Godwin's The History of England

[Title page]

(1)

Other histories of England available to schoolchildren at the time (some of which would have been Godwin’s direct competition within the marketplace) and in subsequent decades noted in Daniel Hahn’s Oxford Companion to Children's Literature (1984) include: 1761: John Newbery’s A New History of England, from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Present Time.; 1764: Newbery publishes Oliver Goldsmith’s An History of England.; 1791: Jane Austen’s (parodic) A History of England.; 1790s: Sarah Trimmer publishes several copperplate prints of biblical and secular history; 1800: John Marshall publishe…

THE 
HISTORY OF ENGLAND, 
FOR 
THE USE OF SCHOOLS 
AND 
YOUNG PERSONS. 
BY EDWARD BALDWIN, ESQ. 
AUTHOR OF FABLES, ANCIENT AND MODERN. 
WITH THIRTY-TWO HEADS OF THE KINGS, 
ENGRAVED ON COPPER-PLATE, 
AND A STRIKING REPRESENTATION OF AN ANCIENT 
TOURNAMENT.

LONDON: 
PRINTED FOR THOMAS HODGKINS, AT THE JUVENILE 
LIBRARY, HANWAY STREET (OPPOSITE SOHO 
SQUARE), OXFORD STREET, AND TO BE 
HAD OF ALL BOOKSELLERS. 
1806.

[Next Page]

PREFACE.

ENCOURAGED by the general acceptance which my Fables, Ancient and Modern, have found with the public, I have been excited to try how far a similar mode of familiar and playful writing might be successfully applied in the composition of History. Too long have books, designed for the instruction of children, been written in a dry and repulsive style, which the patience and perseverance of our maturer years would scarcely enable us to conquer. Too long have their tender memories been loaded with a variety of minute particulars, which, as they excite no passion in the mind, and present no picture, can be learned only to forget. I have lately seen Grammars of Geography, and Grammars of History, in which these faults, if they are faults, are carried to a height hitherto unequalled.

I have one criterion by which to form my judgment in these matters; and I will here plainly communicate it for the benefit of parents and instructors. I hold that those particulars of which an [end a2] accomplished gentleman and a scholar may without dishonour confess that he has no recollection, are a superfluity with which it is quite unnecessary to load the memory of a child. I have seen children, who can explain minutely the process of various manufactures, who can tell from what country we get our cochineal, and currently recite the particulars of the balance of trade between England and the four quarters of the globe. This certainly is not the very first branch of a liberal education.

(2)

See Barnett’s and Gustafson’s introduction to this edition, “The Radical Aesop: William Godwin and the Juvenile Library, 1805-1825,” for more on Godwin’s views on inspiring or enlivening children’s studies, as well as a few examples of the kinds of “grammars of geography” and “grammars of history” he mentions here.

It is not the boast of this little book that it contains a catalogue of five thousand remarkable events. My pages are not crouded with a variety of articles: they are so printed as to be agreeable and refreshing to the eye of a child.

(3)

My pages are not crouded with a variety of articles: they are so printed as to be agreeable and refreshing to the eye of a child: Godwin appears to be drawing on a practice attributed to Anna Barbauld of reducing the amount of printed matter per page so as not to overwhelm child readers. Barbauld typically used this practice in her primers, such as Lessons for Children of Two to Three Years (London: 1787) or Lessons for Children of Three to Four Years (London: 1788). Godwin adopts the practice here for what would likely have been an older audience of readers. For further information on Barbaul…

I wished to give him a bird's eye view of the History of England, not to exhibit it by the aid of a microscope. For this reason I seldom or ever found it necessary to take down a book from my shelf as I wrote. I had nothing to do but with the great landmarks of history which can never be forgotten, and the strong impression which, once received, can never be obliterated.

(4)

Nothing to do but with the great landmarks of history… and the strong impression which, once received, can never be obliterated: Throughout his historical writings, Godwin argues that the historian’s task must go beyond the description of facts to articulate the “individual” character of important historical events and persons. In his unpublished 1797 essay “Of History and Romance,” Godwin notes that history ought to represent its subjects as “composed of materials merely human” (Caleb Williams, “Appendix A” 456) so that the “contemplation of illustrious men” might provide a “fruitful source o…

That which constitutes the ultimate result of historical reading in the mind of a gentleman and a scholar, I was of opinion was precisely the first lesson of history I should wish to communicate to a child.

(5)

The ultimate result of historical reading in the mind of a gentleman and a scholar, … was precisely the first lesson of history I should wish to communicate to a child: In Political Justice, Godwin claims that a child’s intellectual improvement can only occur where her mind “be advanced to the height of knowledge already existing among the enlightened members of the community.” This cultivates the child’s propensity for critical inquiry, encouraging both “the pursuit of further acquisitions” and the notion that all ideas are “open to review” (1798, II: 299-300). On Godwin’s views concerning th…

Yet, lightly as I ap- [end iv] pear in my narrative to skim over the surface of events, the reader will be surprised, when he comes to look at the Tables at the end of the volume, to see how great a mass of information this book contains. I am not without hope that the young reader will learn more from my pages, than from some productions on the same subject in two or three crowded volumes in twelves *.

Moliere, when he wrote his admirable comedies, was accustomed to read them in manuscript to an old woman, his housekeeper, and be always found that, where the old woman laughed or was out of humour, there the audiences laughed or were out of humour also. In the same manner I am accustomed to consult my children in this humble species of writing in which I have engaged. I put the two or three first sections of this work into their hands as a specimen. Their remark was, How easy this is! Why, we learn it by heart, almost as fast as we read it! Their suffrage gave me courage, and I carried on my work to the end.

*For a specimen of the manner in which this outline might advantageously be filled up for children, in those parts which are peculiarly instructive and interesting, the reader is referred to the Life of Lady Jane Grey by Theophilus Marcliffe. [end v]

Judging from the experiment of my own children, I am led to imagine that the sections of this volume might easily, as well as usefully, be committed to memory. The Tables at the end, are intended merely to fix the pupil's recollection of what he has previously learned. They may also convey to the inexperienced reader a vivid feeling, that there are other countries beside England, and other histories worthy to be read. In a word, they obviously serve as an introduction and remote prospect to the whole magazine of human sciences and arts. [end page vi]

HISTORY 
OF 
ENGLAND. 
SHORT CHARACTERS OF THE KINGS OF ENGLAND.

WILLIAM I. 
WILLIAM the Conqueror was harsh and severe.

(6)

William I: Other history books for children in this period tended to represent William I in more measured terms. In Dr. Goldsmith’s History of England, Abridged by Himself. For the Use of Schools (Air: 1799), Oliver Goldsmith acknowledges William’s tyranny but explains it as a response to British rebellions. Alexander Bicknell’s A History of England and the British Empire Designed for the Instruction of Youth (London: 1794), Charles Allen’s A New and Improved History of England, from the Invasion of Julius Caesar, to the End of the Thirty-Second Year of the Reign of his Majesty King George the…

WILLIAM II. 
William Rufus was passionate and rash.

HENRY I. 
Henry Beauclerc was an excellent scholar. [end B]

STEPHEN. 
Stephen of Blois got the crown by a trick, but was hardly able to keep it.

HENRY II. 
Henry Fitz-Empress was a man of spirit and sense, but was whipped at the tomb of Thomas à Becket.

RICHARD I. 
Richard Coeur de Lion fought for the Holy Land with the sultan Saladin.

JOHN. 
John Lackland was a pitiful fellow, and died of eating peaches: in his time was Magna Charta.

HENRY III. 
Henry of Winchester was a poor creature, and had a troublesome reign of fifty-six years. [end 2]

EDWARD I. 
Edward Longshanks was knowing and wise, but he loved war, and conducted it barbarously.

EDWARD II. 
Edward of Caernarvon, a weak prince, was governed by upstarts, and cruelly murdered by his wife in Berkeley castle.

EDWARD III. 
Edward the Third was the conqueror of France.

RICHARD II. 
Richard of Bourdeaux was admirable while a boy, and contemptible when he grew to be a man; he was deprived of his crown and starved to death in Pomfret castle. [end 3]

HENRY IV. 
Henry of Bolingbroke wrested the crown from Richard of Bourdeaux, and was miserable all the days of his reign.

HENRY V. 
Henry of Monmouth won the battle of Agincourt on St. Crispin's day.

HENRY VI. 
Henry of Windsor, half madman, and half fool, lost the crown that his grandfather had wickedly seized.

EDWARD IV. 
Edward the Fourth was an arrant libertine, and took away the famous Jane Shore from her husband that she might live with him.

EDWARD V. 
Edward the Fifth, and his brother, the duke of York, are said to have been [end 4] murdered in the Tower, while children, by their uncle, Richard Crookback.

RICHARD III. 
Richard Crookback I believe was not crooked, and perhaps not a murderer of children; but he was conquered in battle by Henry of Richmond; and Henry was not contented to kill him, without making people think him a monster after he was dead.

HENRY VII. 
Henry of Richmond was nicknamed by his courtiers the wisest of monarchs, but was in reality nothing better than a hard-hearted, scraping old miser.

HENRY VIII. 
Henry the Eighth had six wives: he cut off the heads of two of them, [end 5] and put away two more: in his reign England changed from the Roman Catholic to the Protestant religion.

EDWARD VI. 
Edward the Sixth was nine years old when he began to reign, and sixteen when he died: he was a good boy, studied Greek, and was a towardly scholar.

MARY. 
Bloody queen Mary burned three hundred Protestants in four years, because they did not think just as she did, and would not tell lies about the matters.

ELIZABETH. 
Queen Elizabeth of all her sex had a genius best fitted to govern; but she was apt to swear, and box her [end 6] ministers' ears; in her time was the Spanish Armada.

JAMES I. 
James the First would have made a very good schoolmaster, and a very good schoolmaster is a most excellent member of society: what a pity people should be put to a business they are not fit for!

CHARLES I. 
Charles the First loved and understood the works of Shakespear and Raphael and Titian; he was a noble and accomplished gentleman; but he was not a good king, and he had a hard fate; his subjects went to war with him, defeated him, and cut off his head.

CHARLES II. 
Charles the Second had a good deal of wit, but made a bad use of it; he [end 7] never said a foolish thing nor ever did a wise one.

JAMES II. 
James the Second, like his grandfather James the First, was put to a wrong trade; he was more like a monk, than a king; he wanted to make us Roman Catholics, but we were a hundred and fifty years too old for it.

WILLIAM III. 
William the Third was a Dutchman: we sent for him over, because we would not be made Roman Catholics by James the Second; and so James was sent away, and William reigned in his stead.

ANNE. 
Queen Anne was a quiet, good-natured woman, and wanted nothing but [end 8] peace: but the duke of Marlborough was her general, and won several famous battles for her abroad; his duchess governed queen Anne at home, and would sometimes affront her majesty, and the make the queen beg her pardon.

GEORGE I. 
George the First was invited from Hanover to preserve the Protestant religion: queen Anne wanted to have given the crown to her brother, the son of James the Second; but he, like his father, was a Catholic: in 1715 there was a rebellion in Scotland in favour of queen Anne's brother.

GEORGE II. 
George the Second had to contend with the rebellion in 1745; the rebels were defeated at Culloden by [end 9] William duke of Cumberland, the king's son.

GEORGE III. 
In the reign of George the Third, who has reigned between forty and fifty years, happened the Independence of America, and the French Revolution: Lords Rodney, Howe, Duncan, St. Vincent and Nelson have adorned this reign by their victories at sea. [end 10]

HISTORY 
OF 
ENGLAND.

THE BRITONS.

THE history of the world is divided into Ancient and Modern History: the birth of Christ, who was the great author of the Christian religion, is the event at which Ancient History ends, and Modern History begins.

The inhabitants of Britain before Christ wrote no books; therefore all that we know about them is obscure and imperfect. [end 11]

The best writers of books in the period before Christ were the Greeks and Romans: the Greeks wrote something about the Ancient Britons; but the first accurate account was written by Julius Caesar emperor of Rome, about fifty years before Christ.

(7)

Godwin refers to Commentarii de Bello Gallico, written by Julius Caesar between 58 and 49 BCE. The Gaellic Wars has long been a staple of early Latin education for children due to its straightforward prose, so any of Godwin’s readers who were also receiving a classical education would have been familiar with it.

The first inhabitants of Britain, that we know any thing about, came over from France, anciently called Gaul: they had among them a set of learned men called Druids.

These learned men perhaps could neither read nor write; but they studied the stars, and the system of the heavens, commonly called astronomy; and they composed so many verses upon astronomy, and history, and morality, and religion, and other subjects, that Julius Caesar says it took their pupils twenty years to learn them all by heart: the Druids were lovers [end 12] of Gods and good things, and taught valuable precepts to their scholars.

As the time when the Druids flourished in Britain was before Christ, they could not be Christians; they were very devout, said many prayers, sung many hymns, and made many sacrifices: I am sorry to say, that they sometimes sacrificed (that is, killed) men at their altars, and thought to please their Gods by it: the principal objects of their worship were the sun, moon and stars.

(8)

Druids: Britain’s Druidical past is also the subject of Godwin’s early novel Imogen: A Pastoral Romance from the Ancient British, published anonymously in 1784. The novel makes constant reference to Druid lore and rituals, including human sacrifice, reflecting the late eighteenth century revival of interest in pre-Christian native religions. Godwin may have been aware of Druidic practices from works like John Toland’s A Critical History of the Celtic Religion and Learning (1720), William Cooke’s An Inquiry into the Patriarchical and Druidical Religion, Temples (1780), John Smith’s Galic Antiqu…

THE ROMANS.

ROME, the famous mistress of the world, was at first a poor village, made up of clay-built huts; but in time grew rich, and conquered first all Italy, and then almost the whole known world: [end 13] the last country that the Romans conquered, was Britain.

Julius Caesar, first emperor, invaded Britain, but did not conquer it: a Roman province and government were not established here, till under the fourth [crossed out and fifth written by hand] emperor Claudius: the Britons struggled a long time against their conquerors; the greatest of the ancient British heroes was Caractacus.

(9)

A first-century ACE cheiftain of the Catuvellauni tribe who led the British resistance to the Roman conquest. In 1818 William Blake included Caratctacus in his series of “Visionary Heads.”

The Romans made quite another thing of Britain from what they found it: the Britons lived in mean huts, and when many of these stood together, they dug a deep ditch round the whole, and called it a town: there remains however of the Ancient Britons the ruin of several stupendous structures built for religious purposes: the chief of these is Stone-henge on Salisbury Plain.

The Romans built beautiful towns in many parts of England in the best [end 14] style of architecture, and adorned them with theatres, palaces and temples; so that Britain became in length of time almost as fine as Italy itself: Greek was studied here, and Latin became the ordinary language: the Romans were fond of teaching us, and found us very apt scholars: Constantine the Great and others, were advanced from the government of Britain to the throne of the empire.

The religion of the ancient Romans was the religion of Homer and Virgil: their Gods were Jupiter and Juno and Mercury and Mars and Minerva and Venus: there were a great many of them: an ancient writer counts up thirty thousand

(10)

Godwin’s The Pantheon; or Ancient History of the Gods of Greece and Rome. Intended to Facilitate the Understanding of the Classical Authors, and of the Poets in General. For the Use of Schools, and Young Persons of Both Sexes. With Engravings of the Principal Gods, chiefly taken form the Remains of Ancient Statuary, published by the Juvenile Library under Godwin’s “Edward Baldwin” pseudonym in 1806 (the same year as History of England) explains the classical gods and goddesses to young readers.

: the Romans hated the Druids, because the Druids taught their followers the love of liberty, and the Romans, before they landed here, were become slaves: so the Romans murdered the Druids wherever they [end 15] found them, and destroyed their religion and learning.

Constantine the Great, established the Christian religion in Rome, about the year of our Lord 324: the provinces followed the example of the capital, and Britain, like the rest of the empire, was soon furnished with bishops and clergy, who expounded to the people the doctrines of Christ and his apostles: the Roman government in Britain lasted till the year 420.

THE SAXONS.

THE Romans were once the most frugal, temperate and high-spirited people in the world: in length of time they became wasteful and luxurious, and betook themselves to the most disgraceful excesses: under their republican government they were free, [end 16] under the emperors they were slaves: in the former period they conquered the world, in the latter they were conquered themselves.

When the Roman empire became incapable of defending itself, it was overrun by the Goths, and Vandals, and Huns, and Lombards, and Ostrogoths, and twenty barbarous nations, who poured down upon the civilized world from the frozen regions of the north.

Britain was seized by the Saxons, who came from the shores of the Baltic to this island in their ships: the particular race of Saxons who came here were Anglo-Saxons; and from them the country they seized was for the first time called the land of the Angles, or for shortness England.

The Britons in general made but a poor resistance to their conquerors: this was not the case however with all; [end 17] the bravest among them retired to the mountains of Wales and Cornwall, and were never entirely subdued by their invaders.

Among the Britons who boldly resisted the barbarous and ignorant Saxons, there was one very famous man, who was called king Arthur: he fought any battles, and always showed himself a brave soldier, a good patriot, and a man or honour: he was killed in battle about the year 546: a great many stories have been told of him, some true, and some false, particularly of the adventures of his knights of the Round Table, though knighthood was not invented till some hundred years after his death: Spenser, one of the best of the best of the English poets, wrote a very long about him and the Fairy Queen.

(11)

Most notable, of course, is Edmund Spenser’s The Fairie Queen (1590; 1596).

[end 18]

THE HEPTARCHY.

THE founders of the Saxon government in England were Hengist and Horsa, two brothers; they conquered Kent; their countrymen on the shores of the Baltic, heard of their success, and followed their example; one part of England was seized by them after another; and the Saxons erected seven kingdoms in England, which are called the Heptarchy.

The barbarous Saxons abolished the Christian religion among us: they were quite as successful in teaching us ignorance, as the Romans had been in teaching us knowledge: the very ideas of the Christian God and his son were lost: and historians have supposed that, soon after the death of king Arthur, not a book was to be found in the island.

The Saxons however had a religion of their own, and Woden or Odin was [end 19] their principal God; the names of several of their Gods are preserved to us in the names of the days of the week, Sunday and Monday are the days of the Sun and Moon, Tuesday is Tuisco's day, Wednesday the day of Woden, Thursday of Thor, Friday of Friga and Saturday of Sater: it is usual to consider the Saxons as more peculiarly our ancestors than either the Britons of Romans; because they were Angles, we are called English; and, though the language they spoke (which was the Saxon) has changed its name among us, it differs not otherwise from that we speak now, than as almost all languages alter in the course of some hundred years.

In the year 596 the pope of Rome sent over some monks to convert the Saxons to the Roman Catholic faith: they went from one kingdom of Heptarchy to another, and in a short time all the Saxons became Christians; [end 20] the better sort learned to read and write; England produced students and authors, and gradually became adorned with churches, monasteries and cathedrals.

Monasteries are large houses full of monks or nuns, people who have taken a vow never to marry, and to spend all their lives in saying their prayers, and reading good books.

THE MONARCHY.

IN the year 800 Egbert, king of the West of England, put an end to the Heptarchy, and made himself first king of England.

His grandson, Alfred, was the noblest king that ever sat on this, or perhaps any other throne: he collected all the good laws that had ever been made by any of his Saxon ancestors, and caused them to be observed: the [end 21] Saxons, though a barbarous people, were endowed with good sense, and cultivated the love of liberty in the dark and unpleasant climate they came from: many of their laws are excellent, and are the laws and principles of the English government to this day.

(12)

The ninth-century ACE Doom Book or Code of Alfred is the foundation for subsequent English Common Law.

They were times of great barbarism that Alfred lived in: he did not learn to read till he was nine years old, and then only because he begged to be taught: there were no clocks in the island, and Alfred invented a way of measuring time by candles which were made to burn eight hours apiece: he allowed himself eight hours in every day for sleep and his meals: eight hours for study, and eight hours for the public duties of his government; which he discharged with an exactness, an impartiality, and a wisdom, that almost exceeded human capacity. [end 22]

THE DANES.

BUT Alfred was not allowed to spend his life in exertions to promote the private happiness of his countrymen: the Danes, who inhabited almost exactly the same region from which the Saxons had come, sailed over to Britain in their ships, with an inclination to treat the Saxons now, as the Saxons had treated the Britons before: at one time they were so successful, that Alfred lost his army, and was obliged to hide himself for weeks in the disguise of a servant in a poor man's cottager: it was here that the cottager's wife gave him a scolding, for letting her cakes be burned while he sat by the fire where they were toasting.

From this retreat he contrived to send messages to his friends, and got together a new army: he then dressed himself like a harper (a singer of fine [end 23] old ballads like Chevy Chase, to the music of his harp,

(13)

“The Ballad of Chevy Chase” describes an ill-fated hunting party led by Percy, the English Earl of Northumberland in the Cheviot Hills along the Scottish borders. It was included in Thomas Percy's Reliques of Ancient English Poetry (1765), among other similar collections, and was widely disseminated in chapbook form throughout the eighteenth century. Joseph Addison wrote in the Spectator in 1711 that “the old song of ‘Chevy-Chase’ is the favourite ballad of the common people of England, and Ben Jonson used to say he had rather have been the author of it than of all his works” (Spectator No. 7…

) and went into the Danish camp: there he played and sung before the king: and, having found that the Danes, now they saw no enemy, minded nothing but dancing and drinking and amusements, he went away, and came back with his soldiers, defeated the Danes, and obliged them to go home to the shores of the Baltic.

The Danes were a braver race of men than the Saxons: when the Saxons came over to Britain, and settled among the remnants of Roman luxury, they grew effeminate; when they became Christians, it was but a poor religion that the tyrannical popes and ignorant monks taught them, and they lost the fine old songs and ballads, which celebrated the courage and virtues of their ancestors, that they had learned at home: the monks told them they must sing nothing but Psalms. [end 24]

The Danes, who staid at home in their northern climate, amidst stupendous rocks and wild scenery, continued to sing the songs of their ancestors, and made better: their poets are called Scalds, and their compositions the Runic or Scandinavian poetry: some fine specimens of it have been put into English by Gray, author of the Elegy in a Country Church Yard:

(14)

Thomas Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” was published in 1751. Here, Godwin likely refers to Gray’s “The Fatal Sisters. An Ode” and “The Descent of Odin,” which are loose translations of Norse odes. The translations, written in 1761, were published in Robert Dodsley’s 1768 edition, Poems by Mr. Gray. For further information, including translations of the poems, see Norse Romanticism: Themes in British Literature, 1760-1830, edited by Robert W. Rix.

their religion was the same as that of the Saxons had been.

The Runic poets are the inventors of those charming tales about giants and fairies, and dragons and enchantments, which in this island have always afford an agreeable exercise for the fancy of children.

(15)

See Barnett’s and Gustafson’s introduction to this edition, “The Radical Aesop: William Godwin and the Juvenile Library, 1805-1825,” for contemporary controversy over the potential pedagogical value of fairy tales and their “giants and fairies, and dragons and enchantments.”

The Danes felt a singular animosity to the Christian religion, especially to the monasteries in which so many persons of both sexes lived in idleness and [end 25] effeminacy: one measure which marked the progress of the Danes wherever they came, was the burning of monasteries.

The Saxons perhaps never produced a truly great man, beside Alfred: he stopped for a while the inroads of the Danes: but some time after his death they became more frequent and formidable: the pusillanimous Saxons gave them money to go away, and the Danes, when they had spent what they carried off, came back to get more: Alfred died in the year 900; and about a hundred years afterward Canute, king of Denmark, made a complete conquest of England, and after a reign of eighteen years in this country, left the crown to his sons: the Danes had by this time embraced the Christian faith.

The sons of Canute died without children; in consequence of which the Saxon royal family resumed the throne [end 26] in the person of Edward the Confessor: in his reign lived Macbeth, king of Scotland, upon whose story Shakespear has founded the finest of his plays.

THE NORMANS.

AFTER Edward the Confessor, came in the Normans: the Normans were in the finest race of men that ever the frozen north poured forth from her recesses: amidst the meanness and ignorance of the middle ages, they appear like a superior race of beings

(16)

The Normans… appear like a superior race of beings: Following Thomas Warton’s History of English Poetry (1774), Godwin’s Life of Chaucer praises the Normans for having “introduced politeness and learning” into England (I: 13). Godwin’s views on the Normans partly responds to the “indiscriminate use […] of the terms dark, and the barbarous ages” (Life of Chaucer I: 13) by prominent Enlightenment historiographers such as Voltaire and Edward Gibbon.

: they conquered, and settled themselves in possession of, a part of France and Italy, together with the islands of Sicily and England.

They were the great promoters of knighthood and chivalry: they taught us generosity in our conduct to men, and deference and politeness to the [end 27] ladies: even toward their enemies in war they were generous, warm-hearted and humane

(17)

Great promoters of knighthood and chivalry… they were generous, warm-hearted, and humane: Godwin’s positive characterization of chivalry demonstrates a shift from his earlier views. The first edition of Political Justice, as well as the novels Things as they are, or the Adventures of Caleb Williams (London: 1794) and St. Leon, A Tale of the Sixteenth Century (London: 1799), often represent chivalry as morally corrupting and politically reactionary. Though Godwin remains critical of the economic and cultural inequalities underpinning the feudal system from which chivalric principles spring, his…

: the Greeks and Romans were barbarous in their manners compared with them: the Greeks and Romans were austere and despotical in their conduct toward the tender sex, and the Romance first made a show to the populace of the unhappy kings they had conquered, and then threw them into dungeons to starve: many of the best qualities of the present English character we owe to the Normans.

Edward the Confessor, during the reign of the Danes, had lived a banished man in Normandy; and he so greatly admired what he saw, that, as he had no children, he appointed William duke of Normandy, afterward called William the Conqueror, his successor when he died, in the throne of England. [end 28]

A TABLE OF THE KINGS AND QUEENS 
OF ENGLAND, FROM THE CONQUEST

THE NORMAN LINE.

                             A.D.

William I. began to reign 1066 
William II. - - - - 1087 
Henry I. - - - - - 1100 
Stephen - - - - - 1135

THE PLANTAGENETS.

Henry II. - - - - 1154 
Richard I. - - - - 1189 
John - - - - - 1199 
Henry III. - - - - 1216 
Edward I. - - - - 1272 
---------- II. - - - - 1307 
---------- III. - - - - 1327 
Richard II. - - - - 1377

THE HOUSE OF LANCASTER.

Henry IV. - - - - 1399 
-------- V. - - - - 1413 
-------- VI. - - - - 1422 
[end 29]

THE HOUSE OF YORK.

A.D. 
Edward IV. began to reign 1461 
----------- V. - - - - 1483 
Richard III. - - - - 1483

THE HOUSE OF TUDOR.

Henry VII. - - - - 1485 
------- VIII. - - - - 1509 
Edward VI. - - - - 1547 
Mary - - - - - 1553 
Elizabeth - - - - 1558

THE HOUSE OF STUART.

James I. - - - - - 1603 
Charles I. - - - - 1625 
Charles II. - - - - 1649 
James II. - - - - 1685

THE REVOLUTION, 1688.

William III. - - - - 1689 
Anne - - - - - 1702 
George I. - - - - 1714 
George II. - - - - 1727 
George III. - - - - 1760 
[end 30]

THE 
NORMAN LINE.

WILLIAM I. 
1066

WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR WAS HARSH AND 
SEVERE.

WILLIAM the Conqueror was a prince of great abilities, and formed an entirely new plan of government for this country, agreeably to what is called the feudal system: he divided the soil into knights' fees, baronies and earldoms, and gave them to his Norman followers: a knight, a baron and an earl, meant then the lord or proprietor of a certain province or portion of land, by the name of which the knight, [end 31] the baron, or the earl, was commonly known.

William the Conqueror despised and ill-treated the Saxons, because they were not so wise and so brave as his own countrymen

(18)

William the Conqueror despised and ill-treated the Saxons… as his own countrymen: Godwin appears to be editorializing in this sentence. Goldsmith, Hume, Bicknell, Allen, and Lockman do not explicitly say that William I decried the bravery and wisdom of the Saxons; rather, they argue that he repressed the Saxons in order to quell the chronic insurrections that erupted after he left England.

: French was the only language spoken at court; and one circumstance has taken place in consequence, in English, that belongs to no other language in the world; which is, that we call animals kept for food by one name while they are alive, and by another after they are dead: the Saxons fed the animals, and the Normans ate them:

(19)

The Saxons fed the animals, and the Normans ate them: While writers such as Hume, Goldsmith, and Lockman describe William I’s reign as a tyranny and lament the enslavement of the British in this period, they do not describe divisions of labor as Godwin does.

the names therefore by which they are called while alive are Saxon, and when dead are French: the Saxon, bull, ox, cow, calf, sheep; the French, beef, veal and mutton.

William the Conqueror, when he became king of England, continued duke of Normandy, that is, lord (in subordination to the king of France) [end 32] of a valuable division of that country: his successors acquired other provinces in France, till they became feudal, or inferior, lords of a third part of that kingdom.

A feudal lordship was at first a very humble and dependent station: the person who held it was bound to perform certain menial offices for his superior, such as taking care of his dogs, superintending his wardrobe, or airing his shirt (hence come our master of the horse, groom of the stole, and lord of the bed-chamber); he swore the obedience, on his bended knees, and with his joined hands put between the hands of his lord-paramount; when he died, his successor paid a fine to be permitted to have the land, and if he were under age, was placed at the direction of his superiors; but the feudal lords grew more and more powerful, till they became little less than kings, each over his inheri- [end 33] tance, and seldom paid much attention to those above them.

(20)

The feudal lords grew more and more powerful, till they became little less than kings: The wording in this passage closely echoes Godwin’s criticism of the growing power of court ministers in his own time, whom he describes in Political Justice as becoming “miniature king[s] in their turn” (1798, II: 38). Characters in Godwin’s adult fiction, such as Tyrrell and Falkland in Caleb Williams, embody the figure of the corrupt feudal lord as small-scale potentate, with disastrous consequences. Godwin provides a more detailed historical account of the rise of the feudalism in the Life of Chaucer I: …

Under the direction of William the Conqueror, was made a book, called Doomsday Book, containing a register of all the estates in England: and in his history we read an account of the curfew, and order for all people to put out their fires and candles at eight o'clock in the evening, which has been thought a badge of the slavery he imposed upon the Saxons; but this was practised in many other countries, and was deemed a necessary precaution in these turbulent ages.

(21)

Under the direction of William I…turbulent ages: Allen and Lockman also discuss the imposition of the curfew, although this information is excluded in Goldsmith, Hume, and Bicknell. Allen, like Godwin, defends the curfew as a legitimate rather than tyrannical practice but does so by arguing that William I had instituted the curfew in Normandy prior to its introduction into England. See Allen 37 and Lockman 74.

The Tower of London was built in the reign of William the Conqueror. [end 34]

WILLIAM II. 
1087

WILLIAM RUFUS WAS PASSIONATE AND RASH.

WILLIAM the Conqueror, at his death, appointed that his eldest son Robert should succeed him in the duchy of Normandy, and his second son William (who was his favourite) in the throne of England: Robert was not contented with this distribution, but his resistance was vain.

In the reign of William Rufus began the Crusades, that is, the expeditions of the Europeans for the conquest of the Holy Land: we are now in the dark ages, and though most of the European nations called themselves Christians, they knew very little about the matter: ignorance however is not inconsistent with zeal

(22)

Ignorance however is not inconsistent with zeal: Godwin’s views here echo any number of standard Enlightenment criticisms of religion, which he would have encountered in the French atheists whom he names as influences in the preface to the first edition of Political Justice: Claude-Adrien Helvetius (1715-71) and Baron d’Holbach (1723-89). But Godwin’s comment also accords with Political Justice’s gradualist view of social progress; contrary to the intellectually “premature” (1798, I: 272) conditions which give birth to the “headlong zeal” that animates violent revolutions (1798, I: 361), Godwi…

: they were shocked when they considered that the country where the Great Author of their [end 35] religion was born, had lived, preached, done many wonderful works, and had at last suffered death, and the tomb in which his body had been laid, was in the hands of unbelieving Saracens, the followers of Mahomet.

Pilgrimages were the fashion of this age: the well-meaning, but uninstructed, people who then lived, were accustomed to address separate prayers to every saint in heaven; and these prayers were supposed to have the more merit, if they were said at the tomb, where the bones of the saint had been laid to rest: if any body had done a wicked thing the remembrance of which made him uneasy, he thought, and the priest encouraged him to think so, that if he made a pilgrimage to some celebrated tomb, or shrine, which was perhaps a hundred miles off, and especially if he went to it barefoot, the saint would prevail upon God Almighty to forgive [end 36] him his sin: it was the same way of thinking that induced them to whip themselves, to wear shirts of horsehair, and to make the naked stones their beds; they believed that, if they punished themselves, God would be satisfied and pardon them.

If the religious in this age made pilgrimages to the shrines of so many saints, you may think that they imputed a higher merit to a visit to Jerusalem, where Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the world, died, and was buried: the Saracens, from civilisation and refinement, and because the resort of Christian pilgrims brought wealth into their country, tolerated and accommodated them: but when, ten years after the Conquest, the Turks took Jerusalem from the Saracens, they treated the Christian pilgrims with rudeness and barbarity.

In resentment of this insolence, a [end 37] million of Christians joined from the different countries of Europe, and set out for the conquest of Jerusalem, which surrendered to their arms in the year 1099: Tasso, the best of the modern Italian authors, has written a fine poem on the subject.

(23)

Tasso…has written a fine poem on the subject: Torquato Tasso, a sixteenth-century Italian poet (1544-95) whose epic La Gerusalemme Liberata (1581) offers a mythologized account of the First Crusade. According to his diary, Godwin read Edward Fairfax’s English translation of the poem, Jerusalem Delivered (1749), in early 1792.

Robert, duke of Normandy, was one of the commanders in this undertaking; and the better to enable him to raise his forces, he sold the government of his duchy during his absence, to William Rufus, for a sum of money. William Rufus, like most men of rank in this age, when amusements were so few, was very fond of hunting: one day when he was engaged in the pleasures of the chace in the New Forest, news was brought him that one of his barons in Normandy had taken up arms against his government: William was so enraged at what he heard, that he turned his horse's head, [end 38] and rode immediately to the next port; when he came there, the weather was cloudy and tempestuous, and the sailors were not willing to put to sea; William however insisted; he leaped into the vessel, and asked in a boastful sort of a tone, whether they had ever heard of a king who was drowned?

Another accident happened to him in the New Forest: Walter Tyrrel, one of his courtiers, was hunting with the king, and shot at a stag the arrow glanced against a tree, which changed its direction; it struck the king upon his breast, and he fell dead on the spot.

(24)

This apocryphal version of William Rufus’s death dates back at least as early as the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. The tree was allegedly cut down and burned in the eighteenth century, and the spot in New Forest National Park is marked today with the Rufus Stone.

William Rufus built Westminster Hall, 200 feet long, for his dining-room: he had no children. [end 39]

HENRY I. 
1100.

HENRY BEAUCLERC WAS AN EXCELLENT 
SCHOLAR.

WHEN William Rufus was killed, Robert duke of Normandy was absent in the Holy Land: Henry, the youngest son of William the Conqueror, took advantage of this circumstance: he hastened from the New Forest to Winchester, where he got possession of the public treasure and thence to London, where he got himself crowned.

Robert hurried home, as soon as he heard of the death of William Rufus, and once more tried by the sword to gain the crown of England: but he not only failed in this, but soon after lost Normandy, where he had at first been gladly received: Henry took him prisoner, and put him in confinement, where he remained for the rest of his life, twenty-eight years. [end 40]

Henry Beauclerc had an only son, named William, whom he loved very much, but who was lost at sea at eighteen years of age. Henry was so affected at this event, that, though he outlived it fifteen years, it is remarked that he was never seen to smile afterward.

Henry had one daughter, Maud, married to Henry V, emperor of Germany.

STEPHEN. 
1135.

STEPHEN OF BLOIS GOT THE CROWN BY A TRICK, BUT WAS HARDLY ABLE TO KEEP IT.

ENGLAND had never yet been governed by a queen; and some countries, France for instance, have always refused their sceptre to a woman; so Stephen, grandson to William the Conqueror by [end 41] a daughter, thought he would try his chance with the empress Maud: Maud was out of England, and Stephen got one of Henry's ministers to swear, that to his knowledge the king wished Stephen to be his successor: so Stephen was crowned.

By and by Maud came over with the army, and there was a great deal of fighting between her and her cousin: once she took Stephen prisoner; and twice she escaped being taken herself, the first time from Oxford by dressing herself in white, and walking at night over the snow, and the second time out of Wallingford in a coffin: at last it was agreed that Stephen should reign all the days of his life, and that Henry, son of the empress Maud by her second husband Geoffrey Plantagenet, should succeed him.

The fierce and haughty barons took advantage of the unsettled state of the [end 42] kingdom under Stephen, and built themselves each a strong castle for fortress to the number of eleven hundred and fifteen: thus they took all power into their own hands, and reduced the prerogative of the king to almost nothing: beside this, they were continually quarrelling and fighting with each other, so that poor England looked like a country of savages. [end 43]

THE 
PLANTAGENETS.

HENRY II. 
1154.

HENRY FITZ-EMPRESS WAS A MAN OF SPIRIT 
AND SENSE, BUT WAS WHIPPED AT THE 
TOMB OF THOMAS A BECKET.

HENRY Fitz-Empress was an extremely accomplished man: he first brought the art of writing poetry into England, after a lapse of two hundred years: French was still the language at court; and Henry encouraged Robert Wace

(25)

Robert Wace’s works include Roman de Brut (on the history of Britain) and Roman de Rou (on the history of the Dukes of Normandy).

and Benedict St. More

(26)

Benedict St. More: Godwin apparently refers here to Benoit de Sainte-Maure, author of Roman de Troie (a 30,000-couplet travesty of the Iliad) and the 43,000-line verse Chronique des ducs de Normandie. The editors thank Tara Foster of Northern Michigan University and Jen Edwards of Manhattan College for their assistance identifying this reference.

to write long historical poems of the actions of his ancestors, dukes of Normandy before William the Conqueror.

Henry married Eleanor, heiress of Aquitaine, who brought a great addition [end 44; between 44-45 there is a page of four engraved portraits] to his territories in France: but she was a proud, ill-tempered woman, and led him a disagreeable sort of a life.

To console him for this misfortune, he attached himself to a very beautiful lady, called Fair Rosamond,

(27)

Henry II’s lover Rosamund Clifford—known in folklore as “Fair Rosamund” or the “Rose of the World”—was the subject of several popular ballads. This apocryphal story about her death by poison became a popular motif in her legend. For example, the seventeenth-century broadside ballad “A Lamentable Ballad of Fair Rosamond, King Henry the Second's Concubine, Who was put to death by Queen Elinor, in Woodstock Bower near Oxford” includes the story of the poison: And down along her [Rosamund’s] comely face, proceeded many a tear: But nothing could this furious Queen, therewith appeased be, The cup of…

by whom he had several children: queen Eleanor was very jealous of her; and, as the story goes, the king made a bower for her to live in at Woodstock in the midst of a labyrinth, so contrived that nobody could find the way through it except they were in the secret; queen Eleanor got herself instructed, and went into the bower with a sword in one hand, and a bowl of poison in the other, and told Fair Rosamond that she might choose by which of them she would die; Rosamond took the poison and expired.

Henry had another great quarrel with Thomas à Becket: he saw how much the church in these dark ages [end 45] was disposed to domineer over the state, and how the popes made and unmade kings; and he set his heart upon remedying so disgraceful an evil.

The way it had grown was this: the pope of Rome, and the bishops and monks all over Europe, made a common cause, and agreed that whatever would add power to the one, would add power to the other: so that the popes of Rome acquired an authority, something like that of the emperors of Rome in the days of their prosperity, and had an army of priests and monks scattered in every quarter, who adhered as faithfully to their chief, as ever the body-guard of a sovereign did to the monarch who paid them.

Henry determined to break this league: he had a minister Thomas à Becket, who was exceedingly clever, and had never disobliged him in any thing: he thought, if he could once raise this [end 46] man to the highest dignity of the church in England, and make him archbishop of Canterbury, every thing else that he wished would follow of course.

You cannot think upon how familiar terms this able king and his clever minister lived with each other: one day as they were riding on horseback through the streets of London, they observed a beggar shivering with the cold: Would it not be a good action, said the king, to give that poor fellow a warm coat in this hard season? That it would, said Becket; and your majesty does well to think of such charitable actions: Then he shall have one presently, replied Henry, and with that, gave a smart pluck to Becket's cloak: the minister pulled it close about him, and defended himself as well as he could, till both king and minister had like to have been down in [end 47] the dirt: at length Becket, like a good courtier, let go his hold, and the king gave the cloak to the beggar: it was made of scarlet, and lined with ermine: the beggar knew nothing of the quality of the persons he saw, and was not a little surprised at the nature of the present.

Becket was as great a patron of learning as the king; and, while Henry encouraged the French writers, his minister contracted a strict intimacy with the best authors in Latin he could meet with: Joseph of Exeter, his friend, composed a very tolerable poem on the Trojan war,

(28)

Joseph of Exeter’s Daretis Phrygii Ilias De bello Troiano, a Latin poem in six books, was likely completed in 1184, and his later fragment Antiocheis records the Third Crusade. John of Salisbury or Johannes Parvus (“John the Little”) was a student of Peter Abelard’s and later secretary to Theobald of Bec, the Archbishop of Canterbury. His prose works include the proto-political science discourse Policraticus, sive de nugis curialium et de vestigiis philosophorum (1159?) and The Metalogicon (1159), an educational treatise and defence of the Trivium.

and the prose of John of Salisbury is still admired for the age in which he wrote: Becket lived in a very splendid manner, and spent his leisure-hours in hunting, hawking and horsemanship: this man, for the reasons that have been mentioned, Henry made archbishop of Canterbury. [end 48]

Whether Becket gave any promises to the king I cannot tell, but if he did he certainly broke them all: he no sooner received this preferment, than he determined within himself the plan he would pursue: if he had answered the king's wishes, he would have been spoken ill of and hated by all the clergy of Europe; they would have called him a false brother, an apostate, a tool, and an atheist: this was by no means Becket's intention; he wished to be honoured, and not to be despised.

I suppose too Becket had some religious feelings concerned in the change that now took place: he thought that a courtier and a minister might take some liberties in his way of living, but that a different conduct was due from the first clergyman of a great country: according to the religious notions of those times, he laid aside all his pomp, wore sackcloth next to his skin, and fed [end 49] upon nothing but bread, water and herbs: he whipped himself often and severely, as a punishment for his sins; and, in imitation of what we read of Jesus Christ, washed the feet of a certain number of beggars every day: Thomas à Becket soon passed for the first saint in the land.

Henry, having thus, as he thought, secured himself a staunch friend in the head of the church, brought up a law to prohibit appeals to Rome, and other practices by which England was made dependent on the pope: who do you think was the principal person that opposed this measure? Thomas à Becket. He said, that he owed all manner of obligations and deference to the king, but that he could not betray the duties of his station; he would die sooner than yield: the quarrel grew hotter and hotter: the king seized all the arch- [end 50] bishop's estates, and Becket was obliged to fly beyond sea.

The pope and the king of France received Becket with great love, and determined to carry him through is difficulties: the clergy and a great part of the people of England thought the king acted very wickedly, in quarrelling with and banishing so good a man: Henry was obliged to submit: he gave up the law he wanted to establish: Becket and he met in Normandy, and seemed to be friends.

The king staid in Normandy, while Becket passed over in triumph to his palace and cathedral of Canterbury: Henry could not help muttering to himself what an ungrateful and troublesome subject he had got: a wicked, slave-spirited courtier overheard what the king said, and thinking to win his favour for ever, passed over to England with two or three followers, and mur- [end 51] dered Becket near the high altar in his own cathedral: every body was shocked: his death was the triumphant death of a martyr: thousands of miracles were said to be afterward worked at his tomb, and he was worshipped as the greatest of saints, as long as popery lasted in the island.

(29)

Godwin refers to Becket in Political Justice (1798, I: 153-54) in a chapter examining the nature of “personal virtue.” There, Godwin cites Becket as an example of the difficulty of judging an action in terms of its motives: Becket’s resistance to Henry II is at once a reflection of the priest’s “haughtiness” and “ambition,” as well as a product of a sincere belief that his martyrdom would benefit humankind as a whole. Godwin’s reference to Becket’s posthumous popularity “as long as popery lasted in the island” likely refers to the fact that Becket’s status as martyr and saint was dissolved by …

Henry could not otherwise make his peace with the pope, the king of France, and his own subjects blinded with superstition, than in the way before mentioned, by walking barefoot to the tomb of the holy man, and causing himself to be whipped on his naked back by monks of the cloister.

Poor Henry, unfortunate in his wife, unfortunate in his minister, was still more unfortunate in his children: he was on all occasions a warm-hearted man: he married for ambition, not for love, and therefore queen Eleanor of all persons perhaps had least reason to [end 52] to be pleased with him; but I have told you how kindly and familiarly he behaved to his minister; and he was a most affectionate father.

He loved his eldest son Henry so much, that he determined to admit him to a share of royalty in his own life-time: he made a fine coronation for him; and to do him the more honour, waited upon him at table, according to the manner of the feudal times: the good father could not help observing, as he did it, Never was prince more royally served! I see no such great matter in it, answered the ungracious youth, that the son of an earl should wait upon the son of a king.

Prince Henry afterward joined the king of France, his father's worst enemy, against his parent: queen Eleanor encouraged her two next sons, Richard and Geoffrey, to join in the rebellion, and they led their too in- [end 53] dulgent father a weary life: at length prince Henry died; but the others persisted in their disobedience, and the poor king thought he had no consolation left, but in his youngest son John, a graceless varlet, but who had the art to carry himself smoothly to his father: by and by the king discovered that John, with all his pretences, had acted in the basest and most treacherous manner:

(30)

Godwin seems to reference John’s siding with his brother Richard in the squabbles over who would succeed their father Henry II. John, of course, was later immortalized in folklore as the principal antagonist to Robin Hood.

The discovery broke his heart, and he died.

In the reign of Henry happened the conquest of Ireland, which was however rather nominal, than real: we gained the city of Dublin and a little province round it; but the greater part of the island continued in the hands of its native princes. [end 54]

RICHARD I. 
1189. 
RICHARD COEUR DE LION FOUGHT FOR THE HOLY LAND WITH THE SULTAN SALADIN.

TWO years before Richard came to the crown, the sultan Saladin took Jerusalem from the Christians, after they had possessed it ninety years: all Europe was astonished and confounded at the intelligence, and a new crusade was immediately fitted out for the recovery of the Holy Land: Richard, who burned with the desire of the military glory, was one of the commanders.

Of all the real histories of war, that of the war between Richard and Saladin is the most heroical: Richard performed feats of personal valour that are almost miraculous: Saladin (no Turk, but a Saracen

(31)

No Turk, but a Saracen: The basis for Godwin’s distinction between Turk and Saracen is somewhat obscure, given that both terms were often used interchangeably by western Europeans to describe Muslims in general. In the Life of Chaucer, Godwin praises Saracenic learning as providing the foundations for Europe’s emergence from the dark ages (I: 201-2), while the reference to Saladin’s generosity, civility and manners associates the “Turk” with more “negative” aspects of the Ottoman Empire. This accords with both a medieval and Christian literary tradition which posed Saladin as a kind of chivalr…

) was superior to Richard in generosity and civilised manners: Richard took Acre at the end of a three [end 55] years siege, and won a great battle against Saladin at Ascalon; but he was obliged to give up the war without taking Jerusalem: he made a truce with the sultan for three years: when he came away, he sent Saladin word that, at the expiration of the truce, he would not fail to give him again the meeting with more numerous forces; to which the sultan politely replied that, if it were his fortune to lose this portion of his dominions, he had rather it became the conquest of the king of England, than of any other prince in the world.

King Richard was shipwrecked near Venice on his return to Europe: as he had offended most of the princes who had joined in the crusade with him by his superior glory and the violence of his temper, he disguised himself like a pilgrim, that he might cross Germany safely by land: he was found [end 56] out however and arrested by the basest of his rivals, Leopold, duke of Austria, who threw him into an obscure dungeon at Dirrenstein on the Danube: for some time no one knew what was become of him: in this perilous situation Blondel, a minstrel, and a fast friend of king Richard who had been extremely fond of his heroic songs is said to have wandered among all the fortresses of that part of the world, to find where his brave master was hid: as he approached the castle of Dirrenstein, he struck of a favourite ballad, which he and the king had often sung together: when he had finished the first stanza, a voice from within the walls, which he immediately knew for king Richard's, began the second: I suppose Blodel found some means to letting his master know what he purposed: he then went immediately and informed queen Eleanor, the [end 57] mother of Richard: a great ransom was raised, and the king was finally brought home again to his country: he did not however long survive, being killed by an arrow, as he was besieging the castle of one of his rebellious barons in Normandy.

In the time of Richard lived the famous Robin Hood, who retired with a hundred followers into Sherwood Forest, where he lived upon the king's deer, and the booty he took from travellers: upon him four hundred men never dared to set, though ever so strong: he pillaged the rich, to give to the poor; so that of all thieves he is the prince and the most gentle thief: volumes of old English songs have been made of his exploits, some of which are printed, and called Robin Hood's Garland.

(32)

Robin Hood’s Garland: Refers to the many cheap, popular anthologies of Robin Hood ballads available in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Godwin may have been consciously avoiding conservative censure, or giving his authorship away, by directing readers to the largely unadorned Garland editions rather than to the more politically charged representation of the outlaw in his friend Joseph Ritson’s Robin Hood: A Collection of all the Ancient Poems, Songs and Ballads, now extant, relative to that celebrated Outlaw (London: 1795). Godwin also mentions Robin Hood in the Life of Chaucer I: 106-…

JOHN. 
1199. 
JACK LACKLAND WAS A PITIFUL FELLOW, AND DIED OF EATING PEACHES; IN HIS TIME WAS MAGNA CHARTA.

JOHN Lackland may challenge all history to produce his equal in folly, presumption, and wickedness: you have heard how he behaved to his father.

The true heir to the crown on the death of king Richard, was Arthur of Britanny, the son of Geoffrey, John's elder brother: Richard however made a will bequeathing the succession to John; and the barons of England admitted his claim: Arthur was twelve years old at the decease of Richard, and four years after fell into the hands of his barbarous uncle, who put him to death; according to some accounts stabbed the defenceless youth in a [end 59] boat in the night-time with his own hand.

The king of France, seeing how foolish and wicked a prince John was, thought this a favourable time to take away Normandy, and unite it to his own crown, and he succeeded; when John heard of it, he said, What the French conquer in years, I will retake in a day, when I set about it: but John was all talk, and no performance.

John quarrelled with the pope, and for some time swore, and blustered, as was his custom, and boasted what great things he would do, but afterward submitted: he confessed himself the subject of the pope, and delivered his crown into the hands of the pope's legate, who kept it five days before he returned it.

Every body took advantage of John's want of character and spirit: they cared nothing for his blustering: the more [end 60] he vapoured, the more sure they were he would come down: the barons of England joined together, and drew up Magna Charta, a declaration of the rights of the free people of England,

(33)

Magna Charta, a declaration of the rights of the free people of England: Godwin’s view of the “Magna Charta” as a prototype for an English constitution follows a long line of legal and historical interpretation which, from the late sixteenth century on, reframed the document in liberal or radical terms. Reviving Magna Carta was instrumental in the political debates surrounding the English Civil War, a period of intense interest to Godwin, and was invoked by seventeenth century jurists like Sir Edward Coke as a basis for establishing Parliamentary power, legal principles such as habeas corpus, …

which they forced John to sign at Runny Mead, near Windsor: till his time, as all the Norman kings had been soldierly and active men, they governed as much as they could by their own will, and endeavoured to shun any such declaration as is contained in Magna Charta.

John had no sooner signed Magna Charta, then he showed an inclination to break it; the barons, tired of his wickedness and tyranny, invited over Louis, the dauphin of France, who soon took possession of London, and all the southern part of the kingdom: nothing but the death of John at this crisis, prevented his entire success.

Among the other extravagances of [end 61] John, he is said to have sent a proposal to the Miramolin, or emperor of Morocco, offering to turn Mahometan, if the Miramolin would aid him against the pope, the king of France and the English nation.

King John is the name of the most ancient of Shakespear's historical plays: it contains many fine scenes respecting the unfortunate Arthur, and various considerable events of this reign: in general the productions of this incomparable author are the best Guide to the History of England, as far as he has treated upon the subject. [end 62]

HENRY III. 
1216

HENRY OF WINCHESTER WAS A POOR CREATURE, AND HAD A TROUBLESOME REIGN OF FIFTY-SIX YEARS.

THERE are four kings in the series of English monarchs, who laboured under an evident want to capacity; these are Henry of Winchester, Edward of Caernarvon, Richard of Bourdeaux, and Henry of Windsor: Henry of Winchester was the only one of the four, who died a natural death.

Henry was only nine years old, when he came to be king: William Marshal, earl of Pembroke, was appointed lord protector of England during his childhood, and under Pembroke's able administration the French invaders were driven back to their own country.

The most famous statesman in the reign of Henry of Winchester was Si- [end 63] mon Montfort: Henry reigned, comparatively with little interruption from his barons, for forty-two years: they at length grew tired of his insignificance and imbecility; and Simon Montfort being at their head, he possessed for seven years more authority in the realm than the king.

A great change had taken place in Europe since the time of William the Conqueror; during his life all the people of Christendom were either soldiers, or clergy, or husbandmen: the whole were divided into lords and slaves: there were few artists and less trade: the crusades were the first cause that gradually produced a new face of things: they gave birth to an intercourse between distant nations, through the means of which men learned new wants and new accommodations: we imported learning and luxuries from the East: Europe kept possession of the kingdom [end 64] of Jerusalem for ninety years: and the towns of Italy first, and afterward of other countries, became rich in merchandise by means of their traffic to Jerusalem.

(34)

The crusades . . . gave birth to an intercourse between distant nations: Godwin also speaks of the crusades as a source for British internationalism in the Life of Chaucer I: 13, 201-2. The reference would also have contemporary relevance: the late eighteenth/early nineteenth century saw increased travel to, and writing about, the ‘Near East.’ See Peter J. Kitson, “Romantic Colonialism: Races, Places, Peoples, 1785-1800” and Tim Fulford, “Romantic Colonialism: Races, Places, Peoples, 1800-1830” in Romanticism and Colonialism: Writing and Empire, 1780-1830. Eds. Fulford and Kitson (Cambridge: C…

The citizens and merchants were neither lords nor slaves: about the same time there arose a middle set of men in the open country, persons who held land as freemen, and yet were not rich enough, to associate with the barons, and frequent high courts of parliament: all this gave rise to a their order of persons in the kingdom; burgesses were elected to represent the towns, and knights of shires to represent the inferior landholders: Simon Montfort was the author of the house of commons, that precious part of our government, in England.

Two great battles were fought between Simon Montfort and Henry of Winchester, the first at Lewes, here [end 65] king Henry was taken prisoner, the second at Evesham, where Simon Montfort was killed: Henry spent the short remainder of his days in peace.

Henry of Winchester was a great encourager of the fine arts of architecture, painting and sculpture: the beginning of these arts were rude, but the period of Henry III is considered as the dawn of taste: he rebuilt Westminster Abbey from the ground.

From his reign we may also date the commencement of literature and science in modern times: Friar Bacon in particular was a wonderful man, to whom the art of making gunpowder, telescopes and microscopes was familiar, centuries before they were brought into ordinary use.

(35)

Friar Bacon: Roger Bacon (c. 1214-92), Franciscan friar and English philosopher. Godwin’s praise is typical of many nineteenth-century rationalists, for whom Bacon’s emphasis on induction and the experimental study of nature anticipates the Enlightenment. His Opus Majus (1267) is often credited as being the first European text to describe the manufacture of gunpowder, as well as outline the principles of magnification that would later inform the development of microscopes, telescopes, and spectacles. Godwin discusses Bacon in a similar light in Life of Chaucer I: 193. See also Amanda Power, “A…

[end 66]

[pp 66 is a set of four engraved portraits]

EDWARD I. 
1272. 
EDWARD LONGSHANKS WAS KNOWING AND WISE, BUT HE LOVED WAR, AND CONDUCTED IT BARBAROUSLY.

THE two kings in the English history who possessed the greatest portion of understanding and genius, were William the Conqueror and Edward Longshanks.

Edward, at the same time of his father's death, was engaged on a crusade to the Holy Land.

There is an agreeable story of Edward, that while he was in the Holy Land, a Mahometan assassin came into his tent to murder him, that he stabbed Edward in the arm with a poisoned dagger, and that queen Eleanora saved her husband by sucking the poison out of his wound: certain it is that Edward was passion- [end 67] ately fond of Eleanora all the days of her life.

Edward Longshanks introduced the old Roman law, commonly called the civil law, into England, and spread over his country a face of security, propriety and order, which has never since been banished from it.

As he was a prince of extensive views, he aspired to reduce the whole island under one rule, and regarded that as the natural means of giving to the English people a permanent stability and independence of all the nations of the earth.

The Welsh, calling themselves the Ancient Britons, had continued unsubdued ever since the retreat of the Romans; they had been unconquered by the Saxons and the Danes: the Norman and Plantagenet princes had frequently been at war with them, and obliged them to pay tribute, but they had still [end 68] been governed by princes and laws of their own: Edward Longshanks completed the conquest of Wales.

From the time when the Romans flourished in Britain, the Welsh had been Christians: the Druidical religion and learning had irretrievably perished: but there was still a class of men among the Welsh called the Bards: these were such an imperfect image of the great masters of astronomy and history in the Druidical times, as could be expected to be preserved through centuries of ignorance, calamity and popish superstition: still they had songs, dear to their countrymen, which preserved among their hearers the love of Wales and of liberty.

Edward, who wished England and Wales to be for ever united, did not love the Bards: there is a story that he invited a general assembly of them to meet him at Conway, and there caused [end 69] them all to be murdered: Gray, a late English poet, has written an ode of some merit on this subject:

(36)

an ode of some merit on this subject: Thomas Gray’s “The Bard. A Pindaric Ode” (1754-1757).

ever since the conquest of Wales by Edward I, the eldest son of the king of England has been called prince of Wales.

An event occurred soon after, which gave Edward a favourable opportunity for interfering in the affairs of Scotland: the male line of the kings of that country had become extinct, and disputes had arisen between John Baliol and Robert Bruce, descendants of the female line, which of these had the best claim to the crown: Scotland was on the eve of a civil war on the subject; when the wisest heads in the government of that country, advised that Edward, famed for knowledge and sagacity, should be called in as umpire to settle the dispute, and that all parties should swear to abide by his decision.

Edward set out in execution of this [end 70] office with an army for the borders of Scotland: and, when he had got every thing into his own hand, he set up a barefaced and groundless pretence, that the kings of Scotland had been at all times feudal vassals under the kings of England, and required the candidates to swear this subjection, before he would decide upon their claims: Edward had every advantage over the country without a government or a king, and they were obliged to submit: he then decided in favour of Baliol, the descendant of the elder branch of the royal family of Scotland.

It was not that he might add a feather to the English crown, that Edward asserted the vassalage of Scotland: he soon picked a quarrel with the new king, and asserted that he had not performed all the duties that were required from the feudal vassal to his superior: he therefore, declared the vassal state for- [end 71] feited to the lord paramount, and marched an army to take possession of it: in this enterprise he succeeded.

All nations love their independence, and abhor the idea of becoming a province and an inferior member of some other nation: it is the name of ENGLAND, that has inspired our soldiers and sailors with bravery, and our poets with sublimity and imagination: Scotland is not less dear to a Scotchman: when a country is no longer its own master, it loses its peculiar name, or that name no longer excites the same glow in the bosoms of its natives.

The officers that Edward sent to manage Scotland, governed it tyrannically: one of the bravest and noblest of mankind, sir William Wallace, arose at this time to rescue her from subjection: he underwent incredible hardships, and achieved wonders: but his successes were not permanent: he was at last betrayed into the hands of Edward, who basely caused him to suffer the death of a traitor on Tower Hill: there is an old poem, as long as Homer's Iliad, in the Scotish dialect, by a person known by the name of Blind Harry, commemorating the achievements of sir William Wallace.

(37)

Blind Harry: also known as Harry or Henry the Minstrel, he is best known for The Actes and Deidis of the Illustre and Vallyeant Campioun Schir William Wallace (or simply The Wallace), written around 1477.

Three times Edward conquered Scotland: a third time it rebelled; and, having been now some years without a king, the Scots chose Robert Bruce, the grandson of the competitor of John Baliol, for their sovereign: Edward marched against Bruce, but died on the road, in the sixty-ninth year of his age.

Edward, like his ancestors, the Plantagenets, was a patron of literature and the poets: in his reign Oxford had at one time thirty thousand students, a much greater number than at any subsequent period. [end 73]

EDWARD II
1307.

EDWARD OF CAERNARVON, A WEAK PRINCE, WAS GOVERNED BY UPSTARTS, AND CRUELLY MURDERED BY HIS WIFE IN BERKELLY CASTLE.

THE death of Edward I was a fortunate event for the Scots: they kept their ground and in the seventh year of the reign of Edward of Caernarvon, won a decisive battle at Bannockburn over the whole strength of the English nation: an exquisite song on this battle has lately been produced by Robert Burns, the Ayrshire ploughman.

(38)

an exquisite song on this battle: Scotland’s unofficial national anthem “Scots Wha Hae” was first published in the Morning Chronicle on 8 May 1794 and subsequently appeared in several collections. Burns’s lyrics accompany the traditional Scottish tune “Hey Tuttie Tatie” which was supposedly played by Robert the Bruce's army at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314.

Edward of Caernarvon had attached himself while a boy, to an adventurer, by name Gaveston, and when he came to the crown, gave the government of the kingdom into his hands: Gaveston was a handsome man, expert in youthful sports, riding and fencing; but he was [end 74] vain, conceited and overbearing: the old nobles of the kingdom could not endure him: they obliged the king to send him into banishment: but, finding that neither the king nor Gaveston minded his promise, and that, as soon as the barons had gone home, Gaveston was restored to as much power as ever, they at length struck off his head without form of trial, on a hill near Warwick.

Edward of Caernarvon could not live without a favourite, and after the death of Gaveston attached himself to a young man of the name of Spencer: he was not of low rank like Gaveston: he was the son of a respectable nobleman, though not of the highest class: but the barons no sooner saw him fixed in power, than they hated him as inveterately as they did his predecessor: Spencer was finally hanged on a gibbet, together with his venerable father near [end 75] ninety years of age, in defiance of law, decorum and humanity.

The wife of Edward of Caernarvon was Isabella, sister to the king of France: she had long despised her husband, and wished to govern him; but she was never able to gain his confidence: at length she forgot herself so far as to live in open adultery with Roger Mortimer earl of March: one crime led to another: she who had first despised, and next proved unfaithful to her husband, afterward deprived him of his crown, and then of his life.

EDWARD III. 
1327.

EDWARD THE THIRD WAS THE CONQUEROR OF FRANCE

EDWARD the Third was fifteen years old when his father was murdered [end 76] and three years after, he joined in a confederacy with certain noblemen, who entered Nottingham Castle where the queen and Mortimer lay, seized Mortimer, who was tried and hanged for his crimes, and sent Isabella to prison.

The reign of Edward III belongs to the age of chivalry: the first idea of chivalry was for a knight in complete armour to sally forth on horseback in search of adventures, to succour distress, and punish oppression: in ages of the world, when every baron had a castle, and there was no king or law strong enough to prevent him from doing what he pleased, such a practice was useful: men who can do what they please, will often please to do what is wrong.

(39)

Men who can do what they please, will often please to do what is wrong: Although this maxim clearly applies to Godwin’s criticisms of the aristocracy in general, it also specifically recalls his rejection of the doctrine of “active rights” in Political Justice. Active rights refer to “the right in certain cases to do as we list,” which Godwin considers to undermine his doctrine of universal benevolence, which is aligned with what he calls “passive rights,” or the “right we possess to the forebearance and assistance of other men” (1798, I: 158-62). See also PJ 1798 V, xi; Life of Chaucer I: 24,…

In the stories of the knights-errant, or the knights of chivalry, we continually read of their rescuing ladies from [end 77] dungeons and tyrants: a lawless, uneducated man, who was lord of a castle too often would not be at the trouble to court the lady he liked, but ran away with her by force, without asking her own consent or that of her parents and then, if she was angry, would shut her up in a dungeon, till she consented to whatever he pleased: the knight-errant, when he entered on his profession, vowed that he would devote all his powers to the service of God and the ladies.

(40)

In the stories of the knights-errant…we continually read of their rescuing ladies from dungeons and tyrants: Godwin’s description of the knight-errant recalls his earlier novel Caleb Williams, specifically Falkland’s explicitly chivalric attempt to rescue a young woman (Emily Melvile) from her tyrannical uncle, Tyrrel. Godwin also briefly discusses the broader role and function of the knight-errant in the Life of Chaucer I: 29-30 and in Thoughts on Man, His Nature, Productions, and Discoveries. Interspersed with some Particulars Respecting the Author, 339.

By the time of Edward III the real use of chivalry was pretty well over but it had in it certain features of courage, refinement and humanity, they made it continue a favourite: when the knights no longer rode out to encounter an oppressor (or, as we find it in story-books, a giant or a dragon he dressed himself in armour, mounted on horseback, and invited any other [end 78] [n.b., image of jousting between 78 and 79] knights he could meet with to a friendly trial of skill: when a great many met together for this purpose, it was called a tournament.

There were more tournaments in the reign of Edward III, than in all the rest of the English history put together: the king was frequently one of the combatants, and the queen and all her ladies, seated upon thrones and lofty benches in a circle, were among the spectators.

As Edward was very fond of splendour and show, and a great encourager of tournaments, he was led naturally from this image of war, to wish for the reality: like too many other kings and heads of nations, he desired to be a conqueror.

A conqueror is a man who sallies forth at the head of an army, to disturb the peace and repose of honest, unoffending husbandmen, peasants and ar- [end 79] tisans: he causes the death of thousands, and reduces nations to slavery, that he may become famous, and have songs made in his praise.

(41)

Like too many other kings…he desired to be a conqueror. A conqueror is a man who… causes the death of thousands and reduces nations to slavery: This passage hews closely to Godwin’s extensive critique of aggressive war in Political Justice, which he characterizes as part of the “very essence of monarchy and aristocracy” (1798, II: 143-44). See especially 1798, II:142-82. See also Godwin’s comments on offensive versus defensive war in PJ 1798, I, ii; V, xvi-xx and 'conquest' in II, v, viii; Life of Chaucer also mentions the Battle of Cressy, I: 250-51.

Edward III found that, in right of his mother, he had a claim to the crown of Frances, and that it might admit of a dispute whether he was nearer to the inheritance, or the Frenchman whom the French nation chose to have reign over them: he therefore collected a great army, and set out for the conquest of France: if he succeeded, he thought he should be one of the most famous personages in history.

If he had succeeded, he would have fixed the seat of his government at Paris, because France is a much larger and more populous country than England; and England would have become a poor dependency of the French throne.

At first Edward made but a very small progress; after some years he got into a desperate situation, at a place called Cressy: his army was nearly made prisoners: the English warriors were very brave: they fought their way through; they defeated the French, and won at Cressy a memorable and astonishing victory: this however was not the end of the war.

Edward III had a son called Edward the Black Prince, because he wore a suit of black armour: he was one of the most accomplished warriors that ever lived: ten years after the battle of Cressy, he got into a similar difficulty to that of his father on the former occasion, and extricated himself from it with the same success: he took John, king of France, prisoner: the battles of Cressy and Poitiers are two of the most famous victories in modern history.

(42)

The battles of Cressy and Poitiers: Godwin also discusses these two battles in the Life of Chaucer, repeating his earlier criticisms of aggressive war from Political Justice (I: 250-51). Godwin notes, however, that for “all their vices and miserable consequences,” such victories also taught the English “self-reverence” and are therefore “not unworthy to find a place among the causes which have made us what we are” (I: 402).

When the Black Prince had made [end 81] king John prisoner, he seated him at a splendid entertainment in his tent, and himself waited behind the king's chair: this was in the very manner of the institutions of the feudal system, and of chivalry: when he brought king John over with him to London, he mounted his royal prisoner on a beautiful white horse of a large size, and rode a small black palfrey beside him along the streets: this was a much nobler spectacle than a Roman triumph, where the conqueror dragged his captive king as so many melancholy victims at his chariot-wheels.

There is a famous story of the siege of Calais by Edward III: the brave inhabitants held out for nearly a year: they surrendered at last from the pressure of hunger only: they asked for no more than their lives: Edward was determined to punish them for their honourable adherence to their duty: at last he said, if they would send six of their principal citizens to him, in their shirts, with halters about their necks, he would forgive the rest.

This was a more cruel difficulty than before: where were six citizens to be found, who would go voluntarily to death, to save the rest? at last an admirable fellow, Eustache de St Pierre, offered himself

(43)

Where were six citizens…who would go voluntarily to death, to save the rest? at last an admirable fellow…offered himself: Godwin’s admiration for the story of Eustache de St. Pierre recollects the well-known “fire cause” passage in Political Justice, in which he argues on utilitarian grounds that one should be prepared to sacrifice one’s own life for the good of society at large (1798, I: 127-28).

: five others followed his example: it is said, Edward III would have put these generous fellows to death, if his queen Philippa had not fallen upon her knees before him, and obtained their lives: how strange that a prince who behaved so humanely to people of rank, should have been so harsh and unrelenting to honest citizens!

(44)

How strange that a prince who behaved so humanely to people of rank, should have been so harsh and unrelenting to honest citizens!: In Political Justice, Godwin situates the causes for such double standards in the way princes are educated, which renders them incapable of “the recollection that other men are beings of the same order with himself” (1798, II: 5-20). See also PJ 1798, V, ii-iii, which expostulates on how monarchs come to feel themselves 'above' the rest of humankind and the famous “fire-cause” from PJ 1798, II, ii where Godwin makes the utilitarian argument that one should be prep…

Edward III lived to sustain the loss of all his conquests: he grew old: the Black Prince was seized with a consuming disorder, which robbed him of all [end 83] power of exertion: the English generals did their best, but in vain: France recovered her independence and prosperity.

In the reign of Edward III lived Chaucer, the first, and one of the greatest of the English poets: the English language in his time recovered its ascendancy: the poets who had hitherto been patronised by the Plantagenet princes were French: but the descendants of the Saxons were always much more numerous in England than the Normans, and the language of the multitude at length gained the superiority: it is Chaucer who has presented to us the first genuine model of the present language of England.

Edward III was the builder of Windsor Castle: the colleges of Oxford and Cambridge also began to be founded in this reign. [end 84]

RICHARD II. 
1377.

RICHARD OF BOURDEAUX WAS ADMIRABLE WHILE A BOY, BUT CONTEMPTIBLE WHEN HE GREW TO BE A MAN: HE WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS CROWN, AND STARVED TO DEATH IN PROMFRET CASTLE.

IN the dark and barbarous ages the lower people were slaves: there was such a thing as liberty in England and other European countries; but it was confined to the lords and holders of estates.

(45)

liberty…was confined to the lords and holders of estates: A critique of the inequality of property relations is a central facet of Godwin’s political theory. Departing from the Scottish Enlightenment view of private property as an encouragement to economic prosperity and to the advancement of civil society, Godwin argues that the existing system of property relations generates social strife by “engrossing all its advantages to a few favoured individual, and reserving to the portion of the rest want, dependence and misery” (1798, I: 16). See in particular Political Justice 1798, II: 431-52.

I have told you how the commons, by means of the progress of trade and good sense, rose in process of time to a certain importance: still however the greater part of the country people were slaves: as much had been obtained, they naturally wished for more: first in France, and afterward in England and other countries, they rose in arms, and demanded those privileges which [end 85] might best conduce to their improvement and comfort.

The occasion of the insurrection in England was a poll-tax, or a tax of so much a head, upon all the inhabitants of the kingdom: the collectors of the tax behaved very brutally: an act of indecency that they allowed themselves in to the daughter of a mechanic, named Wat Tyler, exasperated the father of the girl, who, with the hammer that was in his hand, killed the ruffian: thousands were already in a rage against the tax, the action of Wat Tyler

(46)

Wat Tyler: the leader of the 1381 Peasants Revolt was the subject of Robert Southey’s 1817 dramatic poem.

served them for a signal, and they flew to arms.

When the common people have got arms in their hands, and feel themselves masters, they are apt to run into the most outrageous excesses

(47)

When the common people have got arms in their hands…they are apt to run into the most outrageous excesses: Though this remark has clear connotations with respect to the French Revolution, it also calls to mind Godwin’s suspicion of “majority” and the notion that “popular commotions and violence” (Political Justice 1798, I: 277) ought never to serve as the primary engine of social change. See 1798, I: 253-55, 263-84. Godwin repeats a similar idea several times in PJ 1798 esp., IV, ii (“Of Revolutions”).

: the insurgents marched for London in an immense multitude, burned down the Temple, and the Monastery of St John [end 86] in Smithfield, set open the prisons, and cut off the heads of the archbishop of Canterbury, the lord high treasurer, and many other persons of distinction, merely out of envy to their rank.

Richard of Bourdeaux, son of Edward the Black Prince, was at this time only fourteen years and a half old: it was however thought necessary that he should go out from the Tower where he resided, and parley with the rebels in Smithfield: what they demanded was their liberty: during the conference, a quarrel arose between Wat Tyler and a knight attendant upon the king: Walworth, mayor of London, took part with the knight, and felled Tyler to the ground: the multitude grew furious: at this instant king Richard rode forth from his own people to meet the rebels: he called out to them to follow him who was their king, and he would grant them whatever they [end 87]should require: he led them into the open fields: while they were debating on terms with him, a considerable military force was collected: the multitude lost their opportunity, and in the insurrection was soon after suppressed, and rigorously punished.

Richard, as he grew up, appeared to be one of our weak sovereigns, who could not live without a favourite: the name of the man he chose was Vere, earl of Oxford, descended from the ancient nobility: but like most favourites, he was forward, presumptuous and overbearing: Richard himself was a mere man of pleasure, fond of the pomp and magnificence attendant upon royalty, but careless of its duties: his expences were lavish and prodigal, and excited a general sentiment of discontent.

Thomas of Woodstock, one of Richard's uncles, and brother to the Black [end 88] Prince, took advantage of his nephew's feeble character and unpopularity, drove the favourite into banishment, and usurped all the powers of royalty, leaving Richard nothing but the name.

This lasted three years, when a second convulsion restored Richard to his authority, under the guardianship of a new set of favourites, by whose orders Thomas of Woodstock was smothered in his bed.

Richard gained little by the murder of Thomas of Woodstock: the next year Henry of Bolingbroke, son of the famous John of Gaunt duke of Lancaster, another of Richard's uncles, raised an army against the king, took him prisoner, shut him up in Pomfret Castle, where he caused him to be starved to death, and placed himself on the throne.

In the time of Richard of Bourdeaux lived John Wicliffe, a man of great [end 89] learning and courage, who preached against the abuses of popery

(48)

John Wicliffe…who preached against the abuses of popery: John Wicliffe (c. 1331-1381) was a theologian, Oxford professor, reformer, and early translator of the Bible into common English. Wicliffe’s insistence on the primacy of the individual’s interpretation of scripture, his attacks on the Church hierarchy, and rejection of papal authority led him to be declared a heretic and his works banned in 1415. Given this background it is not difficult to see why Godwin, whose politics are deeply shaped by similar anti-authoritarian strains within the Puritan tradition, would make positive mention of W…

: his followers were numerous, and some of them of high rank, but his party was finally suppressed: Wicliffe first translated the Bible into English.

The reign of Richard of Bourdeaux is the subject of the second of the series of plays, which Shakespear has founded on the history of England.

(49)

the second of the series of plays: Shakespeare’s King Richard the Second (1597).

[end 90; page 91 blank] […] true heir, he could not feel easy in his ill-gotten dignity.

The whole reign of Henry of Bolingbroke was infested with plots and conspiracies to restore the true heir: the most distinguished leader in these hostilities was the famous Henry Percy, surnamed Hotspur.

Henry of Bolingbroke experienced another vexation: his eldest son Henry of Monmouth, appeared to turn out an abandoned libertine: he kept low company, was engaged in disgraceful riots, and even went so far with his licentious associates, as to rob on the highway.

King Henry, wasted and broken-hearted with perpetual griefs from without and within, died of a worn-out frame, at the age of forty-five, after an uncomfortable reign of thirteen years. [end 92]

Shakespeare has written the reign of Henry IV.

HENRY V. 
1413.

HENRY THE FIFTH WON THE BATTLE OF AGINCOURT ON ST. CRISPIN'S DAY.

HENRY, surnamed of Monmouth, to the astonishment of every body, laid aside his riots the moment he came to the crown, and ever after behaved himself in such a manner as to gain the affections of his subjects.

The reign of Henry V was splendid; but those very circumstances which constitute its splendour, are in the eye of reason its deepest disgrace.

The king of France was seized with madness, yet a madness that had inter- [end 93] vals: his courtiers and the princes of the blood-royal, were ambitious and profligate: these circumstances involved France in the most terrible calamities: Henry seized this occasion to revive the claim first set up by Edward III, of the royal line of England to the throne of France.

(50)

The king of France was seized with madness, yet a madness that had intervals: Godwin is referring to Charles VI, King of France (1368-1422), whose intermittent bouts of mental incapacity caused political instability. By the time Godwin is writing History of England, England’s George III had long been displaying the symptoms of madness that would eventually lead to his son George IV’s regency in 1811; see page 97 below.

He won the battle of Agincourt, under circumstances exactly similar to the battles of Cressy and Poitiers: with a small army, he seemed to be surrounded and cut off by the numerous forces of France: he forced his way through them, and obtained the fullest and most entire victory.

It was not the battle of Agincourt that placed Henry V on the throne of France: he did not fully carry his point till five years afterward, when, having a second time crossed the seas with an army, such were the distractions of that unhappy country, that he [end 94] was able to dictate what terms he pleased: he graciously permitted the reigning sovereign to retain the title and state of a king, but took the government into his own hands, and decreed that, whenever the present king should die, he himself and his heirs were to succeed to the throne.

Shakespear had written the history play of Henry V.

HENRY VI. 
1422.

HENRY OF WINDSOR, HALF-MADMAN, AND HALF-FOOL, LOST THE CROWN THAT HIS GRANDFATHER HAD WICKEDLY SEIZED.

THE king of France died in less than two months after his conqueror; and Henry of Windsor was proclaimed king of England in London, and king of France in Paris, before he was a year [end 95] old: he lived long enough to become a poor and friendless prisoner in the Tower of London.

The son of the late king of France still maintained some authority in the southern parts of that kingdom: war was carried on for seven years between the contending parties, but the balance of success was in favour of the English: at the end of seven years their enemies appeared ruined: the last trial of strength was before the town of Orleans besieged by the English.

When every thing now looked desperate for the French, a poor young woman, twenty-seven years of age, the maid-servant of a village-inn, called Joan of Arc, came to the prince-dauphin of France, and told him she was inspired by God to raise the siege of Orleans, and to place him on the throne of his ancestors: in the now wretched state of his affairs the prince [end 96] thought any means worth trying: the defeated and unhappy French believed every thing Joan of Arc told them: she put herself at the head of a detachment, and forced her way into the town: the English were as much astonished as the French, at the appearance of this strange sort of general: the siege was raised.

Joan of Arc conducted her sovereign to the cathedral of Rheims in the northern part of the kingdom, where all his ancestors had celebrated their coronation, and where the same ceremony was now performed for him: this was the last of her exploits: she was soon after taken prisoner by the English, who barbarously caused her to be burned alive for a witch: they never however recovered the effects of her achievements, and were finally driven out of France.

This is the first part of the history [end 97] of Henry of Windsor: during the early part of his reign he fought for the crown of France; during the later he was obliged to fight for the crown of England.

John of Gaunt duke of Lancaster was the third, and Edmund of Langley duke of York the fourth son of Edward III: but the descendants of York intermarried with the Mortimers' claim to the throne of England: this was the source of the famous wars of York and Lancaster, frequently called the wars of Two Roses, White and Red.

The mischiefs which the English had inflicted upon France, now recoiled upon ourselves: our king became mad with a madness exactly similar to that of the late king of France: his government was not less weak, and distracted with factions; and Richard duke of York [end 98] was appointed lord protector of England during the king's indisposition.

Henry VI had for his queen, Margaret of Anjou, a lady of great beauty, understanding and accomplishments: this woman for a long time supported the party of Lancaster by her abilities: she had borne to king Henry an only son, a child of great promise, and it was to the maintaining his claim to succeed after the death of his father, that she directed all her exertions.

Richard duke of York, lord protector of the kingdom, had a better claim to the crown than he who wore it: this was a critical situation: queen Margaret thought it dangerous to suffer him to retain his office: he seemed to aspire to nothing more, but he would not part with what he had got: both sides had recourse to arms: after his second victory over the Lancastrians, and having twice taken king Henry [end 99] prisoner, duke Richard caused the parliament to confirm him lord protector during the life of Henry, and heir to the crown after his decease.

Margaret having raised new forces in the north, the battle of Wakefield was soon after fought: in this battle the Yorkists were defeated, and duke Richard killed.

Eton college, the most celebrated school in England, was founded by king Henry VI.

Shakespear has described the principal events of this reign in three historical plays, called the First, Second, and Third Parts of the Reign of Henry VI.

THE 
HOUSE OF YORK.

EDWARD IV. 
1461. 
EDWARD THE FOURTH WAS AN ARRANT LIBERTINE, AND TOOK AWAY THE FAMOUS JANE SHORE FROM HER HUSBAND THAT SHE MIGHT LIVE WITH HIM.

EDWARD, eldest son of Richard duke of York, was daring and adventurous, and in a short time after the death of his father, caused himself to be proclaimed king by the title of Edward IV.

Three years after, his reign became fully established by the victory he obtained over queen Margaret at Hex- [end 101, n.b. no page number on this page] ham: Margaret, flying alone by night with her son, now ten years old, through the neighbouring forest after the battle, was met by a robber with a drawn sword: Margaret, with the sound judgment and the courage which she always displayed, finding she could not escape, advanced boldly toward the robber, saying, Behold the son of your king! I commit him to your protection! the outlaw was struck with the magnanimity of this action, accepted the trust, and concealed his royal guests, till the danger was over, and a vessel procured to transport them to Flanders.

The principal partisan of Edward IV was Neville earl of Warwick, who, from the share he had in raising Edward to the throne, obtained the surname of the king-maker: when Edward had already been king nine years, he and his great partisan quarrelled; [end 102] and, as Warwick had before obtained Edward the crown, he resolved now to deprive him of it: he accordingly took his measures so well that Edward was obliged to fly the kingdom: according to the old historians he was for some time Warwick's prisoner: in six months however he appeared again at the head of an army: Warwick was defeated and killed in the battle of Barnet; and, Edward having obtained a second victory at Tewkesbury, king Henry VI, and his beloved son, now sixteen years of age, were murdered by his order.

Never were any wars more cruel than those of the Two Roses: queen Margaret from resentment and passion, and Edward out of hardness of his heart, sanctioned the most bloody proceedings: in all the later battles no quarter was given, and the nobility and leaders of the defeated army who were not so fortunate as to perish in the field, [end 103] were instantly led to the scaffold: it seemed as if refinement, civilisation and science were perishing from the land, and we were hastening to become a nation of savages.

Edward IV put to death his own brother George duke of Clarence, who had been the abettor of Warwick in his insurrection: there is a vulgar story that he was prompted to this violence by a prophecy, which said that his brother G. would deprive Edward's children of the crown: people afterward found out that this prophecy related to his other brother, Richard duke of Gloucester.

One of the most remarkable circumstances of this reign is the introduction of printing into England: the first English printer was William Caxton. [end 104] [n.b., engraving in between 104-105]

EDWARD V. 
1483. 
EDWARD THE FIFTH, AND HIS BROTHER, THE DUKE OF YORK, ARE SAID TO HAVE BEEN MURDERED IN THE TOWER WHILE CHILDREN, BY THEIR UNCLE, RICHARD CROOKBACK.

EDWARD V reigned two months and eleven days, and was twelve years old at the time of his death. [end 105]

RICHARD III. 
1483 
RICHARD CROOKBACK I BELIEVE WAS NOT CROOKED, AND PERHAPS NOT A MURDERER OF CHILDREN; BUT HE WAS CONQUERED IN BATTLE BY HENRY OF RICHMOND; AND HENRY WAS NOT CONTENTED TO KILL HIM, WITHOUT MAKING A MONSTER OF HIM AFTER HE WAS DEAD.

THE libertine Edward IV indulged himself so licentiously with regard to women, that it became a question after his death who was his wife: when he married Elizabeth Woodville, mother to the young princes, there was another lady, Eleanor Butler, still living, who said he had married her: Richard duke of Gloucester took advantage of this circumstance, alleged that his nephews, not born in lawful wedlock, could not inherit the crown, and caused himself to [end 106] be proclaimed in their room: this was a violent and ungenerous proceeding toward the boys who were placed under his protection: and, if they were set aside, the children of his brother the duke of Clarence, had a better right than he.

The poor children thus excluded from the throne, were shut up in the Tower: and there king Richard is reported to have caused them to be murdered: the truth of this depends upon the credit due to the person called Perkin Warbeck

(51)

Perkin Warbeck: a supposed pretender to the English throne who claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury, the Duke of York, he was the subject of Mary Shelley’s The Fortunes of Perkin Warbeck (1830). After he confessed to being an imposter he was imprisoned in the Tower of London sporadically for two years until his execution by hanging in 1499.

in the next reign, who said he was the duke of York: if Richard did not murder both his nephews, it is not credible that he murdered either.

At this time the cruelties which had been practised by the house of York were visited on their own heads: almost all the ancient nobility of England had been destroyed in the wars of the Two [end 107] Roses: the Lancastrians, who nearly in every family had had a father, a brother, or a son, murdered upon the scaffold, watched for an occasion of revenge.

Henry of Richmond, who had a very remote and doubtful claim to the crown derived from the house of Lancaster, caballed with the partisans of that house to expel Richard: many even of the party of York, disgusted with Richard's usurpation, encouraged this enterprise: Henry sailed for England, and the king, who was a brave and gallant soldier, immediately gave him battle at Bosworth in Leicestershire: Richard was killed, and the crown was placed on the head of his competitor.

Shakespear wrote the historical play of king Richard III; and, to please queen Elizabeth, the grand-daughter of Henry of Richmond, has represented Richard more like a monster than a man. [end 108]

THE 
HOUSE OF TUDOR.

HENRY VII. 
1485. 
HENRY OF RICHMOND WAS NICKNAMED BY HIS COURTIERS THE WISEST OF MONARCHS, BUT WAS IN REALITY NOTHING BETTER THAN A HARD-HEARTED, SCRAPING OLD MISER.

HENRY of Richmond, to patch up his doubtful title, married Elizabeth, sister to the two young princes; and this he called the Union of the Two Houses of York and Lancaster.

Perkin Warbeck

(52)

See note 51.

made his first appearance in the public transactions of history, when he was about eighteen [end 109; page umnumbered] years of age: having resided some time in Ireland and France, where he gave out that he was the younger of the two princes, he went to Brussels, and there succeeded in convincing Margaret duchess of Burgundy, sister to Edward IV and Richard III, of the soundness of his pretensions: after going through a variety of adventures for seven years, he fell into the hands of his rival, Henry of Richmond, who caused him to be hanged at Tyburn. Was he the duke of York, or was he an impostor? in other words, Which was the true murderer, Richard III, or his accuser, Henry VII? This is one of the most difficult questions in history.

The ruling passion of Henry of Richmond was the love of money: he found two convenient instruments, Empson and Dudley, to inforce his extortions on his subjects: they were [end 110] hanged for their practices of this sort in the beginning of the following reign.

In this reign occurred that extraordinary event, the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus.

HENRY VIII. 
1509. 
HENRY THE EIGHTH HAD SIX WIVES: HE CUT OFF THE HEADS OF TWO OF THEM, AND PUT AWAY TWO MORE: IN HIS REIGN ENGLAND CHANGED FROM the ROMAN CATHOLIC TO THE PROTESTANT RELIGION.

THE prime minister of Henry VIII in the earlier part of his reign, was cardinal Wolsey, the son of a butcher at Ipswich: he was a man of a noble mind, and a great lover of learning and learned men: he was also vain, ostentatious and arrogant: he [end 111] built for his private use the palace of Whitehall: no minister of this country ever lived in so splendid and expensive a manner as cardinal Wolsey.

Martin Luther and John Calvin, the great authors of the Protestant religion, lived, the one in Germany, and other in France, in the reign of Henry VIII: king Henry wrote a book against Luther: but he afterward quarrelled with the pope, because the pope would not consent to Henry's dismissing a wife he was tired of, and marrying another woman that he liked better: and to be revenged of the pope, Henry set up the Protestant religion: this event is commonly called the Reformation.

Henry VIII was of a capricious and unrelenting temper: he governed this country, once so free, and which afterward conquered her liberties back again, like a Turkish sultan: whoever

(53)

See note 31.

[end 112] of his subjects he had a dispute with, he put to death: one of the persons who suffered in this way was sir Thomas More,

(54)

Thomas More: lawyer, philosopher, opponent of the Reformation, author of Utopia (1516), and Lord High Chancellor of England from 1529-32. Godwin’s diary indicates that he had read Utopia in 1795; accordingly, the second edition of Political Justice (1796) adds a footnote referencing Utopia, along with Plato’s Republic, Gulliver’s Travels, and Gabriel Bonnot de Mably’s De la législation (1776), as an open attack on the prevailing “system of accumulated property” (1798, II: 459).

lord high chancellor, who is usually considered as the most perfect and spotless character that ever graced the English dominions.

From the reign of Henry VIII England has enjoyed a continual succession of admirable authors: sir Thomas More is one of the pillars of the English language: the earl of Surry

(55)

the earl of Surry: Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, was related to two of Henry VIII’s wives (Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard), which might have contributed to the king’s suspicion that the Earl was plotting against the king’s son Edward. This lead to Surrey’s execution by beheading for treason on 19 January 1547, only eleven days before Henry’s death. Surrey was one of the first English poets to write in blank verse and helped develop the sonnets that would later be called Elizabethan or Shakespearean.

[sic], who also lost his his head by this king's tyranny, was a charming and agreeable poet: Cranmer, archbishop of Canterbury, is to be considered as the principal author of our Book of Common Prayer.

(56)

Cranmer: the Archbishop of Canterbury from 1533 until 1555, Thomas Cranmer was instrumental in the foundation of the Church of England and, as Godwin notes here, he contributed to the establishment of the Book of Common Prayer, which was ratified by the Act of Uniformity in 1549.

About this time painting and statuary first eminently assumed a character of nobleness, beauty and truth, among the moderns: the country in which they were chiefly cultivated was Italy: the great masters were Michael Angelo, Raphael and Titian. [end 113]

Shakespeare wrote the historical play of Henry VIII.

EDWARD VI. 
1547. 
EDWARD THE SIXTH WAS NINE YEARS OLD WHEN HE BEGAN TO REIGN, AND SIXTEEN WHEN HE DIED: HE WAS A GOOD BOY, STUDIED GREEK, AND WAS A TOWARDLY SCHOLAR.

EDWARD VI, though he was a very good boy, did not always learn his lesson: this was while he was prince of Wales, and before he was nine years old: it was the custom of those times for the prince of Wales to have a whipping boy: that is, a boy who learned along with him, and was whipped whenever the prince happened to be idle: the boy therefore teazed the prince to learn, and said, Oh, pray, save me a whipping! [end 114] [n.b., there is a page of engravings between 114 and 115] The name of Edward VI's whipping-boy was young Browne.

The Greek language was almost unknown in the West for several centuries: when the Turks took Constantinople in the year 1453, the Greeks, who had possessed it before, fled for refuge to different countries of Europe, and brought the Greek language, and the writings of Homer, Pindar, Plato, and other famous Greek writers, along with them: from that time Greek gradually became a fashionable study: Edward VI, and his sister (afterward queen Elizabeth), applied to it with great earnestness: one of their fellow scholars, who went beyond them both in diligence and proficiency, was lady Jane Grey.

(57)

In 1806 (the same year Godwin published History of England), Godwin (as Theophilius Marcliffe) published another Juvenile Library title, Life of Lady Jane Grey and of Lord Guilford Dudley, her Husband. This young Lady at Twelve Years of Age understood Eight Languages, was for Nine Days Queen of England, and was Beheaded in the Tower in the Seventeenth Year of her Age, being at that Time the most amiable and Accomplished Woman in Europe, in 1806.

Edward VI was sincerely attached to the Protestant religion; and all Englishmen, who wished well to Reformation and improvement, earnestly prayed [end 115] for his long life and prosperity: by his death their prospects became discouraging and gloomy.

Edward VI was the founder of Christ's Hospital (commonly called the Blue-Coat-School), and St Thomas's Hospital for the sick and wounded: these and other establishments (Westminster School by queen Elizabeth) grew out of the ruins of the monasteries, demolished by Henry VIII in his rage against the pope.

MARY. 
1553. 
BLOODY QUEEN MARY BURNED THREE HUNDRED PROTESTANTS IN FOUR YEARS, BECAUSE THEY DID NOT THINK JUST AS SHE DID, AND WOULD NOT TELL LIES ABOUT the MATTER.

MARY was the daughter of Henry VIII by his first wife that he quarrelled with the pope about: there was therefore no hope but that she would do her utmost to root out the Reformation in England: a few Protestants set up lady Jane Grey for queen: this was a very wicked and a very silly scheme: the admirable young lady was hardly persuaded to come into it by the importunities of her father, her mother, her father-in-law, and her husband: her mock reign lasted nine days, and then Bloody queen Mary cut off her head.

Mary married Philip king of Spain, partly because he was the most bigoted and furious Catholic to be found in Europe.

In the three hundred Protestants burned alive for their religion by Bloody queen Mary, were included Cranmer archbishop of Canterbury, Ridley bishop of London, three other bishops, fifty-five women, and four [end 117] children: is not she rightly called Bloody queen Mary?

(58)

In the three hundred Protestants burned alive…is she not rightly called Bloody queen Mary: This history is famously recounted in John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments of Matter Most Speciall and Memorable, Happening in the Church, with a Universall Historie of the Same (first published in English in 1563), more commonly known as Foxes Book of Martyrs.

In her reign Sackville lord Dorset, afterward lord high treasurer of England, began a famous collection of poems, called the Mirror of magistrates: he was also author of the tragedy of Gorboduc.

(59)

Sackville lord Dorset: Thomas Sackville, 1st Earl of Dorset served as Lord High Treasurer from 1599 until 1608. He was also, as Godwin notes here, one of the editors of and contributors to The Mirrors For Magistrates (not “of,” as claimed above), a collection of historical poems, as well as the co-author of The Tragedie of Gorboduc (1561), the first blank verse drama in English.

ELIZABETH. 
1558. 
QUEEN ELIZABETH OF ALL HER SEX HAD A GENIUS BEST FITTED TO GOVERN; BUT SHE WAS APT TO SWEAR, AND BOX HER MINISTERS' EARS: IN HER TIME WAS THE SPANISH ARMADA.

ELIZABETH was the daughter of Henry VIII by Anne Boleyn, the lady for whose sake Henry turned off Mary's mother: we may therefore say that she was born a Protestant, and on that account she was brought in the danger of her [end 118] life during the reign of her bloody sister.

Queen Elizabeth is said to have had some of the wisest ministers that ever a sovereign was blessed with; particularly lord Burleigh and sir Francis Walsingham: I do not know that she boxed the ears of either of these.

The question whether England should belong to the Protestants or the pope was not yet decided: the Catholics supported the title of Mary queen of Scots, great-grand-daughter of Henry VII, to the throne of England, in preference to that of queen Elizabeth.

Mary queen of Scots was the most beautiful woman of her times: she was exceedingly accomplished and prepossessing in her manners: she wrote very tolerable verses: but she wanted prudence and judgment in her conduct, and this defect proved her ruin. [end 119]

Mary married a very weak young nobleman, her cousin: almost as soon as they were man and wife, they began to have violent quarrels; and about a year and a half after, he was found murdered: from the circumstances of the case Mary was suspected of being concerned in it: she was never able to clear herself, and was obliged to fly from Scotland: she took refuge in England, and Elizabeth threw her into prison.

As long as Mary was alive, the Catholics of England would never be quiet: they formed many conspiracies: they entered into secret correspondences with Mary: at last, after eighteen years' imprisonment, this unfortunate queen had her head cut off at Fotheringay Castle.

The year after her death Philip king of Spain fitted out an immense fleet for the conquest of England: it was [end 120] called the Invincible Armada: several people were so terrified, when they heard that it had sailed, or that it was seen off our coast, that they died of the fright: queen Elizabeth put herself on horseback at the head of her army to repel the invaders: the English captains and seamen, sir Francis Drake, sir Walter Raleigh, and others, baffled all their attempts to land: at length they were overtaken by a violent storm, and after having lost half their numbers, the rest were glad to escape safe to the place from which they came.

Queen Elizabeth, skilful in government, and of a masculine temper, would never consent to take a husband: she said that, when she died, it should be inscribed upon her tomb-stone, Here lies Elizabeth, who lived and died a maiden queen: she however had favourites, particularly two, Robert Dudley earl of Leicester, and Robert Devereux earl of [end 121] Essex: with these she coquetted, and carried on a Platonic correspondence; and thus she endeavoured to solace herself for the sacrifice she made to her ambition, in having neither husband nor child.

The court of queen Elizabeth was exceedingly refined, and the Platonic and romantic ideas she cultivated made it still more so: the brightest ornament of this court was sir Philip Sidney: he was the most generous and benevolent of mankind: no error, no blemish is to be discovered in his behaviour: he was as learned in the closet, as he was graceful and elegant in the drawing-room: he died in battle at the age of thirty-two years, leaving behind him an agreeable and singular romance, entitled Arcadia.

One of the friends of sir Philip Sidney was Edmund Spenser: he possessed, perhaps beyond any poet that ever [end 122] lived, the power of representing in words the impressions received by the sense of sight: his great work is the Fairy Queen, the hero of which is king Arthur.

Of all the vehicles through which writers of imagination have conveyed their conceptions to others, perhaps the most striking is the theatre: among the Greeks were many eminent dramatic writers, Sophocles, Euripides, and Menander: among the Romans Terrence, and Seneca, and Ovid: in the dark ages there were few public amusements: the minstrels went from house to house, playing on the harp, singing ballads of humour or heroic achievements, showing juggler's tricks, amusing their hearers with raillery and ribaldry, and performing a rude sort of plays: the monks of these uncultivated time envied the minstrels their powers [end 123] of pleasing: they invented godly plays, called Mysteries, and Moralities, to rival the profane plays of the vagabonds: the Mysteries were sometimes a representation of God making the world, and sometimes of the sufferings and death of Christ.

After the Reformation came the drama such as we now have it: in the reign of Edward VI was written a laughable comedy, called Gammer Gurton's Needle:

(60)

Gammer Gurton's Needle: A Ryght Pithy, Pleasaunt and merie Comedie: Intytuled Gammer Gurtons Nedle (first performed in Cambridge in the 1550s or 1560s and printed in 1575) is generally identified as the second earliest English comedy (after Nicholas Udall’s Ralph Roister Doister in the early 1550s). In the late eighteenth century it was attributed to Bishop John Still though it was likely composed by William Stevenson, a prebendary of Durham.

in the reign of queen Mary flourished Sackville lord Dorset, author of the tragedy of Gorboduc:

(61)

See note 59.

toward the end of queen Elizabeth's reign we count up twenty or thirty dramatic writers, all possessing some merit: last of all came the divine Shakespear, to whom, if the Greek and Roman writers were now living, they would willingly yield the superiority; the poet of nature; the only man, [end 124] through the successive ages of the world, who knew how the human heart would express itself, in all the variety of situations in which a human creature can be placed. [end 125]

THE 
HOUSE OF STUART.

JAMES I. 
1603.

JAMES THE FIRST WOULD HAVE MADE A VERY GOOD SCHOOL-MASTER, AND A VERY GOOD SCHOOL-MASTER IS A MOST EXCELLENT MEMBER OF SOCIETY:

(62)

A very good schoolmaster is an excellent member of society: From his early Account of the Seminary (1783) onwards, Godwin emphasizes the need to revise the preceptor’s role in education. The schoolmaster is not the arbiter of already established knowledge, which Godwin associates with the “perpetual pupillage” (Political Justice 1798 I: 301) enforced by institutions, but a facilitator whose role is primarily to generate “a motive to learn” (Enquirer 79), inciting students to “act for themselves” with the goal of becoming their “own preceptor” (Political Justice 1798, I: 301). The subsequent de…

WHAT A PITY PEOPLE SHOULD BE PUT TO A BUSINESS THEY ARE NOT FIT FOR!

JAMES the First, son of the unfortunate Mary queen of Scots by her kinsman-husband, and who, before his succession to the English throne, was James the Sixth, king of Scotland, became sovereign of the whole island on the death of Elizabeth.

Two years after, happened one of the most extraordinary events known in his- [end 126, n.b. no page number on page] tory, commonly called the Gunpowder Treason: though the mother of James the First was a Catholic, he himself was bred in the Protestant faith: some Catholics, despairing now of the restoration of their religion, and thinking that the English nation would be hated by God Almighty as long as they continued Protestants, or, as the Catholics called it, Heretics, formed the diabolical plan of blowing up king, lords, and commons, with gunpowder, on the day of the meeting of parliament, Nov. 5, 1605, and for that purpose placed thirty-five barrels of gunpowder, ready to be lighted, in a cellar under the parliament-house: their treason was not found out, till the very day before.

James the First had some learning, and sought all occasions of showing it: this character is what we call a pedant: he made long preachments to his parliaments about king-craft, and told them [end 127] that it would be sedition in them to dispute what a king might do in the height of his power.

(63)

Compare to Godwin’s critique of the education of princes in Political Justice 1798 V, ii.

 

This was very foolish talk: the spirit of the nation had been broken by the wars of York and Lancaster: Henry VIII, as I told you, ruled the English nation like a Turkish sultan: queen Elizabeth governed almost as absolutely as her father; but she knew how to temper authority with prudence; she had a genius for government; she thought herself richer, as she often told her parliament, with the money that was in her subjects' pockets, than with that which was in her own treasury: a legislature, which had been led by her, would not bear to be prated to by a pedant, and they unfortunately taught his son what a parliament could do in the height of its power.

(64)

In History of the Commonwealth intro and I, ii, Godwin mentions the cleavage of monarchical from parliamentary power as a factor in bringing about the Commonwealth; he also discusses parliament's abolition of monarchical authority in Commonwealth III, i-ii.

 

James, though no fool (he was called the English Solomon by his courtiers), [end 128] was certainly exceedingly weak and foolish in his conduct: like other weak princes, he could not live without a favourite

(65)

he could not live without a favourite: For Godwin, the incapacity for rulers to make decisions without the advice of their “favourites” exemplifies how the court establishes an elaborate network of mediations that shields the prince from anything like the direct “collision of mind with mind” (Political Justice 1793, 21) that sparks the necessary process of self-reflection and revision of ideas that grounds Godwin’s republican vision of society. See Political Justice 1798, II: 25-26.

: his first favourite was a Scotch lad of the name of Carr; and, as the king found that this lad was extremely ignorant, he amused his royal leisure with teaching him the Latin Grammar: some time after, Carr was guilty of the murder of sir Thomas Overbury; so king James was obliged to turn him off.

His next favourite was Villiers, afterward created created duke of Buckingham: he was handsome, accomplished, and not without abilities; but, like all other favourites, he was presumptuous, arrogant, and offensive in his demeanour: he soon acquired the hatred of the nation, and his master lost much of the good will of his subjects on his account.

The greatest disgrace of the reign of James the First was the death of sir Walter [end 129] Raleigh: he was one of the remaining ornaments of the court of queen Elizabeth, a great scholar, a great statesman, an accomplished gentleman: we have still remaining of his the History of the World, and several sweet pieces of poetry: in the beginning of James's reign, he was tried and convicted on an obscure charge of treason: after he had remained several years a prisoner in the Tower, James took him out, employed him, and gave him a fleet with which he sailed to South America: this was virtually setting aside the sentence of death which had been pronounced upon him: but the Spaniards pretended that the whole of South America was theirs, and threatened to go to war if sir Walter Raleigh was not exemplarily punished for the infractions he had committed there; and the effeminate and cowardly James, to soothe the king of Spain, caused this great man's head to [end 130] be cut off, under pretence of the sentence which had been passed eighteen years before.

In the latter end of Elizabeth's reign the power of the native Irish was first completely subdued under the English arms: in the reign of James measures, severe, but perhaps necessary, were taken to perpetuate the new establishment.

In the reign of king James Shakespear wrote some of his best plays, particularly Macbeth: another writer of plays of the highest degree of excellence was Ben Jonson: with these two writers we may class without much disparagement the names of Beaumont and Fletcher

(66)

Beaumont and Fletcher are favorites of Fleetwood’s protagonist, who reads the latter’s A Wife for a Moneth (1624) to his wife.

: the great lord Bacon, who had done more for the improvement of natural philosophy than any preceding author we are acquainted with, in like manner adorned this reign with his writings: our present translation of the Bible also belongs to this period. [end 131]

CHARLES I. 
1625.

CHARLES THE FIRST LOVED AND UNDERSTOOD THE WORKS OF SHAKESPEAR AND RAPHAEL AND TITIAN; HE WAS A NOBLE AND ACCOMPLISHED GENTLEMAN; BUT HE WAS NOT A GOOD KING, AND HE HAD A HARD FATE; HIS SUBJECTS WENT TO WAR WITH HIM, DEFEATED HIM, AND CUT OF HIS HEAD.

VILLIERS duke of Buckingham, the favourite of James the First, became after the death of James the favourite of his son: by the violence of his temper he involved his master in many rash measures: but, three years after the accession of Charles, he was stabbed by Felton, in a dark passage at Portsmouth, just as he was going to set out on an expedition against France.

The English parliaments were now resolved to place the liberties of their country on a firm foundation: the [end 132; n.b., engraving between 132 and 133] house of common was, by the change of manners and the progress of civilization, grown to be of the highest importance: they determined to assume the same control over the prerogatives of the crown which the barons had exercised in former times: James the First and Charles the First were by no means inclined to submit to this: continual quarrels had arisen between them and their parliaments; and, a few months after the death of the duke of Buckingham, Charles resolved to call no more parliaments, and to try to rule without them: if he had succeeded, the government of England would have become one of the most despotic

(67)

England would have become one of the most despotic governments in the world: In Political Justice, Godwin characterizes despotism in a similar manner as something which “renders enquiry and examination impossible” by withdrawing “causes to be judged […] to a single centre […] placed at the greatest distance possible” from public discourse (1798, II: 33). On Godwin’s views of the conflict between Charles I and parliament, see his History of the Commonwealth, from its commencement to the Restoration of Charles the Second: containing the civil war (London: 1824), I: 424-27

governments in the world.

The great power of parliament consists of this, that they only have a right to raise taxes on the people: though some irregularity had prevailed upon the subject, this had been admitted for [end 133] centuries to be a fundamental law of the English constitution.

Charles the First governed for eleven years without a parliament: consequently he raised taxes on the people by his royal authority: in the midst of this period of despotism, a true English country-gentleman, John Hambden [sic],

(68)

John Hambden: John Hampden’s 1637 trial for his refusal to pay ship taxes earned him notoriety and made him one of the leading Parliamentarians in opposition to Charles I. He was one of the Five Members of parliament whom Charles attempted to arrest on 4 January 1642, an act that sparked the English Civil War.

refused to pay one of these irregular taxes, and brought the question to a public trial: the venal judges of that period decided against him: he lost his cause; but he gained the approbation and love of the whole people of England.

How long this assumed authority of Charles would have gone on is uncertain: but he quarrelled with the people of his native country, Scotland; they determined to be without bishops: he determined they should not: this quarrel produced a war; and war could not be maintained without a fresh sup [end 134] ply of money: so king Charles once more summoned a parliament.

The parliament of 1640 opened with great solemnity: the whole nation looked to them as the last hope of their country: they began with calling to account the ministers by whose advice king Charles had acted for eleven years: particularly they fixed upon Thomas Wentworth, a man of great abilities, formerly one of the most strenuous friends of freedom, but who had been bought off by the court, and created earl of Strafford: he was impeached by the house of commons, tried by the house of lords, and beheaded on Tower Hill.

(69)

Thomas Wentworth: first Earl of Strafford (1593-1641), began his political career opposing the policies of Charles I but eventually came into the court’s favour and became a close advisor to the king. In the History of the Commonwealth, Godwin suggests that Wentworth’s shift in principles made him “a dangerous foe to public liberty,” though Godwin also criticizes Parliament’s decision to have him executed. See History of the Commonwealth, I: 86-93. Wentworth’s aggressive policies as lord-deputy of Ireland figure significantly in the first volume of Godwin’s 1817 novel Mandeville. a tale of the…

It is difficult for the wisest man, or the most venerable assembly, when they have got all power in their hands, to know where to stop: both parties, the king and the parliament, behaved ill: the parliament though they never [end 135] could not do enough to secure their late asserted liberties: the king hated the parliament, particularly for the death of the earl of Strafford: he had not the fortitude to convince them, that he would frankly and cheerfully yield so much of his power that he might preserve the rest: they went to war.

Charles the First was capable of acting judiciously, when he followed his own understanding; but he was too apt to take advice, and often adopted the worst advice that could be got: this was the immediate occasion of the war: on the 5th of January 1642 he went suddenly to the house of commons, got into the speaker's chair, and demanded that they should surrender their five ablest members, with John Hambden [sic] at their head, into this hands: a senseless thing for him to ask; an impossible thing for them to grant. [end 136]

The English have always mixed a great deal of humour and smart jesting at each other with their quarrels: the parliament-party, who stood up for their liberties, had very grave faces, said long prayers, and wore short hair: their adversaries nicknamed them Roundheads: the king's party set up for jolly, spirited gentlemen: they called themselves the Cavaliers.

The war lasted three years, and the king was conquered: then perhaps Charles might have been restored, and every thing placed on a right footing: but a new and extraordinary personage had arisen during the war, and had been a main instrument of bringing it to a successful conclusion: his name was Oliver Cromwel, the son of a brewer at Huntingdon: Oliver Cromwel resolved that king Charles should never again sit upon the throne: he proceeded so artificially that he baffled [end 137] every attempt for that purpose: he at length contrived that the king should be brought to trial before a high court of justice, for having made war upon the nation: Charles the First was condemned, and beheaded at Whitehall, January 30, 1649.

The reign of king Charles the First is the most interesting period in the history of this country, perhaps in the history of the world

(70)

The most interesting period in the history of this country: Godwin introduces his later History of the Commonwealth in the same terms, arguing that the period is “unlike any thing that can elsewhere be found […] in the records of mankind” (I: 1). Godwin’s Dissenting background inclined him to look upon the Commonwealth as a seminal event in the advancement of English liberty. Accordingly, Godwin approaches the Commonwealth as an early, though failed, experiment with the kind of anarchistic republicanism he would advocate in Political Justice. See History of the Commonwealth, I: 1-6. On the Com…

.

OLIVER CROMWEL. [sic
1649. 
OLIVER CROMWEL [sic] WAS A PITIFUL, CANTING HYPOCRITE; BUT HE GOVERNED THIS NATION WITH MORE VIGOUR AND GLORY, THAN ANY KING THAT EVER SAT UPON THE THRONE.

THE disputes in England produced an unhappy effect in Ireland: the severe policy of James the First had now kept [end 138] that country at peace for forty years: the natives however, who were Catholics (for no part of the light of the Reformation had extended to them), seized the opportunity when every thing was in confusion in the superior country, and murdered the Protestants in great numbers, in what is called the Irish massacre of 1641

(71)

Irish massacre of 1641: The massacre plays a crucial role in Godwin’s Mandeville as a traumatic event the eponymous narrator experiences as a child, and which haunts him for the rest of the novel. See also History of the Commonwealth I: 213-35.

: after this event, Irish affairs continued for some years in the most dismal state of anarchy.

In the year of king Charles's death Cromwel [sic] was made lord lieutenant of Ireland, and in a short time reduced that turbulent people to subjection: the year after, he was appointed lord general and commander in chief of all the English forces, and defeated the party that wanted to set Charles II on the throne, in the battle of Dunbar, and the battle of Worcester: Charles II saved his life by hiding for a whole day in the branches of an oak: Cromwel's [sic] [end 139] last title was lord protector of England: he wanted to have been king.

Since the reign of queen Elizabeth, England had had very little influence among the nations of Europe: Cromwel [sic] raised his country to the highest importance: he went to war with the Dutch, then the greatest naval power in Europe, and gave the command of his fleet to admiral Blake, who by his meritorious exertions soon put an end to the vaunts of the Dutch admiral Van Tromp, that had fastened a broom to his main-mast, and boasted he would sweep the English vessels from the face of the sea.

Comwel [sic] was courted equally by the kings of France and Spain, who wished for his alliance: he decided for France: he remembered the Spanish Armada, and knew that the people of that country were the most bigoted Catholics in Europe: admiral Blake was not less [end 140] successful against the Spaniards, than he had before been against the Dutch: in the reign of Cromwel the island of Jamaica and the harbour of Dunkirk were added to the English dominions.

Cromwel [sic] had for his Latin secretary, John Milton, author Paradise Lost, the sublimest poem in the English, or perhaps in any other language: Milton wrote in Latin a Defence for the People of England, to prove that they had done right to cut off king Charles's head: many persons doubted the soundness of his doctrine, but all the world admired his book: Which was the greater man, Cromwel [sic], the politic and successful lord protector of England, or Milton, his Latin secretary?

(72)

Which was the greater man, Cromwel…or Milton?: The question posed seems highly rhetorical, given Godwin’s well known admiration of Milton and his somewhat more ambivalent attitude towards Cromwell both here and in the History of the Commonwealth. In the latter text, Godwin sees Cromwell’s shift away from the republicanism of the Commonwealth to the Protectorate as “apostasy” (III: 598-99). Equally rhetorical is Godwin’s hedging with respect to Milton’s Defensio Pro Populo Anglicano (1651), which he praises highly in the Lives of Edward and John Philips (15-17). This praise is somewhat checked …

[end 141]

CHARLES II. 
1660. 
CHARLES THE SECOND HAD A GOOD DEAL OF WIT, BUT MADE A BAD USE OF IT; HE NEVER SAID A FOOLISH THING, NOR EVER DID A WISE ONE.

AS long as Cromwel [sic] lived, Charles II remained in exile, one misfortune followed from this; Charles II and his brother, James duke of York, became Catholics: Charles II, who had seldom serious thoughts about any thing, was contented to conceal his desertion of the religion in which he had been brought up; but the duke of York would make no secret of the matter.

After the death of Cromwel [sic], many experiments were made with the English government: Richard Cromwel [sic], his son, was lord protector for seven or eight months: at last with the approbation of a vast majority of the [end 142] nation, the king was sent for home again.

In the romance of Charlemagne, two of the principal knights are Rowland and Oliver: in allusion to this, it was common for the royalists in the time of Cromwel [sic], to say to their foes, We have a Rowland for your Oliver: and there was a favourite ballad in this age, of Sir Rowland the king.

(73)

Sir Rowland the King: The Song of Roland, based on the Battle of Roncevaux in 778, was probably composed between 1040 and 1115.

Charles the Second was a depraved and licentious character: he kept a great many mistresses, actresses, opera-dancers and others, and had a number of children by them, but none by his wife.

The people of England remembered how ill they had been governed by a Catholic sovereign, Bloody queen Mary; and a great party among them were anxious to shut out the duke of York from the succession to the crown, and to place it on the head of one of his daughters, [end 143] Mary and Anne: Charles II, who was seldom serious about any thing, made a conscience of this, and determined rather to lose the crown himself, than that his brother should not succeed him.

At this time happened one of the most wicked things we read of in history: Titus Oates and others formed a plan, by a sham plot,

(74)

Titus Oates: Titus Oates (1649-1705) was one of the key instigators of the Popish Plot of 1678. Working with Israel Tonge, a virulently anti-Catholic clergyman, Oates fabricated evidence of a (sham) Roman Catholic plot to assassinate Charles II and install James, his Roman Catholic brother, in his place. Oates was granted judical power by Parliament to root out so-called plotters, leading to the execution of 35 people. His influence began to wane after 1681. After James II’s ascension to the throne, he was convicted of perjury and jailed. For further information see Oates’s The Discovery of th…

all their own invention, to swear away the lives of many of the most respectable and active Roman Catholics: for some time they succeeded: till at last they were brought to shame, and punished as they deserved.

All king Charles's measures were bad, and his debauched way of living was very expensive: so that he had more things to quarrel with his parliament about, than the exclusion of the duke of York: at last he resolved, like his father, to govern without parliaments. [end 144]

In this bad time, a Protestant plot was invented, not much better than the Popish plot of Titus Oates: and wicked men were found to swear, and a wicked judge (lord-chief-justice Jefferies) to sentence, away the lives of lord Russel and Algernon Sydney, because they were not agreeable to the court: they were both beheaded on Tower Hill: but their names have ever since been almost adored by all the friends of liberty in England.

(75)

Lord Russell and Algernon Sydney: William Lord Russell (1639-1683), a leading member of the Whig party in the House of Commons, was convicted of and executed for treason for his supposed role in the Rye House plot, a supposed conspiracy to attack the King as he journeyed from Newmarket to London by the Rye House. (Godwin may be conflating the Rye House plot with another plot to capture the King’s guards.) According to Lois G. Schwoerer, Russell’s trial was fair according to the treason laws in place in 1683; nonetheless, she contends that Russell was recast as a martyr after death through the …

The greatest literary genius of the reign of Charles II is sir Isaac Newton: he made many discoveries in mathematics and the knowledge of nature: he first demonstratively taught the true system of the universe; and his doctrines respecting light and colours, and many other subjects, are highly curious and important: sir Isaac Newton is the greatest natural philosopher that ever existed. [end 145]

The favourite poet of the reign of Charles II is Dryden: he is not so original as Shakespear, nor so sublime as Milton: he does not possess the imagination of Spenser, nor the acute observation of life displayed by Chaucer: but he has much fire, and still more richness of language and versification in his writings.

JAMES II. 
1685.

JAMES THE SECOND, LIKE HIS GRANDFATHER JAMES THE FIRST, WAS PUT TO A WRONG TRADE; HE WAS MORE LIKE A MONK, THAN A KING; HE WANTED TO MAKE US ROMAN CATHOLICS, BUT WE WERE A HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS TOO OLD FOR IT.

THE whole of the short reign of James II was devoted to one purpose, the re-establishment of the Roman Ca- [end 146] tholic religion in England: and he set about it with so much passion and so little prudence, that even the pope disapproved of his proceedings.

Charles II had a favourite son by one of his mistresses, the duke of Monmouth: this young man had been encouraged by some of the advocates of the bill of exclusion in the last reign, to hope that he might one day be king: four or five months after the accession of James II, he landed from Holland in the West of England, with a few followers: many of the more zealous Protestants in that part of the kingdom joined him: but he was defeated at the battle of Sedgemoor; and, being discovered in a ditch, with a few pease in his pocket for food, was conducted to London, and beheaded on Tower Hill: the savage and inhuman Jefferies was sent down to try the rebels: the brutality of his proceedings was long remem- [end 147] bered, and this transaction is commonly known by the name of the Bloody Western Assizes.

James II resolved that his ministers, and the persons in principal employment about him, should be Catholics: there was a law requiring that they should be Protestants: but James undertook of his own authority to dispense with this law: this he called his Dispensing Power.

There were several laws of England hostile to the Roman Catholics, forbidding them the open exercise of their religion, and subjecting them to other severities: James published of his own will and pleasure a Declaration of Indulgence suspending the operation of these laws, and ordered this Declaration to be read in all churches.

The Protestant clergy of England saw that it was necessary for them to make a stand against the rashness of the king: they determined not to read [end 148] the Declaration: seven of the bishops presented a petition to James against it: the king, to the astonishment of all mankind, sent the bishops to the Tower for writing this petition: they were tried for it as a crime: and never was a more universal joy felt, than when an English jury pronounced a verdict of Not Guilty in their favour, and set them at liberty.

(76)

Godwin may be recalling or alluding to the widespread public celebration of the acquittals of Thomas Hardy, John Horne Tooke, and John Thelwall in the Treason Trials of 1794.

Another circumstance happened nearly at the same time, which in its consequences deprived James of the throne: this was the birth of his only son, June 10, 1688: previously to this, the next heir to the crown was Mary, the king's eldest daughter, a zealous Protestant: and, as James was now past middle age, his subjects had no doubt that Mary, after his death, would speedily undo all that the king could do: the birth of this son put an end to their hopes. [end 149] Mary was married to William prince of Orange, chief magistrate of the republic of Holland: he was a person of great ambition, sagacity and fortitude: it was well known that, if Mary succeeded to the crown of England, she would desire that the functions of government should be committed to her husband: to this prince therefore the Protestants looked for succour, and he resolved to gratify them: he sailed with a considerable fleet and army, to redress the injuries of the people of England, and oblige the king to call a free parliament: he landed at Torbay on the fourth of November, five months after the birth of the king's son: James II was deserted by almost every body; and, terrified at the recollection of his father's fate, fled secretly from his palace in the following month, and took refuge in France.

The free parliament which had been [end 150] proposed, soon after met, and came to a decision that James, having violated the fundamental laws of England, and withdrawn himself out of the kingdom, had abdicated the government, and that the throne was vacant (this question was carried in the house of lords by a majority of two voices only): they next resolved upon an address to the prince and princess of Orange, inviting them to assume the crown: and they annexed to this settlement of the crown, a Bill of Rights, determining in favour of freedom all the questions which, of late years, had been at issue between the king and the people: this event is called the Revolution.

(77)

The Revolution: The Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the passage of the Bill of Rights the following year culminated in a radical limitation of the king’s powers, thus establishing a constitutional rather than absolute monarchy. The Crown was now required to seek Parliament’s permission before raising taxes and maintaining a standing army during peacetime. The Revolution also effectively ended any possibility of a Catholic ascending to the throne.

The Revolution constitutes the final settlement of the government of England: England had been free under the Saxons, the Normans, and the Plantagenets; but the freedom then enjoyed was not exactly the sort of freedom re- [end 151] quired in our present state of civilisation: all ideas of regular government had been suspended by the wards of York and Lancaster: the Tudors had reigned in many respects arbitrarily: the whole period between power and liberty: and this contention was not entirely closed but by the proceedings of the Glorious Revolution.

(78)

This contention was not entirely closed but by the proceedings of the Glorious Revolution: Though Godwin here praises the Glorious Revolution for closing a “barbarous” period of English history, he remains ambivalent about its overall consequences. The Lives of Edward and John Philips praises the Revolution’s lack of violence as a model for the “rational” revolution proposed by Political Justice (268). However, Godwin also charges the Revolution, whose newly struck balance of powers effectively installed a Whig oligarchy, as “far from […] friendly to freedom in a political view” (Lives of Edwa…

[end 152]

THE 
REVOLUTION

WILLIAM III. 
1689. 
WILLIAM THE THIRD WAS A DUTCHMAN: WE SENT FOR HIM OVER, BECAUSE WE WOULD NOT BE MADE ROMAN CATHOLICS BY JAMES THE SECOND; AND SO JAMES WAS SENT AWAY, AND WILLIAM REIGNED IN HIS STEAD.

THE discovery of America conduced more to the profit of the Spaniards than of any other European nation: they made themselves masters, by means of excessive cruelties, of the mines of Mexico and Peru: the neighbouring states began to fear that Spain would grow too powerful for the preservation of their independence. [end 153, n.b. page number not included on page]

Spain had once been under the dominion of the Saracens or Moors, who were Mahometans: the Christians afterward got the better: but the Moors of Spain were still very numerous, as well as very industrious: Philip II, the husband of Bloody queen Mary, could not bear that his subjects should be of any other religion than his own: so he drove out the Moors: ever since that time Spain has been thinly peopled, and has lost its industry, its ingenuity, and its strength.

As Spain declined, France became the most powerful government in Europe: when Cromwel [sic] directed his efforts against Spain, there was more reason why he should have been jealous of France, if indeed either of these countries afforded sufficient matter for jealousy.

Louis XIV reigned over France se- [end 154] venty-two years, and was the most prosperous of all her monarchs: William III thought that he was too powerful for the good of his neighbours, and formed a confederacy of England, Holland and Germany, to reduce him to a weaker condition.

The war was carried on principally in Flanders, a part of which country Louis XIV had taken from the Spaniards: William III fought several battles there, and was generally defeated: but, though Louis XIV won many victories, he gained no ground upon his inflexible enemy, and king William had the honour to give the first check to the progress of the power of France.

The most eminent author of the reign of William III is Locke: his Essay Concerning Human Understanding is a truly English book, and has been the foundation of every thing of [end 155] value which has since been written on that subject.

(79)

Locke: John Locke (1632-1704), English philosopher whose Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689) is one of the cornerstones of empiricism. Godwin’s first edition of Political Justice is strongly influenced by Locke’s epistemology, especially the rejection of innate ideas, which Godwin initially deploys to argue against any “original propensity to evil” (1793, 20). A subchapter on “Literature” as one of the three causes of moral improvement in the first edition of Political Justice considers Locke as having established “certain maxims respecting man” that are as “unquestionable” as Newton’s…

 

ANNE. 
1702. 
QUEEN ANNE WAS A QUIET, GOOD-NATURED WOMAN, AND WANTED NOTHING BUT PEACE: BUT THE DUKE OF MARLBOROUGH WAS HER GENERAL, AND WON SEVERAL FAMOUS BATTLES FOR HER ABROAD; HIS DUCHESS GOVERNED QUEEN ANNE AT HOME, AND WOULD SOMETIMES INSULT HER MAJESTY, AND THEN MAKE THE QUEEN BEG HER PARDON.

KING William bequeathed his politics to his successor: the nation was engaged, and queen Anne was obliged to go on with the war against Louis XIV: her personal friend was the duke of Marlborough; and this man turned out perhaps the only true genius for military science that England ever pro- [end 156, n.b. engraving between 156-157] duced: he won the battles of Blenneim [sic], Ramilies [sic] and Oudenarde:

(80)

battles of Blenneim, Ramilies and Oudenarde: The Battle of Blenheim was fought on 13 August 1704, the Battle of Ramillies on 23 May 1706, and the Battle of Oudenarde on July 1708; all three were key British victories in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714).

he effectually humbled the pride of Louis XIV: he reduced him to great distress, and embittered the last days of that ostentatious monarch: the renown of the duke of Marlborough was so great in France, that, for a long time after, it is said that French nurses still their crying children, by telling them Marlborough was coming! 

The duke of Marlborough was at first a great favourite with the English nation: they built for him the palace of Blenheim in honour of his battle of that name: at last people grew tired of the war: the duke of Marlborough never knew when to have done: Louis was humbled, but Marlborough would not make peace: a different party came into possession of the great offices of government, and made peace for him.

An accident at court contributed to [end 157] this change: great quarrels arose between queen Anne's favourites, the duchess of Marlborough and Mrs. Masham: queen Anne at length grew weary of the duchess's tyranny: one historian says, that the duchess of Marlborough spitefully spilled some watter on Mrs. Masham's best petticoat; Mrs. Masham determined to have her revenge by rooting the duchess out of queen Anne's good-will; and this decided the matter: it is a singular circumstance, that the duke and duchess of Marlborough are said to have been the handsomest man and woman at that time in England.

Another affair happened which conduced no less than the spoiling Mrs. Masham's petticoat, to check the duke of Marlborough in his career: it was the trial of doctor Sacheverel: the story is this.

In the reign of queen Elizabeth two [end 158] parties first rose in this country, one for the sovereign, the other for the people: they were then called episcopalians and puritans, that is, persons who wished to have bishops in England, and persons who thought religion would prosper better without them: these parties took opposite sides in the wars of Charles I.

In the reign of Charles II they got new names: their objects were no longer the same: they thought less about religion, and more about politics: the king's party taught passive obedience, or in other words, that whatever the king thought proper to do, the people should submit: the people's party taught that the king was only one member of our free government, and that, as the king had his prerogatives, so the people had their rights

(81)

The king’s party taught passive obedience: In Political Justice, Godwin distinguishes between an external or “passive” obedience which stems from the “arbitrary interference of some voluntary being” and an “intrinsic” or active obedience flowing from the “independent conviction of our private judgment” (1798 I: 226-27).

: the new names they got were whigs and tories, two barbarous words imported from Scotland and Ireland.

(82)

Whigs and tories, two barbarous words imported from Scotland and Ireland: The OED lists “whig” as a shortened form of the Scotch whigg (‘country-bumpkin’) and whiggamore (‘mare-driver’), the latter of which became an abusive nickname given to a faction of Scottish Presbyterians “who marched on Edinburgh in 1648 to oppose Charles I.” “Tory” also derives from the seventeenth century and is related to the Irish word for “outlaw,” toraidhe. The term initially referred to those Irish peasants who turned to robbery after being displaced by English settlers, but was subsequently used to disparage sup…

[end 159]

If the doctrines of the tories were true, the Revolution was an act of treason, and king William a usurper: the duke of Marlborough was a whig, or at least his best friends were of that party: queen Anne was in her heart a tory: the tories however were not all of them friends of king James: they only thought the power of the crown was too narrow, and ought to be enlarged.

Doctor Sacheverel was a very silly fellow, and preached a flaming tory-sermon in favour of passive obedience: some people, as silly as he, thought this sermon worthy of an impeachment by the house of commons, and a trial by the house of lords: he was sentenced not to preach any more for three years: all the world was in arms about the question: men were first indignant at the prosecution, and afterward laughed at the sentence: both ways the [end 160] whigs lost the kindness and good opinion of their countrymen.

(83)

a flaming tory-sermon: Henry Sacheverell’s 5 November 1709 sermon to the City Fathers at St Paul's Cathedral, entitled “The Perils of False Brethren, in Church, and State,” commemorated the failure of the Gunpowder Plot. As Godwin notes here, Sacheverell’s impeachment by the House of Commons and subsequent light sentence contributed to the Whigs’ defeat by the Tories in the 1710 election.

King William, by whose means James II was deprived of the crown, had been exceedingly desirous to fix the succession to the throne so as to prevent the object which had been effected at the Revolution from being ever undone again: he and his consort had no children: queen Anne had one son, the duke of Gloucester, who died at twelve years of age: at king William's instigation therefore an act of parliament was made, calling to the throne, after William and Mary and Anne, the family of Hanover, the nearest in the line of inheritance who were adherents to the Protestant religion.

Queen Anne was naturally desirous to bequeath her crown to her brother, the son of James II: the tories professed to be friends to the succession of the Hanover family; but their doc- [end 161] trines so clearly pointed the other way, that people doubted their sincerity: queen Anne died in the fiftieth year of her age: her ministers were tories; the whole nation was in alarm, lest they should be once more doomed to make experiment of a Roman Catholic king, who, out of respect to his father, would be inclined to treat every thing that had been done since his exile as a usurpation: if any plans of that sort had been seriously formed, they were defeated by the quarrels of the ministers, and the sudden decease of queen Anne: she died on the first of August 1714, and George, elector of Hanover, was the same day proclaimed king.

Some persons have affected to set up the reign of queen Anne as the great age of English literature in opposition to the reign of queen Elizabeth, and have thought Pope and Swift and Addison, a match for Spenser and [end 162] Shakespear and Jonson and Fletcher

(84)

Pope and Swift and Addison: Alexander Pope (1688-1744), English poet and satirist widely acknowledged for his mastery of classical metrical form in poems such as An Essay on Criticism (1711), The Rape of the Lock (1711-12), The Dunciad (1728-43), and An Essay on Man (1733-34). Jonathan Swift (1667-1745), Anglo-Irish wit known primarily for his acerbic prose satires, A Tale of a Tub (1706), Gulliver’s Travels (1726), and A Modest Proposal (1729). Joseph Addison (1672-1719), English man of letters whose influential magazine The Spectator (1711-12), founded alongside Richard Steele, sought to est…

: Pope is the most correct and polished poet in the English language: Swift had an infinite deal of wit: and Addison did eminent service to his country, by his paper of the Spectator, which first made literature and taste familiar to persons who had not the happiness of a learned education.[end 163]

THE 
HOUSE OF HANOVER.

GEORGE I. 
1714. 
GEORGE THE FIRST WAS INVITED OVER TO ENGLAND TO PRESERVE THE PROTESTANT RELIGION: QUEEN ANNE WANTED TO HAVE GIVEN THE CROWN TO HER BROTHER, THE SON OF JAMES THE SECOND; BUT HE, LIKE HIS FATHER, WAS A CATHOLIC: IN 1715 THERE WAS A REBELLION IN SCOTLAND IN FAVOUR OF QUEEN ANNE'S BROTHER.

GEORGE I. had the misfortune to know but little English, and was between fifty and sixty years of age when he came to this country: he was esteemed however a prince of modera- [end 164] tion and good intentions: he chose for his minister sir Robert Walpole, a man of considerable application and perseverance, but of no elevation of mind: his language and sentiments were vulgar: the object of his administration was to render the nation rich, commercial and pacific, a people of traders, uninfluenced by the love of literature, or the love of liberty.

(85)

Robert Walpole: English politician (1675-1745) popularly known as the unofficial ‘first Prime Minister’ after being appointed as Lord of the Treasury in 1721. Walpole’s twenty-one year career in office solidified Whig control over the House of Commons and the Court, an event his enemies referred to as the “Robinocracy.” The term, a homonym both for Walpole’s given name and for rule by “robbery,” made reference to his frequent use of government offices as perks to buy the loyalty of members of Parliament, a practice satirized in John Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera (1728). In The Enquirer, Godwin crit…

GEORGE II. 
1727. 
GEORGE THE SECOND HAD TO CONTEND WITH THE REBELLION IN 1745; THE REBELS WERE DEFEATED AT CULLODEN BY WILLIAM DUKE OF CUMBERLAND, THE KING'S SON.

GEORGE II continued the reins of government in the same hands in which his father had placed them: sir Robert [end 165] Walpole did not cease to be minister till the year 1742.

The immediate cause of sir Robert Walpole's loss of power, was that the people were foolishly tired of peace, and determined to have a war: George II thought he knew something of military matters: he commanded the English army with success at the battle of Dettingen.

The French thought they could not more effectually counteract the plans of George II, than by sending the nephew of queen Anne, commonly called the Young Pretender, over to invade us: he penetrated from the north of Scotland as far as Derby: every body was frightened: but he was obliged to go back to Scotland, and there the duke of Cumberland defeated him at the battle of Culloden: the Young Pretender through a thousand dangers escaped to France. [end 166.]

The first war in which George II engaged was not brilliant: the second was very much so: the proceedings of this war were directed by William Pitt, afterward earl of Chatham: we gained victories by sea, and conquests in America: our principal ally on the continent was Frederic, king of Prussia, who defended himself heroically against the joint attacks of France, Austria, Germany and Russia: this is what the king of Prussia has called, in his History of his Own Times, the Seven Years' War. [end 167]

GEORGE III. 
1760.

IN THE REIGN OF GEORGE THE THIRD, WHO HAS REIGNED BETWEEN FORTY AND FIFTY YEARS, HAPPENED THE INDEPENDENCE OF AMERICA AND THE FRENCH REVOLUTION: LORDS RODNEY, HOWE, DUNCAN, ST. VINCENT AND NELSON HAVE ADORNED THIS REIGN BY THEIR VICTORIES AT SEA.

IN the beginning of this reign John Wilkes, a popular, but unprincipled demagogue, excited great discontents, in certain affairs in which he supported the privileges of the people against the incroachments of ministers.

(86)

John Wilkes (1727-1797) was a popular British politician who served on and off as a member of Parliament throughout his career and founded the political journal The North Briton. He was brought up on charges of seditious libel for an article attacking the King, for which he eventually served two years imprisonment. Fiery and polemic, Wilkes notably advocated for parliamentary reforms, rights for Dissenters and Catholics, and American independence. For further information see John Oliphant, “John Wilkes,” Encyclopedia of the American Revolution: Library of Military History, edited by Harold E. …

While the Spaniards enriched themselves with the spoils of South America, the English planted industrious colonies on the shores of North America: it was for the defence of these colonies that we began the war that lord Chatham conducted: when the colo- [end 168] nies were grown to a certain degree of strength, the English parliament thought proper to impose taxes upon them: the colonies conceived they had as good a right as the English to pay no taxes but what they imposed upon themselves: on this question began the war between Great Britain and America.

The colonies declared themselves Independent States: the war lasted eight years: they were happy in having a noble leader to command their armies, George Washington: after some years, France and Spain, envying our prosperity, united their forces to support the Americans against us: in the end of the war their independence was established.

While we lost an empire in the West, we gained one in the East Indies: Which was most worth having? The colonies of America were too large [end 169] and too distant for us to hope to retain them long in subjection: yet they had English feelings and spoke the English language: the inhabitants of our East-India dominions, (much larger than these) are Hindoos or Moors, speaking the Hindoo, the Arabic or the Persian, and can be kept in subjection only by the sword.

(87)

While we lost an empire in the West, we gained one in the East Indies . . . . The inhabitants of the East of our East-India dominions, (much larger than these) are Hindoos or Moors, speaking the Hindoo, the Arabic or the Persian, and can be kept in subjection only by the sword: Godwin’s antipathy to British colonialism is evident throughout his career, beginning as early as 1784 when he was commissioned to write three chapters for the “British and Foreign History” section of The New Annual Register for 1783, and as a contributing editor under the pseudonym “Mucius” for the Political Herald, an…

In 1789 began the French revolution: the French, who (as their name implies) were once as free as any nation in Europe, had for more than a century been reduced to complete subjection: as they were a proud nation, and more vain than proud, they could not bear to hear of the liberties of their neighbors, and feel that they themselves were slaves: the successful struggle of the Americans for independence particularly inflamed them.

Unhappily the French nation are of a violent and fiery temper[.] they went [end 170] about their undertaking too eagerly: they stopped at nothing: yet as they are a refined and polished people, their neighbours at first sympathised in their efforts, and wished for a revolution too: the king of Prussia, the king of Spain, the emperor of Germany, and other princes, did not like this: they went to war with France, that they might check so dangerous a spirit in its source.

(88)

They went to war with France, that they might check so dangerous a spirit in its source: The War of the First Coalition (1792-97) represented the first attempt by European monarchies to crush the French Revolution through a series of invasions. It comprised of the monarchies of Austria, Sardinia, Naples, Prussia, Spain, and Great Britain. Godwin’s phrasing implies that the Prussian, Spanish, and German monarchs were the aggressors in declaring war on France, though historically the beginning of the conflict is difficult to pin down: it was France who first declared war on Prussia in 1792, thou…

Louis XVI then king of France, was a harmless, and well-meaning sovereign: yet he could not feel himself quite easy: his queen, sister to the emperor of Germany, who was very unpopular, felt still more alarmed: they tried to escape out of France, and join their friends on the frontiers: they were brought back: and Louis was some time after tried, as Charles I. had been, on an accusation of stirring up war against his country: he was sentenced, and experienced the same unhappy fate. [end 171]

When the French had cut off their king's head, England joined the confederacy against them, and the flames of war spread from one end of Europe to the other: France was finally victorious.

The English however made some figure in this war: our seamen had long been the best in the world: yet, by some mismanagement, this had not been seen in the American war, till the last year of that contest, when lord Rodney introduced a more daring method of attacking the enemy, and thus gave our superiority its full effect: the naval commanders in the war of the French revolution followed lord Rodney's steps, and our fleets were every where victorious: the war was concluded by the treaty of Amiens in 1802.

(89)

Lord Rodney: Admiral George Brydges Rodney (c. 1718-1792) distinguished himself at sea for his innovative adaptation of naval tactics. In particular, by exploiting weaknesses, he was able to break up the French line during the 1782 battle of the Saints in the Caribbean thereby confirming Britain’s ascendency in the Caribbean and strengthening their negotiating power with the French. For further information, see John Oliphant, “George Brydges Rodney,” Encyclopedia of the American Revolution: Library of Military History, edited by Harold E. Selesky, Biography in Context, http://link.galegroup.co…

The French revolution produced one very extraordinary man, Napoleon Bo- [end 172] naparte, as the English civil war against Charles I. produced Oliver Cromwel

(90)

The French Revolution produced one extraordinary man, Napoleon Bonaparte, as the English Civil War against Charles I. produced Oliver Cromwel: Napoleon crowned himself Emperor in 1804, an event Godwin noted in his diary on 18 May. Though the comparison of Napoleon to the “apostate” Cromwel [sic] may not be as complementary as his remark initially suggests, Godwin remained sympathetic towards both figures for much of his career. Godwin’s sympathies toward Napoleon became more pronounced between 1813 and 1818, due in part to his increased contact with intermittently pro-Napoleonic radicals such …

: this man in 1804 declared himself emperor of France, and in 1805 king of Italy: the French had in the war of their revolution conquered the Netherlands, Holland, Switzerland, and many other countries: a second war was now begun against them, to check their overgrown power, as the first had been begun to check their revolutionary principles: Bonaparte finished this war victoriously in three months, and on the 27th of December 1805 dictated terms of peace to the emperor of Germany, in his capital of Vienna: William Pitt, son of the earl of Chatham, who conducted the war of the French revolution, and had with little interruption been first minister of England for twenty-two years, died in a few weeks after.

The most celebrated author of the [end 173] reign of George II is doctor Samuel Johnson: his principal works are, Lives of the Most Eminent English Poets, and a Dictionary of the English Language: we posses not only the writings of this author, but a regular series of his most familiar conversations, collected and published by his constant friend and companion, James Boswell.

(91)

his principal works: Samuel Johnson’s Lives of the Most Eminent English Poets (1779–81) and A Dictionary of the English Language (1755), James Boswell’s The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. (1791).

[end 174]

TABLES 
OF THE 
VARIOUS SUBJECTS TREATED OF OR ALLUDED TO IN THIS HISTORY.

(92)

N.b.: except for notations of [sic] and the ends of pages, the bracketed material in the sections below are reproduced as they appear in the original text.

N.B. Where no figure is found in the Tables, the subject is to be sought in its place, in the king's reign to which it belongs.

RELIGIONS. 
I. THE Druidical, or the religion of the Ancient Britons. [p. 12, 13, 69.] 
II. The Greek and Roman, the religion of Homer and Virgil. [p. 15.] 
III. The Scandinavian, or the religion of the Saxons and Danes: a book was written, which is the Bible of this religion, about the time [end 175, n.b. number not included on page] of William the Conqueror, called the Edda. [p. 19, 25.] 
IV. The Christian [p. 11, 16]: this religion became corrupted in the dark ages, when the popes employed it as their instrument, for imposing the most absurd doctrines (such as transubstantiation, or the actual change of the bread and wine in the sacrament, into the flesh and blood of Christ), and for exercising the greatest tyranny: the popes styled their adherents the Roman Catholic church. [p. 20, 24, 36, 46, 49, 60, 90, 112, 116.] The French, the Spaniards, the Italians, with the half of Germany and Poland, are Catholics.           
V. The Protestant: an attempt to purify the Christian religion from the corruptions of the church of Rome: begun by Martin Luther [end 176] and John Calvin. [p. 112, 116.] England, Holland, Sweden, Denmark, and the other half of Germany and Poland, are Protestant. 
Russia, and the Christians of the Turkish empire, are of a third sect of Christians, called the Greek church. 
VI. The Episcopalians; so called form the Latin word, episcopus, a bishop: that division of Protestants, who maintain that the government of the Christian church ought to be by bishops: this party in the reign of Charles I. assumed the name of the Cavaliers. [p. 134, 137, 159.] 
VII. The Puritans: that division of Protestants, who opposed the government by bishops, and demanded a republican equality in matters of religion. This party [end 177] in the reign of Charles I. was familiarly nicknamed the Roundheads. [p. 137, 159.] 
Whig and Tory are scarcely religious parties, but succeeded in state affairs to the two parties last mentioned: when spoken of in relation to their religious prepossessions, they are usually called High Church and Low Church. [p. 159, 161.] 
VIII. The Mahometan: Mahomet, who began to propagate this religion in the year of our Lord 622, was a native of Arabia: the Turks, the Saracens, the Persians, the Moors, and many other nations are followers of Mahomet: their Bible is a book, called the Alcoran, written by Mahomet. [p. 36, 62, 154.] [end 178]

HEATHEN GODS.

  • Druidical
  • [p. 13]
  •  
  •  
  • Greek
  • and
  • Roman
  • [p.15]
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Saxon
  • [p. 20]
  •  
  • Sun
  • Moon
  • Stars.
  • Jupiter
  • Juno
  • Mercury
  • Mars
  • Minerva
  • Venus.
  • Woden
  • Tuisco
  • Thor
  • Friga
  • Sater.

STATES, NATIONS, OR RACES OF MEN. 
The Trojans: inhabitants of the city Troy to the west of Asia: Troy was taken and destroyed by the Greeks, 1184 years before Christ. 
[p.48.] [end 179] 
The Greeks: this race of men inhabited the country now called Turkey in Europe: they excelled all nations in subtlety and invention: the principal city of Greece was Athens. [p. 12, 28, 115, 123.] 
The Romans: this race of men was at one time the most temperate, public-spirited and virtuous, and at another the most licentious and debauched of mankind: they studied the learning of the Greeks: the Greeks and Romans are the most refined nations of antiquity. [p. 12, 13, 28, 82, 123.] 
The city of Rome has been famous in three forms of government: 
1. Under the republic. [p. 16.] 
2. Under the emperors. [p. 17.] 
3. Under the popes. 
The Britons: all the adherents of the ancient Druidical religion are in [end 180] their origin Celts: in ancient times they spread over the north of Europe: the Gauls, the ancient inhabitants of France, were of this race. [p. 12, 14, 18, 68.] 
                        The Goths 
                        The Vandals 
[p. 17.] The Huns 
                        The Lombards 
                        The Ostrogoths. 
The Saxons: this race of men came from the shores of the Baltic in the fifth century: they are supposed to be of the same origin as the Germans, and to be descended from the Goths. [p. 16, 24.] 
The Danes inhabited nearly the same regions as the Saxons, and are likewise descended from the Goths. [p. 23.] 
The same may be affirmed of the Normans: also of the Franks, who invaded France at the decline of [end 181] the Roman empire, and from whom the country received it present name. [p. 27.] 
The Saracens are the original followers of Mahomet, and came from Arabia: they were a refined and ingenious people: their capital Bagdad: their descendants are called the Moors. [p. 36, 37, 55, 15[?], 170.] 
The Turks are of Tartar origin, and come from the north of Asia: they conquered the Saracens, and put an end to their improvements. [p. 37, 115.] 
The Christian kingdom of Jerusalem, [p. 38, 55.] 
The sultan of Egypt and Jerusalem. [p. 55.] 
The Miramolin, or emperor of Morocco. [p. 62.] 
Wales. [p. 18,68.] [end 182] 
Scotland. [p. 27, 70, 74, 119, 126, 134, 164, 166.] 
Ireland. [p. 54, 131, 138.] 
France. [p.12, and innumerable other places.] 
Spain. [p. 117, 120, 130, 140, 153, 168, 169, 171.] 
Germany. [p. 56, 155, 167, 171, 173.] 
Austria. [p. 57, 167.] 
Prussia. [p. 167, 171.] 
Hanover. [p. 161, 162, 164.] 
Russia. [p. 167.]           
Holland: the inhabitants are called the Dutch. [p. 140, 150, 155, 173.] 
Flanders, or the Netherlands. [p. 155, 173.] 
Switzerland. [p. 173.] 
South American (Mexico, Perus, &c.) [p. 111, 130, 153, 168.] 
North America; the American States. [p. 168, 169.] 
Jamaica. [p. 141.] 
The East Indies. [p. 169.] 
The Hindoos, or Gentoos. [p. 170.] [end 183]

LANGUAGES.

Greek. [p. 15, 115, 123.] 
Latin. [p. 15, 48, 123.] 
Saxon. [p. 20, 32.] 
French: this was the language of the court of England for more than 200 years after the Norman Conquest. [p. 32, 44.] 
English. [p. 20, 32, 84.] 
Italian. [p. 38] 
Hindoo 
Arabic [p. 170.] 
Persian.

INSTITUTIONS 
OF THE TENTH, ELEVENTH, AND TWELFTH CENTURIES.

The feudal system: this was a scheme for the government of a country, founded upon the idea of conquest: the king, or conqueror, [end 184] considered himself as becoming owner of the whole country:

(93)

The king, or conqueror, considered himself owner over the whole country: Godwin’s definition of the feudal system is couched in the terms of Political Justice’s critique of the unequal distribution of property. In Political Justice, Godwin speaks of feudalism as a “ferocious monster,” “the policy of men, who, having first gained a superiority […] have made use of their superiority, for the purpose of conspiring and monopolizing whatever their rapacity could seize” (II: 99, 446). See also Political Justice 1798, I: 23, II: 446.

he divided it into parcels, and let it out among his officers: the condition upon which they held it, was that of joining him in the field, whenever he expected to encounter an enemy: he let it at first for a few months, then for a year, then for a small number of years, afterward for life, and at length to the tenant and his heirs: each new tenant, from father to son, paid a gratuity to be admitted to possession: the king was his guardian if he were under age, and determined whom he should marry: the tenants were considered as menial servants to their superior; they were his cup-bearers, his stewards, his masters of the horse, masters of the hounds, and grooms of the [end 185] bedchamber: whenever there was no heir, the estate went back to the king: the king's tenants had other tenants under them: and the people of the conquered country for the most part were made slaves: this was the contrivance of a barbarous age, but it had a great deal of method in it. [p. 31, 71, 82.] 
Chivalry: an institution, which grew out of the feudal system: the king's tenants, when they served him in war, came on horseback, clad in complete armour: these persons were called knights: their armour was heavy, and, when they did not want to use it, they had a servant who followed them, and carried it for them: he was called the esquire, or armour-bearer: as there was in these times no learn- [end 186] ing, and few books, the knights had nothing to do, but to learn their exercise. [p. 27, 77, 82.] 
Knight-errantry: as the knights had learned nothing else, they were very eager to make use of the little they knew: in savage countries there is not always a law and a justice at hand to correct every thing that goes wrong: therefore the most active of the knights became errants, or wanderers, roaming the country to assist the weak and oppressed: females were oftener oppressed than men: therefore they principally enquired after any injuries that had been done to the ladies.

(94)

In “Of Diffidence” in Thoughts on Man, Godwin refers to himself occupying, and struggling with, the role of a political “knight-errant,” given that his character inclines towards reserve.

[p. 77.] 
Tournaments: as the knights we have been speaking of learned nothing perfectly but their exercise, they were eager not only to make use, but to make a show, of what [end 187] they knew: this was the meaning of tournaments, where frequently hundreds of knights met: they had single combats, not for anger, but a trial of skill: they often clashed together in companies, in imitation of a battle: the ladies sat round in boxes or booths to see all that passed: and, when it was over, the victors in the tournament went to the place where the lady highest in rank was seated, and she bestowed upon them a garland, or some other mark of her approbation, to signify that she was satisfied with what they had done. [p. 79.] [end 188.]

ENGLISH FORMS OF GOVERNMENT.

The Ancient British, or Druidical. 
The Provincial; Britain being made a province of the Roman empire, A.D. 42. 
The First Saxon, or the Heptarchy, 449. 
The Second Saxon, or the Monarchy, 800. 
The Danish Monarchy, 1017: it continued 24 years. 
The Norman, or Feudal Monarchy, established by William the Conqueror, 1066. 
Magna Charta, a charter defining the rights of the freemen of England, under king John, 1215. 
Rise of the House of Commons, under Henry III, 1265: the feudal system, thus corrected and improved, continued to be the [end 189] government of England for two hundred and twenty years. 
Arbitrary government of the Tudors. 
Liberty re-claimed under the Stuarts. 
The Republic, or Commonwealth: Oliver Cromwel [sic] Lord Protector: 1649. 
The Restoration: the Stuarts reseated upon the throne: 1660. 
The Revolution: the liberties Englishmen had claimed and fought for under the Stuarts, peaceably recognised under William III: 1688.

AGES OF LITERATURE.

The Christian scriptures were written in Judea: those of the Old Testament before any of the ages of profane literature spoken in this history. [p. 90, 131.] 
Homer, though the greatest of the Greek writers, lived before the age of literature in Greece. [p. 15, 115.] 
Sophocles, Euripedes and Plato lived in the best age of Grecian literature, called the age of Pericles. [p. 115, 123.] 
Virgil and Ovid lived in the best period of Roman literature, called the age of Augustus. [p. 15.] 
Learning of the Druids. [p. 12, 69.] 
Learning of the Saracens, commonly called the Arabic learning: its most brillant period was the ninth century. [p. 37.] 
Learning of the Scalds. [p. 24, 25.] 
Learning of the Minstrels. [p. 44, 57, 123.] 
Learning of the Monks. [p. 48, 123.] 
The age of Henry II is the dawn of modern literature in England. [end 191] 
Friar Bacon. [p. 66.] 
Chaucer, the Father of poetry in the English language. [p. 84.] 
Wicliffe, the first reformer. [p. 89.] 
Caxton, the first printer. [p. 104.] 
The Reformation. [p. 112.] 
Cranmer, author of the book of Common Prayer. [p. 113.] 
Sackville: with him commences the regular series of English poets. [p. 118.] 
Age of queen Elizabeth: to this age belong sir Philip Sidney, sir Walter Raleigh, Spenser, Shakespear, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher, and lord Bacon. 
Our present translation of the Bible was made in the reign of James I. 
Milton. [p. 141.] 
Sir Isaac Newton, the great natural philosopher. [p. 145.] [end 192] 
Locke, the standard writer on the philosophy of the mind. [p. 155.] 
The age of queen Anne: to this age belong Swift, Pope and Addison. 
Doctor Samuel Johnson: in the reign of George III also lived Hume, Robertson and Gibbon, celebrated historians.

(95)

Godwin critiques the methods of these historians in “Of History and Romance.”

[p. 174.]

LITERARY INSTITUTIONS.

In the reign of Edward I, Oxford had at one time thirty thousand students: the University of Cambridge is scarcely less ancient than the University of Oxford. 
In the reign of Edward III the colleges of Oxford and Cambridge began to be founded. 
Eton school was founded by Henry VI. 
Christ's Hospital (the Blue-coat School

(96)

Blue-coat School: The “Blue coat” schools, so called because the students wore matching blue frock coats, were established for the education and care of poor children. The first blue coat school was established at Christ’s Hospital in London by Edward VI in 1552.

) was founded by Edward VI: the [end 193] same prince was also the founder of St. Thomas's Hospital for the sick and wounded. 
Westminster School was founded by queen Elizabeth. [p. 116.]

PUBLIC BUILDINGS.

Stone-henge, a Druidical temple on Salisbury Plain. [p. 14.] 
Roman Palaces, Theatres and Temples in Britain. [p. 15.] 
The Tower of London was built by William the Conqueror. 
Westminster Hall was built by William Rufus. 
Westminster Abbey was rebuilt by Henry III, first built in the Heptarchy. 
Windsor-Castle was build by Edward III. 
Whitehall was built by cardinal Wolsey. [end 194]

BATTLES, SIEGES, TRIALS, EXECUTIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS.

The siege of Troy, or the Trojan war, eleven hundred and eighty-four years before Christ. [p. 48.] 
Manner of the Romans in celebrating their triumphs. [p. 28, 82.] 
Expedition of Julius Caesar against Britain. [p. 14.] 
The Roman emperors make themselves masters of Britain. [p. 14.] 
The Roman empire destroyed by the Goths and Vandals. [p. 17.] 
The Anglo-Saxons subdue Britain, and give to their conquest the name of England. [p. 16.] Gallant stand made by king Arthur: supposed Twelve Knights of the Round Table. [p. 18.] 
Commencement of the religion of Mahomet, 622. [p. 36.] 
Charlemagne: supposed Twelve Peers of France. [p. 113.] [end 195] 
The Danes invade England. [p. 23.] 
------- become sovereigns of England for 24 years. [p. 26.]

WILLIAM I. 
The Norman Conquest.

WILLIAM II. 
The Crusades. 
Jerusalem taken by the Crusaders. 
William II accidentally shot.

STEPHEN. 
Civil wars of Stephen and Maud. 
Escape of Maud from Oxford and Wallingford.

HENRY II. 
Conquest of Ireland. 
Jerusalem taken by Saladin.

RICHARD I. 
Crusade for the recovery of Jerusalem. 
Siege of Acre. 
Battle of Ascalon.

JOHN. 
Murder of prince Arthur. [end 196] 
England in part conquered by the dauphin, son of the king of France.

HENRY III. 
The dauphin expelled. 
Wars of the barons. 
Battle of Lewes. 
Battle of Evesham.

EDWARD I. 
Edward stabbed with a poisoned dagger before Jerusalem. 
Conquest of Wales. 
Conquest of Scotland. 
Execution of sir William Wallace.

EDWARD II. 
Battle of Bannockburn: Scotland recovers its independence. 
Execution of Gaveston. 
Execution of the Spencers, father and son. 
Edward II murdered.

EDWARD III. 
Battle of Cressy. [end 197] 
Siege of Calais. 
Battle of Poitiers: John, king of France, taken prisoner.

RICHARD II. 
Wat Tyler's insurrection. 
Richard II. starved to death.

HENRY IV. 
Plots and conspiracies: Henry Hotspur.

HENRY V. 
Battle of Agincourt. 
Conquest of France.

HENRY VI. 
Orleans besieged by the English; relieved by Joan of Arc. 
English expelled from France. 
Constantinople taken by the Turks. [p. 115.] 
Civil wars of York and Lancaster. 
Battle of Wakefield: duke of York killed. [end 198]

EDWARD IV. 
Battle of Hexham: Margaret flies: adventure of the Forest. 
Battle of Barnet: earl of Warwick killed. 
Battle of Tewkesbury.

RICHARD III. 
Supposed murder of the two young princes in the Tower. 
Battle of Bosworth.

HENRY VII. 
Perkin Warbeck hanged. 
Discovery of America by Colombus.

HENRY VIII. 
The Reformation. 
Henry VIII puts two of his queens to death. 
Execution of sir Thomas More. 
Execution of the earl of Surry.

MARY. 
Execution of lady Jane Grey. 
Three hundred Protestants burned [end 199] alive for their religion in four years.

ELIZABETH. 
Execution of Mary queen of Scots. 
Spanish Armada, 1588. 
Ireland wholly reduced.

JAMES I. 
Gunpowder plot.

CHARLES I. 
Duke of Buckingham stabbed at Portsmouth. 
Trial of Hambden [sic] for not paying an unlawful tax.

(97)

Trial of Hampden for not paying unlawful tax: See note 68. There are various criticisms of taxation throughout Godwin’s corpus. In Political Justice, taxation is criticized for adding an extra burden on the poor, as the byproduct of the nation’s involvement in “foreign wars,” and for sustaining a corrupt and overcomplex government bureaucracy (1798, II: 309-10, 315). The History of the Commonwealth details Hampton’s resistance to a ship tax, which Godwin praises as the act of a “citizen of the purest model” and Hampden himself as “one of the most extraordinary men in the records of mankind (I:…


Execution of the earl of Strafford. 
Irish massacre. 
King Charles demands the five members. 
Civil war between the king and parliament: three years. 
Execution of Charles I, Jan. 30, 1649.

OLIVER CROMWEL. [sic
Conquest of Ireland. [end 200] 
Battle of Dunbar. 
Battle of Worcester. 
Victories of Blake over the Dutch. 
Victories of Blake over the Spaniards. 
Jamaica taken. 
Dunkirk taken.

CHARLES II.
The Restoration, 1660. 
Pretended Popish plot by Titus Oates. 
Supposed plot of Algernon Sydney and lord Russel: they are beheaded.

JAMES II. 
Battle of Sedgemoor; duke of Monmouth beheaded. 
Bloody Western Assizes by Judge Jefferies. 
Trial of the Seven Bishops. 
Abdication of king James: the Revolution, 1688.

WILLIAM III. 
War of the allies to reduce the power of Louis XIV. [end 201]

ANNE. 
Second war to reduce the power of Louis XIV. 
Battle of Blenheim. 
Battle of Ramilies. 
Battle of Oudenarde. 
Trial of Doctor Sacheveral.

GEORGE I. 
Rebellion of 1715 headed by the Pretender.

GEORGE II. 
Battle of Dettingen. 
Rebellion of 1745 headed by the Young Pretender. 
Battle of Culloden. 
The British arms victorious by sea and land, under the direction of William Pitt, earl of Chatham.

GEORGE III. 
Turbulence of John Wilkes. 
Conquests of the English in the East Indies. [end 202] 
American war: the Americans aided by France and Spain: they are successful. 
French Revolution. 
Execution of Louis XVI. 
War of the allies against France: the French conquer Flanders, Holland, Switzerland, and other countries. 
Peace of Amiens. 
Napoleon I, emperor of France. 
Second war of the allies against France. 
Vienna taken by the French. 
Death of William Pitt, prime minister.

PUBLIC CHARACTERS 
Julius Caesar, first Roman emperor. 
[p. 12, 14.] 
Claudius, fourth Roman emperor. 
[p. 14.] [end 203] 
Caractacus, king of Britain. [p. 14.] 
Constantine, emperor of Rome. [p. 15, 16.] 
Hengist and Horsa, kings of Kent. 
[p. 19.] 
King Arthur. [p. 18.] 
Mahomet. [p. 36.] 
Charlemagne, king of France. [p. 143.] 
King Egbert. [p. 21.] 
King Alfred. [p. 21.] 
King Canute. [p. 26.] 
King Edward the Confessor. [p. 27, 28.] 
Macbeth, king of Scotland. [p. 27.]

WILLIAM II. 
Robert, duke of Normandy.

HENRY I. 
William, the king's only son. 
Maud, empress of Germany, his daughter. [end 204] 
1. Henry. 
2. Richard I. 
3. Geoffrey, married to the heiress of Britanny. 
4. John. 
Fair Rosamond. 
Thomas à Becket, archbishop of Canterbury. 
RICHARD I. 
Saladin, sultan of Egypt and Jerusalem. 
Leopold, duke of Austria. 
Robin Hood.

JOHN. 
Arthur of Britanny, son of Geoffrey, John's elder brother, true heir to the crown. 
Louis, dauphin of France.

HENRY III. 
William Marshal, lord protector. 
Simon Montfort. [end 205]

EDWARD I. 
Queen Eleanora of Castille. 
John Baliol and Robert Bruce, competitors for the crown of Scotland. 
Sir William Wallace. 
Robert Bruce, king of Scotland, grandson of the former Robert Bruce.

EDWARD II. 
Queen Isabella of France. 
Gaveston. 
The Spencers, father and son. 
Roger Mortimer, earl of March.

EDWARD III. 
Queen Philippa of Hainault. 
Sons of Edward III and queen Philippa. 
1. Edward, the Black Prince. 
2. Lionel, duke of Clarence: his daughter Philippa married Edmund Mortimer, earl of March. 
3. John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster. 
4. Edmund of Langley, duke of York. [end 206] 
5. Thomas of Woodstock, duke of Gloucester. 
John, king of France. 
Eustache de St. Pierre, citizen of Calais.

RICHARD II. 
Wat Tyler. 
Walworth, mayor of London. 
Vere, earl of Oxford.

HENRY IV. 
Edmund Mortimer, grandson of Philippa of Clarence, true heir to the crown. 
Henry Percy, surnamed Hotspur.

HENRY VI. Queen Margaret of Anjou. 
The prince, son of Henry VI and queen Margaret. 
Joan of Arc. 
Richard, duke of York, lord protector, grandson of Edmund of Langley, true heir to the crown: his mother was a Mortimer. [end 207] 
Sons of Richard duke of York, by Cicely Neville. 
1. Edward IV. 
2. George duke of Clarence. 
3. Richard, duke of Gloucester, afterward Richard III.

EDWARD IV. 
Lady Eleanor Butler, supposed wife to the king. 
Queen Elizabeth Woodville, mother of the princes. 
Neville, earl of Warwick, surnamed the king-maker, first cousin to Edward IV.

EDWARD V. 
Duke of York, brother to the king, supposed to have been murdered by Richard III: in the reign of Henry VII appeared a yo[...], known in history by the name of Perkin Warbeck, who said he was the duke of York. [end 208]

HENRY VII. 
Queen Elizabeth Plantagenet, sister to the princes. 
Margaret, duchess of Burgundy, sister to Edward IV and Richard III 
Empson and Dudley, oppressive ministers of Henry VII. 
Christopher Columbus.

HENRY VIII. 
Cardinal Wolsey. 
Queen Anne Boleyn, mother of queen Elizabeth.

EDWARD VI. 
Young Browne, the king's whipping-boy.

MARY. 
Lady Jane Grey. 
Philip II, king of Spain, husband to queen Mary 
Cranmer, archbishop of Canterbury. 
Ridley, bishop of London. [end 209]

ELIZABETH. 
Lord Burleigh. 
Sir Francis Walsingham. 
Mary queen of Scots. 
Sir Francis Drake. 
Sir Walter Raleigh. 
Robert Dudley, earl of Leicester. 
Robert Devereux, earl of Essex.

JAMES I. 
Carr. 
Sir Thomas Overbury. 
Villiers, duke of Buckingham.

CHARLES I. 
Felton. 
John Hambden [sic]. 
Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford.

OLIVER CROMWEL. 
Robert Blake, English admiral. 
Van Tromp, admiral of Holland.

CHARLES II. 
Richard Cromwel, lord protector. 
Titus Oates. 
Chief Justice Jefferies. [end 210] 
William lord Russel. 
Algernon Sydney.

JAMES II. 
Duke of Monmouth.

WILLIAM III. 
Queen Mary, daughter of James II. 
Duke of Gloucester, son of the princess, afterward queen, Anne. 
Louis XIV, king of France.

ANNE. 
Duke of Marlborough. 
Duchess of Marlborough. 
Mrs. Masham. 
Doctor Sacheverel.

GEORGE I. 
The Pretender, son of James II. 
Sir Robert Walpole.

GEORGE II. 
The Young Pretender, son to the former. 
William, duke of Cumberland. 
William Pitt, earl of Chatham. [end 211] 
Frederic, king of Prussia.

GEORGE III. 
John Wilkes. 
George Washington, president of the United States of America. 
Louis XVI, king of France. 
George Brydges Rodney, lord Rodney. 
Richard Howe, earl Howe. 
Adam Duncan, viscount Duncan. 
John Jervis, earl of Saint Vincent. 
Horatio Nelson, viscount Nelson. 
Napoleon Bonaparte, emperor of France. 
William Pitt.

AUTHORS AND THEIR WORKS.

IN JUDEA, OR THE HOLY LAND. 
The Bible, or the Books of the Old Testament: the first part of this most interesting collection of the [end 212] early history of the human race, was written by Moses, about one thousand five hundred years before Christ: the following divisions of the volume consist of the history of the Judges and Kings of the Jews, the works of David and Solomon, and the sublime writings of the prophets: every Christian ought to make himself thoroughly acquainted with the contents of the sacred volume: the Old Testament was written in Hebrew, or the language of the Jews. 
The New Testament: this consists principally of two parts; the Life of Jesus Christ, the adored founder of the Christian religion; and the Letters of his twelve apostles, or delegates, written for the instruction of the first professors of the Christian faith: [end 213] the New Testament was written in Greek. [p. 90, 131.] 
Homer: he is usually considered as the father of that poetry, which is not appropriated to the uses of religion: he lived nine hundred years before Christ: his works are the Iliad, a historical poem on the siege of Troy, and the Odyssey, a historical poem on Ulysses, one of the Grecian kings by whom Troy was destroyed: it has been doubted whether Homer could either read or write, and whether his poems were not handed down for a long time, like those of our British Druids, by memory only: as Homer is the oldest, so he is perhaps the most perfect, of the poets. [p. 15, 115.] 
Pindar: he wrote principally Odes on [end 214] the Grecian chariot-races and other games: Homer and Pindar are considered as the sublimest of the Grecian poets. [p. 115.] 
Sophocles wrote one hundred and twenty tragedies, and lived ninety years: the city of Athens laid out 20,000l. in the decorations of one of his plays. [p. 123.] 
Euripides wrote seventy-five tragedies: he and Sophocles lived at the same time, and emulated each other in the exhibition of tragic merit. [p. 123.] 
Plato: he is one of the most admired of the prose-writers of Greece: he wrote on moral philosophy, political philosophy, and the principles of the universe, with all the fire and imagination of a poet. [p. 115.] 
Menander wrote one hundred and eight comedies. [p. 123.] [end 215]

IN ANCIENT ROME. 
Terence: we possess of this writer six elegant comedies. [p. 123.] 
Caesar: he was a great general, and enslaved his country: he wrote Commentaries, or the history of his own wars. [p. 12.] 
Virgil: he wrote the Aeneid, a historical poem on Aeneas, one of the kings who defended Troy, and who was regarded by the Roman people as their founder: his poem has been so much admired, that when we would speak of the best poets, it is usual to join together Virgil and Homer. [p. 15.] 
Ovid: he is called the poet of love: several fine works of Ovid remain: Medea, and admired tragedy of his composing, is lost. [p. 123.] 
Seneca: only seven of the ancient Roman tragedies have been pre- [end 216] served: they bear the name of Seneca, but it is uncertain by whom they were written. [p. 123.]

IN MODERN ITALY. 
Tasso: he wrote a historical poem on the Delivery of Jerusalem from the Saracens: he lived in the time of queen Elizabeth. [p. 38.]

IN GERMANY. 
Martin Luther: he lived in the reign of Henry VIII.

IN FRANCE. 
John Calvin: he lived in the reign of Henry VIII.

IN PRUSSIA. 
Frederic II: he wrote a History of his Own Times, and Other Works: he died in 1786. [p. 167.]

IN ENGLAND. 
The Druids: from the disinterestedness of these memorable personages, [end 217] or from accident, we only know that many thousands of verses were composed by them, but we are unacquainted with the name of any of the authors: an inferior class in the Druidical establishment are the Bards, who made heroic songs of the great actions of their countrymen: in allusion to them a poet is frequently in modern speech denominated a Bard: probably no genuine compositions of the ancient heathen Druids or Bards are preserved. [p. 12, 69.] 
The Scalds, called also the Scandinavian or Runic poets: these were the poets of our northern ancestors, particularly the Danes: the names of some of these poets and several of their works, are preserved. [p. 25.] 
The Minstrels: these were the poets [end 218] of the Norman and Plantagenet times: both the Minstrels and the Scalds travelled the country, and sung their songs at festivals and great men's houses: the Minstrels were the first introducers of stage-plays among the moderns. [p. 44, 57, 123.] 
The Monks: these were men who lived together in large houses called monasteries and convents: they engaged by a vow never to marry: as there was no such thing as printing, a part of their employment was transcribing books: and, as the monks were very numerous, and had a great deal of leisure, they wrote many books themselves in the Latin language, some so well that they have passed for works of the ancient Romans: they made also religious plays in emulation of [end 219] the profane plays of the Minstrels: the most profound and excellent writers among the Monks are a set of men known by the name of the Schoolmen: of these Duns Scotus and Thomas Aquinas are the most celebrated. [p.48, 123.]

WILLIAM I. 
Doomsday-Book: an account of all the estates in England.

  • HENRY II.
  • Robert Wace,
  • Benedict St. More.
  • These authors wrote
  • their poems in French.
  • Joseph of Exeter:
  • poet
  • John of Salisbury:
  • prose-writer.
  • These authors were
  • monks, and wrote
  • in Latin.

RICHARD I. 
Blondel: a minstrel: a native of Provence, or the south of France. [end 220]

HENRY III. 
Friar Bacon.

EDWARD III. 
Chaucer, the father of English poetry: his principal work is Canterbury Tales.

RICHARD II. 
Wicliffe: he first translated the Bible into English.

HENRY VI. 
Blind Harry, a poet of Scotland. [p. 73.]

EDWARD IV. 
Caxton, the first English printer: he wrote some of the books, which he printed.

HENRY VIII. 
Sir Thomas More. 
Henry Howard, earl of Surry. 
Archbishop Cranmer.

EDWARD VI. 
Gammer Gurton's Needle, a comedy. [p. 124.]

MARY. 
Thomas Sackville, lord Dorset.

ELIZABETH. 
Sir Philip Sidney. 
Spenser. [p. 18: he is spoken of again in his place; reign of Elizabeth.] 
Shakespear

JAMES I. 
Sir Walter Raleigh. 
Ben Jonson. 
Beaumont and Fletcher. 
Lord Bacon. 
Our present translation of the Bible.

OLIVER CROMWEL. [sic
Milton. 
CHARLES II. 
Sir Isaac Newton. 
Dryden: the most popular of his works, [end 222] is an Ode for St. Cecilia's day, commonly called Alexander's Feast.

WILLIAM III. 
Locke.

ANNE. 
Swift. 
Pope. 
Addison.

GEORGE III. 
Doctor Samuel Johnson. 
Boswel. [sic] [he is not named for his own merit, but because he recorded the conversations of another.] 
Gray. [p. 25, 70.] 
Burns. [p. 74.]

PAINTERS. 
Michael Angelo: an Italian: the greatest genius of modern times in painting and sculpture: his best pictures are painted upon the walls of certain chapels and [end 223] palaces in Rome, and cannot be removed. [p. 113.] 
Raphael d'Urbino, an Italian: he is usually considered as the rival of Michael Angelo: there are seven fine pictures of his, called the Cartoons, in the castle at Windsor.

(98)

The Raphael d’Urbino collections at Windsor Castle are cataloged in The Works of Raphael Santi da Urbino as Represented in the Raphael Collection in the Royal Library at Windsor Castle, Formed by H.R.H. The Prince Consort, 1853-1861, and Completed by Her Majesty Queen Victoria (London, 1876).

[p. 113, 132.] 
Titian, a very fine painter of Italy: he lived at the same time as Raphael, but much longer: Raphael died at the age of thirty-seven, and Titian of ninety-nine.

Just thus in life, 'tis those excel, 
Not who live long, but who live well.

(99)

Just thus in life, ‘tis those excel, / Not who live long, but who live well: This appears to be a poetic revision of Benjamin Franklin’s aphorism “Wish not so much to live long as to live well,” originally published in the 1746 edition of Poor Richard’s Almanack. There is no record of Godwin having read the Almanack, nor does the phrase appear in the Mémoires de la vie privée de Benjamin Franklin écrits par lui meme, et addressés a son fils (1791), which Godwin read in 1792-93. The expression is more likely from another text Godwin read in 1793, Milcah Martha Moore and John Ralling’s Miscellan…

THE END.

---------------

Printed by B. McMillan, 
Bow Street, Covent Garden. [end 224]

NEW BOOKS FOR CHILDREN, 
Published by THOMAS HODGKINS, at the JUVENILE LIBRARY, Hanway Street (opposite Soho Square) Oxford Street, and to be had of all Booksellers. I. 
Elegantly printed in two volumes, 12mo. and adorned with seventy-three superb engravings. Price 8s. handsomely bound in coloured paper, 
FABLES, ANCIENT AND MODERN. 
By EDWARD BALDWIN, Esq. 
“These Fables are better calculated to excite the attention of Children, to amuse and instruct them, than any we have ever perused. We recommend them without reserve.”

British Critic for November.

“They are unquestionably written on a much better plan, for making an impression on, and conveying instruction to, those for whose use they are designed, than any other Fables which have fallen under our cognizance.”

Anti-Jacobin Review and Mag. for December.

"This is not a common-place collection, but possesses much novelty and interest. The style is far superior to that of any Fables in our language. The Engravings are all made from original Designs, many of which abound with character."

General Review for Feb.

"They are neatly written; and are ornamented with Plates, considerably superior to what are usually found in works of a similar nature."

European Mag. for November.

For a further character of this Work, see Critical Review, Eclectic Review, Literary Journal, and Monthly Mirror.

II. 
Elegantly printed in one volume duodecimo, Price 4s. 
handsomely bound in coloured paper,           
THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND, for the Use of Schools and Young Persons. 
By EDWARD BALDWIN, Esq. 
With Thirty-two Heads of the Kings, engraved on copper-plate, and a striking Representation of an Ancient Tournament. [end 225, n.b. not paginated]

III. 
Illustrated with five copper-plates. Price 1s. 
THE LOOKING-GLASS: 
A Mirror in which every Good Boy and Girl may see what He or She is; and those who are not yet Quite Good, may find what they ought to be. 
By THEOPHILIUS MARCLIFFE.

IV. 
Illustrated with a Portrait, elegantly engraved. Price 1s. 
LIFE OF LADY JANE GREY, and of LORD GUILDFORD DUDLEY her Husband. 
By THEOPHILUS MARCLIFFE. 
This Young Lady, at Twelve Years of Age, understood Eight Languages; was for Nine Days Queen of England; and was Beheaded in the Tower in the Seventeenth Year of her Age, being at that Time the most Amiable and Accomplished Woman in Europe.

V. 
Illustrated in fifteen elegant engravings. Price 1s. plain, or 1s. 6d. coloured, 
THE KING AND QUEEN OF HEARTS: 
Showing how Notably the Queen made her Tarts, and how Scurvily the Knave stole them away.

(100)

THE KING AND QUEEN OF HEARTS: A short book of children’s verse written by Charles Lamb with engravings by William Mulready and published for the Juvenile Library in 1805. Godwin was so impressed with Mulready’s work on The King and Queen of Hearts that he made the latter the subject of a short biography, referred to in the catalogue above as The Looking-Glass, the full title of which is The Looking-Glass, A True History of the Early Years of an Artist (London: 1805).

VI. 
Illustrated in fifteen elegant engravings. Price 1s. plain, or 1s. 6d. coloured, 
THE LITTLE WOMAN AND THE PEDLAR 
With the Strange Distraction that seized her, and the Undutiful Behaviour of her Little Dog on that Occasion.

(101)

THE LITTLE WOMAN AND THE PEDLAR: An illustrated version of the nursery rhyme, “There was a little woman, as I’ve heard tell…” and also featuring engravings by Mulready (London, 1807). The cover indicates that the book was “printed for Thomas Hodgkins, at the Juvenile Library”; Godwin had employed Hodgkins to manage the bookshop that he and his second wife, Mary Jane Godwin, opened on Hanway Street.

N.B. Copies of the two preceding Publications are kept on sale in Sheets, for ladies who wish to use them as Ornaments for Screens; and may be had, either in a peculiarly delicate style of colouring, or plain by those who prefer colouring them for themselves.

Notes

1. Other histories of England available to schoolchildren at the time (some of which would have been Godwin’s direct competition within the marketplace) and in subsequent decades noted in Daniel Hahn’s Oxford Companion to Children's Literature (1984) include: 1761: John Newbery’s A New History of England, from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Present Time.;
1764: Newbery publishes Oliver Goldsmith’s An History of England.;
1791: Jane Austen’s (parodic) A History of England.;
1790s: Sarah Trimmer publishes several copperplate prints of biblical and secular history;
1800: John Marshall publishes an anonymous Abridgement of English History, from the Conquest to the Present Reign;
1815: William Darnton publishes Louisa Brown’s Historical Questions on the Kings of England, in verse.;
1818: John Harris’s The Chapter of Kings.;
By 1820: series of Pinnock’s Catechisms, including A Catechism of Ancient History, A Catechism of Roman History, and A Catechism of the History of America (n.b.: Harris succeeded Elizabeth Newbery, who succeeded her step-uncle John);
1820: “Mrs Markham” (Elizabeth Penrose) produced celebrated history books; Peter Parley (S.G. Goodrich) is active in the same decade;
1830: William Darton’s The British Sovereigns, from William the Conqueror to William IV.;
1832: John Harris’s The British Story Briefly Told, from early times to the present period.;
1835: Little Arthur’s History of England;
1851-1854: Charles Dickens’s Child’s History of England. [back]
2. See See Barnett’s and Gustafson’s introduction to this edition, “The Radical Aesop: William Godwin and the Juvenile Library, 1805-1825,” for more on Godwin’s views on inspiring or enlivening children’s studies, as well as a few examples of the kinds of “grammars of geography” and “grammars of history” he mentions here. [back]
3. My pages are not crouded with a variety of articles: they are so printed as to be agreeable and refreshing to the eye of a child: Godwin appears to be drawing on a practice attributed to Anna Barbauld of reducing the amount of printed matter per page so as not to overwhelm child readers. Barbauld typically used this practice in her primers, such as Lessons for Children of Two to Three Years (London: 1787) or Lessons for Children of Three to Four Years (London: 1788). Godwin adopts the practice here for what would likely have been an older audience of readers. For further information on Barbauld’s practice see William McCarthy, “Mother of all Discourses: Anna Barbauld’s Lessons for Children,” in Culturing the Child, 1690-1914, ed. Donelle Ruwe, 85-11 (Lanham: The Children’s Literature Association and Scarecrow Press, 2005). [back]
4. Nothing to do but with the great landmarks of history… and the strong impression which, once received, can never be obliterated: Throughout his historical writings, Godwin argues that the historian’s task must go beyond the description of facts to articulate the “individual” character of important historical events and persons. In his unpublished 1797 essay “Of History and Romance,” Godwin notes that history ought to represent its subjects as “composed of materials merely human” (Caleb Williams, “Appendix A” 456) so that the “contemplation of illustrious men” might provide a “fruitful source of activity and motive” that “kindles into a flame the hidden fire within us[….] There must be an exchange of real sentiments […] before improvement can be the result” (458). For further discussions of the method of “individual” history, see Godwin’s prefaces to his ‪Life of Geoffrey Chaucer, the early English poet‬: ‪including memoirs of his near friend and kinsman, John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster: with sketches of the manners, opinions, arts and literature of England in the fourteenth century‬ (2 vols. London: 1803), and The History of the Commonwealth of England. From its Commencement, to the Restoration of Charles the Second (3 vols. London: 1824-27). [back]
5. The ultimate result of historical reading in the mind of a gentleman and a scholar, … was precisely the first lesson of history I should wish to communicate to a child: In Political Justice, Godwin claims that a child’s intellectual improvement can only occur where her mind “be advanced to the height of knowledge already existing among the enlightened members of the community.” This cultivates the child’s propensity for critical inquiry, encouraging both “the pursuit of further acquisitions” and the notion that all ideas are “open to review” (1798, II: 299-300). On Godwin’s views concerning the formation of proper intellectual habits in children and the benefits of historical reading more broadly, see also The Enquirer. Reflections on Education, Manners, and Literature. In a Series of Essays (London: 1797), 1-6, 36-55. [back]
6. William I: Other history books for children in this period tended to represent William I in more measured terms. In Dr. Goldsmith’s History of England, Abridged by Himself. For the Use of Schools (Air: 1799), Oliver Goldsmith acknowledges William’s tyranny but explains it as a response to British rebellions. Alexander Bicknell’s A History of England and the British Empire Designed for the Instruction of Youth (London: 1794), Charles Allen’s A New and Improved History of England, from the Invasion of Julius Caesar, to the End of the Thirty-Second Year of the Reign of his Majesty King George the Third. Designed for the Use of Schools (London: 1793), and David Hume’s Hume’s History of England, Abridged, from the Invasion of Julius Caesar, to the Revolution in 1688. For the Use of Schools and Young Gentlemen (Edinburgh: 1793) similarly balance William I’s acts of tyranny against his early attempts at justice. John Lockman’s A New History of England, by Question and Answer, Extracted from the Most Celebrated English Historians, Particularly M. Rapin de Thoyras (London: 1787) takes an even more balanced view: “[William] had a great soul, an elevated mind, and a prodigious genius, which suffered nothing to escape its researches. He delighted in war, understood it well, and was successful in it. When once he was raised to anger, it was scarce possible to appease him. This the English experienced […] At first he treated them with great lenity, and confirmed their laws and privileges. But when he found them plotting year after year to dethrone him, he then altered his conduct: for he punished the mutineers without mercy; and, stripping them of their possessions, bestowed them on Normans, and such of the English as had been faithful to him. He deprived, so far as he could, the English nation of their privileges; abolishing their laws, and establishing those of Normandy in their room” (73). [back]
7. Godwin refers to Commentarii de Bello Gallico, written by Julius Caesar between 58 and 49 BCE. The Gaellic Wars has long been a staple of early Latin education for children due to its straightforward prose, so any of Godwin’s readers who were also receiving a classical education would have been familiar with it. [back]
8. Druids: Britain’s Druidical past is also the subject of Godwin’s early novel Imogen: A Pastoral Romance from the Ancient British, published anonymously in 1784. The novel makes constant reference to Druid lore and rituals, including human sacrifice, reflecting the late eighteenth century revival of interest in pre-Christian native religions. Godwin may have been aware of Druidic practices from works like John Toland’s A Critical History of the Celtic Religion and Learning (1720), William Cooke’s An Inquiry into the Patriarchical and Druidical Religion, Temples (1780), John Smith’s Galic Antiquities: Consisting of the a History fothe Druids (1780), and Hugh Blair’s Dissertation on the Poems of Ossian, the Son of Fingal (1783). [back]
9. A first-century ACE cheiftain of the Catuvellauni tribe who led the British resistance to the Roman conquest. In 1818 William Blake included Caratctacus in his series of “Visionary Heads.” [back]
10. Godwin’s The Pantheon; or Ancient History of the Gods of Greece and Rome. Intended to Facilitate the Understanding of the Classical Authors, and of the Poets in General. For the Use of Schools, and Young Persons of Both Sexes. With Engravings of the Principal Gods, chiefly taken form the Remains of Ancient Statuary, published by the Juvenile Library under Godwin’s “Edward Baldwin” pseudonym in 1806 (the same year as History of England) explains the classical gods and goddesses to young readers. [back]
11. Most notable, of course, is Edmund Spenser’s The Fairie Queen (1590; 1596). [back]
12. The ninth-century ACE Doom Book or Code of Alfred is the foundation for subsequent English Common Law. [back]
13. “The Ballad of Chevy Chase” describes an ill-fated hunting party led by Percy, the English Earl of Northumberland in the Cheviot Hills along the Scottish borders. It was included in Thomas Percy's Reliques of Ancient English Poetry (1765), among other similar collections, and was widely disseminated in chapbook form throughout the eighteenth century. Joseph Addison wriote in the Spectator in 1711 that “the old song of ‘Chevy-Chase’ is the favourite ballad of the common people of England, and Ben Jonson used to say he had rather have been the author of it than of all his works” (Spectator No. 70, May 21, 1711). [back]
14. Thomas Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” was published in 1751. Here, Godwin likely refers to Gray’s “The Fatal Sisters. An Ode” and “The Descent of Odin,” which are loose translations of Norse odes. The translations, written in 1761, were published in Robert Dodsley’s 1768 edition, Poems by Mr. Gray. For further information, including translations of the poems, see Norse Romanticism: Themes in British Literature, 1760-1830, edited by Robert W. Rix. [back]
15. See Barnett’s and Gustafson’s introduction to this edition, “The Radical Aesop: William Godwin and the Juvenile Library, 1805-1825,” for contemporary controversy over the potential pedagogical value of fairy tales and their “giants and fairies, and dragons and enchantments.” [back]
16. The Normans… appear like a superior race of beings: Following Thomas Warton’s History of English Poetry (1774), Godwin’s Life of Chaucer praises the Normans for having “introduced politeness and learning” into England (I: 13). Godwin’s views on the Normans partly responds to the “indiscriminate use […] of the terms dark, and the barbarous ages” (Life of Chaucer I: 13) by prominent Enlightenment historiographers such as Voltaire and Edward Gibbon. [back]
17. Great promoters of knighthood and chivalry… they were generous, warm-hearted, and humane: Godwin’s positive characterization of chivalry demonstrates a shift from his earlier views. The first edition of Political Justice, as well as the novels Things as they are, or the Adventures of Caleb Williams (London: 1794) and St. Leon, A Tale of the Sixteenth Century (London: 1799), often represent chivalry as morally corrupting and politically reactionary. Though Godwin remains critical of the economic and cultural inequalities underpinning the feudal system from which chivalric principles spring, his later writings demonstrate an increased tolerance for the potentially beneficial affective qualities of chivalry. The third edition of Political Justice and the Life of Chaucer already acknowledge chivalry’s “mixed and equivocal accomplishments” (Political Justice 1798, II: 92), including “the principle of modern honour in the best sense […], the generosity of disinterested adventure” and the “successful cultivation of the private affections” (Life of Chaucer I: 360-61). In an 1812 letter to Percy Shelley, Godwin makes reference to the “excellent effects” reaped by the present from the feudal and chivalric systems (qtd. in Paul, William Godwin: His Friends and Contemporaries II: 204-6). [back]
18. William the Conqueror despised and ill-treated the Saxons… as his own countrymen: Godwin appears to be editorializing in this sentence. Goldsmith, Hume, Bicknell, Allen, and Lockman do not explicitly say that William I decried the bravery and wisdom of the Saxons; rather, they argue that he repressed the Saxons in order to quell the chronic insurrections that erupted after he left England. [back]
19. The Saxons fed the animals, and the Normans ate them: While writers such as Hume, Goldsmith, and Lockman describe William I’s reign as a tyranny and lament the enslavement of the British in this period, they do not describe divisions of labor as Godwin does. [back]
20. The feudal lords grew more and more powerful, till they became little less than kings: The wording in this passage closely echoes Godwin’s criticism of the growing power of court ministers in his own time, whom he describes in Political Justice as becoming “miniature king[s] in their turn” (1798, II: 38). Characters in Godwin’s adult fiction, such as Tyrrell and Falkland in Caleb Williams, embody the figure of the corrupt feudal lord as small-scale potentate, with disastrous consequences. Godwin provides a more detailed historical account of the rise of the feudalism in the Life of Chaucer I: 24-31. [back]
21. Under the direction of William I…turbulent ages: Allen and Lockman also discuss the imposition of the curfew, although this information is excluded in Goldsmith, Hume, and Bicknell. Allen, like Godwin, defends the curfew as a legitimate rather than tyrannical practice but does so by arguing that William I had instituted the curfew in Normandy prior to its introduction into England. See Allen 37 and Lockman 74. [back]
22. Ignorance however is not inconsistent with zeal: Godwin’s views here echo any number of standard Enlightenment criticisms of religion, which he would have encountered in the French atheists whom he names as influences in the preface to the first edition of Political Justice: Claude-Adrien Helvetius (1715-71) and Baron d’Holbach (1723-89). But Godwin’s comment also accords with Political Justice’s gradualist view of social progress; contrary to the intellectually “premature” (1798, I: 272) conditions which give birth to the “headlong zeal” that animates violent revolutions (1798, I: 361), Godwin argues that social improvement can only occur “in a just proportion to the illumination of public understanding” (1798, I: 273). [back]
23. Tasso…has written a fine poem on the subject: Torquato Tasso, a sixteenth-century Italian poet (1544-95) whose epic La Gerusalemme Liberata (1581) offers a mythologized account of the First Crusade. According to his diary, Godwin read Edward Fairfax’s English translation of the poem, Jerusalem Delivered (1749), in early 1792. [back]
24. This apocryphal version of William Rufus’s death dates back at least as early as the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. The tree was allegedly cut down and burned in the eighteenth century, and the spot in New Forest National Park is marked today with the Rufus Stone. [back]
25. Robert Wace’s works include Roman de Brut (on the history of Britain) and Roman de Rou (on the history of the Dukes of Normandy). [back]
26. Benedict St. More: Godwin apparently refers here to Benoit de Sainte-Maure, author of Roman de Troie (a 30,000-couplet travesty of the Iliad) and the 43,000-line verse Chronique des ducs de Normandie. The editors thank Tara Foster of Northern Michigan University and Jen Edwards of Manhattan College for their assistance identifying this reference. [back]

27. 

Henry II’s lover Rosamund Clifford—known in folklore as “Fair Rosamund” or the “Rose of the World”—was the subject of several popular ballads. This apocryphal story about her death by poison became a popular motif in her legend. For example, the seventeenth-century broadside ballad “A Lamentable Ballad of Fair Rosamond, King Henry the Second's Concubine, Who was put to death by Queen Elinor, in Woodstock Bower near Oxford” includes the story of the poison:

And down along her [Rosamund’s] comely face,
proceeded many a tear:
But nothing could this furious Queen,
therewith appeased be,
The cup of deadly poyson strong,
as she sat on her knee.
She gave this comely Dame to drink,
who took it in her hand,
And from her bended knee arose,
and on her feet did stand:
And casting up her eyes to heaven,
she did for mercy call,
And drinking up the poyson strong,
her life she lost withal.

[back]

28. Joseph of Exeter’s Daretis Phrygii Ilias De bello Troiano, a Latin poem in six books, was likely completed in 1184, and his later fragment Antiocheis records the Third Crusade. John of Salisbury or Johannes Parvus (“John the Little”) was a student of Peter Abelard’s and later secretary to Theobald of Bec, the Archbishop of Canterbury. His prose works include the proto-political science discourse Policraticus, sive de nugis curialium et de vestigiis philosophorum (1159?) and The Metalogicon (1159), an educational treatise and defence of the Trivium. [back]
29. Godwin refers to Becket in Political Justice (1798, I: 153-54) in a chapter examining the nature of “personal virtue.” There, Godwin cites Becket as an example of the difficulty of judging an action in terms of its motives: Becket’s resistance to Henry II is at once a reflection of the priest’s “haughtiness” and “ambition,” as well as a product of a sincere belief that his martyrdom would benefit humankind as a whole. Godwin’s reference to Becket’s posthumous popularity “as long as popery lasted in the island” likely refers to the fact that Becket’s status as martyr and saint was dissolved by Henry VIII, who instead labeled the priest a rebel and a traitor and had his shrine destroyed during the Dissolution of the Monasteries in 1538. [back]
30. Godwin seems to reference John’s siding with his brother Richard in the squabbles over who would succeed their father Henry II. John, of course, was later immortalized in folklore as the principal antagonist to Robin Hood. [back]
31. No Turk, but a Saracen: The basis for Godwin’s distinction between Turk and Saracen is somewhat obscure, given that both terms were often used interchangeably by western Europeans to describe Muslims in general. In the Life of Chaucer, Godwin praises Saracenic learning as providing the foundations for Europe’s emergence from the dark ages (I: 201-2), while the reference to Saladin’s generosity, civility and manners associates the “Turk” with more “negative” aspects of the Ottoman Empire. This accords with both a medieval and Christian literary tradition which posed Saladin as a kind of chivalric hero and used the term “Turk” broadly to describe the enemy of Christian Europe. See Carole Hillenbrand, “The Evolution of the Saladin Legend in the West” in  Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph 58 (2005): 1-13. In St. Leon, Godwin represents Turkish colonial rule in Hungary as corrupt and dictatorial, though the novel’s eponymous narrator sees little distinction between the Ottomans and the equally ruinous colonial aspirations of the Holy Roman Emperor, Ferdinand I. See St. Leon, 361-81. In this respect, “Turk” would appear to be another figure for what Godwin calls “institution” in Political Justice, though it also invokes the burgeoning discourse of Romantic Orientalism that will emerge in the following decade in popular works by Robert Southey, Thomas Moore, and Byron. [back]
32. Robin Hood’s Garland: Refers to the many cheap, popular anthologies of Robin Hood ballads available in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Godwin may have been consciously avoiding conservative censure, or giving his authorship away, by directing readers to the largely unadorned Garland editions rather than to the more politically charged representation of the outlaw in his friend Joseph Ritson’s Robin Hood: A Collection of all the Ancient Poems, Songs and Ballads, now extant, relative to that celebrated Outlaw (London: 1795). Godwin also mentions Robin Hood in the Life of Chaucer I: 106-7, 121, 123. On the Garland editions see R. B. Dobson and J. Taylor, “The Legend Since the Middle Ages.” Robin Hood: An Anthology of Scholarship and Criticism. Ed. Stephen Knight. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1999. 170-75. On the influence of Ritson’s collection see Marilyn Butler, “The Good Old Times: Maid Marian.Robin Hood: An Anthology of Scholarship and Criticism. 143-44. [back]
33. Magna Charta, a declaration of the rights of the free people of England: Godwin’s view of the “Magna Charta” as a prototype for an English constitution follows a long line of legal and historical interpretation which, from the late sixteenth century on, reframed the document in liberal or radical terms. Reviving Magna Carta was instrumental in the political debates surrounding the English Civil War, a period of intense interest to Godwin, and was invoked by seventeenth century jurists like Sir Edward Coke as a basis for establishing Parliamentary power, legal principles such as habeas corpus, and for limiting the divine right of kings. In the Life of Chaucer, Godwin refers to the legal-historical geneology descending from the “memorable epoch of the Magna Charta,” which includes “chief justice Coke,” as necessary “to maintain in the human mind a certain sentiment of independence and integrity” (I: 363-64). Writing in the context of the return of papal authority during the early years of the reign of Edward III, Godwin also understands the “repeated reenactions” of the Magna Carta as essential for safeguarding “a vigorous secular administration” (Life of Chaucer, II: 118-19). [back]
34. The crusades . . . gave birth to an intercourse between distant nations: Godwin also speaks of the crusades as a source for British internationalism in the Life of Chaucer I: 13, 201-2. The reference would also have contemporary relevance: the late eighteenth/early nineteenth century saw increased travel to, and writing about, the ‘Near East.’ See Peter J. Kitson, “Romantic Colonialism: Races, Places, Peoples, 1785-1800” and Tim Fulford, “Romantic Colonialism: Races, Places, Peoples, 1800-1830” in Romanticism and Colonialism: Writing and Empire, 1780-1830. Eds. Fulford and Kitson (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998), 13-47. [back]
35. Friar Bacon: Roger Bacon (c. 1214-92), Franciscan friar and English philosopher. Godwin’s praise is typical of many nineteenth-century rationalists, for whom Bacon’s emphasis on induction and the experimental study of nature anticipates the Enlightenment. His Opus Majus (1267) is often credited as being the first European text to describe the manufacture of gunpowder, as well as outline the principles of magnification that would later inform the development of microscopes, telescopes, and spectacles. Godwin discusses Bacon in a similar light in Life of Chaucer I: 193. See also Amanda Power, “A Mirror for Every Age: The Reputation of Roger Bacon,” The English Historical Review 121.492 (2006): 657-92. [back]
36. an ode of some merit on this subject: Thomas Gray’s “The Bard. A Pindaric Ode” (1754-1757). [back]
37. Blind Harry: also known as Harry or Henry the Minstrel, he is best known for The Actes and Deidis of the Illustre and Vallyeant Campioun Schir William Wallace (or simply The Wallace), written around 1477. [back]
38. an exquisite song on this battle: Scotland’s unofficial national anthem “Scots Wha Hae” was first published in theMorning Chronicle on 8 May 1794 and subsequently appeared in several collections. Burns’s lyrics accompany the traditional Scottish tune “Hey Tuttie Tatie” which was supposedly played by Robert the Bruce's army at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314. [back]
39. Men who can do what they please, will often please to do what is wrong: Although this maxim clearly applies to Godwin’s criticisms of the aristocracy in general, it also specifically recalls his rejection of the doctrine of “active rights” in Political Justice. Active rights refer to “the right in certain cases to do as we list,” which Godwin considers to undermine his doctrine of universal benevolence, which is aligned with what he calls “passive rights,” or the “right we possess to the forebearance and assistance of other men” (1798, I: 158-62). See also PJ 1798 V, xi; Life of Chaucer I: 24, 29, 124-25, 230-31; Falkland in Caleb Williams; St. Leon. [back]
40. In the stories of the knights-errant…we continually read of their rescuing ladies from dungeons and tyrants: Godwin’s description of the knight-errant recalls his earlier novel Caleb Williams, specifically Falkland’s explicitly chivalric attempt to rescue a young woman (Emily Melvile) from her tyrannical uncle, Tyrrel. Godwin also briefly discusses the broader role and function of the knight-errant in the Life of Chaucer I: 29-30 and in Thoughts on Man, His Nature, Productions, and Discoveries. Interspersed with some Particulars Respecting the Author, 339. [back]
41. Like too many other kings…he desired to be a conqueror. A conqueror is a man who… causes the death of thousands and reduces nations to slavery: This passage hews closely to Godwin’s extensive critique of aggressive war in Political Justice, which he characterizes as part of the “very essence of monarchy and aristocracy” (1798, II: 143-44). See especially 1798, II:142-82. See also Godwin’s comments on offensive versus defensive war in PJ 1798, I, ii; V, xvi-xx and 'conquest' in II, v, viii; Life of Chaucer also mentions the Battle of Cressy, I: 250-51. [back]
42. The battles of Cressy and Poitiers: Godwin also discusses these two battles in the Life of Chaucer, repeating his earlier criticisms of aggressive war from Political Justice (I: 250-51). Godwin notes, however, that for “all their vices and miserable consequences,” such victories also taught the English “self-reverence” and are therefore “not unworthy to find a place among the causes which have made us what we are” (I: 402). [back]
43. Where were six citizens…who would go voluntarily to death, to save the rest? at last an admirable fellow…offered himself: Godwin’s admiration for the story of Eustache de St. Pierre recollects the well-known “fire cause” passage in Political Justice, in which he argues on utilitarian grounds that one should be prepared to sacrifice one’s own life for the good of society at large (1798, I: 127-28). [back]
44. How strange that a prince who behaved so humanely to people of rank, should have been so harsh and unrelenting to honest citizens!: In Political Justice, Godwin situates the causes for such double standards in the way princes are educated, which renders them incapable of “the recollection that other men are beings of the same order with himself” (1798, II: 5-20). See also PJ 1798, V, ii-iii, which expostulates on how monarchs come to feel themselves 'above' the rest of humankind and the famous “fire-cause” from PJ 1798, II, ii where Godwin makes the utilitarian argument that one should be prepared to sacrifice one's own life for the good of the society at large. [back]
45. liberty…was confined to the lords and holders of estates: A critique of the inequality of property relations is a central facet of Godwin’s political theory. Departing from the Scottish Enlightenment view of private property as an encouragement to economic prosperity and to the advancement of civil society, Godwin argues that the existing system of property relations generates social strife by “engrossing all its advantages to a few favoured individual, and reserving to the portion of the rest want, dependence and misery” (1798, I: 16). See in particular Political Justice 1798, II: 431-52. [back]
46. Wat Tyler: the leader of the 1381 Peasants Revolt was the subject of Robert Southey’s 1817 dramatic poem. [back]
47. When the common people have got arms in their hands…they are apt to run into the most outrageous excesses: Though this remark has clear connotations with respect to the French Revolution, it also calls to mind Godwin’s suspicion of “majority” and the notion that “popular commotions and violence” (Political Justice 1798, I: 277) ought never to serve as the primary engine of social change. See 1798, I: 253-55, 263-84. Godwin repeats a similar idea several times in PJ 1798 esp., IV, ii (“Of Revolutions”). [back]
48. John Wicliffe…who preached against the abuses of popery: John Wicliffe (c. 1331-1381) was a theologian, Oxford professor, reformer, and early translator of the Bible into common English. Wicliffe’s insistence on the primacy of the individual’s interpretation of scripture, his attacks on the Church hierarchy, and rejection of papal authority led him to be declared a heretic and his works banned in 1415. Given this background it is not difficult to see why Godwin, whose politics are deeply shaped by similar anti-authoritarian strains within the Puritan tradition, would make positive mention of Wicliffe here. The second volume of the Life of Chaucer discusses Wicliffe at length, with Godwin placing his ideas on equal footing with those of Shakespeare and Roger Bacon. Life of Chaucer II: 123-35, 209-19, 373-402, 536-38. [back]
49. the second of the series of plays: Shakespeare’s King Richard the Second (1597). [back]
50. The king of France was seized with madness, yet a madness that had intervals: Godwin is referring to Charles VI, King of France (1368-1422), whose intermittent bouts of mental incapacity caused political instability. By the time Godwin is writing History of England, England’s George III had long been displaying the symptoms of madness that would eventually lead to his son George IV’s regency in 1811; see page 97 below. [back]
51. Perkin Warbeck: a supposed pretender to the English throne who claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury, the Duke of York, he was the subject of Mary Shelley’s The Fortunes of Perkin Warbeck (1830). After he confessed to being an imposter he was imprisoned in the Tower of London sporadically for two years until his execution by hanging in 1499. [back]
52. See note 51. [back]
53. See note 31. [back]
54. Thomas More: lawyer, philosopher, opponent of the Reformation, author of Utopia (1516), and Lord High Chancellor of England from 1529-32. Godwin’s diary indicates that he had read Utopia in 1795; accordingly, the second edition of Political Justice (1796) adds a footnote referencing Utopia, along with Plato’s Republic, Gulliver’s Travels, and Gabriel Bonnot de Mably’s De la législation (1776), as an open attack on the prevailing “system of accumulated property” (1798, II: 459). [back]
55. the earl of Surry: Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, was related to two of Henry VIII’s wives (Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard), which might have contributed to the king’s suspicion that the Earl was plotting against the king’s son Edward. This lead to Surrey’s execution by beheading for treason on 19 January 1547, only eleven days before Henry’s death. Surrey was one of the first English poets to write write in blank verse and helped develop the sonnets that would later be called Elizabethan or Shakespearean. [back]
56. Cranmer: the Archbishop of Canterbury from 1533 until 1555, Thomas Cranmer was instrumental in the foundation of the Church of England and, as Godwin notes here, he contributed to the establishment of the Book of Common Prayer, which was ratified by the Act of Uniformity in 1549. [back]
57. In 1806 (the same year Godwin published History of England), Godwin (as Theophilius Marcliffe) published another Juvenile Library title, Life of Lady Jane Grey and of Lord Guilford Dudley, her Husband. This young Lady at Twelve Years of Age understood Eight Languages, was for Nine Days Queen of England, and was Beheaded in the Tower in the Seventeenth Year of her Age, being at that Time the most amiable and Accomplished Woman in Europe, in 1806. [back]
58. In the three hundred Protestants burned alive…is she not rightly called Bloody queen Mary: This history is famously recounted in John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments of Matter Most Speciall and Memorable, Happening in the Church, with a Universall Historie of the Same (first published in English in 1563), more commonly known as Foxes Book of Martyrs. [back]
59. Sackville lord Dorset: Thomas Sackville, 1st Earl of Dorset served as Lord High Treasurer from 1599 until 1608. He was also, as Godwin notes here, one of the editors of and contributors to The Mirrors For Magistrates (not “of,” as claimed above), a collection of historical poems, as well as the co-author of The Tragedie of Gorboduc (1561), the first blank verse drama in English. [back]
60. Gammer Gurton's Needle: A Ryght Pithy, Pleasaunt and merie Comedie: Intytuled Gammer Gurtons Nedle (first performed in Cambridge in the 1550s or 1560s and printed in 1575) is generally identified as the second earliest English comedy (after Nicholas Udall’s Ralph Roister Doister in the early 1550s). In the late eighteenth century it was attributed to Bishop John Still though it was likely composed by William Stevenson, a prebendary of Durham. [back]
61. See note 59. [back]
62. A very good schoolmaster is an excellent member of society: From his early Account of the Seminary (1783) onwards, Godwin emphasizes the need to revise the preceptor’s role in education. The schoolmaster is not the arbiter of already established knowledge, which Godwin associates with the “perpetual pupillage” (Political Justice 1798 I: 301) enforced by institutions, but a facilitator whose role is primarily to generate “a motive to learn” (Enquirer 79), inciting students to “act for themselves” with the goal of becoming their “own preceptor” (Political Justice 1798, I: 301). The subsequent description of James as a pedant recalls the analogous functions of pedantry and government in Godwin’s educational and political theory. Like government, the pedant’s role as “superintendent and director to his junior” estranges him from “liberal sentiments of equality,” such that the pedant “inevitably contracts some of the vices that distinguish the master from the slave” (Enquirer 120). [back]
63. Compare to Godwin’s critique of the education of princes in Political Justice 1798 V, ii. [back]
64. In History of the Commonwealth intro and I, ii, Godwin mentions the cleavage of monarchical from parliamentary power as a factor in bringing about the Commonwealth; he also discusses parliament's abolition of monarchical authority in Commonwealth III, i-ii. [back]
65. he could not live without a favourite: For Godwin, the incapacity for rulers to make decisions without the advice of their “favourites” exemplifies how the court establishes an elaborate network of mediations that shields the prince from anything like the direct “collision of mind with mind” (Political Justice 1793, 21) that sparks the necessary process of self-reflection and revision of ideas that grounds Godwin’s republican vision of society. See Political Justice 1798, II: 25-26. [back]
66. Beaumont and Fletcher are favorites of Fleetwood’s protagonist, who reads the latter’s A Wife for a Moneth (1624) to his wife. [back]
67. England would have become one of the most despotic governments in the world: In Political Justice, Godwin characterizes despotism in a similar manner as something which “renders enquiry and examination impossible” by withdrawing “causes to be judged […] to a single centre […] placed at the greatest distance possible” from public discourse (1798, II: 33). On Godwin’s views of the conflict between Charles I and parliament, see his History of the Commonwealth, from its commencement to the Restoration of Charles the Second: containing the civil war (London: 1824), I: 424-27 [back]
68. John Hambden: John Hampden’s 1637 trial for his refusal to pay ship taxes earned him notoriety and made him one of the leading Parliamentarians in opposition to Charles I. He was one of the Five Members of parliament whom Charles attempted to arrest on 4 January 1642, an act that sparked the English Civil War. [back]
69. Thomas Wentworth: first Earl of Strafford (1593-1641), began his political career opposing the policies of Charles I but eventually came into the court’s favour and became a close advisor to the king. In the History of the Commonwealth, Godwin suggests that Wentworth’s shift in principles made him “a dangerous foe to public liberty,” though Godwin also criticizes Parliament’s decision to have him executed. See History of the Commonwealth, I: 86-93. Wentworth’s aggressive policies as lord-deputy of Ireland figure significantly in the first volume of Godwin’s 1817 novel Mandeville. a tale of the seventeenth century (Edinburgh: 1817), and are further explored in History of the Commonwealth, I: 213-44. [back]
70. The most interesting period in the history of this country: Godwin introduces his later History of the Commonwealth in the same terms, arguing that the period is “unlike any thing that can elsewhere be found […] in the records of mankind” (I: 1). Godwin’s Dissenting background inclined him to look upon the Commonwealth as a seminal event in the advancement of English liberty. Accordingly, Godwin approaches the Commonwealth as an early, though failed, experiment with the kind of anarchistic republicanism he would advocate in Political Justice. See History of the Commonwealth, I: 1-6. On the Commonwealth as a “lost republican moment” see Jon Klancher, “Godwin and the Genre Reformers: On Necessity and Contingency in Romantic Narrative Theory,” Romanticism, History and the Possibilities of Genre: Re-Forming Literature, 1789-1837, ed. Tilottama Rajan and Julia M. Wright (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998), 31-32; and Tilottama Rajan, Romantic Narrative: Shelley, Hays, Godwin, Wollstonecraft (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2010), 141-43. [back]
71. Irish massacre of 1641: The massacre plays a crucial role in Godwin’s Mandeville as a traumatic event the eponymous narrator experiences as a child, and which haunts him for the rest of the novel. See also History of the Commonwealth I: 213-35. [back]
72. Which was the greater man, Cromwel…or Milton?: The question posed seems highly rhetorical, given Godwin’s well known admiration of Milton and his somewhat more ambivalent attitude towards Cromwell both here and in the History of the Commonwealth. In the latter text, Godwin sees Cromwell’s shift away from the republicanism of the Commonwealth to the Protectorate as “apostasy” (III: 598-99). Equally rhetorical is Godwin’s hedging with respect to Milton’s Defensio Pro Populo Anglicano (1651), which he praises highly in the Lives of Edward and John Philips (15-17). This praise is somewhat checked in the History of the Commonwealth (III: 241-45), which defends Milton’s argument but situates it as part of the “atrocious” vitriol of seventeenth-century political discourse. In both texts, Godwin emphasizes the importance of the Defensio’s popularity in England and abroad and spends little time examining those persons whom, as he indicates here, challenged the soundness of Milton’s arguments. [back]
73. Sir Rowland the King: The Song of Roland, based on the Battle of Roncevaux in 778, was probably composed between 1040 and 1115. [back]
74. Titus Oates: Titus Oates (1649-1705) was one of the key instigators of the Popish Plot of 1678. Working with Israel Tonge, a virulently anti-Catholic clergyman, Oates fabricated evidence of a (sham) Roman Catholic plot to assassinate Charles II and install James, his Roman Catholic brother, in his place. Oates was granted judical power by Parliament to root out so-called plotters, leading to the execution of 35 people. His influence began to wane after 1681. After James II’s ascension to the throne, he was convicted of perjury and jailed. For further information see Oates’s The Discovery of the Popish Plot, Being the Several Examinations of Titus Oates D.D. Before the High Court of Parliament, The Lord Chief Justice, Sir Edmund Bury-Godfrey, and Several Other of his Majesty’s Justice of the Peace (London: 1679) and A True Narrative of the Horrid Plot and Conspiracy of the Popish Party Against the Life of his Sacred Majesty, The Government, and the Protestant Religion (London: 1679) [back]
75. Lord Russell and Algernon Sydney: William Lord Russell (1639-1683), a leading member of the Whig party in the House of Commons, was convicted of and executed for treason for his supposed role in the Rye House plot, a supposed conspiracy to attack the King as he journeyed from Newmarket to London by the Rye House. (Godwin may be conflating the Rye House plot with another plot to capture the King’s guards.) According to Lois G. Schwoerer, Russell’s trial was fair according to the treason laws in place in 1683; nonetheless, she contends that Russell was recast as a martyr after death through the efforts of his widow, friends, admirers (51), and (according to Zook) his own final speech on the scaffold. Algernon Sydney (1622-1683), another leading Whig politician, was also convicted and executed as an accessory to the Rye House plot. For further information see Lois G. Schwoerer, “William, Lord Russell: the Making of a Martyr, 1683-1982,” Journal of British Studies 24, no. 1 (Jan. 1985): 41-71 and Melinda S. Zook, Radical Whigs and Conspiratorial Politics in Late Stuart England (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999). [back]
76. Godwin may be recalling or alluding to the widespread public celebration of the acquittals of Thomas Hardy, John Horne Tooke, and John Thelwall in the Treason Trials of 1794. [back]
77. The Revolution: The Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the passage of the Bill of Rights the following year culminated in a radical limitation of the king’s powers, thus establishing a constitutional rather than absolute monarchy. The Crown was now required to seek Parliament’s permission before raising taxes and maintaining a standing army during peacetime. The Revolution also effectively ended any possibility of a Catholic ascending to the throne. [back]
78. This contention was not entirely closed but by the proceedings of the Glorious Revolution: Though Godwin here praises the Glorious Revolution for closing a “barbarous” period of English history, he remains ambivalent about its overall consequences. The Lives of Edward and John Philips praises the Revolution’s lack of violence as a model for the “rational” revolution proposed by Political Justice (268). However, Godwin also charges the Revolution, whose newly struck balance of powers effectively installed a Whig oligarchy, as “far from […] friendly to freedom in a political view” (Lives of Edward and John Philips 268), for curtailing the cause of republicanism in England (History of the Commonwealth I: 5-6), and for inaugurating a period English history in which politics becomes a matter of “negotiations and tricks” (Caleb Williams, Appendix A, 461). [back]
79. Locke: John Locke (1632-1704), English philosopher whose Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689) is one of the cornerstones of empiricism. Godwin’s first edition of Political Justice is strongly influenced by Locke’s epistemology, especially the rejection of innate ideas, which Godwin initially deploys to argue against any “original propensity to evil” (1793, 20). A subchapter on “Literature” as one of the three causes of moral improvement in the first edition of Political Justice considers Locke as having established “certain maxims respecting man” that are as “unquestionable” as Newton’s laws of matter (1793, 21). Godwin nevertheless takes issue with some of Locke’s major ideas, especially those in the Two Treatises of Government (1689) regarding property and an “original” social contract. See Political Justice 1793, 83-6 and the chapter “Principles of Property” in Political Justice 1798, II: 431-52. [back]
80. battles of Blenneim, Ramilies and Oudenarde: The Battle of Blenheim was fought on 13 August 1704, the Battle of Ramillies on 23 May 1706, and the Battle of Oudenarde on July 1708; all three were key British victories in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714). [back]
81. The king’s party taught passive obedience: In Political Justice, Godwin distinguishes between an external or “passive” obedience which stems from the “arbitrary interference of some voluntary being” and an “intrinsic” or active obedience flowing from the “independent conviction of our private judgment” (1798 I: 226-27). [back]
82. Whigs and tories, two barbarous words imported from Scotland and Ireland: The OED lists “whig” as a shortened form of the Scotch whigg (‘country-bumpkin’) and whiggamore (‘mare-driver’), the latter of which became an abusive nickname given to a faction of Scottish Presbyterians “who marched on Edinburgh in 1648 to oppose Charles I.” “Tory” also derives from the seventeenth century and is related to the Irish word for “outlaw,” toraidhe. The term initially referred to those Irish peasants who turned to robbery after being displaced by English settlers, but was subsequently used to disparage supporters of James II. Though Godwin’s politics are generally more Whig than Tory, his remark concerning the equally “barbarous” origins of these terms gestures towards his more fundamental skepticism towards party (op)positions as forms of “institution.” [back]
83. a flaming tory-sermon: Henry Sacheverell’s 5 November 1709 sermon to the City Fathers at St Paul's Cathedral, entitled “The Perils of False Brethren, in Church, and State,” commemorated the failure of the Gunpowder Plot. As Godwin notes here, Sacheverell’s impeachment by the House of Commons and subsequent light sentence contributed to the Whigs’ defeat by the Tories in the 1710 election. [back]
84. Pope and Swift and Addison: Alexander Pope (1688-1744), English poet and satirist widely acknowledged for his mastery of classical metrical form in poems such as An Essay on Criticism (1711), The Rape of the Lock (1711-12), The Dunciad (1728-43), and An Essay on Man (1733-34). Jonathan Swift (1667-1745), Anglo-Irish wit known primarily for his acerbic prose satires, A Tale of a Tub (1706), Gulliver’s Travels (1726), and A Modest Proposal (1729). Joseph Addison (1672-1719), English man of letters whose influential magazine The Spectator (1711-12), founded alongside Richard Steele, sought to establish aesthetic criteria by which readers could consume works of literature as objects of “taste” or refined enjoyment. In the preface to the first edition of Political Justice, Godwin credits Swift with having convinced him that “monarchy was a species of government unavoidably corrupt” (1793, 4). Godwin also juxtaposes the literature of the Elizabethan and Augustan eras in his essay “Of English Style” for The Enquirer (435), which includes discussions Addison and Swift (437-449). [back]
85. Robert Walpole: English politician (1675-1745) popularly known as the unofficial ‘first Prime Minister’ after being appointed as Lord of the Treasury in 1721. Walpole’s twenty-one year career in office solidified Whig control over the House of Commons and the Court, an event his enemies referred to as the “Robinocracy.” The term, a homonym both for Walpole’s given name and for rule by “robbery,” made reference to his frequent use of government offices as perks to buy the loyalty of members of Parliament, a practice satirized in John Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera (1728). In The Enquirer, Godwin criticizes Walpole’s mercenary approach to economics for hastening the demise of the taste for literature in England (436). Godwin’s distinction between commercial interests and “the love of literature” also recalls Political Justice’s critique of early capitalism’s tendency toward monopoly by the wealthy, inequality in property relations, and the indolence of the aristocratic classes, effects that could be countered by the spread of literature in the broad sense of belles lettres (1798, II: 456-62, 483; 1793, 21-22). Reflecting the growing sense of literary fiction as a mode of writing distinct from belles lettres in the Romantic period, Godwin’s “Of History and Romance” specifically invokes “romance” to argue against the reduction of literary texts to their commodity form (Caleb Williams, Appendix A 463-64). [back]
86. John Wilkes (1727-1797) was a popular British politician who served on and off as a member of Parliament throughout his career and founded the political journal The North Briton. He was brought up on charges of seditious libel for an article attacking the King, for which he eventually served two years imprisonment. Fiery and polemic, Wilkes notably advocated for parliamentary reforms, rights for Dissenters and Catholics, and American independence. For further information see John Oliphant, “John Wilkes,” Encyclopedia of the American Revolution: Library of Military History, edited by Harold E. Selesky, Biography in Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/K3454901676/BIC?u=iulib_nw&side=BI&xid=a37c6ac9 [back]
87. While we lost an empire in the West, we gained one in the East Indies . . . . The inhabitants of the East of our East-India dominions, (much larger than these) are Hindoos or Moors, speaking the Hindoo, the Arabic or the Persian, and can be kept in subjection only by the sword: Godwin’s antipathy to British colonialism is evident throughout his career, beginning as early as 1784 when he was commissioned to write three chapters for the “British and Foreign History” section of The New Annual Register for 1783, and as a contributing editor under the pseudonym “Mucius” for the Political Herald, and Review in 1785-86. In both, Godwin criticizes colonial policy in India while praising America as the “first enlightened people who have formed for themselves and independent government in the Western hemisphere” (The New Annual Register for 1783, 187). After the impeachment of Warren Hastings in 1787, Godwin even made plans to write, but never completed, the Memoirs of the Administration of the Government of Madras, which were to examine the “cruelty, tyranny, usurpation, and avarice” of those involved in the Indian affairs (Uncollected Writings 61). See also Political Justice 1798, II: 164-66. [back]
88. They went to war with France, that they might check so dangerous a spirit in its source: The War of the First Coalition (1792-97) represented the first attempt by European monarchies to crush the French Revolution through a series of invasions. It comprised of the monarchies of Austria, Sardinia, Naples, Prussia, Spain, and Great Britain. Godwin’s phrasing implies that the Prussian, Spanish, and German monarchs were the aggressors in declaring war on France, though historically the beginning of the conflict is difficult to pin down: it was France who first declared war on Prussia in 1792, though the declaration itself was a response to the Declaration of Pillnitz (1791) in which Frederick II of Prussia and the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Leopold II declared their opposition to the Revolution, which led to the Prussians initial invasion of France. Godwin’s equivocations concerning the French reflect his lingering, if pragmatically subdued, belief in the core principles of the Revolution. In the first edition of Political Justice, Godwin more closely aligns his argument for “a government of the simplest construction” with “the ideas of the French Revolution” (1793, 4), though he remains consistent throughout the three editions in criticizing insurrectionary violence. By the third edition, Godwin’s support for the Revolution is more nuanced, and led him to revise and expand his earlier chapter “Of Revolutions” (Book 4, Chapter 2). For a list of revisions to Political Justice, see Volume 4 of Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin. Gen. ed. Mark Philp (London: Pickering, 1993). [back]
89. Lord Rodney: Admiral George Brydges Rodney (c. 1718-1792) distinguished himself at sea for his innovative adaptation of naval tactics. In particular, by exploiting weaknesses, he was able to break up the French line during the 1782 battle of the Saints in the Caribbean thereby confirming Britain’s ascendency in the Caribbean and strengthening their negotiating power with the French. For further information, see John Oliphant, “George Brydges Rodney,” Encyclopedia of the American Revolution: Library of Military History, edited by Harold E. Selesky, Biography in Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/K3454901347/BIC?u=iulib_nw&sid=BIC&xid=f771f0bc [back]
90. The French Revolution produced one extraordinary man, Napoleon Bonaparte, as the English Civil War against Charles I. produced Oliver Cromwel: Napoleon crowned himself Emperor in 1804, an event Godwin noted in his diary on 18 May. Though the comparison of Napoleon to the “apostate” Cromwel [sic] may not be as complementary as his remark initially suggests, Godwin remained sympathetic towards both figures for much of his career. Godwin’s sympathies toward Napoleon became more pronounced between 1813 and 1818, due in part to his increased contact with intermittently pro-Napoleonic radicals such as Robert Owen (1771-1858) and John Thelwall (1764-1834). According to Henry Crabb Robinson, Godwin, Thelwall, and Hazlitt were among the most disappointed with Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo (Diary, Reminiscences and Correspondence I: 491). In an anonymous pamphlet titled The Letters of Verax, originally published in June 1815 but quickly withdrawn after Waterloo, Godwin criticized the European Alliance’s decision at the Congress of Vienna to depose Napoleon after his return from exile as an unjustifiable interference in the internal affairs of another country (Uncollected Writings 381, 410, 415-16). [back]
91. his principal works: Samuel Johnson’s Lives of the Most Eminent English Poets (1779–81) and A Dictionary of the English Language (1755), James Boswell’s The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. (1791). [back]
92. N.b.: except for notations of [sic] and the ends of pages, the bracketed material in the sections below are reproduced as they appear in the original text. [back]
93. The king, or conqueror, considered himself owner over the whole country: Godwin’s definition of the feudal system is couched in the terms of Political Justice’s critique of the unequal distribution of property. In Political Justice, Godwin speaks of feudalism as a “ferocious monster,” “the policy of men, who, having first gained a superiority […] have made use of their superiority, for the purpose of conspiring and monopolizing whatever their rapacity could seize” (II: 99, 446). See also Political Justice 1798, I: 23, II: 446. [back]
94. In “Of Diffidence” in Thoughts on Man, Godwin refers to himself occupying, and struggling with, the role of a political “knight-errant,” given that his character inclines towards reserve. [back]
95. Godwin critiques the methods of these historians in “Of History and Romance.” [back]
96. Blue-coat School: The “Blue coat” schools, so called because the students wore matching blue frock coats, were established for the education and care of poor children. The first blue coat school was established at Christ’s Hospital in London by Edward VI in 1552. [back]
97. Trial of Hampden for not paying unlawful tax: See note 68. There are various criticisms of taxation throughout Godwin’s corpus. In Political Justice, taxation is criticized for adding an extra burden on the poor, as the byproduct of the nation’s involvement in “foreign wars,” and for sustaining a corrupt and overcomplex government bureaucracy (1798, II: 309-10, 315). The History of the Commonwealth details Hampton’s resistance to a ship tax, which Godwin praises as the act of a “citizen of the purest model” and Hampden himself as “one of the most extraordinary men in the records of mankind (I: 11-12). Hampden is also listed in the History of the Commonwealth’s Introduction as one of the “forgotten” whose labours Godwin is attempting to recuperate (I: 2). [back]
98. The Raphael d’Urbino collections at Windsor Castle are cataloged in The Works of Raphael Santi da Urbino as Represented in the Raphael Collection in the Royal Library at Windsor Castle, Formed by H.R.H. The Prince Consort, 1853-1861, and Completed by Her Majesty Queen Victoria (London, 1876). [back]
99. Just thus in life, ‘tis those excel, / Not who live long, but who live well: This appears to be a poetic revision of Benjamin Franklin’s aphorism “Wish not so much to live long as to live well,” originally published in the 1746 edition of Poor Richard’s Almanack. There is no record of Godwin having read the Almanack, nor does the phrase appear in the Mémoires de la vie privée de Benjamin Franklin écrits par lui meme, et addressés a son fils (1791), which Godwin read in 1792-93. The expression is more likely from another text Godwin read in 1793, Milcah Martha Moore and John Ralling’s Miscellanies, Moral and Instructive, in prose and verse; Collected from Various Authors for the use of Schools and Improvement of Young Persons of both Sexes (London: 1787), which includes a number of Franklin’s sayings. [back]
100. THE KING AND QUEEN OF HEARTS: A short book of children’s verse written by Charles Lamb with engravings by William Mulready and published for the Juvenile Library in 1805. Godwin was so impressed with Mulready’s work on The King and Queen of Hearts that he made the latter the subject of a short biography, referred to in the catalogue above as The Looking-Glass, the full title of which is The Looking-Glass, A True History of the Early Years of an Artist (London: 1805). [back]
101. THE LITTLE WOMAN AND THE PEDLAR: An illustrated version of the nursery rhyme, “There was a little woman, as I’ve heard tell…” and also featuring engravings by Mulready (London, 1807). The cover indicates that the book was “printed for Thomas Hodgkins, at the Juvenile Library”; Godwin had employed Hodgkins to manage the bookshop that he and his second wife, Mary Jane Godwin, opened on Hanway Street. [back]

Godwin's The History of England © 2024 by William Godwin, Suzanne L. Barnett, Katherine Bennett Gustafson, Jared McGeough, and Romantic Circles is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0