- A certain shape recurs in Shelley’s
verse—a beautiful, slumbering human form. In Canto
10 of The Revolt of Islam, Laon discovers such
forms amidst the ruins of a maddened civilization:
xxiii
Sometimes the living by the dead were hid.
Near
the great fountain by the public square,
Where corpses made a crumbling pyramid
Under
the sun, was heard one stifled prayer
For
life, in the hot silence of the air;
And strange 'twas, amid that hideous heap to
see
Some
shrouded in their long and golden hair,
As if not dead, but slumbering quietly
Like forms which sculptors carve, then love to
agony.[1]
The stanza adumbrates three classes of
being: the living, the dead, and the "as if not
dead"—bodies suspended in and shrouded by their
own nimbus, preserved intact within the wreckage. It is
"strange" to find these hermetic figures here. They
seem to insist on their radical extraneousness to human
concern, on the way in which they simply do not
matter—to the plot of this poem, to the scene in
which they are posited. Yet that very insistence seems
to place them in some relation—or charged
non-relation—to the overtly social landscape in
which they slumber.
- True aliens, these pod people only simulate the
natural human body. They are also only "like" Romantic
works of art, whether conventionally understood as
expressing and inciting human passion, or rendered by
Shelley as "seeds" and "dead leaves" that slumber,
dormant, until futurity unlooses their incendiary social
potential. Where these images are identified with motion,
mutability, transference—the movement of trope and
verse itself—the perpetual dreamers of
this passage, with their factitious, arresting
glamour, resist metamorphosis, the poetic turn, and all
the transformative practices and values we have come to
associate with Shelley's poetry. They are thus related to
a construction of "the aesthetic" that descends to us
from Kant through Adorno: "the aesthetic" as autonomous,
enigmatic, auratic form. The stanza could thus be seen to
pose the question of the relation of the aesthetic to the
social field.
- These beautiful dreamers live a posthumous life,
beyond life and death, but transcending neither. I want
to suggest that they speak to a fantasy of the endurance
of the poet and the poetic work, not as endlessly
renewable, socially-efficacious resources, but as forms
radically closed to our concerns. They can thus be
connected to an experience of Shelley's own poetry,
which, however sympathetic we are with recent historicist
work that insists on the poet's commitment to social and
political change, can strike us as most wonderful at its
most difficult and hermetic, the point where it fails to
yield to our reading. They can also evoke the exquisite
loveliness of Shelley himself as he appears in the
accounts of his contemporaries—as the prematurely
arrested figure who never was of our kind.
- In the pages that follow I want to look at the
Shelley circle's posthumous constructions of "the
Poet"— the one who walks among us like a mercurial
visitant from another world, and, more rarely, the
closed, immobilized but equally unearthly form that
slumbers forever in the hearts of those who knew him.
These constructions are cultic but not naïve, I
would argue. They are informed by passionate, attentive
readings of Shelley's poetic figures, including figures
of the aesthetic as that which adamantly refuses to
matter in terms of human economies of desire and
exchange. Perhaps, Shelley's ruthless Witch of Atlas
suggests, the artist is most loyal to human needs and
desires when his art preserves at its core a resistance
to our demands.
I. Shelley's Bones
- In 1869, when Edward Trelawny, the friend of Shelley,
was in his late seventies, William Michael Rossetti, born
after the poet's death, began a series of visits to him.
These visits resulted in Trelawny's expansion and
republication of his Recollections of the Last Days
of Shelley and Byron, as Records of Shelley,
Byron, and the Author. They resulted as well in
Rossetti's delighted acquisition of a little piece of
bone:
He gave me a little piece (not before seen by me) of
Shelley's skull, taken from the brow: it is wholly
blackened—not, like the jawbone, whitened by
the fire. He has two such bits of jawbone, and three
(at least) of the skull, including the one now in my
possession. I must consider how best to preserve it.
[cited in Crane, 339]
- Trelawny had these bones to give away because he was
himself a relic—the last survivor of the small
circle who orchestrated Shelley's cremation after his
drowning in Italy. By the time Rossetti met him, he had
been living for some years off his stories of the poet's
last days. Here is his account of his first encounter
with Shelley's skull, on the beach off the Via Reggia
where the drowned body had washed up:
We were startled and drawn together by a dull hollow
sound that followed the blow of a mattock; the iron
had struck a skull, and the body was soon uncovered.
Lime had been strewn on it; this, or decomposition,
had the effect of staining it of a dark and ghastly
indigo colour. [Records, 211]
Attended by Leigh Hunt and Lord Byron, and
assisted by a host of Italian officials, Trelawny
proceeded to move the corpse onto a funeral pyre and to
repeat the ceremony that had been performed for
Shelley's friend Williams the day before:
After the fire was well kindled we repeated the
ceremony of the previous day; and more wine was
poured over Shelley's dead body than he had consumed
during his life. This with the oil and salt made the
yellow flames glisten and quiver. The heat from the
sun and fire was so intense that the atmosphere was
tremulous and wavy. The corpse fell open and the
heart was laid bare. The frontal bone of the skull,
where it had been struck with the mattock, fell off;
and, as the back of the head rested on the red-hot
bottom bars of the furnace, the brains literally
seethed, bubbled and boiled as in a cauldron, for a
very long time. . . . The only portions that were not
consumed were some fragments of bones, the jaw, and
the skull; but what surprised us all was that the
heart remained entire. In snatching this relic from
the fiery furnace, my hand was severely burnt; and
had any one seen me do the act I should have been put
in quarantine. [Records, 212-13]
The fire consumes the elaborate machinery
Trelawny has mobilized to produce this spectacle on a
recalcitrant, modern landscape: in the end, all that
stays with us is the boiling, fabulous body, with its
unorchestrated energies, utterly transfigured into
something rich and strange—into the elusive,
ungraspable figure of poetic genius.
- Or almost utterly. There is the matter of the bones
and the heart that refuse to burn. These become "relics,"
parts to which accrue the magic of the lost
one—like manuscripts, locks of hair, portraits,
biographical anecdotes, other things that originate in
physical proximity to the dead person. "Relics" can
stand, or stand in, for the lost body itself, in the way
a fragment can come to stand for the projected shape of a
lost work or corpus. The heart acquired these latter
values in the course of its afterlife, which began when
Trelawny gave it at the cremation to Leigh Hunt, who
begged it of him; Mary Shelley then wanted it, but the
uncharacteristically unchivalrous Hunt wouldn't give it
up until after some weeks of negotiation. The heart was
then encrypted in a locked drawer of Mary Shelley's
writing desk, folded in a page of Adonais, where
it was discovered after her death and buried. Leigh Hunt,
in the meantime, ever after mourned and eulogized its
loss: "Cor Cordium," or heart of hearts, is the epitaph
he put on Shelley's tombstone; "Let those who have known
such hearts and lost them judge of the sadness of his
friends," he writes in Shelley's obituary.[2]
- Like Rossetti, who wondered "how best to preserve"
his bit of bone, these lovers of Shelley had the passion
of collectors and hoarders. But what of Trelawny, who
snatched these remains from the fiery furnace only to
give them away? He reminds us that the labor of the
circle is twofold: to collect the pieces, and to put them
back into circulation. An adventurer who gave up a career
at sea to follow the poets, the preserver of their deaths
and their relics, Trelawny knew that these traces are the
stuff of biography—little bits of material that
begin in proximity to the person but only come into their
full value when disseminated. If the heart, exposed in
its cage, looks especially plummy, worth burning oneself
for, perhaps this is less because it represents the core
or essence of the biographical subject than because it is
the figure of circulation. Trelawny, who tracks the
metamorphic career of Shelley's body as it is drowned,
buried, disinterred, burned, encrypted, and buried again,
like to keep things moving: he keeps alive the "surprise"
of the heart's spectacular appearance by passing it
along; he keeps always a few bones in reserve, for the
ever-renewed delight of the initiate. By these tactics he
sustains the magic of the relic—its reference, not
to the natural human body, but to the protean,
otherworldly shape of the poet.
- A professional romanticist could well find an
interest in the career of Shelley's bones somewhat
embarrassing: even during the nineteenth century such
reliquarianism seemed a particularly excessive and
dismissible manifestation of the romantic cult of genius.
Yet Paul de Man's important essay "Shelley Disfigured"
suggests that versions of this attachment may inform the
very construction of Shelley's corpus and the entire
history of his reception. In his brilliant, rigorous
analysis of Shelley's "Triumph of Life," de Man
identifies a poetics of disfiguration that repeatedly
erodes and erases what it posits, that "warns us that
nothing, whether deed, word, thought, or text, ever
happens in relation, positive or negative, to anything
that precedes, follows, or exists elsewhere, but only as
a random event whose power, like the power of death, is
due to the randomness of its occurrence" ("SD" 122).
Paradoxically, Shelley's literal death by drowning before
finishing the poem has operated to give positive
"shape"—the shape of a fragment—to a text
that is better described as a performance of this
negative knowledge. "[W]hat we have done with the dead
Shelley, and with all the other dead bodies that appear
in Romantic literature. . . is simply to bury them, to
bury them in their own texts made into epitaphs and
monumental graves . . . They have been transformed into
historical and aesthetic objects" ("SD" 122).
- The cultic life of the dead Shelley might seem to be
the most naïve and egregious of these
monumentalizing strategies. Yet as de Man repeatedly
demonstrates, it is not easy to disengage the valuative
work of commemoration from the rigor of a reading. What
"shape" circulates in these early accounts of Shelley? In
Thomas Hogg's account of meeting Shelley at Oxford, his
friend first appears as a "stranger," a visitant, who
speaks with no natural voice and is animated by no
natural life (SO 6-13). Here is Hogg describing
Shelley sleeping:
. . . he would sleep from two to four hours, often so
soundly that his slumbers resembled a deep lethargy;
he lay occasionally upon the sofa, but more commonly
stretched upon the rug before a large fire, like a
cat; and his little round head was exposed to such a
fierce heat, that I used to wonder how he was able to
bear it. Sometimes I have interposed some shelter,
but rarely with any permanent effect; for the sleeper
usually contrived to turn himself, and to roll again
into the spot where the fire glowed the brightest. .
. . At six he would suddenly compose himself, even in
the midst of a most animated narrative or of earnest
discussion; and he would lie buried in entire
forgetfulness, in a sweet and mighty oblivion, until
ten, when he would suddenly start up, and . . . enter
at once into a vehement argument, or begin to recite
verses, either of his own composition or from the
works of others, with a rapidity and an energy that
were often quite painful. During this period of his
occultation I took tea . . . [SO 40-41]
- Shelley is here possessed of the charge of the poetic
figure, and not just any figure, but his own as described
by de Man: he is a shape all light, subject to periodic
occultation; or, more fatally put, an evanescent and
fading form, continually metamorphosing, vanishing, going
under. In the words of William Hazlitt: "His person was a
type and shadow of his genius. His complexion, fair,
golden, freckled, seemed transparent with an inward
light, and his spirit within him
--so
divinely wrought,
That you might almost say his body thought.
He reminded those who saw him of some of
Ovid's fables" (Critical Heritage, 336). And
here is Trelawny, who in his Records describes
his first encounter with Shelley, who simply disappears
from a room of people: Trelawny asks, "Where is he?"
and Jane Williams answers, "Who? Shelley! Oh, he comes
and goes like a spirit, no one knows when or where"
(Records 22). In the logic of these
biographical testimonials, the drowning of this figure
is merely a repetition of a characteristic
disappearance. In the account of the Genovese captain
who reported seeing the spectacle of the Don
Juan in turbulent waters: "The next wave which
rose between the Boat and the vessel subsided—not
a splash was seen amidst the white foam of the
breakers. Every trace of the boat and of its wretched
crew had disappeared" (Cameron, 60).
- The "Shelley" who appears in the memoirs of those who
knew him is always on the brink of being lost. Most
characteristically, he is lost in books—the natural
setting for a poetic figure. The first time Trelawny
meets him, he begins to read and translate Calderon:
"Shoved off from the shore of common-place incidents that
could not interest him, and fairly launched on a theme
that did, he instantly became oblivious of everything but
the book in his hand . . . After this touch of his
quality I no longer doubted his identity"
(Records 22). Trelawny's nautical figure
suggests that Shelley's immersion makes him vulnerable to
drowning. This is literally true: his inability to get
his nose out of his book makes him a perilous sailor. But
there's also a fatal logic at work here: Narcissus-like,
the poet finds and loses himself in other scenes, in
landscapes that do not support human life. He's always
reading, and he always gravitates toward water, and no
one likes to think of the combination, particularly
Trelawny, who goes searching for him in a forest one day
and stumbles upon an old man who guides him to an
ominously Ovidian scene: "By-and-by the old fellow
pointed with his stick to a hat, books, and loose papers
lying about, and then to a deep pool of dark glimmering
water, saying 'Eccolo!' I thought he meant that Shelley
was in or under the water" (Records 103).
- This ability to be transported lends Shelley his
charm, makes him a marvelous and wonderful figure, a man
like no other, according to the recollections of his
friends. He seems to have inspired in them the stabbing
emotion that a lover of books feels when watching the
reader, the obsessive scholar, the writer, when that
person seems to carry a capacity for immersion beyond all
limits: a love that is an amalgam of identification,
protectiveness and dread, and, no doubt, envy and rage.
Such a figure seems on the one hand to be in constant
need of rescue: to be reminded to come home, to eat, and
periodically, to be fished out of the fire or the water.
And yet one intervenes at his and one's own peril: when
Shelley is sleepwalking or seeing ghosts, or when he's
out in a boat over his head, one can only hold one's
breath, for the merest gasp might tumble him out of the
poise that sustains him. So he is kept alive by constant
vigilance—the practical measures and magical
thinking of the circle that forms around this mercurial
stranger who does not seem to have attached himself to
life.
- It's hard to imagine that Shelley, an expert in the
allure of the vanishing figure, doesn't intuit this; that
there isn't an element of performance in his
obliviousness to the world. This is suggested by another
anecdote Trelawny tells. One day, swimming in the Arno,
Trelawny "astonished the Poet by performing a series of
aquatic gymnastics, which [he] had learnt from the
natives of the South Seas." Shelley asks, "Why can't I
swim?" Trelawny replies, "Because you think you can't,"
and advises him to try.
He doffed his jacket and trowsers, kicked off his
shoes and socks, and plunged in; and there he lay
stretched out on the bottom like a conger eel, not
making the least effort or struggle to save himself.
He would have been drowned if I had not instantly
fished him out. When he recovered his breath, he
said, 'I always find the bottom of the well, and they
say Truth lies there. In another minute I should have
found it, and you would have found an empty shell. It
is an easy way of getting rid of the body.'
[Records 91]
On the one hand, this story tells the
usual story: of the poet careless of his cage, always
ready to leave this world. But on the other hand, how
else could a man who can't swim captivate a man who
learned his tricks in the South Seas than by this
flamboyantly staged willingness to drown? How else
could a man without the will to live provoke the
dramatic interventions necessary to keep him afloat?
Trelawny's Shelley is a little stooped from a life of
being doubled over still surfaces; but it's not always
possible to know if his Narcissus posture represents an
extreme of self-forgetfulness or of ruthless
self-absorption. And indeed, more than any positive
image of Shelley as an ideal or etherial figure, it's
that undecidability—the undecidability of a pure
self-reflex—that constitutes his charm.
- The Shelley that circulates in these early
biographies is the projected phantasm of his verse: the
personification of a negative knowledge and an
ungraspable poetics, or, in de Man's words, "the
glimmering figure [who] takes on the form of the
unreachable reflection of Narcissus, the manifestation of
shape at the expense of its possession" ("SD" 109). The
posthumous creation of the circle that labored to give
shape to the poet after his death, this glimmering figure
is neither a naïve nor an escapable construction. It
descends to haunt the most powerful of our modern
readings of Shelley, for instance, de Man's—a
haunting symptomized by de Man's gestures of figuration
and his inordinate attachment to the figure that refuses
to attach itself to any life supports whatsoever.
- Death arrests this evanescent form. In death Shelley
reminds Leigh Hunt of a "spirit" "found dead in a
solitary corner of the earth, its wings stiffened, its
warm heart cold" (Hunt ii, 105). His description recalls
the splayed skeleton found—or fabricated—by
Trelawny:
Two bodies were found on shore,—one near Via
Reggia, which I went and examined. The face and
hands, and parts of the body not protected by the
dress, were fleshless. The tall slight figure, the
jacket, the volume of Aeschylus in one pocket, and
Keats's poems in the other, doubled back, as if the
reader, in the act of reading, had hastily thrust it
away, were all too familiar to me to leave a doubt on
my mind that this mutilated corpse was any other than
Shelley's. [Records 189-90]
The stiffening of the glimmering figure
into the determinate shape of the Poet recalls de Man's
claim about the fate of Shelley's corpus, which
"stiffens" into the rigidity of an historical and
aesthetic object when read backwards through his death.
Yet these descriptions of the poet's corpse suggest
that "the aesthetic object"—the static, closed
thing that comes to stand for art—represents less
a detour from the rigors of reading than the limit-case
of a Shelleyan poetics. Shelley's dead body is the
formal, fixed rendering of an infinitely redoubled
strategy of figuration. In death, Shelley's bones
arrange themselves into the posture of the reader
arrested in a moment of absorption, but too late to
save himself from drowning; or, perhaps, of the reader
already drowning—doubled over and lost in his
book, or in the figure of the dead Keats—before
death's random blow arrests him; or, even, of the
reader halted before the "shape" of the dead Shelley,
discovering herself already absorbed into his
circle.
II. Live burial
- Hunt's image of Shelley as a stiffened ephemeron
recalls the exquisite bodies tucked away in the ruins in
the stanza I began by quoting. These bodies can in turn
be linked to the encrypted form that colonizes the circle
after Shelley's death, causing it to stiffen into an
obdurate, breakable formation. The beautiful hermetic
dreamers of Shelley's poems provide a way to think about
the problems attendant upon reading or mourning Shelley.
How does one get hold or let go of a radically arrested
figure?
- Pod people occur throughout Shelley's work, but they
are strangely insistent in The Witch of Atlas,
Shelley's great autobiographical poem of 1820. The
glamorous Witch is herself a pod person: she spends her
days in a cave and her nights in a fountain or well,
where she folds into a chrysalis form, a barely animated
effigy of herself, recalling her author's stints as
conger eel or occulted sleeper:
xxviii
This lady never slept, but lay in trance
All
night within the fountain—as in sleep.
Its emerald crags glowed in her beauty's
glance;
Through the green splendour of the water deep
She saw the constellations reel and dance
Like
fire-flies—and withal did ever keep
The tenour of her contemplations calm,
With open eyes, closed feet and folded palm.
- During the poem the Witch moves out of the cocooning
spaces of cave, fountain, and well of fire, to set out on
travels that Stuart Sperry calls "a journey without goal
or quest" (SMV 154). But like an otherworldly
Johnny Appleseed, wherever she goes she collects and sows
forms that mime her own encapsulated beauty. Most
strikingly, she creates a somnolent Hermaphrodite that
briefly accompanies her; then, in the last movement of
the poem, she follows the Nile to the seat of human
civilization, where she walks by night, "scattering sweet
visions" and "observing mortals in their sleep." To the
most beautiful of these she gives a "strange panacea"
(lxix). When such a one dies, she unwraps the shroud,
throws the coffin into a ditch, and lays the body out:
lxxi
And there the body lay, age after age,
Mute,
breathing, beating, warm and undecaying,
Like one asleep in a green hermitage,
With
gentle smiles about its eyelids playing
And living in its dreams beyond the rage
Of
death or life; while they were still arraying
In liveries ever new, the rapid, blind
And fleeting generations of mankind.
Thus her sports leave behind
deposits—figures evocative of poets lost in their
creations, of works whose contents have withdrawn into
inscrutable form, and of observers absorbed in some
other scene than the social landscape they
inhabit—all of which have in common a posture
that, borrowing from Adorno, one might call aesthetic
"comportment" (AT 12).
- The ubiquity of these withdrawn figures in The
Witch of Atlas seems teasingly related to the text's
almost complete lack of conversation, in 1820, with
Shelley's ambitious, overtly political writing of
1819—a year that saw the completion of The
Cenci and Prometheus Unbound and the
composition of new works including The Mask of
Anarchy, A Philosophical View of Reform,
and "England 1819," all deeply engaged with post-Peterloo
England. Indeed, we could speculate that The
Witch's abstracted forms serve to foreground a
certain absence of relation: the absence Mary Shelley
protested and Percy Shelley insists on in his dedicatory
stanzas "To Mary (On her objecting to the following poem,
upon the score of its containing no human interest),"
where he asserts that his poem tells no story and has no
pretensions to an audience—it is like the kitten's
objectless jeu, and the ephemeron that lives
only for a day.[3]
- In her notes to Shelley's Posthumous Poems,
Mary Shelley returns to the scene of this disagreement.
At the time, she explains, she was urging Shelley to
write on "subjects that would more suit the popular taste
than a poem conceived in the abstract and dreamy spirit
of The Witch of Atlas."
It was not only that I wished him to acquire
popularity as redounding to his fame; but I believed
that he would obtain a greater mastery over his own
powers, and greater happiness in his mind, if public
applause crowned his endeavors. . . . But my
persuasions were vain, the mind could not be bent
from its natural inclination. Shelley shrunk
instinctively from portraying human passion, with its
mixture of good and evil, of disappointment and
disquiet. Such opened again the wounds of his own
heart; and he loved to shelter himself rather in the
airiest flights of fancy, forgetting love and hate,
and regret and lost hope. [PW 388-89]
The context of The Witch of
Atlas, she suggests, is not the work of the year
that preceded its composition but the professional and
domestic disappointments that ushered in, plagued, and
followed that burst of productivity. She's thinking no
doubt of Shelley's failure to command any audience at
all with his writing: by the time of The
Witch's composition, The Cenci had been
rejected by Covent Garden, and Ollier and Hunt were
remaining silent on all the other pieces. And she hints
at the private losses that marked this time: the death
of William, the second of their children to die in
Italy; her own subsequent depression; the death of at
least one other Shelley baby and a further hardening of
the couple's estrangement.[4]
Mary identifies Shelley with his Witch: like her, he
cordons off an arena of "airy fancy" within which to
sport, rather than engaging "human interest." And she
suggests that the mercurial play of poet, work, and
poetic figure exists in some relation to the
sealed-over wounds of the heart.
- Mary may not be right about this urbane poem, which
could be said to have an uncharacteristically strong
sense of audience. But she is suggestive about the Witch
herself, who exists in a pointed, even comic lack of
relation to human passionate life. Her first act is to
bolt from the creatures who orbit in the "magic circle of
her voice and eyes" (vii): she must leave, she tells
them, because she is not of their kind, and not being
mortal herself, she doesn't want to get attached to them
only to have to suffer at their deaths (xxiii). Her
problem with commitment, however, is nowhere more
striking than when she abandons the "fair Shape" she
herself has created out of a "repugnant mass" of "fire
and snow" (xxxv):
A fair Shape out of her hands did flow—
A
living Image, which did far surpass
In beauty that bright shape of vital stone
Which drew the heart out of Pygmalion.
xxxvi
A sexless thing it was . . .
The
countenance was such as might select
Some artist that his skill should never die,
Imaging forth such perfect purity.
We've been reading long enough to feel a
plot coming on—a version of the Pygmalion myth.
This is a Shelley poem: shouldn't the
Witch poesy be destined to fall in love with her
creation, to love it perhaps "to agony"? Yet by the end
of the stanzas quoted, this possibility has been closed
off: the Image is a "sexless thing," and its beauty has
become the preoccupation of a new artist. For the Witch
herself, the Image is less an object of fixation than a
way to keep moving: she peremptorily commands it to
"Sit here!" in her boat (xxxvii); at her command
"Hermaphroditus" (the only time it is named) it spreads
its wings and flies her upstream, where she and the
poem abandon it (xliii).
- Indeed, the force of Shelley's story could be said to
reside in its polemical resistance to the solutions of
Pygmalion. Repelled by the "hardness" of the women of his
state, the first ever to turn to prostitution, Pygmalion
throws himself into his art; only when he sees and falls
in love with the woman in the marble does he comes to
know his own desire, which the gods then fulfill (Ovid,
X, 244-300). His art is thus a form of therapy, a
"working through" blocked impulses until desire comes to
be known and to speak, and his story belongs to a popular
class of narratives of human interest—stories of
the heart's efforts to know and close with its objects.
It is thus "romantic," at least in terms of popular
accounts of that aesthetic: the tale casts the work as
expressive of the genial artist's desires and suggests
its power to effect the integration of the person and the
overcoming of social antagonisms through its awakening of
sympathy and love.
- If in the Pygmalion story the aesthetic object serves
the interest of the human subject, in the Witch's story
the created form is impervious to human needs and aims.
The impediment is perhaps in the object itself. The
proper name "Hermaphroditus" refers us back to another
tale from The Metamorphoses in which latency
proves to be destiny. Already bearing the stitched
together names of his famously libidinal parents Hermes
and Aphrodite, "Hermaphroditus," at fifteen years old,
has no interest in awakening to sexual desire: the plot
turns on his refusal of the nymph Salmacis, whose pool
Hermaphroditus visits. Struck by his beauty, she
propositions him; he rebuffs her advances; she retreats
into the woods but stays to observe him; he, "as if no
one were looking at him," strips and bathes in her pool;
incited by his beautiful form, she jumps into the pool
after him and clings to his body. When he resists her,
she calls to the gods to allow her never to be parted
from this youth: and so he becomes "the
Hermaphrodite"—an enervated half-man, half-woman.
That is, it becomes a fallen, fixed version of what he
was, in a doom he may have even invited: a creature
forever before or beyond sexual life (Ovid IV,
287-390).
- When Shelley imports this story to The Witch of
Atlas, he suggests that the creator creates wo/man,
not in her own image, but in the image of the Image. If
Pygmalian falls in love with the human form he sees in
the marble, the Witch's Shape is arresting for the way
the marble—the formal, material dimension, the
dimension of "Image" and "countenance"—swims up
into the supposedly living thing. One is caught up, not
by a promise of intimacy, but by an apprehension of the
radical alterity of this apparitional form to human
desire.[5]
The Witch's creation thus points to an "abstracting"
tendency of Shelley's art, which critics have
historically linked to his preoccupation with the "ideal"
but which seems better described by, say, de Man's
account of the poetry's strategies of "figuration." The
Hermaphrodite and all the beautiful slumbering forms of
The Witch of Atlas are adamantly unsubjectable:
they refuse to satisfy, and they unmask the ruse by which
a factitious, formal thing could be said to do so.
- And yet—like Ovid's Hermaphroditus, whose
flaunted unavailability incites the nymph Salmacis, and
like the beautiful slumbering figure Shelley admired in
the Villa Borghese,[6]
the Witch's Image is lovely, "surpassing" the beauty of
Pygmalion's statue, and surely capable of becoming the
object of someone's fascination if not passion:
xl
And ever as she went, the Image lay
With
folded wings and unawakened eyes;
And o'er its gentle countenance did play
The
busy dreams, and thick as summer flies,
Chasing the rapid smiles that would not stay,
And
drinking the warm tears, and the sweet sighs
Inhaling, which, with busy murmur vain
They had aroused from that full heart and brain.
Indeed, the Image is here the very figure
of fascination: of consciousness playing about the
countenance, creating and imbibing delicate and
evanescent traces of an unfathomable affective life.
This sweetly and gently monstrous countenance holds us
if it fails to hold the Witch, and it does so in a way
that evokes what could be said to be an Ur-scene of
attachment, the experience of watching the baby sleep:
watching the closed, fleetingly and delicately animated
face of the creature to whom it is one's destiny to
become attached as it is given over to what the
psychoanalysts call "hallucinatory satisfaction," its
"dreams"—neither belonging to it nor exterior to
it, and indistinguishable from one's own
fascination—sporting over its metamorphic
countenance. In this setting, the observer's love could
take the form of wanting to preserve forever this
fragile dream of perfect self-sufficiency; to ward off
permanently the creature's awakening to a consciousness
of dependency and loss, the cost of its entry into
human desire, human interest, and human exchange. The
purest idolatry, such love would defend the primitive
magic of the image from its erosion by life.
- Human beings never willingly give up on a libidinal
position, Freud tells us; artists least of all (Freud,
133). D. W. Winnicott even contends without reference to
clinical evidence that artists, as a class, are
"ruthless" because they simply refuse the guilt that
comes with the depressive position (Winnicott, 26). It is
possible to see what critics call the Witch's
"limitations"—her failure to form attachments and
respond empathically to a rich, complex field of human
passions—as a beautiful refusal to lose. If under
the regime of "the rage of death or life" archaic dreams
must be forgotten in order that generation after
generation of human subjects and their labor can be
efficiently cycled into the liveries of various work
masters, the Witch's sport would seem to refuse and foil
that killing productivity—particularly when, moving
from form to form "like a sexless bee" (lxviii), she
takes the most beautiful out of circulation to deposit
and abandon them in secret crypts. Her carelessness, her
ruthlessness, her refusal of grief, her penchant for airy
flight and her somnambulistic returns to the eerie
loveliness of the abstracted human form—all derive
their logic from her "defense" of poetry.
- Thus the poem articulates a fantasy of the poet, the
work, and the baby, not as sites for regenerative
exchange, but as repositories that preserve magical,
archaic things from a devastating human interest. This is
a fantasy shared by psychoanalytic theory, which, like
Shelley's circle, and like Romanticism in its highest and
lowest forms, sometimes casts the artist—the one
who is arrested before growing up—as a magical
throwback to another dispensation, making good on our
losses. In the terms of this fantasy, what we might want
is not to be engaged by poetry's appeal to our passions,
but rather, to preserve poetry's strange distance from
human interest—to reassure ourselves that magical,
hermetic poetic figures exist among us, slumbering in
secret as we live out our days, entering our dreams by
night, keeping alive the possibility of a ruthless,
magical refusal of loss.
- At the end of The Witch of Atlas the poem's
somnolent forms lie suspended, "age after age," amidst a
world that "rages" around them. This world is
also a world of dreamers—misers, priests, kings,
and lovers whose dreams, as a result of the witch's
pranks, become parodic and utopic, unmasking "reality"
itself as a collective dream. The witch finally and
capriciously becomes the muse of an interventionist
poetry. Yet still the figures she has encapsulated
slumber on, in significant non-communication with even
this transformed social field. The poem's ending suggests
the insistent and perhaps founding obduracy of the "the
aesthetic" to even the most admirable political visions;
and it implies that art may be most loyal to humanity's
dreams when it preserves, encrypted within it, a
resiliently inhumane impulse—a ruthless refusal to
speak to what we may only imagine are our concerns.
III. Coda: The Exquisite Corpse
- In real life, of course, if out of idolatrous love
you respect too much the capacity for hallucinatory
satisfaction of babies, poems, or poets, they fail to
thrive. It seems likely that both Mary and Percy Shelley
suspected that this was the fate of the Shelley babies
who died in Italy; it was arguably the fate of the
stillborn poetry. And, psychoanalysis tells us, if a
loved object dies before the work of attachment, which is
also the work of letting go, is completed, the outcome is
not the "working through" of mourning but a refusal to
recognize loss: the magical incorporation of the object
in the form of a blocking imago, in a move of
"hallucinatory satisfaction." Thus the countenance of the
sleeping baby who needs for nothing mirrors the exquisite
corpse buried alive in the heart of the one who cannot
grieve.[7]
- The Witch of Atlas was composed a year and
two months after the death of William Shelley, the second
of three Shelley children to die in Italy; the year
anniversary of his death was marked by the death of the
third, Shelley's "Neapolitan charge."[8]
The poem's embryonic, unawakened forms conjure these
babies who can neither be restored to the living nor be
put to rest, as well as the parents who can neither face
their continued insistence nor let them die, nor puncture
each other's hermetic isolation, nor independently heal
the wounds of their separate hearts—in part because
each holds the key to the other's sorrow. They speak to a
fantasy of the body beyond sex and the engendering of
life and death; and of the body that leaves encrypted
babies everywhere, in the shape of quasi-aesthetic
objects buried in textual graves. And they speak of the
cryptic poem itself, with its aggressively flagged lack
of relation to the heart's secrets.
- It's possible to feel the pressure of these domestic
circumstances in a cluster of poems from this period,
including Epipsychidion and Adonais. In
these poems, as well as in most biographical accounts of
the Shelley marriage, the couple's stuck formation would
seem determined by Mary Shelley's stuck mourning: she is
the commissioned mourner, while he suffers indirectly
when her "coldness" lays him to sleep; he could revive,
he suggests half-heartedly, if only something could slake
her wound.[9]
But what would it take to slake the mother's wound? She
herself tells us in Adonais. Urania, the last to
visit the corpse of her youngest born, makes an appeal to
him and, indirectly, to Death (xxv):
"Leave me not wild and drear and comfortless,
As silent lightning leaves the starless
night!
Leave me not!" cried Urania; her distress
Roused Death: Death rose and smiled, and met her
vain caress.
xxvi
"Stay yet awhile! speak to me once again;
Kiss me, so long but as a kiss may live;
And in my heartless breast and burning brain
That word, that kiss shall all thoughts else
survive
With food of saddest memory kept alive,
Now thou art dead, as if it were a part
Of thee, my Adonais! I would give
All that I am to be as thou now art!
But I am chained to Time, and cannot thence depart!
The mother asks for one last word and one
last kiss—one breach of death's seal, one
instance of mutually avowed attachment—in order
that she may get on with her grieving.
- The Shelley babies in fact died in their mother's
arms. But the scene anticipates Mary's experience of the
loss of Percy, which had no last breaching moment;
rather, the report of the mutilated corpse, the heartless
breast, and the burning brain came to her from afar, to
stiffen a pointed lack of relation. That report was
Trelawny's, of course. After Shelley's death the circle
transformed from a volatile dynamic to a formation
demanding constancy and allegiance, a change blamed on
Mary Shelley by Trelawny among others; historically,
biographers have preferred his and Hogg's "lively"
Shelley to Mary and Lady Shelley's "idealized"
one.[10]
But the mercurial visitant and the stiffened form are
each true, although to different experiences of loss.
Trelawny, who thrusts his hand through the wall of the
poet's body and delivers it of its previously enwombed
form, gives birth to a Shelley possessed of a great
heart, and purchases his own mobility in the process.
This is the scene that Mary Shelley misses: and so she
fails to escape the role of the commissioned mourner,
forever constant to and immobilized by the encrypted,
wounded heart and exquisite corpse.
|