Quarterly Review (1809) Vol. II
Early issues of the Quarterly Review were
kept in type, and reprinted with alterations over a
period of several years, without listing any details of
these new impressions. In the absence of a critical
recension of the text, the purpose of this note is to
give as many details as possible about the copy text, and
the relationship to it of the etext.
Collational Formula of Copy
7½" x 4¼" :
Idiosyncrasies of Copy Text
Issue 3, Art. 8 is incorrectly headed as
Art. 7 in printed original.
Issue 3 Art 8 Small type is used for main
text in printed original pp 160-164.
Issue 4, p 323 is incorrectly numbered
303 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 326 is incorrectly numbered
306 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 327 is incorrectly numbered
307 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 330 is incorrectly numbered
310 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 331 is incorrectly numbered
311 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 334 is incorrectly numbered
314 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 335 is incorrectly numbered
315 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 338 is incorrectly numbered
318 in printed original.
Issue 4, p 433 - date of publication is
incorrectly given as 1890 in the printed original.
NB Different texts were used for the OCR
process and for editorial correction. Text in the Roman
alphabet was corrected to the copy text described above,
but the images used to represent non-Roman text were
taken from the original scans, which have been used to
produce the PDF version.
Spelling and punctuation have been
Page numbers of the copy text are
reproduced in square brackets at the end of the page to
which they refer.
The PDF file does not reproduce the copy
The etext was prepared by Dr David
Jenkins-Handy and Dr Gavin Budge, School of English,
University of Central England, Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK.
Scanned images were made by the staff of UCE Electronic
This text is copyright, Romantic
Periodical Project, University of Central England.
Permission is granted for non-commercial use.