My dear Henry
I have sent off the Review [1] to
Hamilton. [2] its insertion does
not depend upon me, however – unless another account should
already be printed, I suppose he will in common decency
oblige me. You directed your letter to me at Mr Corrys, instead of inclosing
it to him – in consequence it was charged at the Post
Office. the outside should be to him only – & remember
you cannot send above an ounce weight.
Your reading now would be more immediately
pleasant, & every way more profitable – if you erected
land-marks as you went along. Hearing that you are at
Ariosto [3] an idea occurred to me which you may
think of at leisure – & if you like pursue. about two or
perhaps three year <ago,> a violent tho a well
directed attack was made against the Italian Poets, in
particular Ariosto, in the Monthly Magazine. [4] I know you like Ariosto, – & if you
could with critically defend
the Orlando Furioso – it would not be difficult to get your
paper inserted in the same Magazine – & thus put you
perhaps in a way of adding a little to your yearly income,
while you improved yourself still more – I should like to
help you in tracing the history of that Paladin story thro
all its families, from Turpin [5] – or from ought older than Turpin – if
it can be found, analysing & criticising the various
poems. if this made too large a digression in my own book
upon Spanish literature [6] – it might be published
in a separate form. Pulci [7] & Boyardo [8] are doubtless
within your reach – the rarer books I will hunt out, &
furnish all the triumphant poems upon Roncesvalles that are
to be found in Spanish [9] – I think you would like some such
leisure pursuit – that the subject would stimulate you
sufficiently, & eventually the result be useful &
creditable.
Literary habits are not acquired late in
life. if you think them worth acquiring, this is the time.
they are always a source of pleasure – & that pleasure
the most lasting. a more palpable & pressing motive may
be urged to you. at present you are plentifully supplied
with money, but hereafter you will be compelled to
oeconomize, – if the resources of literature should not be
absolutely necessary, you will find
them convenient. I would now young as you are – introduce you to
the Reviews – if it were in my power. but in this way I have
no influence whatever. I could not even transfer my own
employment on going abroad – neither can I now recover
it.
You imagine me in the high road to wealth
& power – & travelling full gallop – the whole truth
is that for the next year I have an income without working –
not exceeding what I should have
else have earned & received. that what I write – in my
vocation – will be for Mr Corry instead of a
newspaper or a bookseller, & that at the years end the
only certainty is that I shall be richer – by whatever my
leisure hours may have produced. A possibility exists that some birth may be given me
in Ireland – a bare possibility – naked as the legal phrase expre to which I have
no claim – of which no expectation. the South of Europe is
still the point of my wishes. a Secretaryship – & the
regular salary there is but £300 – would satisfy my wants –
& I would for it abandon far brighter prospects than lie
before me. the climate annoys me here, & I find no
advantages in England to counterbalance that heavy evil.
I wish it were in my power to visit Norwich –
but God knows when that will be. if there were no other
objection – I am tethered here.
Burnett is
going on miserably & in a way that distresses all his
friends. he is earning a poor & precarious subsistence
by writing for Philips [10] – a task for
which he has neither activity nor knowledge. there is a hope
– but a very poor one – that some office may be found for
him in Ireland – if he will stoop to the duties of common
attention. I labour to convince him, that if he has the
power of ever producing any thing great – any situation is
more favourable than that of a hackney author. that he ought
to take a tutors place – or an Ushers if it could be got,
& give his leisure to what he calls asserting his
literary rank. he writes well – but he really possesses no knowledge
– & from the little use he ever made of leisure I may
say, no love of knowledge for its own sake. & now he has
to get knowledge for the sake of getting literary
reputation. It is not the first instance I have seen of
Vanity misleading a man – but it is the most unfortunate
one. poor fellow – I will do what I can to serve him – &
wish heartily more were in my power.
I have turned over a whole bundle of
Anthology <papers> to some new Editors [11] who are about to publish print a third volume.
the fault they find with my selection ought to imply severer
conduct in themselves. Wm Taylors Hexameters [12] are the great
mark of xxxxx abuse in the
last volume – I smile to hear the Authors of the very
dullest poems there complain of the dull pieces
inserted.
My Mother is
coming to town with Mrs Lovell. I have been
expecting them since Friday – & growling at the lazy
& uncivil trick of not [MS torn] to prevent expectation.
She was well enough to talk of travelling from Bath to
Reading in one day. Of Tom I have not heard for many months. Edward &
his Aunt
both grow worse & worse – every thing I hear of them
only vexes & irritates
& distresses me –
Ediths love –
God bless you –
yr affectionate brother
R Southey.
Monday. November – 30. 1801.
Notes
* Address: To/ Mr
Henry Herbert Southey/ with Mr P.
Martineau/ Norwich./ Single
Stamped:
[illegible]
Postmark: No/ 30/ 1801
MS: Bodleian
Library, MS Don. d. 3
Previously published: Kenneth
Curry (ed.), New Letters of Robert
Southey, 2 vols (London and New York, 1965),
I, pp. 257-259. BACK
[1] An article written by Henry
Herbert Southey for the Critical Review.
Its identity is unknown, and indeed it may not have been
published. Henry Herbert Southey later contributed to
the Annual Review. BACK
[2] Samuel
Hamilton (fl. 1790s-1810s), owner of the Critical
Review, 1799-1804. BACK
[3] Ludovico
Ariosto (1474-1533), Orlando Furioso
(1532). BACK
[4] See Monthly
Magazine, 8 (August 1799), 440-442; 8
(December 1799), 870-872. The articles were signed
‘G.T.’. BACK
[5] Archbishop Turpin, 8th-century Archbishop
of Reims, and reputed author of the 12th-century
forgery, Historia de Vita Caroli Magni et
Rolandi, an early source for the story of
Orlando. BACK
[6] Southey may have still been considering
writing a book on the history of Spanish (and
Portuguese) literature. BACK
[7] Luigi Pulci (1432-1484), Italian poet,
whose Morgante (1483) also concerned
Orlando. BACK
[8] Matteo Boiardo (1441-1494), Italian poet,
whose Orlando Innamorato (1495) provided
the early history of the hero of Ariosto’s
Orlando Furioso. BACK
[9] The battle of Roncesvalles in the
Pyrenees in 778 was a minor affair, in which part of the
rearguard of Charlemagne’s (742-814; King of the Franks
768-814, Holy Roman Emperor 800-814) army was defeated
by local Basque forces. In legend it became the site of
the last stand of the hero Roland, and the paladins of
Charlemagne (of whom Orlando was one). There is an
alternative Spanish tradition in which Roland was
defeated by the legendary hero Bernardo del Carpio,
whose deeds were most famously commemorated in Bernardo
de Balbuena (1561-1627), El Bernardo
(1624). BACK
[10] Sir Richard Phillips (1767-1840;
DNB), publisher and proprietor of the
Monthly Magazine. BACK
[11] The project to produce a
successor to the Annual Anthology (1799)
and (1800). James Webbe Tobin was one of the proposed
editors. BACK
[12] William Taylor (under the
signature ‘RYALTO’), ‘The Show, an English Eclogue’,
Annual Anthology (Bristol, 1800), pp.
200-210. If Southey is referring to reviews he was
mistaken, as Taylor’s poem was not singled out for
particular attention. He could, however, be reporting
things said to him in conversation. BACK