Material from the Romantic Circles Website may not be downloaded, reproduced or disseminated in any manner without authorization unless it is for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, and/or classroom use as provided by the Copyright Act of 1976, as amended.
Unless otherwise noted, all Pages and Resources mounted on Romantic Circles are copyrighted by the author/editor and may be shared only in accordance with the Fair Use provisions of U.S. copyright law. Except as expressly permitted by this statement, redistribution or republication in any medium requires express prior written consent from the author/editors and advance notification of Romantic Circles. Any requests for authorization should be forwarded to Romantic Circles:>
By their use of these texts and images, users agree to the following conditions:
Users are not permitted to download these texts and images in order to mount them on their own servers. It is not in our interest or that of our users to have uncontrolled subsets of our holdings available elsewhere on the Internet. We make corrections and additions to our edited resources on a continual basis, and we want the most current text to be the only one generally available to all Internet users. Institutions can, of course, make a link to the copies at Romantic Circles, subject to our conditions of use.
BL Add. MS 28268, ff. 60–61; published in Hart, p. 13
For permission to publish the text of MSS in their possession, the editors wish to thank the Beinecke Rare Books and Manuscript Library, Yale University; Berg Collection of English and American Literature, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the Bodleian Library Oxford University; the British Library; Boston Public Library; the Syndics of Cambridge University Library; the Syndics of the Fitzwilliam Museum Cambridge; Haverford College, Connecticut; the Historical Society of Pennsylvania; the Hornby Library, Liverpool Libraries and Information Services; the Houghton Library, Harvard University; the John Rylands Library, Manchester; the Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas; Luton Museum (Bedfordshire County Council); Massachusetts Historical Society; McGill University Library; the National Library of Scotland; the Newberry Library, Chicago; the New York Public Library (Pforzheimer Collections); the Pierpont Morgan Library, New York; the Public Record Offices of Bedford, Suffolk (Bury St Edmunds) and Northumberland, the Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge; the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne; the Trustees of the William Salt Library, Stafford, the Wisbech and Fenland Museum; the University of Virginia Library.
A research grant from the British Academy made much of the archival work possible, as did support from the English Department of Nottingham Trent University.
All quotation marks and apostrophes have been changed: " for “," for ”, ' for ‘, and ' for ’.
Any dashes occurring in line breaks have been removed.
Because of web browser variability, all hyphens have been typed on the U.S. keyboard
Dashes have been rendered as —
Bloomfield's spelling has not been regularized.
Writing in other hands appearing on these manuscripts has been indicated as such, the content recorded in brackets.
& has been used for the ampersand sign.
£ has been used for £, the pound sign
All other characters, those with accents, non-breaking spaces, etc., have been encoded in HTML entity decimals.
I received your letter and I own having this moment received it, I am much hurt by it.
I think there will be the height of absurdity in having the notes to the octavos and quartos in a different form from those to the pocket vol. I imagine all this is from Mr Hood, who, having done me a gross insult & shameful injustice in the matter of the Homer, wishes, as you may in time learn is usual, to exclude my name from every part of your works and to make you believe my judgment of approbation is greatly to be dreaded. I wish I had known your mind in time. I would not have given my mind the trouble often very distressing of calling off its attention from yet far nearer objects of its concern to write notes on your poems excellent as those poems are, and much as I have regarded and am disposed to regard their author.
I think I am as much at liberty to express my opinion of your poems as the reviewers or any other person.
However say if you please, and in any terms you please at the end of the vol, that you disapprove my having done so; only do not forget to say that you never hinted this disapprobation to me till all were printed.
There could hardly I think be an instance of more concentrated criticism, nor a more simple unexceptionable shape in which to offer it. What I said of Mr Fox I said less for the sake of Mr Fox than for the sake of my country and posterity and mankind. If it may lead any portion of the public to learn Better to distinguish than hitherto Between those who have plunged us into such a war and so long kept us in it and those who would have prevented our ever rushing into that direful whirlpool I have my chief object.
I will certainly not alter the form of the notes. I was excluded
from any other part in this volume by your own express desire. I think I may say
in future that it is not likely that I should thus strangely offend. I do not
mean to write either note or essay to any future edition of any poems you may
publish in my Life-time. I assure I can very ill spare the time short as the
notes are. To have taken so avowed a part in the first publication and none
except that of corrector of the press and occasional emendator in this would I
think have had a strange and undesirable appearance for you and for the poems:
as if I had changed my mind as to you or them or both. Mind, I could not well
take any part that was more modest, or offer an opinion in fewer words. You, and
you say your friends in general, are, or will be,
dissatisfied with them and dislike my occupying even so small a space in your
works and so unobtrusive a station as the bottom of the page. I believe you will
find me assuredly resolved not to occupy any space at all in them in future;
only if I must not say what I think of you it would have been as well if you, in
your preface, had not said what you think of me. In future if I am to be silent
as to your praise in your publications I would request you to be so as to mine
reciprocally.
But I hope it was not about such a matter as this that the Duke of Grafton told me by Mr. Rogers that he meant to call at Troston. I heard by Mr. Rogers what I was glad to hear as it concurs with my own sentiments, that ‘The Miller’s Maid’ was a particular favourite with Mr Fox.
Suppose you did read my praise of your poems in the proofs and did not strike it out. What then? Did not you send me your praise of me to read in your preface in the proof? If you thought it wrong that a man should revise a proof in which a friend has said something in his praise you should not have sent such a proof to me. I am ready at all times to do what essential services I can, but such punctilios I do not like nor expect from a man of genius.