|  | |
"Teaching British Romantic Drama: A Senior Seminar in Studies in
Drama"
Marjean D. Purinton, Texas Tech University
Background
1. During the spring 2006 semester, I taught a senior-level course in British
Romantic Drama for English majors, a course that satisfied for them a genre
upper-division requirement. My first-day assessments of my students revealed
that several had taken an introductory course in drama, and some had taken a
junior-level course in Shakespeare,
but no one enrolled in the course had pursued a course in the Romantic
period. This course was, therefore, the students’ only contact with the
Romantic period as well as a course involving the reading, discussing,
writing, and performing of drama from the 1780s to the 1830s.
2. During the spring 2005, when I was teaching the senior capstone course in
English, I included Joanna Baillie’s 1798
Plays on the Passions (Count
Basil, The Tryal, and De Monfort) in a culminating activity I
termed “The Baillie Project,” and during
the fall 2006 semester, I included Baillie’s Count Basil in a sequence of
plays for an Honors College course entitled Introduction to Drama:
Tragically Monstrous, a course that is offered as a First-Year Experience
requirement for incoming Honors College students. The first-year students
read Count Basil in tandem with Euripedes’ Medea and Shakespeare’s Othello. When I teach the
junior-level course in the British Romantic period, I routinely include two
or three dramas, including Count Basil and Thomas
Bellamy’s 1789 The Benevolent Planters (both are
anthologized in Mellor and Matlak’s British Literature
1780-1830). And when I teach the graduate-level course in
British Romantic literature, I add P. B.
Shelley’s 1819 The Cenci and Lord Byron’s 1822 Manfred to the two plays from the undergraduate
course. My point is that while I had integrated Romantic drama into other
courses I had taught, I had never taught an entire course devoted to
Romantic drama until the spring of 2006. In spring, 2007, I taught the
graduate version of the course as an Advanced Problems topic entitled
British Romantic Drama. This course was actually a “piggy-back” course in
that it was taught as a graduate seminar and an Honors College seminar for
4000-level credit for English majors and minors with the appropriate
prerequisites.
Course Description
3. To help students identify what a course entitled Senior Seminar in Studies
in Drama: British Romantic Drama was about, I supplied the following
description, which provided them a sense of the cultural and political
aspects of the course we would emphasize as well as strategies they could
use for reading the plays:
4. After more than a decade of recovering and recontextualizing Romantic drama
in Great Britain, we have come to recognize the central role that drama
played during the period. Romantic drama, staged and read, was its culture’s
most popular medium, crossing class, national, and gender divisions, as well
as a serious literary form written by the period’s major writers. Manifested
in diverse ways (melodrama, gothic, verse drama, opera, pantomime, puppet
shows, children’s drama, monodrama, tragedy, comedy, burlesque), Romantic
drama performed, reflected, and influenced the political, social, and
cultural issues of its day. The Licensing Act of 1737, granting patents to
the Royal Theatres of Drury Lane, Covent Garden, and the Haymarket, and the
Lord Chamberlain’s censorship (willingness to grant performance licenses)
meant that playwrights had to be clever in their stagings of controversial
and taboo subjects.
5. In this seminar, we will examine diverse plays from the period as
negotiations of theatrical politics. We will look at the performative
aspects of Romantic drama, including the role of the actor, the design of
stages, non-dramatic performances (such as itinerant medical shows), and
private theatricals. We will consider the thematic and dramaturgical
handling of the revolutionary and changing Romantic culture from which its
drama emanated. We will contextualize the ways in which Romantic drama
engaged with the late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth centuries as British
society became increasingly democratized, commercialized, and bourgeois. We
will discover how the theatre was a site for performing gender and how
playwriting was particularly problematic for women. We will situate Romantic
drama in the history of theatre.
Textbooks
- Baillie, Joanna. Plays on the Passions. 1798. Ed. Peter Duthie.
Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2001. ISBN: 1-55111-185-3
- Cox, Jeffrey N., and Michael Gamer, eds. The
Broadview Anthology of Romantic Drama. Peterborough, ON:
Broadview, 2003. ISBN: 1-55111-298-1
Teaching Philosophy
I ask students to come to this seminar prepared to engage in
interactive learning, to be willing to explore all dimensions of Romantic
drama as reading and performance texts, as stage spectacles, as serious
commentary on the period and its culture. I inform them during our first
class meeting that because my pedagogy and scholarship are informed by
feminism and feminist theory, they will encounter a learning environment of
decentralized authority with an invitation to participate in their own
learning/discovery process, their own knowledge- and meaning-making. I tell
them that because Romantic drama is a genre that uses performance as well as
the printed page, they should be prepared to engage in some reading and
performance activities that will require them to learn affectively as well
as intellectually. Students are given multiple opportunities to pursue their
own interests and lines of inquiry involving the drama, and my writing and
discussion prompts are directive but open-ended.
Learning Outcomes
If you successfully complete this course, you should be able
- To interpret knowledge of the human condition, as reflected in British
Romantic drama, in its diverse generic manifestations and from various
theoretical perspectives;
- To identify current and historical developments in studies of British
Romantic drama;
- To analyze theoretical and critical arguments about British Romantic
drama and the Romantic theatre;
- To integrate primary and secondary source evidence into analytical
writing that presents close textual readings;
- To assess the ways in which British Romantic drama and scholarship
about it have contributed to our understanding of Romanticism.
Learning Outcomes Assessments
If you successfully complete this course, you should be able to demonstrate
the above learning outcomes by
- Writing response papers that require you to summarize, to explicate,
and to judge the content of assigned Romantic dramas;
- Contributing to seminar discussions with analyses, comparisons,
contrasts of Romantic dramas as well as the scholarship on Romantic
dramas;
- Conducting a brief literature search of relevant secondary materials
and assessing their importance to close readings of Romantic
dramas;
- Reading and responding to contemporary performance reviews of assigned
Romantic dramas;
- Writing a research-based project that requires you to weigh, select,
and apply close textual readings and critical studies of Romantic drama.
Other Course Objectives
- To consider the ways in which Romantic drama has affected the field of
Romantic literary studies and our understandings of late eighteenth- and
early nineteenth-century British culture;
- To recognize and validate diverse perspectives and experiences that
inform our readings of Romantic drama;
- To work out the particular performance dimensions of Romantic drama
that are important to our understandings and appreciations of it as a
unique cultural expression;
- To foster professional development;
- To collaborate in the learning/discovery/sharing process;
- To learn something about ourselves and our responses to literary
expressions;
- To enjoy reading Romantic drama and the discovery activities which
enrich our understandings and appreciation of Romantic literature.
Course Policies
- Come to class ready to share and to learn. Read assignments and bring
texts of the plays with you to class;
- Attendance is required for you to pass this course;
- All assignments must be submitted for you to receive a passing
grade;
- All assignments must be prepared according to my instructions;
- Maintain academic integrity. The deliberate use of someone else’s
language, ideas, or original material without acknowledging its source
constitutes plagiarism. Plagiarism is intellectual dishonesty and
thievery. If you plagiarize, you will fail the course, and the incident
will be reported to the university.
- If because of a disabling condition, you require some special
arrangements in order to meet course requirements, you should let me
know. Please present appropriate verification from Student Disability
Services, Access TECH.
- If you are absent from class for the observation of a religious holy
day, you shall be allowed to make up assignments scheduled for that day
within a reasonable time after the absence if, no later than the
fifteenth day after the first day of the semester, you have notified me
of each scheduled class that you will miss for a religious holy day.
Learning Environment
- This is a discussion/participation seminar. Everyone should feel free
to contribute ideas, experiences, knowledge, reactions; therefore, we
need to maintain an environment in which everyone’s opinions and
perspectives are respected and valued. From our diversity, we can
multiply what we share and learn. Help us to maintain an environment
conducive to interactive learning by turning off cellular phones and
beepers, by arriving on time, and by avoiding distracting
behaviors.
- In this seminar, your voice is valuable and valued. Be willing to
assume an active role in your learning/discovery process.
- Our reading, activities, and schedule will be fluid and flexible, and
you are invited to help shape what we pursue and emphasize.
- Because Romantic drama is a genre that uses performance as well as a
kind of literary text, we will engage in some reading and performative
activities that will require you to be willing to engage with our
readings in more than intellectual ways. Be open to new ways of reading,
learning, and responding.
- Because some of the topics at the heart of Romantic drama involve
gender, class, and race, you may discover materials in this course that
present issues, language, and affective areas that are sensitive. It is
important, therefore, for us to be sensitive to our colleagues’ needs,
feelings, and responses to these matters.
- Enjoy the community, personal growth, and professional development
this seminar hopes to engender.
Course Requirements and Grade Determination
- 3 Response Papers (3-5 pages each) = 300 points (100 points
each)
- 2 Discovery Activities = 300 points (150 points each)
- Attendance/Participation/Performance = 100 points
- Researched Critical Analysis = 300 points
- Total Points = 1000 points
- Grading Scale: 90% = A, 80% = B, 70% = C, 60% = D
Tentative Assignments Schedule
| Response Paper #1 |
Thursday, January 31 |
| Response Paper #2 |
Thursday, March 23 |
| Response Paper #3 |
Tuesday, April 25 |
| Discovery Activity #1 |
Thursday, March 2 |
| Discovery Activity #2 |
Tuesday, April 11 |
| Researched Critical Analysis Proposal |
Tuesday, February 14 |
| Research Critical Analysis |
Thursday, May 4 |
Tentative Reading Schedule
| Thursday, January 12 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. vii-xxxiv and 325-329
A Bold Stroke for a Husband (C&G
1-38) |
| Tuesday, January 17 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 311-317 |
| Thursday, January 19 |
Every One Has His Faults
(C&G 39-74) |
| Tuesday, January 24 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 318-325 |
| Thursday, January 26 |
The Tryal (Duthie
217-298) |
| Tuesday, January 31 |
Catch Up |
| Thursday, February 1 |
De Monfort (Duthie
301-387) |
| Tuesday, February 7 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 380-383 |
| Thursday, February 9 |
Duthie, pp. 424-458 |
| Tuesday, February 14 |
Catch Up |
| Thursday, February 16 |
Orra (C&G 133-64) |
| Tuesday, February 21 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 370-378 |
| Thursday, February 23 |
Remorse (C&G
165-204) |
| Tuesday, February 28 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 389-392 |
| Thursday, March 2 |
Catch Up |
| Tuesday, March 7 |
Catch Up |
| Thursday, March 9 |
The Cenci (C&G
221-259) |
| Tuesday, March 14 |
Spring Break |
| Thursday, March 16 |
Spring Break |
| Tuesday, March 21 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 393-398 |
| Thursday, March 23 |
Catch Up |
| Tuesday, March 28 |
Catch Up |
| Thursday, March 30 |
Count Basil (Duthie
117-213) |
| Tuesday, April 4 |
Catch Up |
| Thursday, April 6 |
Catch Up |
| Tuesday, April 11 |
Catch Up |
| Thursday, April 13 |
Sardanapalus (C&G
261-309) |
| Tuesday, April 18 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 398-392 |
| Thursday, April 20 |
Blue-Beard (C&G 75-96)
and Timour the Tartar (C&G
97-116) |
| Tuesday, April 25 |
Catch Up |
| Thursday, April 27 |
Cox & Gamer, pp. 329-351 |
| Tuesday, May 2 |
Last Day of Class |
Descriptions of Assignments
Response Papers
Brief (3-5 pages) “informal” responses to readings, discussions, videos,
performances, issues, controversies, activities generated during the
seminar. I will offer specific prompts for each paper. I want you to engage
conceptually with the drama and the theatre of the Romantic period, and this
activity is a kind of “thinking-on-paper” writing in which you are still its
primary reader, but I am dropping in on the thinking process. Make your
reflections honest, useful, and specific. These responses may serve you well
later in your reshaping of initial reactions and ideas into more
reader-based discourse for the researched critical analysis assignment. (See
the Appendix with specific writing prompts for the three response
papers.)
Discovery Activities
Discovery Activity #1: Secondary Sources Activity
To augment your Critical Analysis with secondary sources (research), you
will need to do some library work.
Locate five secondary sources germane to your project. Remember that at
least one source must be a journal article and that only two sources may be
derived on-line.
Once you have located relevant secondary materials, here’s what you need to
do:
- Write the working title and thesis of your Critical Analysis;
- Outline your major points of development as you see them at this
time;
- Provide complete bibliographical entries for your secondary sources in
MLA Style. If you need to review MLA Style specifications for your
sources, use this website: www.lib.ttu.edu/reference/style/htm;
- Indicate briefly how each source will be useful to your Critical
Analysis, support or refute your thesis, demonstrate points of
development, explain evidence, etc.
Here are the website and linked websites that will be useful for on-line
secondary sources. You will also find bibliographies on these websites:
Here are some journal titles that will be useful for articles:
- Studies in Romanticism
- Nineteenth-Century Contexts
- The Wordsworth Circle
- Romanticism
- Women’s Writing
- The Keats-Shelley Journal
- The Byron Journal
- Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature
- European Romantic Review
- Prism(s): Essays in Romanticism
- The Keats-Shelley Review
- Gothic Studies
Remember that secondary sources can be critical, theoretical, or
extra-literary in nature.
Remember that works published before 1985 are generally not as useful to us
as recently published work, especially if the secondary source is critical
in nature. Look for something current, whether your secondary source is a
monograph, an essay in a collection of essays, or a journal article. Try to
discover the secondary
sources for your project.
Discovery Activity #2: Contemporary Reviews Creative Activity
This Discovery Activity requires two parts.
Part 1
Select a set of reviews for a play we have read and discuss what they reveal
about the performance(s) of that play. Refer to specific reviews, and cite
direct quotations parenthetically in-text. Use the following questions to
guide your thinking and writing.
- What do we learn about scenery, costuming, actors, audience, critical
opinions, and the entertainment value of the play?
- What about the play was especially popular and/or
controversial?
- How do the reviews offer us insights about the play that we might not
otherwise perceive from our reading of the text?
Part 2
Next, imagine that you were staging the play, or reworking the play for
cinema or Video/TV, and describe/discuss what obstacles or challenges you
would have with this project. Use the following questions to guide your
thinking and writing.
- Who would be your primary audience? Why?
- Would you stage or shoot the entire play, or would you make cuts?
Where and why?
- How might you make the play relevant to contemporary audiences, such
as manipulating the special effects, casting star performers, creating
fantastic scenery and music?
- What do you learn about the play by imagining it from a director’s
point of view or from the perspective of performance rather than from
the position of literary student/scholar?
This activity is designed to tap into your creative and imaginative
responses to Romantic drama, so have fun with it. Remember that you do not
have to re-write the script, but you do want to detail how the staging or
shooting of the play might be rendered.
Researched Critical Analysis Proposal
Write an informal (1-2 pages) proposal in which you indicate what you are
planning to develop in your Researched Critical Analysis. I am your
audience. Include the following information:
- Working title and thesis (argument or position) of your
project;
- Play(s) that will be included as primary source material;
- Working major points of development and critical approach (i.e.,
historical, feminist, Marxist, post-colonial);
- Tell me what you hope to accomplish (beyond the grade) in this
project. (Can it be useful for you beyond this course, for
example?)
- List the secondary sources you have investigated as relevant to your
project and indicate how you plan to use these materials (rely on
Discovery Activity #1 here);
- List any difficulties or questions you perceive at this point in the
planning and development of your Researched Critical Analysis.
Researched Critical Analysis
The culminating project for this seminar on British Romantic Drama will be
a critical analysis (research, literary, and persuasive) featuring one or
more plays that we have read.
While I recognize that what you may submit may well represent work in
progress more than a “finished” product, you want to think about this
project as one that can offer you a writing sample for your professional
dossier (e.g., application to graduate school, law school, scholarships), a
potential paper for a conference presentation, an essay that you can return
to and expand as a senior thesis or in graduate courses. Strive for about
7-10 pages of discourse followed by notes (if applicable) and your works
cited listing.
Your audience will be your classmates (including me), and so before you
write, do an audience analysis. Here are some helpful questions to ask about
your audience.
What do they know about the issue and the play(s) at the center of my
analysis? How can I get them engaged in my discussion? How can I communicate
clearly and persuasively, using primary and secondary evidence? Remember
that we share the reading and understanding of the dramas, but in order to
access your arguments and evidence, you will have to supply contextual clues
and connections.
Here are some recommendations as you engage in the process of writing:
- Make your position (thesis) focused, directional, argumentative, and
specific;
- Discuss a limited number of supporting or major points of
development;
- Draft a 3-5-page position paper using your own knowledge (including
all class-derived materials) and the play(s) you are analyzing or
including in your project—exhaust what you know in this draft that
involves a close reading of your text(s)—here’s where one or more of
your Response Papers may be useful;
- Begin each supporting point with a clear topic sentence, and practice
good paragraph development;
- Select evidence from the play(s) you are including in your analysis
(primary-source evidence);
- Analyze your audience carefully, for it is crucial to your argument.
Select the best quotations and paraphrases from primary and secondary
sources to support your major points of development and your argument
(thesis);
- Set up the context of evidence (primary and secondary) for your
audience and make reasonable connections between evidence and your major
points of development, and then between that supporting point and your
thesis;
- Contextualize adequately the evidence for your readers—help them to
access it and then to see its importance to your argument;
- Insert primary-source evidence correctly (use MLA Style for in-text
citations) and explain it thoroughly;
- Turn to your five secondary sources to supplement your discussion (at
least one must be a journal article, and only two may be derived from
online sites);
- Follow MLA Style (in-text or endnotes) in citing secondary source
materials (summaries, paraphrases, quotations);
- Use secondary sources only to supplement your discussion, to
demonstrate your knowledge of current scholarly discourse about British
Romantic drama. Points of agreement or disagreement might be included in
your discussion or packaged as endnotes. Remember that the analysis
should reflect your thesis, arguments, developments, and discussion.
Keep the number and length of all direct quotations to a minimum. You
are the primary author of this researched critical analysis.
If you need assistance with your writing or revising process and inserting
and documenting secondary sources, seek help at the University Writing
Center, in the English Building, first floor of the east wing. You may make
an appointment to visit a tutor there, and you can submit online work in
progress. There is no fee.
Hours: Monday -- Friday 9:00-5:00
Telephone: 742.2476, x 269
Attendance/Participation/Performance
Come to each seminar prepared to participate in your own learning process.
Read the assigned plays and reviews. Bring questions to share and to
stimulate discussion. In this seminar, we want to build a community of
teachers/learners/scholars, and so be willing to talk to each other and not
just to me.
We want our exchanges to be thoughtful, responsible, and professional. As
with good writing, specific comments and questions yield better responses.
Try to ground and situate your comments and responses within our readings,
cultural or theoretical contexts, or experiential knowledge. In other words,
we want to avoid communication that is the more student-based
“shooting-from-the-hip” form and to strive for the more scholarly,
professional, informed, and critical discussion during our seminar
meetings.
You may also find yourself led outside your “comfort zone” a bit by seminar
activities that require our reading aloud or enacting parts of the plays we
read and discuss, experimenting with staging and voice that generally do not
occur in conventional English courses. Be willing to take risks and to
exercise creative aspects of “reading” and “learning” that you might
otherwise leave latent. You get credit for your willingness to participate,
so enjoy this opportunity, for you have nothing to lose and possibly some
interesting things to learn about yourself by engaging in a form of
participation that is vital to our understand and appreciation of British
Romantic drama.
Any co-curricular activities you attend or participate in (e.g., TTU
Theatre, Women’s History Month, music department recitals) will be
acknowledged and considered in the formulation of your final semester grade.
Simply bring me a playbill, a program, or other proof of attendance.
Discussion of Course Sequence and Pedagogical Strategies
Course Sequence
6. The selection and sequencing of the dramas for the course reflects
quasi-chronological progression, quasi-generic groupings, and thematic
clustering so that plays can be read dialogically. [1] One
reason for my including so much drama by Joanna
Baillie is that about one third of my students needed to satisfy
a major requirement for a single author, and so they were able to do so by
taking this course that highlighted Baillie
as its major playwright. I tried to include representative plays by male and
female playwrights, but we began with three late eighteenth-century comedies
by women: Hannah Cowley’s A
Bold Stroke for a Husband (1783), Elizabeth Inchbald’s Everyone Has His
Fault (1793), and Joanna
Baillie’s The Tryal (1798). These
comedies opened onto discussions of Georgian courtship and marriage customs
that cast men and women in stereotypical relationships that favored men. We
discovered how Cowley displaces British
manner and customs onto Madrid, and, like Baillie, relies on disguise and cross-dressing to suggest
gender-bending in which women gain control over their lives. Inchbald’s comedy, we agreed, brings the legal
issues of divorce, custody, adoption, bankruptcy, and robbery into the
contexts of women’s rights and gender stereotypes. While A
Bold Stroke for a Husband is also a play that stages ambivalent,
gender-bending heroines, we looked at how gender was even more complicated
in performances featuring Mary Robinson as Victoria. All three plays show
the centrality of marriage for women of Georgian Britain. All three comedies
also push generic bounds. Cowley deploys
conventions of Spanish intrigue and recycles the motifs of the comedy of
manners. [2]
Inchbald’s play resonates with pathos of
character and novel-like structure. Baillie’s comedy revolves around subplots of play-making; Marianne
and Agnes are themselves playwrights in this metadramatic comedy. Because
these comedies are critical of the culture’s dominant practices, the
students find them fun, but they help to draw students into Romantic period
culture as well as into the playwrights’ resistance to its dominant
ideologies.
7. We next turned to tragedies, beginning the next cluster of plays with Baillie’s De Monfort
(1798), Orra (1812), and Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s Remorse (1813)—three plays that address sensibilities
of the early nineteenth-century, including the Gothic. In De Monfort, we continued our exploration of gender-bending
strategies, but here in tragic forms, and we considered whether or not the
play holds up a tragic hero for emulation or admiration, whether it hints at
homoerotic or incestuous relationships, and whether it presents the tragic
consequences of immoderate passions, especially hatred. [3] We learned how Baillie stages the Gothic, more fully developed, in the
kidnapping and brainwashing of the tragic heroine in Orra. Like the other plays we had read, Orra puts marriage center stage, as well as the heroine’s
resistance to patriarchal control. We found that Orra also demonstrates the power of storytelling and the
consequences to those whose naïve understandings of the world give them
limited critical ability to discern reality from fiction. Similarly, Remorse, we agreed, explores gender-bending and
mistaken identities so as to expose the fallacies and inconsistencies in
social orders that are shaped by misogyny. While Baillie’s tragedies explore the crises for female identity and
expose the subjection of femininity within patriarchal structures, Coleridge’s tragedy brings early
nineteenth-century constructions of masculinity under scrutiny. All three
plays can be read through postmodern lenses as historically specific—both in
terms of their medieval settings and their Romantic-era contexts of
composition—enactments of gender; the tragedies’ theatricality and
performance, furthermore, expose the artificiality and even the fluidity of
gender roles and gendered behaviors at the very time when codifications of
those roles were being scripted off-stage as well as on-stage.
8. The next grouping of tragedies—P. B.
Shelley’s The Cenci (1816), Baillie’s Count
Basil (1798), and Lord
Byron’s Sardanapalus (1821)—took us into
deeper and darker spaces of Romantic thought by way of historically based
incidents and characters. All three of these plays involve despotic rulers
of corrupt governments, but they similarly feature stories of dysfunctional
families, thus bringing the crises of public and private spaces together in
shared space on the stage. The Cenci, like De Monfort from the previous cluster, is a play that
opens onto discussions of censorship and licensing of plays in the Romantic
period. The settings of Italy for Cenci and Basil, and Assyria for Sardanapalus offer spaces where taboo and disturbing issues
affecting early nineteenth-century British culture could be displaced and
displayed. These three tragedies open onto explorations of criminal behavior
and punishment, the efficacy of language, the function of the public body,
and the pathology of madness. Count Basil exposes
the folly of excessive passions, coded masculine or feminine, and the
segregated and gendered spaces that impede an individual’s healthy
participation in the public sphere. P. B.
Shelley’s tragedy presents us also with the problem of morality
sanctioned by state and religion. Sardanapalus adds
layers of colonialism and orientalism to its questioning of gendered agency
and effective leadership. All three tragedies hint at Romantic
preoccupations with transgressive public figures under surveillance and then
put on trial for their moral and legal infractions.
9. As afterpieces to the course, we read George Colman the Younger’s Blue-Beard; or Female Curiosity! (1798), and Matthew
Lewis’s Timour the Tartar; A Grand Romantic Melo-drama in
Two Acts (1811), two plays that demonstrate to students the kind
of experimentation that was occurring with drama, particularly staged drama,
during the Romantic period. These two fantasies are fanciful but disturbing
in their staging of the abuses of misogyny and of orientalism (both set in
the Near East) under the guise of children’s theatre, harlequinade,
pantomime, and spectacle. Both Bluebeard and Timour are representations of
actual figures whose stories become thoroughly mythologized and fantasized.
Their stories and depictions, like that of Beatrice Cenci, have been
replayed in multiple forms—theatre, novels, visual arts, opera, and film—and
we talked about why Romantic theatergoers would find these characters so
interesting and engaging.
10. To supplement each clustering of dramas, we read, as the schedule above
indicates, the performance reviews that Cox
and Gamer have included in the Broadview
anthology and that Duthie has included in his edition of Plays on the Passions and that are relevant to the play we are
discussing. The creative discovery activity enables students to work closely
with these reviews and to think critically about performance aspects of the
plays. Graduate students work beyond the reviews of the anthology, seeking
additional performance information and reviews from online and traditional
scholarly sources in the preparation of their assignment. They may also look
at reviews of contemporary stagings of Romantic plays. [4]
Pedagogical Strategies
11. As the syllabus indicates, our class frequently read parts aloud (often in
character) to get a feel for the language and the performance aspects of the
play. For example,
- From A Bold Stroke for a Husband, we read
aloud act 2, scene 2 (pp. 12-15 from the Cox and Gamer edition) and
act 4, scene 1 (pp. 25-27)
- From Everyone Has His Fault, we read aloud
act 2, scene 1 (pp. 46-54) and act 3, scene 1 (pp. 55-57)
- From The Cenci, we read aloud act 5, scene 4
(pp. 253-55) and act 5, scene 4 (pp. 257-59)
- From The Tryal, we read aloud act 1, scene 1
(pp.219-228 of the Duthie edition)
- From De Monfort, we read aloud act 2, scene 1
(pp. 320-28) and act 5, scene 2 (pp. 373-79)
12. Sometimes for these oral readings, we wear masks. I have a collection of
paper cardboard masks that can be easily distributed and worn from such
sources as Madame Tussaud’s Book of Victorian Masks,
Venetian Masks, and Famous Figures Historical
Masks. [5] Occasionally, students make their
own masks for the parts they are reading.
13. Additionally, I rely on a select but valuable collection of AV materials to
supplement our readings and discussions of these plays. When students
entered the classroom on the first day of class, they were greeted by the
sounds of the CD Playhouse Aires: 18th-Century English Theatre Music, performed by The London Oboe Band to set the stage for the
Introductory reading in the Cox and Gamer Broadview anthology. [6] With A Bold Stroke for a
Husband, I played excerpts from the CD A Bold
Stroke for a Husband, from the production directed by Frederick
Burwick, original music composed by Brian Holmes. Burwick and Paul Douglass
have created an invaluable resource, a website entitled “Theatre and Popular
Songs, Catches, Airs, and Art Songs of the Romantic Period,” which features
CD recordings at nominal cost, thereby making them accessible for
pedagogical use. [7] Two other recordings Burwick and Douglass have made and that
are useful for the teaching of British Romantic drama are the recording of a
live performance of Thomas Lovell Beddoes’s Death’s
Jest-Book: A Grotesque Musical Comedy and Inchbald’s Animal
Magnetism.
14. As we moved to the cluster of tragic plays with gothic overtones, I
introduced the cluster with a small segment of the video of the Readers’
Theatre production of A Tale of Mystery (1806) that
was performed and video-taped at the 2003 meeting of the International
Conference on Romanticism at Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
The setting of the reading in the St. Joan of Arc Chapel on the Marquette
University campus was a spectacular way for students to get a visual clue
about how to read settings in De Monfort, Orra, and
Remorse. The live accompaniment of the reading
gave students a sense of how music was, in fact, a vital component to the
play—something I asked them to pay close attention to in their readings of
the plays’ stage directions. Likewise, our reading and discussion of Count Basil was enriched by two video supplements. In
March of 2002, in celebration of Women’s History Month, the Women’s Studies
Program and the Theatre Department at Texas Tech University worked together
to present a parlour reading of Romantic period dramas by Felicia Hemans, Elizabeth Inchbald, and Joanna Baillie. We held the reading in the
parlor of a local, private home, and relied on student and faculty volunteer
performers, and I served as dramaturg for the production. We videotaped the
performance, and thus, I have a segment of Count
Basil as amateur readers’ theatre that I can show the students.
In August of 2003, the North American Society for the Study of Romanticism
brought a Horizons Theatre production of Count
Basil to Fordham University, Lincoln Center Campus for the
association’s annual meeting. Having procured a DVD recording of that
professional production, I can show my students parts of the play or the
entire performance of Count Basil. I can also refer
students to reviews of that production that were published in European Romantic Review. [8]
15. To enrich our readings of The Cenci, Sardanapalus,
Blue-Beard, and Timour the
Tartar, I relied on reproductions of artwork, all of which are
easily available online for showing in class or for reproducing as handouts.
In particular, we looked at the “Sirani Elisabetta Portrait of Beatrice
Cenci” attributed to Guido Reni that P. B.
Shelley saw in Palazzo Colonna in 1818. This visual served as a
starting point for our discussion of the enduring interest in Beatrice
Cenci, as demonstrated by the many revisions of her life story in plays,
operas, novel, and film. For Sardanapalus, we
looked at Eugène Delacroix’s painting The Death of
Sardanapalus, 1827-1828 which is on display at the Louvre. For
Colman the Younger’s play, we viewed Gustav Doré’s nineteenth-century
illustrations of Bluebeard. Timour the Tartar
became more accessible for the students with the visual enrichment of
Skelt’s Scenes from the novel version of Timour’s story, J.K. Green’s
illustrations of the characters and scenes of the play, and the playbill of
Mrs. H. Johnston in the melodrama of Timour the Tartar.
We also looked at a picture of the statue of Timur in Shahrisabz,
Uzbekistan.
16. We rely on the online sites Romantic Circles, Romanticism on the Net, British Women
Playwights around 1800, and Romantic
Chronology for the enriching materials, scholarship, and visuals
that these sites bring to students. For my graduate seminar, students work
with at least one hypertext found on British Women
Playwrights around 1800, or they work with a novel and its
dramatic adaptation. [9]
Sample Student Responses
17. In the creative discovery activity #2, one student took the reviewers of
Joanna Baillie’s Plays
on the Passions, in particular of an 1804 staging of Count Basil, to task. She writes: “…I find Baillie’s
endeavors to capture the state of one passion incredibly impressive and
thought provoking. The reviewers seemed to have missed some of the points of
Baillie’s unchecked and exaggerated
passions.” A researched critical analysis of Baillie’s Orra explores the
“patriarchal-taught self-fear” that Orra experiences and its contribution to
her madness. The student writes: “This self fear is beneficial to the
patriarchal, hierarchal society because it keeps women in their ‘place’ by
making them emotionally weak and easily scared. They either run to men for
help and/or readily submit to men without question.” Another student
astutely observes gender dichotomies: “[v]iolence directed at women in
Romantic drama serves the masculine standard by placing the dramatic burden
firmly on the shoulders of the female characters—both as actor and acted
upon.… Clearly, Baillie is interested in
how her contemporaries utilized violence and gender both to control action
on stage and, in many ways, to control the making of this action.”
18. For the re-staging of The Cenci, one student
elaborates on the scenery and costuming: “Lighting would be very warm, reds,
oranges, and yellows…Once Count Cenci reveals the demise of his sons and
openly celebrates their death, the brightness of the stage will begin to
diminish and the darkness of the Palace will take over, like a foreboding
shadow. Beatrice would, like the other characters, begin the play, except
for Cenci, in drab and colorless apparel, but when she starts to plan her
father’s murder, she changes to richly colored costumes so that by the
height of her madness, she would be donning apparel almost equal to the
richness and color of the costuming worn by Cenci.” Another student proposes
a contemporary cast for a new film version of P. B. Shelley’s tragedy: Scarlet Johansen as Beatrice, Michael
Douglas as Count Cenci, Jessica Lange as Lucretia, and Anthony Hopkins as
Cardinal Camillo. As for an interesting stage effect at the end of the play,
another student writes: “The Hall of Justice would be a long hallway, with
the prisoners positioned at one end, each seated in a rolling office chair,
and Camillo and the judges at the other. As characters are given their turns
to speak, their chairs roll forward toward the judges, and as they are
dismissed, their chairs will roll into a doorway off to the side of the
hall.”
19. A response to 1813 reviews of Coleridge’s tragedy Remorse indicates
how the student better appreciates the importance of the play’s scenery for
spectators. He writes: “With these reviews, it was somewhat easier to
imagine what key scenes would have looked like, the sorcery scene
specifically. They also gave me a sense of what early nineteenth-century
audience thought of acting capabilities. By giving our imagination a
direction, the reviews let me see different perspectives, things I can’t see
from merely reading the play.” Another student recommends Remorse for a made-for-TV movie, recast as a story about
high-school kids and cliques. The outsider Alvar would be chunky and nerdy,
and Ordonio would be thin and popular. Ordonio teases Alvar and spreads
malicious rumors about his brother, eventually causing Alvar to transfer
schools, despite the fact that Teresa finds him attractive. When Alvar
returns to the school months later, he has lost weight, wears contacts, and
is immediately a hit with the popular crowd.” Another student recommends
filming Byron’s Sardanapalus for the big screen, with a setting in the
1940s in Washington, D.C. and involving a congressional scandal with a
closeted effeminate male and a press leak, so that the story would be about
the fall of democratic leadership rather than the fall of the Assyrian
empire. Another student, however, sees contemporary appeal for a movie that
retains Byron’s Near East
setting, particularly given our political interests in the very region that
was seen as vital to the emerging commercial economy of early
nineteenth-century Britain. A passage from a researched critical analysis of
Sardanapalus reveals how clothing becomes code
for sexuality for this reader: “Clothing is used in this play to reveal
Sardanapalus’ femininity, and Sardanapalus’s preoccupation with battle
clothing makes him seem less of a man. When Sardanapalus orders his servant
to bring him a mirror, we see his narcissism, his feminine concern with
appearances rather than the impending battle for control of Nineveh.”
20. In general, the course evaluations for British Romantic Drama were similar
to what I receive from other courses I teach, but here are some comments
that are particularly relevant to the content and delivery of the seminar
and that indicate how students were able to integrate the learning
experiences. One student writes: “This class taught me something very
different; reading drama can be just as fulfilling or more fulfilling than
actually seeing a play read.” Another student points to the ways in which
the drama contributed to his self-awareness: “I learned a lot about myself
over the course of this semester in class. It took me a while to learn how
to read the plays, but once I learned what worked, I fell in love with some
of the plays we read. I wish I had taken a course in Romanticism before my
senior year.” Another student emphasizes connections between
self-actualization and the drama we read: “Through this class, I have been
exposed to literature and drama that, up until this point, I had not heard
of and I was able to learn. I think that the most important thing that I
have learned about myself this semester is that I really enjoy reading drama
and that I am drawn to these plays because of their interesting content. I
think that groupings of the plays are helpful since it allows for
progression through the semester with smooth transition between plays.” And
finally, a student admits ending up in this course quite by happenstance,
but finds it a surprisingly pleasant and instructional experience: “This
class has been an invaluable learning experience for me. I thoroughly
enjoyed the curriculum and loved learning about, for me, a new kind of
drama. Joanna Baillie was my favorite
dramatist, and I must confess that I took this course because the Shakespeare class was full, but I am
very glad that I had this opportunity.”
Expected Outcomes
21. At the end of the semester, I was able to report to my department chair that
students who successfully completed English 4312: Studies in Drama: British
Romantic Drama during the spring 2006 were able to write analytical essays
that summarized, explicated, and judged diverse cultural expressions in the
plays we read. The students contributed to class discussions with analyses,
comparisons, contrasts, and presentations of experiential knowledge informed
by close textual readings of Romantic drama and reviews. The students
demonstrated generic and periodic understandings of how literary and
language studies function through their response papers and the researched
critical analysis. The students integrated understandings and applications
of skills acquired through the study of literature and language as part of
their last response paper (see Appendix), which required them to perform a
self-assessment and to discuss the ways in which the skills and strategies
they had acquired in this course would be helpful to them in the future.
Finally, the students composed a research essay in which secondary materials
supplement and support close readings of the drama, an essay that was built,
in part, by the cumulative assignments of the secondary source discovery
activity, the response papers, the critical analysis proposal, and class
discussions. By the end of the course, most students were able to identify
historical and current developments in the study of British Romantic drama
and were cognizant of the ways in which British Romantic drama reflected the
cultural and historical issues of the late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth
centuries.
Notes[1] For another syllabus and discussion of teaching
British Romantic drama by women, see Catherine Burroughs, “Teaching the Theory and Practice of
Women’s Dramaturgy,” Romanticism on the Net 12
(November 1998) [22 February 2010]
http://www.erudit.org/revue/ron/1998/v/n12/005823ar.html BACK [2] See my essay “On
Teaching A Bold Stroke for a Husband and Other
Comedies by Romantic Women Playwrights,” European
Romantic Review 17.3 (July 2006): 351-60, for an extended
discussion of teaching Hannah Cowley’s
comedy. BACK [3] For a discussion of the teaching of Joanna Baillie’s dramas, see my essay,
“Pedagogy and Passions: Teaching Joanna
Baillie’s Dramas,” in Joanna Baillie,
Romantic Dramatist: Critical Essays, ed. Thomas Crochunis (New York: Routledge,
2004), 315-47. BACK [4] See, for example, Jeffrey
N. Cox, “Theatrical Forms, Ideological Conflicts, and the
Staging of Obi,” Romantic
Circles Praxis Series, ed. Charles Rzepka (February 4,
2005), [March 24, 2006] http://www.rc.umd.edu/prasix.obi/cox/cox.html and Jerrold
E. Hogle, “Directing Obi in 2000,” Romantic Circles Praxis Series, ed. Charles Rzepka
(February 4, 2005) [March 24, 2006] http://www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/obi/hogle/hogle.html BACK [5] Lionel Lambourne,
Madame Tussaud’s Book of Victorian Masks
(New York: E.P. Dutton, 1987). BACK [6] Playhouse Aires: 18th-Century English Theatre Music, The London Oboe Band, lead by Paul Goodwin (France:
Harmonia Mundi, 1996). BACK [8] See Reviews of the Horizons Theatre Production of
Joanna Baillie’s Count Basil, New York City, August 2003, edited by Catherine B. Burroughs in European Romantic Review 15.2 (June 2004):
351-85. BACK [9] For a discussion
of teaching gothic dramas adapted from gothic novels, see my essay
“Teaching the Gothic Novel and Dramatic Adaptations,” in Approaches to Teaching Gothic Fiction: The British and
American Traditions, ed. Diane Long Hoeveler and Tamar
Heller (New York: Modern Language Association, 2003), 326-42. See also
Susan J. Wolfson, “Teaching Hemans with Byron,” European Romantic Review
17.1 (January 2006): 93-99 and Tricia Lootens, “New Criticism and New
Classrooms: Teaching Felicia
Hemans,” European Romantic Review
17.1 (January 2006): 101-109. BACK |  |
|