486. Robert Southey to William
Taylor, [c. 3 February 1800]
*
My dear friend
I thank you for your Eclogue. [1] with the beginning I have often been pleased, & the
remainder pleases me not less. Some lines will not scan – Men who against Kings
&c – is a foot short. Surely the dome of the Invalides – a foot too long,
&, We poor Jews when it went, in the same fault. I have scannd these lines
so often as to be satisfied the error is not in my toning. In Hexameters of a
loftier tone I should object to such the placing
a verb like “batter” at the end of one line & the “down” at the beginning of
the next – as it is almost splitting a word: but in this place the effect is
rather good than otherwise. I think you estimate rightly the powers of this
metre. perhaps no other is so well adapted for the sort of domestic poetry, if
the term be understandable, in which I believe Voss has written his Luise. [2] I have sometimes thought
Mohammed [3] too high a subject for the metre
– & Robin Hood [4]
a better hero for a hexametrical poem.
The second Anthology [5] is very far advanced,
eleven sheets being printed. the sooner therefore, you send me the correction of
the halting lines, the better. you asked me in a former letter, & I forgot
to answer the question, if epigrams were admissible. – every thing except
translations, & I reserve the few epigrams already collected to go together
near the end of the book. [6]
Harry is much improved in
manners & in mind since my visit to Yarmouth. I am however uneasy lest he
should contract habits of expensiveness, <of> which it will be difficult
to divest himself, & which if indulged must be subversive of independance
& perhaps integrity. my attempts to correct this are rather by example, than
by precept. you have considerable influence <over him,> & I say this
to you that you may bear in mind his failing & his danger. make but
independance his pride, & he will do well. you will perhaps smile to hear
that the first book that ever seriously influenced my opinions & my conduct
was the Manual of Epictetus. [7]
Harry is very quick – he has
talents enough if well directed, to render himself useful & respectable. the
marks of genius are not, I think, to be found in there him. Do you approve the plan of sending him to a German
University after x previous studies chemical
& anatomical in England?
I am seriously thinking of quitting England in search of health.
either to wait till Autumn & then revisit Lisbon, or to employ the summer in
xxxx travelling thro Vienna to Trieste.
something I must do lest habits of sickliness affect my mind as well as body. I
use stimulants enough – from porter to the gaseous oxyd, [8] & certainly am
better for them – indeed unable to do without them. My employments are perforce
contracted. I have given up rhyming a guineas-worth a week for the Morning Post.
it was become an oppression which harrassed me. With Thalaba [9] I proceed leisurely, & therefore it is a pleasure &
relief. eight books are written to my own mind well; when it is compleated &
corrected I will send you the manuscript.
To return to the hexameters – the structure which Klopstock
disapproves [10] is to my ear then only unpleasant, when a pause in the sense
makes it perceptible, & then it is equally offensive in any of the four
first feet. I recollect but one instance in the fragment of Mohammed – Disturbs
him – so deep his attention. the pause, breaks the dactyl into a trochee. you
are right I think in recommending the long syllable-ending to precede the
superfluous beginning one of the next line, & this liberty seems inevitable.
I meant it to be read Waš thȳ spīrīt. the “Souňds
thāt rung” make a licentious foot – an amphimacer – & for these are anomalies a preface must plead excuse &
demand acquittal. I sent you all that I have written & you must not forget
that they are the apprencticeship-verses. it is evident that their perceptible
harmony is obtained by no forced accent or unnatural construction of language.
they would very soon become as easy to me & as wieldable as blank verse.
& when Thalaba is finished I shall certainly give them the trial of a long
and important poem. Whether Mohammed be a hero likely to blast a poem in a
Christian country is doubtful. my Mohammed will be, what I believe the Arabian
was in the beginning of his career, sincere in enthusiasm – & it would
puzzle a casuist to distinguish between the belief of inspiration & the
actual impulse. from Coleridge I am promised the half, & we divided the books
according as their subjects suited us – but I expect to have nearly the whole
work. his ardour is not lasting, & the only inconvenience that his
dereliction can occasion will be that I shall write the poem in fragments &
have to seam them together at last. the action ends with the capture of Mecca.
the mob of his wives are kept out of sight – & only[MS torn] the
Egyptian [11]
introduced. Ali [12] is
of course my hero – & if you will recollect the prominent characters of Omar
& Abubeker & Hamza [13] you will see variety enough. Among the Koreish are Amron
& Caled. [14] from Maracci’s curious prolegomena to his refutation of
the Koran [15] I have collected
many obscure facts for the narrative. Still however tho the plan is well formed
& interesting I fear it would not give the hexameters a fair chance. a more
popular story, & one requiring not the elevation of thought & language
which this demands would probably succeed better. a sort of pastoral epic, which
is one of my boy-plans yet unexecuted. there is no need to make enemies to the
poem, when the metre will have so many. give me your judgement upon this point
which it is almost time to decide, for a few weeks will finish Thalaba.
I should have been glad of your Dr
Faustus. [16] in general these Beelzebub stories
require a mixture of the ludicrous with the terrific, which it is difficult, if
possible, to avoid. I have been reprehended for writing such tales, because they
encouraged superstition – an idle remark, − for surely making free with the
Devil is not the way to preserve his respectability.
You probably learnt from Coleridges letter the
rascally conduct of Sheridan about your Norwich riots. [17] at Bristol we have
always something new in the way of chemical experiment. Davy has been very busy in examining
the effects of the different gasses in respiration, & the oxygen-mania must
I think be exploded by them. he has ascertained that by <in> breathing pure oxygen, less oxygen is absorbed than in
breathing common air. I wish you knew the young man – I never saw one who
promised so much, who possessed so compleatly the power powers which make a great man.
Another campaign – & another expedition! [18] Amen. so be it! & if
bleeding be a cure for frenzy, I think this promises to sanity <make> the people of England
sane.
farewell.
yrs Robert Southey.
Notes* Address: To/ Mr Wm Taylor Junr/ Surry
Street/ Norwich./ Single Postmarks: BRISTOL/ FEB 3 1800; B/ FEB 3/ 1800
Endorsement: Ansd 7 Feb MS: Huntington Library,
HM 4826 Previously published: J. W. Robberds (ed.), A Memoir of
the Life and Writings of the Late William Taylor of Norwich, 2
vols (London, 1843), I, pp. 322–327. BACK [1] William Taylor’s ‘The Show, an English Eclogue, in
hexameters’, Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1800), pp.
200–210. BACK [2] Johann Heinrich Voss (1751–1826),
Luise (1795). BACK [3] Muhammad (570–632), Prophet
of Islam, subject of a proposed poem in hexameters by Southey and Coleridge;
see Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood Warter, 4 series
(London, 1849–1850), IV, pp. 18–20. BACK [4] Legendary medieval
outlaw. For Southey’s interest in him as a subject for poetry see
Common-Place Book, ed. John Wood Warter, 4 series
(London, 1849–1850), IV, p. 215. He later collaborated on a Robin Hood poem
with Caroline Bowles (1786–1854; DNB). It was never finished;
a fragment was published in 1847 by Bowles, by then Southey’s widow. BACK [6]
Annual
Anthology (Bristol, 1800), pp. 267–272. All seventeen epigrams
were by Southey, Coleridge or James Webbe Tobin. BACK [7] Epictetus
(55–135), Greek Stoic philosopher. His works are known through his pupil
Lucius Flavius Arrianus’s (c. 86–after 146) Enchiridion, or
‘Handbook’ of Epictetus’s thought. BACK [8] Nitrous oxide, or ‘laughing gas’. BACK [9]
Thalaba the Destroyer
(1801). BACK [10] Friedrich Gottlieb
Klopstock (1724–1803), German poet. Klopstock disapproved of a dactyl and
spondee as the second and third foot of a hexameter; see Taylor to Southey,
December 1799, J.W. Robberds (ed.), A Memoir of the Life and Writings
of the Late William Taylor of Norwich, 2 vols (London, 1843), I,
p. 312. BACK [11] Maria al-Qibtiyya (d. 637)
Egyptian Christian slave who became Muhammad’s wife or concubine. BACK [12] Ali ibn Abi Talib
(598/600–661), cousin and son-in-law of Muhammad; Caliph 656–661. BACK [13] Umar
(586/590–644; Caliph 634–644); Abu Bakr As-Siddiq (573–634; Caliph 632–634);
Hamza ibn Abd al-Muttalib 568/572–625), key early followers of
Muhammad. BACK [14] The Quraysh were the
dominant tribe in Mecca. Khalid ibn al-Walid (592–642) and Amr ibn al-Ab (c.
583/9–664) were military commanders in the tribe and were initially hostile
to Muhammad. BACK [15] Lodovico Maracci,
Alcorani Textus Universus ex Correctioribus Arabum Exemplaribus
Summa Fide, atque Pulcherrimis Charecteribus Descriptus, ... in Latinum
Translatus, 2 vols (Padua, 1698), II, part 2, pp. 76–77 and
appendix. This material was used as a note in Thalaba the
Destroyer (1801), Book 11, line 114. BACK [16] William Taylor’s unfinished
ballad on Dr Faustus, the legendary German who made a pact with the devil
(Taylor to Southey, December 1799, J.W. Robberds (ed.), A Memoir of
the Life and Writings of the Late William Taylor of Norwich, 2
vols (London, 1843), I, p. 327). BACK [17] Coleridge’s letter to William Taylor, 25 January 1800, E.L.
Griggs (ed.), The Collected Letters of Samuel Taylor
Coleridge, 6 vols (Oxford, 1956–1971), I, pp. 564–566. It
mentioned an ‘Extract of a Letter from Norwich, Saturday, January 18 1800’,
published anomymously in the Morning Post, 22 January 1800,
but written by the Whig playwright and politician, Richard Brinsley Sheridan
(1751–1816; DNB). The ‘Extract’ gave an account
of conflicts between local radicals and the 9th Regiment of Foot, in which
the conduct of the soldiers was highly praised. BACK [18] A new invasion of the Continent by an
Anglo-Russian expedition, following on the invasion of Holland in 1799,
was being widely rumoured at this time. BACK |
|