Friday night.
To night I have been overhauling old papers – a business
which to me is truly detestable – old recollections rise as
if it were a rehearsal of Doomsday. old mirth that makes one
unhappy – & letters from those who are dead! – a whole
heap are already piled for the candle – another I have
thrown aside as precious materials for
The Whole Works &c
of the late
Robert Southey! –
a publication which I hope may be long delayed – but such a
heap I shall lay by. I have received too many odd letters to
be all wasted.
You see what I send you. among the burnanda
are a theme which Vincent
[1]
returned with a long row for abusing Burke [2] in it – & a fragment
of the ribband about which Morrell [3]
& Joe
Phillimore quarrelled & fought & made a
rebellion, eleven years ago. [4] so long is it since I was a school boy
–
Some letters have made me more than
ordinarily serious. the two which I received from Lisbon on
my being rejected at Ch. Church – & afterward on
abandoning Oxford. [5] ten years have
materially altered me. the flavour of the liquor is the same
– & I believe it is still sound – but it has ceased to
froth & to sparkle. – what what avails it to discover where <&
how> you lost your way upon a road that is never more to
be travelled? –
Howbeit there is a long account to balance
the loss. in no other circumstances should I have possessed
the powers & knowledge which I now feel. – there they
lie – & I wish my Executor – that is the Gentleman
whoever he be that will one day execute me biographically –
or rather necrologically dissect me – had the trouble of
picking them up & arranging them.
There are more relics of poor Bunbury –
for my own <part> I hate these memorials & had
almost as lief meet the ghost of a dead friend as these
bodily & tangible remembrancers. there are some savages
who bury with the dead all his arms & cloathes – I am
somewhat of their way of feeling only burning would be
better — & a high wind for the ashes.
God bless you Wynn
–
I wrote this morning to Wrexham before your letter came
& inclosed the Dog story. [6]
Notes
* Endorsement: Aug/ 1802
MS: National
Library of Wales, MS 4811D
Previously published:
John Wood Warter (ed.), Selections from the
Letters of Robert Southey, 4 vols (London,
1856), I, pp. 202-203 [in part].
Dating note: Dated
from the letter’s content. The letter belongs to
early-mid August 1802, and was written after that to
Wynn of [6 August 1802]. BACK
[1] i.e. work returned to the schoolboy Southey. BACK
[2] Edmund Burke (1729/30-1797;
DNB). BACK
[3] Southey’s Westminster contemporary Deacon
Morrell (d. 1854), in later life a clergyman. BACK
[4] When Morrell and Phillimore fought each
other in November 1791 the whole school turned out to
watch them, refusing the headmaster’s summons to
return. BACK
[5] i.e. letters sent to Southey by Herbert Hill in 1792
and 1794, respectively. Vincent had been instrumental in
Southey’s rejection by Christ Church, Oxford; see
Southey to Grosvenor Charles Bedford, [c. 29 September
1792], The Collected Letters of Robert Southey.
Part 1, Letter 25. BACK
[6] The ‘dog Story’ came from Gaspar
Pérez de Villagrá (1555-1620), who served as a
captain in the 1598 expedition that first colonised
New Mexico. His epic Historia de la Nueva
México (1610), Canto 19, lines 221-244,
described how he was forced to kill his dog for
food. However, he then found he was unable to eat
the animal. Southey’s letter containing the story
has not survived. BACK