|
|
| |
John
Clare's "Domestic
Tree":
Freedom and Home
in "The
Fallen Elm"
Timothy
Ziegenhagen,
Northland College
Introduction
-
A
complex
expression
of loss
and anger,
John Clare's
poem "The
Fallen
Elm" speaks
to
feelings
of
powerlessness
in
the
face
of
unchecked
economic
greed. Parliamentary
enclosure
and the
development
of new,
scientifically-based
agricultural
practices
(like crop
rotation)
changed
the face
of the poet's
native Helpston
landscape.
In an effort
to boost
agricultural
efficiency
and to increase
profits,
large landowners
leveled
hills, rechannelled
streams,
and put
up fences,
growing
hedgerows,
and putting
common lands
under the
plow. While "The
Fallen Elm" describes
the
hidden
costs
of the
loss
of
a single
tree,
it also
explores
the
misuse
of
the
rhetoric
of
freedom
towards
the
privatization
of
the
common
lands
through
parliamentary
enclosure.
What
was
really
lost
as
the
result
of
this
dispossession?
How
can
enclosure
in
Clare's
time
connect
with
the
drive
towards
privatization
(of
water
rights,
of
intellectual
property,
of
genetic
codes)
in our
own?
How
can
the
loss
of
a beloved
landscape
affect
one's
sense
of local
history?
By
exploring
these
connections,
students
can
come
to
a more
full
understanding
of
the
complexity
of
Clare's
great
protest
poem.
-
There
are
two
steps
an instructor
might
take
when
introducing
students
to
the
sense
of
loss
pervading
the
first
section
of "The
Fallen Elm." Using
Clare's
poem as
a touchstone,
the instructor
might lead
students
in an analysis
of the intimate
connections
they form
with very
particular
natural
landmarks
(trees climbed,
caves explored),
helping
them to
consider
more generally
the ramifications
of this
intimacy.
Such an
exploration
will help
students
better understand
Clare's
unique sense
of place,
how the
poet's understanding
of "home" encompasses
a nascent
ecological
point of
view. An
instructor
might also
explore
the more
overt political
content
of "The
Fallen Elm," which
includes
a fierce
condemnation
of the rhetoric
of freedom;
this rhetoric
seeks to
legitimize
the destruction
of the natural
world and
the enslavement
of the rural
poor. Modern
students
of Clare's
work coming
from rural
areas near
large cities—areas
transformed
from farmland
into sprawling
suburban
housing
developments—are
quick to
make connections
between
the enclosure
so vividly
depicted
in Clare's
poems and
the rapid "Californication" (to
use
an Edward
Abbeyism)
taking
place
in
their
own
backyards.
The
descriptions
of
change
brought
about
by the
agricultural
revolution
in
nineteenth-century
England
may
speak
to
their
own
experiences,
in
which
Walmart
and
large
box
retailers
appear
in the
midst
of
cornfields,
and
rapid
suburban
development
swallows
up
family-owned
century
farms.
I.
The Fallen
Elm: The
Loss of
an Intimate
Landmark
-
In
recent years,
much has
been written
about how
Clare's
poems reflect
a proto-environmental
awareness
of natural
systems
(see McKusick's Green
Writing as
well as
Bate's The
Song of
the Earth).
Margaret
Grainger's
edition
of
the
poet's
natural
history
writings
show
his
interest
in
depicting
nature
in prose
as well
as in
poetry;
impressed
by
the
writings
of
Gilbert
White,
Clare
hoped
to record
the
natural
phenomena
he
saw
in the
fields
around
Helpston,
the
small
Northamptonshire
town
in which
he lived.
So precise
were
Clare's
observations
as
a naturalist
that
Edmund
Gosse
complained
the
poet "was
a camera,
not a mind," suggesting
that he
viewed Clare's
work as
a collection
of static
images,
frozen in
time (qtd.
in Storey
17). The
essence
of Clare's
poetry,
however,
is movement,
flux, process.
Every new
observation—a
newly-discovered
orchid variety,
for example—affects
how Clare
perceives
the world
around him,
and he delights
in chronicling
a world
that changes
from one
moment to
the next.
John Barrell
shows that
in relation
to the highly-structured
visual landscapes
of eighteenth-century
nature poetry,
Clare "developed
a whole
aesthetic
of disorder" (152)
in which
the descriptive
elements
of a poem
are "parts
of
the
same
complex
impression,
not
just
this and that,
but this while that" (157).
An
ecologist
by
informal
experience
and
careful
observation,
Clare
describes
not
only
a particular
place,
but
a particular
place
at a
unique
moment
in time,
under
distinct,
novel
conditions.
-
Clare's
natural
history
writings
are
astonishing
for
their
clarity
of
perception
and
their
objective—one
even might
say scientific—way
in which
the poet
records
what he
observes.
These descriptions
of natural
phenemona
are not
static,
and he excels
at "utilizing
the kinetic
elements
inherent
in the picturesque
vision.
. . . Clare
not only
admits more
detail into
his work
than most
of his predecessors,
he is also
aware that
those details
are in constant
mutation" (Brownlow
116). Clare's
kinetic
descriptions
reflect
living landscapes,
made up
of dynamic
ecosystems,
changing
weather
patterns,
human and
animal activities,
plant growth
and decay.
His constant—and,
some might
say, obsessive—rewriting
of local
scenes,
bird species,
and plants
evidences
his view
of nature
in flux,
in need
of continual "updating."
-
To
give
a sense
of
the
kinetic
movement
in
Clare's
work,
the
instructor
might
find
it
useful
to
center
early
discussions
around
how
the
poet "looks" at
the natural
world. Students
could be
asked to
list the
things that
Clare sees
in his poems,
but also
what he
doesn't
see: Which
images stick
out, and
which are
absent?
What metaphors
does Clare
use, and
how do these
metaphors
work to
make the
reader see
natural
phenomena
in new ways?
Nature writing
tends to
emphasize
the visual,
so students
can be asked
to analyze
the "camera
eye" of
the writer;
such class
discussions
can be speculative
(especially
if students
have training
in film
theory!),
but they
can also
help students
begin to
understand
how Clare's
poems emphasize
natural
systems
from one
poem to
the next—like
a series
of windows
framing
dynamic
images of
the natural
world. It's
useful to
look at
bundles
of related
poems to
build on
this sense:
an exploration
of three
bird poems
together
demonstrates
Clare's "thick" description
of habitat,
how he portrays
instinctual
behaviors,
the look
of a crow
as it crosses
the afternoon
sky.
-
Clare's
writings
display
his
strong
emotional
attachment
to
the
landscape
surrounding
Helpston,
a "rootedness" (no
pun intended)
and an awareness "of
the relation
of all creatures
to a habitat
in which
the human
observer
is also
implicated" (McKusick
80). To
quote Edward
Storey, "Clare's
contact
with the
land was
a physical
one" (51).
Such a connection
is intimate,
based on
a day-to-day
familiarity
with a place,
which is
really the
sum of its
natural
processes:
The loss
of a single
life has
a negative
impact on
the entire
system,
which becomes
less diverse
(and less
resilient). While
Clare was
obviously
no ecologist
in the modern
sense—the
term ecology
itself wouldn't
even be
coined till
after his
death—he
nevertheless
had
a clear,
intuitive
sense
of the
value
of
a diverse
ecosystem,
and
he could
be
very
protective
of
animals,
trees,
streams,
and
even
landforms.
In
a letter
to
his
publisher
John
Taylor
in
1821,
Clare
expresses
his
grief
at
the
impending
loss
of a
pair
of old
elm
trees
growing
near
his
cottage:
my
two
favorite
Elm
trees
at
the
back
of
the
hut
are
condemned
to
dye
it shocks
me but
tis
true
the
saveage
who
owns
them
thinks
they
have
done
their
best & now
he wants
to make
use of the
benefits
he can get
from selling
them—O
was this
country
Egypt & was
I but a
caliph the
owner shoud
loose his
ears for
his arragant
presumption & the
first wretch
that buried
his axe
in their
roots shoud
hang on
their branches
as a terror
to the rest—I
have been
several
mornings
to bid them
farewell—had
I £100
to spare
I would
buy their
reprieves—but
they
must
dye.
. .
. (qtd.
in
Bate
172)
Clare's
shock
at the
loss
of
the
two
elms
is heightened
by
the
injustice
of
their
deaths.
Like
an innocent
man
standing
on
the
gallows,
the
trees
are "condemned" to
die and
past "reprieve";
they must
be cut because
the owner
wants the "benefits" of "selling
them." Their
usefulness
to birds,
or to humans
desiring
shade, is
not considered.
Such a domestic
function
is un-enclosable,
and Clare's
own emotional
connection
to these
trees—while
quite powerful—counts
for nothing
on a balance
sheet. The
poet's fantasy
of cropping
the ears
of the "wretch" who
would
chop
down
the
trees
underscores
the
illegality
of
the
act
and
links
chopping
trees
with
counterfeiting:
Clare
here
suggests
that
the
tree
has
some
essential
(and
unenclosable)
value
that
has
been
stolen
by its
greedy,
coining
owner.
-
Clare's "The
Fallen Elm" memorializes
a beloved
tree and
exposes
the injustice
perpetrated
by an economic
system that
ignores
its ecological—one
could say
its domestic—value,
requiring
it
be cut
down.
By making
the
tree
a part
of
his
family,
Clare
argues
for
a new
relationship
between
humans
and
living
things,
all
part
of
a continuous
ecological
whole.
The
opening
lines
of the
poem
beautifully
portray
the
tree
as
it leans
closely
over
Clare's
cottage,
protecting
the
poet
and
his
family
and
offering
a kind
of gentle
companionship:
Old
elm that
murmured
in our chimney
top
The
sweetest anthem autumn ever
made
And
into mellow whispering calms
would drop
When
showers fell on thy many-coloured
shade
And
when dark tempests mimic thunder
made
While
darkness came as it would
strangle light
With
the black tempest of a winter
night
That
rocked thee like a cradle
to thy root,
How
did I love to hear the winds
upbraid
Thy
strength without—while
all within was mute.
It
seasoned comfort to our hearts'
desire,
We
felt thy kind protection like
a friend
And
edged our chairs up closed
to the fire,
Enjoying
comforts that was never penned.
(lines 1-14)
The
lush
consonance
in
this
passage
evokes
a kind
of Keatsian,
luxurious
ease
(especially
when
read
aloud).
Indeed,
Clare's
letter
to Taylor
about
the
condemned
elms
was
written
around
the
time
that
Clare
heard
of
Keats's
death
in Italy,
and
one
wonders
if
the
sonorous,
Keatsian
qualities
in
the
above
lines
represent
a kind
of subtle
elegy.
The
domestic
images
in the
poem's
first
thirty-six
lines
underscore
the
fact
that
the
tree
gives
both
protection
and
comfort;
the
soft
murmur
through
the
chimney
links
the
elm
to tender
(and
attentive)
parental
care,
a detail
Clare
reinforces
by
depicting
the
tree
as
a "cradle," a
safe place
protecting
the human
family from
the violence
of the elements.
The elm
is nature's "domestic
tree" (line
18); its "homely
bower" (line
21) attracts
children,
who build "playhouse
rings of
sticks and
stone" (line
24) under
its protective
branches.
Social psychologist
M. Kirkby
has researched
the attraction
of children
to the canopies
of trees,
which provide
a kind of
refuge associated
with the
safety of
a home environment
(1-12).
Indeed,
Clare's
pun on the
word homely—with
connotations
of simplicity
and the
domestic—connects
the elm
in an intimate
way with
the poet's
own cottage,
so that
tree and
home become
inextricably
associated.
The loss
of the tree,
Clare suggests,
is intensely
personal,
a "domestic" loss—a
death
in the
family.
-
Part
of the
tree's
power
is its
tough
longevity—it
is the "sacred
dower" of "time" (line
17)
(again,
one
is
reminded
of
Keats
and
his
Grecian
urn,
the "bride" of "time").
Children
play
under
its
branches,
and
their
games
establish
an
associative
link
between
comfort,
the
domestic,
and
nature.
Such
games—tree-climbing
and
apple
gathering—perhaps
domesticate
nature
on
one
level,
but
they
also
expand
human
zones
of
intimacy
to
include "wild" spaces.
Early
childhood
exploration
can
lead
to
an
almost
sacramental
relationship
with
particular
locales,
so
that
these
locales
gain
the
coloring
of
personality,
heavily
invested
with
an
individual's
history.
A
visit
to
a
loved
spot
(like
Wordsworth's "Tintern
Abbey," to
give
but
one
example)
can
become
a
kind
of
ritual,
an
opportunity
for
self-reflection.
The
seeming
permanence
of
the
tree
enables
the
poet
to
form
a
specific
and
intimate
bond—one
steeped
in
his
family's
continuous
history.
The
elm
is "steadfast
to
[its]
home" (line
20),
taking
a
kind
of
ownership
over
the
humans
living
under
it,
even
as
the
humans
take
a
kind
of
affectionate
ownership
over
it.
Its
destruction
thus
makes
Clare's
own
family
more
vulnerable.
As
Jonathan
Bate
writes, "the
elm
tree
is
a
temporal
as
well
as
a
spatial
landmark
[for
Clare].
Because
it
was
there
when
he
was
a
boy,
it
guarantees
the
continuity
of
his
own
life" (174-175).
Clare's
sense
of
loss
at
the
felling
of
the
tree
is
related
| |