|
||||||||||||
Romanticism and the New DeleuzeThe Transcendental: Deleuze, P. B. Shelley, and the Freedom of ImmobilityRobert Mitchell, Duke University |
||||||||||||
Notes1 Hereafter, all references
are indicated parenthetically, with the following abbreviations employed: "DR" for Difference
and Repetition; "KCP" for Gilles Deleuze, Kant's Critical
Philosophy: The Doctrine of the Faculties; "WIP" for Gilles
Deleuze and Félix Guattari, What is Philosophy?; "CPR" for
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason; "CJ" for Immanuel
Kant, Critique of Judgment.
2 As David
L. Clark notes, our ability to imagine beings such as aliens, angels,
and animals that are constituted in other ways plays an important role
in Kant's general system; see, for example, "Kant's Aliens: The Anthropology
and Its Others," pp. 201-289.
3 As
Deleuze notes in Difference and Repetition, "Kant defines the
passive self in terms of simple receptivity, thereby assuming sensations
already formed, then merely relating these to the a priori forms
of their representation which are determined as time and space" (DR 98).
4 What intrigues Deleuze especially about the account of the beautiful in the Critique of Judgment is Kant's account of the role of "free materials of nature" (KCP 54), such as colors and sounds, in our experience of the beautiful. As is well known, Kant's account of the beautiful stresses the role of form over colors and sounds: for Kant, "form" names that aspect of an object which the imagination alone can "reflect," whereas (as Deleuze notes) "color and sound are too material, too entrenched in the senses to be reflected in our imagination in this way" (KCP 47). But at the same time, Kant's subsequent account of symbolism acknowledges, even if circumspectly, the importance of colors and sounds for the emergence of an aesthetic accord of the faculties. For Kant suggests that in experiences of the beautiful, the free materials of nature such as colors and sounds "do not relate simply to the determinate concepts of the understanding," but also end up relating to an Idea of reason: the white lily, for example, is a kind of plant from the standpoint of the understanding, but a symbol of innocence from the standpoint of reason. And, Deleuze stresses,
It is true, of course, that Kant seeks to position these
genetic movements—that is, the emergence within the subject of
new forms of common-sense—within teleological, developmental frames.
So, for example, Kant suggests that emergence of "the indeterminate unity
and the free accord of the faculties" that takes place in experiences
of "the beautiful" "do not merely constitute that which is deepest in
the soul, but prepare the advent of that which is most elevated,
that is to say the supremacy of the faculty of desire, and make possible
the transition from the faculty of knowledge to the faculty of desire" (KCP 55-6).
5 Or, as
Deleuze puts it in Difference and Repetition, judgments of sublimity
are useful insofar as they allow us to investigate the "triple violence" to
which faculties can be submitted: namely, "the violence of that which
forces [the faculty] to be exercised, [second,] of that which [the faculty]
is forced to grasp and which it alone is able to grasp, yet also that
of the ungraspable (from the point of view of [the faculty's] empirical
exercise" (DR 143).
6 Of course,
Kant doesn't make this point directly; rather, Deleuze argues, it is
in the changes that Kant makes to his account of the faculty of imagination—and
the role of the human body and rhythm—between the first and third
critiques that we can see that imagination's activities (apprehension,
comprehension, recognition) must depend upon a prior synthesis of sensation.
7 The precise
nature of the threat differs considerably from reading to reading: critics
inclined toward philosophical interpretations have tended to stress epistemological
threats, while historicist critics have emphasized threats that are more
political, social, or environmental in nature. Examples of philosophical
interpretations include I. J. Kapstein's classic argument in "The Meaning
of Shelley's 'Mont Blanc'" that the poem manifests the threat of logical
inconsistency resulting from Shelley's apparent allegiance to both philosophical
materialism and idealism; Charles H. Vivian's counter-proposal in "The
One 'Mont Blanc'" that the poem is in fact "self-consistent," since
it is "not a poem in which the problems [about the "ultimate nature of
mind"] are solved," but is rather about "the very experience of coming
to grapple with the problems, and about the nature of the evidence available
for dealing with them" (55, 61); Earl Wasserman's suggestion in Shelley:
A Critical Reading that the inhospitable ice is an index of the possibility
that nature is fundamentally "vacant"; Frances Ferguson's contention
in "Shelley's 'Mont-Blanc': What the Mountain Said" that while the poem "exhibits
its own repeated failure to let Mont Blanc be merely a blank, merely
a mass of stone" (173), it also attempts to remove this as a problem
by turning "epistemological language into love language" (173, 178);
and Christoph Bode's claim in "Shelley's 'Mont Blanc': The Aesthetic
'Aufhebung' of a Philosophical Antinomy": that the apparent conflict
between the epistemology and ontology of the poem itself makes for a
consistent argument for an idealist philosophy. Historicist interpretations
include Nigel Leask's assertion in "Mont Blanc's Mysterious Voice: Shelley
and Huttonian Earth," that "Mont Blanc" constitutes a secular attempt
to counter religious interpretations of the sublimity of the glacier
and mountain and Alan Bewell's suggestion in Romanticism and Colonial
Disease that the glaciers of the mountain—glaciers that "creep/
Like snakes that watch their prey"—register Shelley's fear of the
threat of unstoppable global cooling (ll. 100-101).
8 This image
in Queen Mab was a poetic reworking of a line of thought that
Shelley first developed in correspondence with Elizabeth Hitchener. In
his 2 January 1812 letter to Hitchener, for example, he argued that an
understanding of life as "infinite" was equivalent to the position that "every
thing is animation" (The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley, I:156).
9 For an
account of Shelley's more general interest in creating ruptures in his
auditors' "time consciousness," see my Sympathy and the State in the
Romantic Era: Systems, State Finance, and the Shadows of Futurity, pp.
163-204.
10 It
was this understanding of sensation, I suggest, that motivated Shelley's
belief that "passive resistance" was an effective political strategy.
Shelley's doctrine of passive resistance—exemplified in a poem
such as "The Mask of Anarchy" (1819), and inspirational for later figures
such as Mahatma Gandhi—has often been interpreted from a purely
psychological view. From this perspective, passive resistance is effective
because it "shames" aggressors. It is more productive, however, to approach
Shelley's understanding of passive resistance from the perspective of
suspended animation: by suspending one's own action, one enables greater
capacities of sensation—that is, lines of linkage with systemic
potentials—for others. Such a perspective avoids the dubious causal
claims of the psychological approach—it is not at all clear why
passive resistance ought "automatically" to produce shame in aggressors—while
retaining the emphasis on system to which Shelley was committed.
11 See
M. H. Abrams, "Keats's Poems: The Material Dimensions."
12 See
Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, "Rhythm and Meaning." While Gumbrecht
draws on systems theory, rather than Deleuze, in his essay, his claims
can be productively linked to a Deleuzean approach to rhythm and meaning.
13 For
an example of Dick's interest in the activity of passivity, see his brilliant
novel Ubik, which depicts a cast of characters who travel all
around the globe, as well as between the earth and moon. These characters
slowly come to the realization that they are, in fact, in states of suspended
animation, yet they nevertheless retain a capacity to affect events outside
these states, in the "real" world. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Romantic
Circles Praxis Series Series Editor: Orrin N. C. Wang Volume Technical Editor: Joseph Byrne |
||||||||||||