|
|||||
Sullen Fires Across the
Atlantic:
|
|||||
Notes1 Marietta
Messmer provides a thorough and compelling genealogy of
literary historiographical nationalism in the US, and
argues that it is time for the revisionist "intra-American
cultural pluralism" of recent decades to be supplemented by
studies of "America’s transnational or global
interliterary and intercultural relations" (50). 2 For a
preciously stuffy statement of the mid-century nationalist
position, see Robert Hertz’s "English and American
Romanticism" (1965), which notes that "we characterize the
Romantics of the United States as men of affirmation,
optimism, and healthy vision of the certain glory which
lies a little beyond. By implication, the English Romantics
are brilliant but effete aristocrats rather than men of the
People or great souls of quiet meditation and discovery"
(81). See Russell Reising, Gerald Graff, and David R.
Shumway for general accounts of the nationalistic impulses
behind the disciplinary formation of American
Literature. 3
Another influential summary statement of the common sense
of old historicism is Tony Tanner’s essay, "Notes for
a Comparison between American and European Romanticism"
(1968), in one of the earliest issues of the journal of the
British Association for American Studies. Tanner is mainly
concerned to differentiate American practice from the known
quantity of the European tradition. He observes that the
Americans have an abiding sense of solitude in nature, a
low regard for history, and, more surprisingly, that they
do not have a "revolutionary social dimension," that is, an
"energizing conviction that the poet’s imaginative
visions...could vitally influence and enhance the
conditions of life of their fellow men" (97). 4
Linden Peach makes a systematic argument of this position
in his British Influence on the Birth of American
Literature (1982). 5
Brantley expands his argument in Anglo-American Antiphony:
The Late Romanticism of Tennyson and Emerson (1994) and in
Experience and Faith : The Late-Romantic Imagination of
Emily Dickinson (2005). 6 Two
important earlier studies of reciprocity in the formation
of American and British national identity are Christopher
Mulvey’s Anglo-American Landscapes (1983) and
Transatlantic Manners (1990), both of which use travel
narratives as their main body of evidence. 7
Another way of complicating the easy tale of American
Romanticism’s rebellion against Wordsworth,
Coleridge, Byron, Shelley, and Keats has been to
demonstrate that Emerson, Thoreau, Fuller, and the rest
were consciously indebted to wholly other forebears. See,
for instance, Susan Manning’s two excellent studies
of connections between Scottish and American literary
cultures. Also see Robin Grey’s account of the
importance of 17th-Century English culture to the major
authors of the American Renaissance. 8
See also Giles’s exploration of the term
"transnational" along with his rereading of Emerson and
Thoreau in the context of early national Anglophobia in
"Transnationalism and Classic American Literature." An
important complementary study of the way in which British
nationalism developed as part of the rise of imperialism is
Saree Makdisi’s Romantic Imperialism (1998), which
rereads the central Romantic poets in the context of
developments in India, Africa, and the Arab world. 9
Several recent collections of essays have begun to explore
the field mapped most thoroughly by Gravil. Comparative
Romanticisms: Power, Gender, Subjectivity (1998), edited by
Larry H. Peer and Diane Long Hoeveler provides twelve case
studies of the true internationalism of the three
analytical categories listed in the title. These essays
make connections around the entire Atlantic Rim and beyond,
with readings of American, British, German, French,
Italian, and Russian texts. A second collection of essays
from the discipline of comparative literature, this one
focusing more narrowly on connections between the British,
French, and German Romantics, is Gregory Maertz’s
collection, Cultural Interactions in the Romantic Age
(1998). Also important for its accounts of the
internationalism of both natural history and republicanism
and their literary consequences is Revolutions and
Watersheds: Transatlantic Dialogues 1775-1815 (1999),
edited by W. M. Verhoeven and Beth Kautz. More recently,
Verhoeven has edited Revolutionary Histories: Transatlantic
Cultural Nationalism, 1775-1815 (2002), an impressive
volume centered on the Romantic keywords, "history" and
"nation." Finally, the first half of Special Relationships:
Anglo-American Affinities and Antagonisms, 1854-1936,
edited by Janet Beer and Bridget Bennett offers a valuable
selection of case studies in late Romanticism. 10 See the two recent collections of essays
in transatlantic studies edited by Will Kaufman and Heidi
Slettedahl Macpherson for a sampling of the full range of
concerns, outside the Romantic period, addressed by this
new discipline. |