433. Robert Southey to Humphry
Davy, [4 September 1799]
*
Your Mounts-Bay, my dear Davy, disappointed me in its
length. [1] I expected more & wishd more,
because what there is is good. there is a certain swell – an elevation in the
flow of the blank verse, which I know not how, produces an effect like the
fullness of an organ-swell upon the feelings. I have felt it from the rythm of
Milton [2] – & sometimes of Akenside [3] – a pleasure wholly independant of that derived
from the soul of the poetry, arising from the beauty of the body only – I
believe a man who did not understand a word of it would feel pleasure &
emotion at hearing such lines read with the tone of a poet. the character drawn
of Theora is I think out of place – it is not a common character. & the
story is no ways influenced by it. the passion to be excited is pity, not admiration.
I must not press the subject of poetry upon you – only do not
lose the feeling, & the habit of seeing all things with a poets eye. at
Bristol you have a good society – but not a man who knows any thing of poetry.
Dr
Beddoes’ taste is very pessimism. Cottles
only likes what his
friends & himself write. Every person fancies himself competent to pronounce
upon the merits of a poem. & yet no trade no science requires so long an
apprenticeship, or involves the necessity of such multifarious knowledge. I want
an equal reader to judge my poems, one whose knowledge & taste is
commensurate with mine, who has thought as much upon the subject – or else one
who pretends not to criticise but will surrender his feelings to me & follow
the impulse they receive.
It gave me pain to see Dr Beddoes’s Domiciliary Verses inserted in
the Anthology. [4] when I left Bristol a variance subsisted between
myself & Coleridge. I
had therefore reason on the score of delicacy not to make myself the means of
publishing any thing designed as a ridicule either upon him or his friend
Wordsworth, & those lines at the time they were written were handed about as
such. this I requested Cottle to
mention to Dr B. as a reason for
not inserting them. he did so & Dr
B replied that unless they were inserted, nothing of his should. the
epigram [5] was then already
printed & Cottle did right not
to offend the Doctor himself. But
had I been then in Bristol, his poems should have been immediately returned
& what was already printed cancelled. I respect Dr Beddoes – but in this instance
he has acted with an indelicacy & a kind of arrogance which I never before
experienced. for the second volume [6] of course no application shall be made to him.
The second volume I hope to send to press early in November.
sometimes remember this, & let it prevent
<save> a poetizing impulse from being repelled.
I have been long idle, or rather lying fallow. after writing to
you I walkd to the Valley of Stones & to Ilfracombe. on my return we
remained a fortnight at Stowey with Coleridge, where Edith gradually recovered, &
where with walking & talking I was compleatly occupied. we travelled
together to Ottery St Mary – & after vainly seeking
lodgings on the coast or in the villages near I found lodgings on Monday last at
Mr Tuckers. Fore-Street-Hill. Exeter. [7] whither direct. Coleridge is eleven miles
distant at his brothers. he will
pass some time here. we have formed the plan of a long poem to execute in
hexameters. but this you had better not mention as it will need a strong
preliminary attack to bully people out of their prejudices against innovations
in metre. our story is Mohammed. [8]
At Lymouth I saw Tobins [9] friend Williams [10] who opened upon me
with an account of the gazeous oxyd. [11] I had the advantage of him, having
felt what he it seems, had only seen. Lymouth where he is fixd is certainly the
most beautiful place I have seen in England – so beautiful that all the after
scenes come flat & uninteresting. it may
xxxxxx the Valley of Stones is about half-a-mile distant, as a strange & magnificent which ought to
have filled the whole neighbourhood with traditions of giants & devils &
magicians. but I could find none – not even a lie preserved. I know too little
of natural history to hypothesize upon the cause of this valley: it appeard to
me that nothing but water could have so defleshed & laid bare the bones of
the earth. that any inundation which could have overstopped these heights must
have deluged the kingdom – but the opposite hills are clothed with vegetable with vegetable soil & verdure
– therefore the cause must have been partial. a water-spout might have
occasioned it perhaps – & there my conjectures rested – or rather took a new
direction to the Preadamite Kings, [12] the fiends who married Diocletians fifty
daughters – their giant progeny [13] – old Merlin [14] &
the builders of the Giants Causeway. [15]
For the next Anthology I project a poem on our Clifton
Rocks. [16] the scenery is fresh in my
sight – & these kind of poems derive a more interesting cast as recollections than as immediate pictures.
farewell
yours truly
Robert Southey.
Exeter.
Thursday May [17]
4. 99.
Notes* Address: [deletion and readdress in another hand] To/ Mr Davy/ Pneumatic Institution/ Hot
Wells <Post Office minehead>/ Bristol. / Single Stamped:
EXETER Endorsement: May 99/ Exeter MS: Royal Institution, London,
Davy MSS Previously published: John Davy (ed.), Fragmentary
Remains, Literary and Scientific, of Sir Humphry Davy, Bart.
(London, 1858), pp. 34–36 [in part; misdated 4 May 1799]. Dating note:
Southey dates this letter as ‘May 4.99’. But its contents, including
references to the recently-published Annual Anthology (1799),
Southey’s walking-tour in north Somerset and his new lodgings in Exeter, all
date the letter to early September 1799. BACK [1] Humphry Davy, ‘Extract from
an unfinished poem upon Mount’s-Bay’, Annual Anthology
(Bristol, 1799), pp. 281–286. BACK [2] John Milton (1608–1674;
DNB). BACK [3] Mark Akenside (1721–1770;
DNB). BACK [4] Thomas Beddoes’s
‘Domiciliary Verses’ appeared in Annual Anthology (Bristol,
1799), pp. 287–288. BACK [5] Beddoes’s ‘On Some Modern
Improvements in a Celebrated Spot in Gloucestershire’, Annual
Anthology (Bristol, 1799), p. 248. BACK [6] The
second volume of the Annual Anthology was published in
1800. BACK [7] Possibly the retired stationer and bookseller
Richard Tucker (fl. 1779–1784), whose business had occupied premises on
Fore-Street, Exeter. BACK [8] Coleridge and Southey’s plan for a jointly-written poem in hexameters on
Muhammad (570–632), the Prophet of Islam, did not make much progress. A
fragment by Southey was published posthumously in Oliver Newman: a
New-England Tale (London, 1845), pp. 113–116; and 14 lines by
Coleridge in The Poetical Works of S. T. Coleridge, 3 vols
(London, 1834), II, p. 68. For Southey’s notes for, and early sketch of, the
poem see Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood Warter, 4 series
(London, 1849–1850), IV, pp. 18–20. BACK [10] Williams (first name and dates unknown) was the
‘natural son’ of Prince William Henry, Duke of Gloucester (1743–1805;
DNB), Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood
Warter, 4 series (London, 1849–1850), IV, p. 521. BACK [11] Nitrous oxide, or ‘laughing gas’. BACK [12] Both
Christian and Muslim theologians had speculated about the existence on earth
of non-human civilizations before the creation of Adam. William Beckford’s
(1760–1844; DNB) An Arabian Tale, From An Unpublished
Manuscript: With Notes Critical and Explanatory (London, 1786),
pp. 196, 205, had popularised the notion and used the specific phrase
‘Pre-Adamite Kings’. BACK [13] John
Milton (1608–1674; DNB), ‘History of Britain’, The
Works of John Milton, Historical, Political, and Miscellaneous. ... To
Which is Prefixed, An Account of His Life and Writings, 2 vols
(London, 1753), II, pp. 2–3. BACK [14] Legendary wizard at the Court of King Arthur. BACK [15] In
legend, the Irish giant Finn McCool built the causeway in order to walk to
Scotland to fight the Scottish giant Benandonner. BACK [16] A series of rocks and cliffs
in the Avon gorge, near the Bristol suburb of Clifton. For the plan of this
poem see Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood Warter, 4 series
(London, 1849–1850), IV, pp. 195–196. BACK [17] May: Southey misdates, the letter was written in September. BACK |
|