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne; the Trustees of the William Salt Library, Stafford, the Wisbech and Fenland Museum; the University of Virginia Library.
A research grant from the British Academy made much of the archival work possible, as did support from the English Department of Nottingham Trent University.
All quotation marks and apostrophes have been changed: " for “," for ”, ' for ‘, and ' for ’.
Any dashes occurring in line breaks have been removed.
Because of web browser variability, all hyphens have been typed on the U.S. keyboard.
Dashes have been rendered as a variable number of hyphens to give a more exact rendering of their length.
Southey's spelling has not been regularized.
Writing in other hands appearing on these manuscripts has been indicated as such, the content recorded in brackets.
& has been used for the ampersand sign.
£ has been used for £, the pound sign
All other characters, those with accents, non-breaking spaces, etc., have been encoded in HTML entity decimals.
Well Grosvenor we shall be settled when we get xx an apartment in the church yard however. so you too are about to waste the five best years of existence in acquiring a detestable jargon unpleasant to acquire, unprofitable to the head & the heart when obtained. why not physic? but you must know best, for were that useful science equally eligible as to worldly concerns you would certainly prefer it. allons! would the journey were over! — would it were begun!
You want me at London & I want to be there as much as you can wish to have me. what hinders? there needs no Oedipus to solve that question!
have you seen Bob Banyards Review of Joan of Arc?
“a professional man must not step too much out of his way.” granted — ergo I abjure public poetry. but a professional man must have a house & furniture ergo I must write a book first. poor Madoc! if he will buy me chairs tables beds linen &c &c &c it will be worth more than an eternity of posthumous credit — xx is <it> not damnd hard Bedford that the booksellers should make so much of that poem when I am rotten, & that I should make so little? it will be in twenty books. a thirty shilling volume. the sale of one edition would make me happy. two hundred copies would indemnify the publication & the remaining three put me in possession of about three hundred guineas, which would furnish a house, & leave enough to risk in an octavo edition. a pretty scheme Grosvenor — & easy for one who has a wide circle of acquaintance. but I am — RS!
after all
I wish much to see ——. if I were but intimate with her. — do you believe the persuadability of the Beast? of the better order I do. no more of this: your determination concerning your future life must be regulated by the choice you shall make between the high delights & many anxieties of marriage — xx negation of both in the heart
I have always followed my feelings instead of my judgement — & they have led me right.
r Losh. he carries with him one of the most open manly democratic faces I ever saw: he mentioned Carlisle. I enquired what were Carlisles opinions upon religious subjects: he told me atheistical. now Grosvenor who am I to believe? that his sentiments as given in conversation if not avowedly atheistical, lead immediately to atheism from the testimony of Allen & Losh appears certain; they are both accustomed to metaphysical reasonings & could hardly both be deceived. moreover, the part which Carlisle wrote in one of your letters to me, appeared most clearly to be the production of an Atheist. mark you — his speculative fancies <tenets> will neither make him rise or fall in the barometer of my opinion: but as you have so positively assured me that he thinks otherwise & as he is by others who know him, Christians as well as Atheists, considered as a disbeliever of Deity — you will do well. if you are right, in telling him how his opinions are mistaken, & warning him, if he be indeed a Theist, not to give his sanction to principles, which, to say the best of them, can produce no good. you may, if you like it, show him what I have written.
St Pierres book is entitled Etudes de la Nature.
I remove to Bath on Tuesday next, to remain with my Mother till I fix my tents among you. I do not expect to make any friends in London. & the fewer acquaintance the better. As I cannot cage the Beast I must cage myself. I think of your club with the determination of declining it. tell me Grosvenor — after nine hours law which will make me happiest — the company of half a dozen men — or the continuing Madoc? God bless you. direct your next to Westgate Buildings Bath