430. Robert Southey to Joseph Cottle
[fragment], [25] August 1799
*
My dear Cottle –
The books arrived safely. I was vexed to see
the paragraph you had added to the Preface [1] – the more vexed
because every person who has yet seen the volume cry out
against the folly of it
desiring an opportunity of telling contributors their verses
are bad. people who wished their peices returned would have
said so without being asked. the sentence can only operate
to prevent post men of
diffidence from sending me anything. I cannot conceive why
you added it – to say the best of it it is perfectly useless
– & I am afraid it will be mischievous. if it were
possible the leaf should be cancelled.
About Beddoes & his soi-disant lampoon. [2] there is no harm done as matters now
are. but in Beddoes after the reason assignd for not
inserting it it was very very indelicate. & the arrogance & impertinence
of the man have irritated me. I desire that no future
application be made to him for contributions. if he sends
them he may but I will not be dictated to. nor treated with
impertinence by any man. Beddoes has my
respect & respectful voice – I look up to him as a
useful & benevolent man, the agent of much good – but in
this instance he has behaved with an indelicacy of which I
could have suspected no one.
The volume is very good. or more xxxxxx it may be xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx it with my xxxxx xxxxxx – xxx xx xxxx xxxxxx
xxx xxxxx xxxxxx Robert Southey xxx xxxxxxx xxx
xxxxxxxxxx xxx xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx.
In the Volume few & trifling alterations
only are made. it is always to build a new house than repair
one originally ill-plannd. it will be better perhaps at the
end to advertise only my books. [3] but
this as you judge best. you will be good to have an equal
number of large copies struck off with the second volume
& direct Biggs to be as uniform with that as possible.
The frank I spoke of you enclosed
to Mr Southey
here – & a frank it was. now I am always glad
to hear from y[MS torn] but your enclosure only contained
notice that you had enclo[MS torn]
it, I only mention this to put you
in mind that a little thought upon common occasions is very
useful. so you must receive it with the same levity that it
is written with.
I hope to have the second Anthology out in
January – so do you beat up. it will be a better volume than
the first. we must if possible go to press at the beginning
of November.
If any letters or parcel reach you before you
get my direction send them to Coleridge at his brothers
at Ottery St Marys – Devonshire – for
me. we go to Sidmouth, five miles beyond [half a sheet of MS
missing]
examine them. your best poem in the Anthology
is Ellen [4] – of which [MS torn] middle stanza is
very striking. xx our next
volume will have less dross. but this will do. it must be
popular – or my judgement is lamentably erroneous.
kind remembrances from Coleridge. he begs you will not forget the
Tragedy [5] –
about which Poole is very anxious.
yrs affectionately
R. Southey.
Sunday. 1799. August.
Edith
desires her love to your sister[MS torn]
Notes
* Endorsement: (106) 51
MS: Tulane University
Libraries, Manuscripts Collection M 1104
Previously
published: Andy P. Antippas, ‘Four New Southey Letters’,
The Wordsworth Circle, 5 (1974),
93.
Dating note: In his letter to Danvers of
Tuesday, 20 August 1799 (Letter 428), Southey asked
Cottle to immediately forward three copies of the
recently-published Annual Anthology
(1799). This letter is dated by Southey as ‘Sunday’ and
thanks Cottle for the books, making its most likely date
to be Sunday, 25 August 1799. BACK
[1] ‘Advertisement’,
Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1799),
(unpaginated). The final paragraph inserted by Cottle
ran as follows: ‘It is the intention of the Editor to
publish annually a similar volume. Communications are to
be addressed to Messrs. BIGGS & Co. Printers, Bristol, for the Editor of the
Annual Anthology. It is requested that the Writer will
enclose his address, that the piece may be returned, if
found inconvenient to insert.’ BACK
[2] ‘Domiciliary Verses’,
Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1799), pp.
287–288. BACK
[3] There were no advertisements at the end
of Annual Anthology (1799) or
Annual Anthology (1800). BACK
[4] ‘Ellen’,
Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1799), pp.
102–104. BACK
[5] Probably
a reference to Coleridge’s ‘Osorio’ (1797). BACK