Notes
1. See for
example Pocock 37-50, Dwyer (1993), Sher (1985)
187-188.
2. The
Edinburgh Annual Register, 1814, Edinburgh, 1816, pp
57, 74; The Edinburgh Annual Register, 1815.
Edinburgh, 1817, p 67.
3. Roberts
notes "a decided preference" among paternalists "for local
over central government, and within the concept of local
government a decided preference for private over public
authorities" (Roberts 40).
4. See
also Letters V, 114 [March 1818]; 286-287 [January
1819]; 451 [August 1819]; 486 [September 1819].
5. When
the narrator finds (in his dream) distressed weavers in the
West of Scotland supplied with work by a benevolent
aristocrat, his expectation that a grateful peasantry will
bless their benefactor is rudely dashed( II, 32).
6. Robert
Malcolmson quotes Southey's "pardonable exaggeration" in
Letters from England iii 102-103: "All persons
[...] speak of old ceremonies and old festivities as things
which are obsolete." Malcolmson adds that "most men of
property seem to have applauded their demise as a of
progress and national improvement" (89).
7. For
example, Robert Crawford, Devolving English
Literature (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992); Leith
Davis, Acts of Union: Scotland and the Literary
Negotiation of the British Nation 1707-1830 (Stanford:
Stanford Univ Press, 1998); Janet Sorensen, The Grammar
of Empire in Eighteenth-Century British Writing
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000); Adam Potkay,
The Fate of eloquence in the Age of Hume (Cornell:
Ithaca and London, 1994); Adam Potkay, The Passion for
Happiness: Samuel Johnson and David Hume (Ithaca and
London: Cornell Univ. Press, 2000); Leith Davis, Ian
Duncan, Janet Sorensen, eds., Scotland and the Borders
of Romanticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2004).
top of page
|