382. Robert Southey to William Taylor,
24 February 1799
*
Thank you for the dirge, which I hope neither
of us may ever deserve, & for Lake Keswic. [1] I
begin to know you now in prose & verse. there is a
profusion of imagery a rapidity of combination which belong
to nobody else. like the Eastern Mosques every part is
beautiful, & all the parts blend into an impressive
whole. I knew you in the Edda, with which every body is
pleased, & I thank you for lenity there. [2] I know you in that rascal Herbert Crofts
book, [3] (of whom I have something to say
speedily in the Magazine [4]
–) & in the Abbe Barruel, [5] whom I suspect of being a
great scoundrel, for he cannot possibly believe all he
attempts to prove. On your ode I offer a few remarks before
the press closes on it. in the first line – would it not be
better by an easy transposition to get rid of the
superfluous syllable & write it O Keswic
oer thy lake? for should not rhymeless odes be as
harmonious as possible? in the second sail & gale rhyme. is not
the second stanza incongruous? a cloud fathoming the sky
seems to reverse the fact. stanzas 5 & 7. it would I
think be better to continue the conditional tense. 15. streak & cheek. 16. I would rather time
destroyed you than woe. 23. is not sear an inapplicable word? 30. the moon
does not wind.
I do not think the ode too long. a bad poem
cannot be too short, the reverse is not quite true – &
yet I am always sorry to come to the end of what has
delighted me. will you have the stanzas seperated in
printing, or connected as they sometimes run into each
other? & what signature do you chuse? I have a curious
optical anecdote for the Magazine [6] & shall send up the
advertisement [7] with it. it will be better perhaps to call
it by the original name of the Almanach, as that title will
be recognized on the continent, & I hope to equal the
continental collections.
Judging by what I hear & feel, I do not
think the Oberon will be popular in England, at least not in
Sothebys translation. [8] It only diverts. it does not kindle the
imagination, it does not agitate & make the heart beat
like the wonders of Ariosto & Tasso. [9] Wielands opinion of the effect of
story [10] is contrary to all experience, witness
the Thebaid – witness the Henriade. [11]
Your Dr Smith [12] is to treat us with Botanical Lectures,
which I fear can hardly be so timed as to benefit me. Mrs Smith is hopelessly ill. so I am told
& by those who best know. [13]
I am vexed about Burnett &
uneasy as to his future fortunes. there is not only the
difficulty of subsisting during his medical studies – but
the interval after they are compleated before he can get
into practice. the Brentford scheme [14] might have satisfied him by
keeping him employed. in every way of life there is a crowd
struggling to get on, & George is not
calculated to make his way in a crowd. His Yarmouth situation,
with nothing better in view, was surely not enough to
content a young man, but is he likely to better himself by
the alteration? if indeed his restlessness arises from
unsettled opinions, one cannot wish him to have acted
otherwise. the prospect appears to me a very gloomy one. he
has been too long accustomed to do little; ever to
accomplish much.
We have a very extraordinary young man lately
settled here, who is to manage the Pneumatic
Institution. [15]
Beddoes
mentioned him in the M Magazine. [16] he
is not yet twenty one, nor has he applied to Chemistry more
than eighteen months, but he has advanced with such
seven-leagued strides as to overtake every body. his name is
Davy, I have
been labouring at his Essays on Light &c, [17]
but he is going to show me his poems, of which I hear much
from tolerable judges <& wch I shall better
understand.> Whatever his verses may be he is a great
acquisition to this neighbourhood, & if his future
progress be at all answerable to the success with which he
has set out, he must rank with the first names of the
century.
You mentioned young Parry [18] in one of your letters. I hav[MS cut]
him but seldom; & to little advantage. he displeased me
by a forwardness & a desire of displaying himself, the
effect I am told of being always shown off at home &
having always been admired. this will probably wear away. I
did not know that he ever wrote poetry his drawings are very
fine indeed. whether his taste in painting be good or not,
better judges than me must determine, he spoke with high
praise of Barry, [19] & therefore I
suppose scientifically, for no common eye will ever look
five minutes on any picture of Barrys – I was quite
disappointed at find<ing> so little said of Voss’s
Louisa in the Monthly Review. [20] you have
made me hunger & thirst after German poetry.
Your hexameters from Klopstock [21] are very fine, one or two inversions
of syntax might have been avoided, but these little
corrections are always more obvious to a reader than a
writer. they gave me pleasure too as by their situation
rendering such metres not quite strange to an English
ear.
My poems [22] I hope will reach you in the course of
the week. I am clearing off other things to begin the Dom
Daniel. [23] which will be in stanzas, the rhymes I
believe irregularly arranged, & perhaps the lines long
or short at pleasure.
God bless you.
yrs affectionately
Robert Southey.
Sunday night. 24 Feby. 99.
Notes* Address: To/
Mr Wm Taylor
Junr/ Surry Street/ Norwich./
Single Postmarks: BRISTOL/ FEB 25 99; [partial] FE/
26/ 99 Endorsement: Ansd 4 March MS: Huntington
Library, HM 4819 Previously published: J. W.
Robberds (ed.), A Memoir of the Life and Writings
of the Late William Taylor of Norwich, 2
vols (London, 1843), I, pp. 252–256. BACK [1] Taylor’s ‘Dirge: For him who
shall deserve it’, Annual Anthology
(Bristol, 1799), pp. 36–37; and ‘Lake Keswic’, published
as ‘Topographical Ode’, in Annual
Anthology (Bristol, 1799), pp. 1–9. BACK [2] Taylor’s review of Amos
Simon Cottle, Icelandic Poetry, or the Edda of
Saemund Translated into English Verse
(1797), Monthly Review, 27 (December,
1798), 318–388. BACK [3] Taylor’s
review of Herbert Croft’s (1751–1816;
DNB), A Letter, from Germany, to
the Princess Royal of England; on the English and
German Languages (1797), Monthly
Review, 27 (December, 1798), ‘Appendix’,
494–498. BACK [4] For Southey’s attack on Croft, see his
letter to the editor of the Monthly
Magazine, October [1799], Letter 439. BACK [5] Taylor’s review of Augustin Barruel
(1741–1820), Memoirs Illustrating the History of
Jacobinism (1798), appeared in the
Monthly Review, 27 (December, 1798),
‘Appendix’, 509–524. BACK [6] See Southey’s letter to the editor of the
Monthly Magazine, 21 February 1799,
Letter 381. BACK [7] The
advertisement for the Annual Anthology;
see Monthly Magazine, 8 (November 1799),
807. BACK [8] William Sotheby (1757–1833; DNB),
Oberon, a Poem; From the German of
Wieland (1798). BACK [9] Ludovico Ariosto (1474–1535)
and Torquato Tasso (1544–1595), Italian epic
poets. BACK [10] In a
letter to Southey of 28 January 1799, Taylor had cited
Christoph Wieland’s (1733–1813) opinion that ‘The fable
of a poem is ... of very inferior consequence to its
beauties of detail’ (J.W. Robberds (ed.), A
Memoir of the Life and Writings of the Late William
Taylor of Norwich, 2 vols (London, 1843), I,
p. 250). BACK [11] Publius Papinius Statius (c. AD 45–c.
96), The Thebaid (1st century AD);
François-Marie Arouet (Voltaire) (1694–1778), La
Henriade (1728). BACK [12] Taylor’s friend James Edward
Smith (1759–1828; DNB), Unitarian,
botanist, and founder and President of the Linnean
Society. BACK [13] Pleasance Smith (1773–1877;
DNB), was healthier than she seemed,
living until the age of 103. BACK [15] The
Pneumatic Institute, Dowry Square, Bristol, had opened
recently. It was first advertised in the Bristol
Gazette and Public Advertiser, 21 March
1799. BACK [16] Thomas Beddoes had announced Humphry
Davy’s appointment as ‘superintendant’ at the Pneumatic
Institute in a letter of 9 October, see Monthly
Magazine, 6 (October 1798), 238. BACK [17] Humphy Davy, ‘Experimental
Essays on Heat, Light, and on the Combination of Light,
with a New Theory of Respiration, and Observations on
the Chemistry of Life’, in Thomas Beddoes,
Contributions to Physical and Medical
Knowledge, Principally from the West of
England (Bristol, 1799), pp. 5–147. BACK [18] Taylor’s letter to Southey,
26 September 1798 (J.W. Robberds (ed.), A Memoir
of the Life and Writings of the Late William Taylor
of Norwich, 2 vols (London, 1843), I, p.
229) mentioned Charles Henry Parry (1779–1860;
DNB), the son of the eminent Bath
physician Caleb Hillier Parry. Like his father, Charles
Parry became a doctor, rather than a poet or
painter. BACK [19] The
history painter James Barry (1741–1806;
DNB). BACK [20] Johann Heinrich Voss (1751–1826),
Luise (1795). The article in the
Monthly Review, 27 (December, 1798),
‘Appendix’, 564–565 was not by Taylor. BACK [21] Unidentified; possibly a
translation of a section of Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock
(1724–1803), Der Messias
(1748–1773). BACK [22] Southey’s two-volume Poems
(1799). BACK [23] An early
version of Thalaba the Destroyer
(1801). BACK |
|