|
|||||
Sullen Fires Across the
Atlantic:
|
|||||
Notes1 The
Pirate was published in Edinburgh and London November,
1821; authorized editions of The Pilot were
published in New York and London in January, 1824. 2 The variety
of republican attitudes at work in the 1820s suggest that
republicanism was a highly adaptable approach to theorizing
the relationship of persons and communities to the
state—one signaled by certain recurring themes rather
than a system or set of beliefs. I use "republican" to
refer to political ideas that both value representative
government, elite or democratic, and emphasize a need for
communal identity. In early nineteenth-century American
culture, republican ideologues tended to understand
political power as embodied in representative males who are
endowed with authority by a constituency comprised of elite
white property-owners, who in turn represent the aggregate
body of society. For example, in no. 39 of The
Federalist Madison sums up the "republican complexion"
of government (242) as that endowed with authority "from
the great body of the society" it governs (Rossiter,
241). 3 In a recent
study informed by the history of the book and by the
history of ideas, Mark G. Spencer has described how
Hume’s ideas about factionalism influenced James
Madison’s Federalist No. 10. 4 The careers
of individual maritime workers in the ages of sail
exemplify the contingent nature of "the Atlantic world,"
for many served or sought profit in both Pacific and
Atlantic spheres, and many more employed their skills in
smaller local communities. The narratives of eighteenth-
and nineteenth-century seafarers suggest that Atlantic rim
culture is as constructed as local and national
geo-political terms for cultural contiguity. Since maritime
workers were a historical locus of transatlantic cultural
exchange, then narratives about sailors provide an
especially useful archive for excavating embedded concerns
with the shifting configurations of citizenship and
international relations. For foundational research on
seamen of African descent and the spread of political
ideas, see Julius Scott, "The Common Wind: Currents of
Afro-American Communication in the Era of the Haitian
Revolution," diss., Duke U, 1986. 5 By the
nineteenth century, the British popular imagination had
long associated piracy with democracy; both could be seen
as unruly systems without any established moral foundation.
Christopher Hill notes that in the seventeenth century
pirate "Captains were often elected, and were answerable to
their crews; decisions on policy and disciplinary
punishments were democratically taken. This contrasted very
sharply with the despotism of naval captains, the rule of
the lash, the ultimate possibility of a death sentence for
mutiny" (Hill, 117). 6 Notably,
Cooper’s fantasy of revolutionary adventure imagines
a maritime power the republic did not possess in the
Revolutionary era or in the 1820s, although the US would
achieve considerable sea power by the end of the
century. 7 Anthony
Rotundo’s American Manhood: Transformations in
Masculinity from the Revolution to the Modern Era is a
useful overview of changing ideas about manhood in the
United States. Rotundo shows that in the later eighteenth
century, intimate friendship between men was the norm in
genteel circles. Recent studies of manhood and US print
culture have applied the insights of Rotundo’s work
to more specific textual sites for the construction of
masculinity. Most notably, in American Sympathy,
Caleb Crain examines the relationship of sympathy to
manhood in the early republic, and in the process shows how
critics might productively view friendship among men as a
site of possibility and complex negotiations of affect,
rather than a reflection of the competitive relations of
the market. My purpose here is to show how, for writers
like Cooper, the dialectical emotional exchanges between
friends also suggested one way to re-imagine the
relationship of Britain to the US. 8 Regarding
the early republican fascination with charismatic males,
Mark Kann writes that "Ultimately, the founders’
faith in the Heroic Man completed their grammar of manhood
by promoting a patriarchal discourse that lifted up a few
great men over the democratic masses and played down
women’s political potential as citizens and leaders"
(Kann, 130-1). In A Republic of Men political
scientist Kann analyzes the ways in which cultural concepts
of gender, and especially white manhood, were deployed in
federalist print of the early national era. Positing a
cultural "grammar of manhood"—comprised of "the
hegemonic norms, language, and rules they employed to
promote public quiescence and justify leadership"
(3)—Kann assesses the effect of cultural notions of
threatening (non-heterosexual) manly disorder, family
stability, civic virtue and heroic individuality on the
development of citizenship and doctrines of political
authority. 9 In this
manner, my argument differs from Margaret Cohen’s
examination of "know-how" in The Pilot. 10 My
analysis of the feelings of the hero draws from the theory
of charisma and institutional bureaucracy articulated by
Max Weber. According to his sociology of the individual as
political fetish, the modern state routinizes gender
inequalities through a "workaday" bureaucracy located in
the mundane structural demands of economic activity; in the
civic arena created by official bureaucracy, patriarchal
social patterns formalize commercial relations and enforce
the domination of a perceived "natural leader" in the home,
the marketplace, and the sphere of civic activity.
Weber’s description of patriarchal authority
emphasizes the historical connections of patriarchal
authority to economic forces and statutory bureaucracy. In
the Western political scenarios that Weber describes, a
social group recognizes the quality of "charisma" in a man;
this act of ascription legitimizes the privileged positions
of charismatic individuals within the prescribed hierarchy
of the "social strata" (Weber, 39). Weber claims that under
the conditions of modern capitalism, most social
institutions in the West authorize these forms of
individual—almost always a male
individual—empowerment by managing the system of
social status and access to capital. 11 Showing
how later eighteenth-century poets used the "imaginative
domain" of the "Atlantic theater" to represent "the
connection between emotion and history," Julie Ellison
argues that "the Age of Sensibility can by defined by its
focus on the moments when consciousness dilates to
historical horizons and when history is compressed into
consciousness" (Ellison; 124, 141, 142). In a similar
manner, maritime historical novels such as The
Pirate and The Pilot relate individual
consciousness to grand historical narratives through shared
experience. In the romantic worlds imagined by Cooper and
Scott, each man’s affective capacities engineer his
position within social and political hierarchies, and his
intimate attachments to peers, subalterns, and authority
figures become the basic components of manly historical
enterprise. 12 It may
also be recognizable to scholars of nineteenth century US
sentimental fiction. For literary scholars like Elizabeth
Barnes, Julia Stern, and Lori Merish, in the eighteenth
century philosophies of sympathy set the precedent for
sentimental forms and rhetoric—a nineteenth century
middle class phenomena with a unique incarnation in the US.
In her examination of the ways that familial love
intersects with seduction plots, Elizabeth Barnes
illustrates how doctrines of sympathy could collapse a
variety of emotional relations into the same forms in
nineteenth-century novels. Stern uses her readings to
describe the psychological underpinnings of connections
between emotion, gender, and national violence in US
writing, while Merish emphasizes attitudes toward the
political and national subject status of middle-class women
that make commodity consumption into a gendered practice.
Following Nancy Armstrong, most feminists examining
literary form in the early US emphasize the acculturation
of British forms associated with the white middle class;
for many of these scholars the literary relations of the US
with Britain illustrate the relevance of British culture
and especially print culture to gendered, political, and
material practices in later nineteenth-century
America. 13 According
to Enlightenment thinkers, this process of empowerment
requires properly socialized national subjects, because the
public must willingly recognize charisma in the men who
exercise power. 14
Interrogating the literary-critical tendency to idealize
narratives of interracial male pairing, Robyn Wiegman has
shown how these popular bonding narratives operate by
"transmuting the narrative of racial difference into a
scenario of the mutuality of gender" (Wiegman, 172).
Despite the prevalence of this narrative convention in
popular fiction and film, "critical discussions of the
American [canonical] tradition have nonetheless debated,
for almost half a century, the meaning, centrality, and
utopian possibilities inherent in the image of closely
bonded men" (172). Wiegman’s thesis on the obsession
of twentieth-century narrative with "symbolic marriage
among men" is relevant to my study because her close
readings highlight the ongoing relevance of theses about
manliness, affinity, and sympathy in Enlightenment-era
political thought. My point is that the cultural work
assigned to same-sex friendship in eighteenth- and early
nineteenth-century historical fictions eventually produced
the discourse of sexual correspondence that allowed
twentieth-century critics like Leslie Fiedler to theorize
"democracy" in US fiction by pointing to scenarios that
displace women and heterosexuality, and that use same-sex
bonds to dissolve the historical and political problem of
racial difference (149). |