|
||||||||||||
Romanticism and the New DeleuzeThe Transcendental: Deleuze, P. B. Shelley, and the Freedom of ImmobilityRobert Mitchell, Duke University |
||||||||||||
Notes1
Hereafter, all references are indicated parenthetically,
with the following abbreviations employed: "DR" for
Difference and Repetition; "KCP" for Gilles
Deleuze, Kant's Critical Philosophy: The Doctrine of the
Faculties; "WIP" for Gilles Deleuze and
Félix Guattari, What is Philosophy?;
"CPR" for Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure
Reason; "CJ" for Immanuel Kant, Critique of
Judgment.
2 As David L. Clark notes, our ability
to imagine beings such as aliens, angels, and animals that
are constituted in other ways plays an important role in
Kant's general system; see, for example, "Kant's Aliens:
The Anthropology and Its Others," pp. 201-289.
3 As Deleuze notes in
Difference and Repetition, "Kant defines the passive
self in terms of simple receptivity, thereby assuming
sensations already formed, then merely relating these to
the a priori forms of their representation which are
determined as time and space" (DR 98).
4 What intrigues Deleuze especially about the account of the beautiful in the Critique of Judgment is Kant's account of the role of "free materials of nature" (KCP 54), such as colors and sounds, in our experience of the beautiful. As is well known, Kant's account of the beautiful stresses the role of form over colors and sounds: for Kant, "form" names that aspect of an object which the imagination alone can "reflect," whereas (as Deleuze notes) "color and sound are too material, too entrenched in the senses to be reflected in our imagination in this way" (KCP 47). But at the same time, Kant's subsequent account of symbolism acknowledges, even if circumspectly, the importance of colors and sounds for the emergence of an aesthetic accord of the faculties. For Kant suggests that in experiences of the beautiful, the free materials of nature such as colors and sounds "do not relate simply to the determinate concepts of the understanding," but also end up relating to an Idea of reason: the white lily, for example, is a kind of plant from the standpoint of the understanding, but a symbol of innocence from the standpoint of reason. And, Deleuze stresses,
It is true, of course, that Kant seeks to
position these genetic movements—that is, the
emergence within the subject of new forms of
common-sense—within teleological, developmental
frames. So, for example, Kant suggests that emergence of
"the indeterminate unity and the free accord of the
faculties" that takes place in experiences of "the
beautiful" "do not merely constitute that which is
deepest in the soul, but prepare the advent of that
which is most elevated, that is to say the supremacy
of the faculty of desire, and make possible the transition
from the faculty of knowledge to the faculty of desire"
(KCP 55-6).
5 Or, as Deleuze puts it in
Difference and Repetition, judgments of sublimity
are useful insofar as they allow us to investigate the
"triple violence" to which faculties can be submitted:
namely, "the violence of that which forces [the faculty] to
be exercised, [second,] of that which [the faculty] is
forced to grasp and which it alone is able to grasp, yet
also that of the ungraspable (from the point of view of
[the faculty's] empirical exercise" (DR 143).
6 Of course, Kant doesn't make this
point directly; rather, Deleuze argues, it is in the
changes that Kant makes to his account of the faculty of
imagination—and the role of the human body and
rhythm—between the first and third critiques that we
can see that imagination's activities (apprehension,
comprehension, recognition) must depend upon a prior
synthesis of sensation.
7 The precise nature of the threat
differs considerably from reading to reading: critics
inclined toward philosophical interpretations have tended
to stress epistemological threats, while historicist
critics have emphasized threats that are more political,
social, or environmental in nature. Examples of
philosophical interpretations include I. J. Kapstein's
classic argument in "The Meaning of Shelley's 'Mont Blanc'"
that the poem manifests the threat of logical inconsistency
resulting from Shelley's apparent allegiance to both
philosophical materialism and idealism; Charles H. Vivian's
counter-proposal in "The One 'Mont Blanc'" that the poem
is in fact "self-consistent," since it is "not a
poem in which the problems [about the "ultimate nature of
mind"] are solved," but is rather about "the very
experience of coming to grapple with the problems, and
about the nature of the evidence available for dealing with
them" (55, 61); Earl Wasserman's suggestion in Shelley:
A Critical Reading that the inhospitable ice is an
index of the possibility that nature is fundamentally
"vacant"; Frances Ferguson's contention in "Shelley's
'Mont-Blanc': What the Mountain Said" that while the poem
"exhibits its own repeated failure to let Mont Blanc be
merely a blank, merely a mass of stone" (173), it also
attempts to remove this as a problem by turning
"epistemological language into love language" (173, 178);
and Christoph Bode's claim in "Shelley's 'Mont Blanc': The
Aesthetic 'Aufhebung' of a Philosophical Antinomy": that
the apparent conflict between the epistemology and ontology
of the poem itself makes for a consistent argument for an
idealist philosophy. Historicist interpretations include
Nigel Leask's assertion in "Mont Blanc's Mysterious Voice:
Shelley and Huttonian Earth," that "Mont Blanc" constitutes
a secular attempt to counter religious interpretations of
the sublimity of the glacier and mountain and Alan Bewell's
suggestion in Romanticism and Colonial Disease that
the glaciers of the mountain—glaciers that "creep/
Like snakes that watch their prey"—register Shelley's
fear of the threat of unstoppable global cooling (ll.
100-101).
8 This image in Queen Mab was a
poetic reworking of a line of thought that Shelley first
developed in correspondence with Elizabeth Hitchener. In
his 2 January 1812 letter to Hitchener, for example, he
argued that an understanding of life as "infinite" was
equivalent to the position that "every thing is animation"
(The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley, I:156).
9 For an account of Shelley's more
general interest in creating ruptures in his auditors'
"time consciousness," see my Sympathy and the State in
the Romantic Era: Systems, State Finance, and the Shadows
of Futurity, pp. 163-204.
10 It was this understanding of
sensation, I suggest, that motivated Shelley's belief that
"passive resistance" was an effective political strategy.
Shelley's doctrine of passive resistance—exemplified
in a poem such as "The Mask of Anarchy" (1819), and
inspirational for later figures such as Mahatma
Gandhi—has often been interpreted from a purely
psychological view. From this perspective, passive
resistance is effective because it "shames" aggressors. It
is more productive, however, to approach Shelley's
understanding of passive resistance from the perspective of
suspended animation: by suspending one's own action, one
enables greater capacities of sensation—that is,
lines of linkage with systemic potentials—for others.
Such a perspective avoids the dubious causal claims of the
psychological approach—it is not at all clear why
passive resistance ought "automatically" to produce shame
in aggressors—while retaining the emphasis on system
to which Shelley was committed.
11 See M. H. Abrams, "Keats's Poems:
The Material Dimensions."
12 See Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, "Rhythm
and Meaning." While Gumbrecht draws on systems theory,
rather than Deleuze, in his essay, his claims can be
productively linked to a Deleuzean approach to rhythm and
meaning.
13 For an example of Dick's interest
in the activity of passivity, see his brilliant novel
Ubik, which depicts a cast of characters who travel
all around the globe, as well as between the earth and
moon. These characters slowly come to the realization that
they are, in fact, in states of suspended animation, yet
they nevertheless retain a capacity to affect events
outside these states, in the "real" world. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Romantic Circles Praxis
Series
Series Editor: Orrin N. C. Wang Volume Technical Editor: Joseph Byrne |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||